FLRA hears testimony in bid to decertify immigration judge union (2020)
| Administrative State |
|---|
|
| Five Pillars of the Administrative State |
| •Agency control • Executive control • Judicial control •Legislative control • Public Control |
| Click here for more coverage of the administrative state on Ballotpedia.
|
| Click here to access Ballotpedia's administrative state legislation tracker. |
The Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) on Tuesday held a hearing to consider testimony on a petition filed by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in August that seeks to decertify the union representing the agency’s immigration judges (IJs), the National Association of Immigration Judges (NAIJ).
Decertification of the NAIJ could give DOJ officials more control over the work schedules and caseloads of immigration judges. DOJ last attempted to decertify the NAIJ in 2000 under the Clinton administration, claiming at the time that IJs function in management roles and cannot legally participate in collective bargaining activities. FLRA rejected DOJ's petition in 2000, but DOJ has since contended, in part, that changes to the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) review process have relaxed oversight of IJ decisions and strengthened IJs' policymaking authority.
In Tuesday's hearing, DOJ attorneys argued that IJs are management officials who cannot participate in union activities. Federal law defines management officials as "any individual employed by an agency in a position the duties and responsibilities of which require or authorize the individual to formulate, determine, or influence the policies of the agency.” IJs qualify as management officials, according to DOJ, because they can issue final orders that set binding precedent for agency policy.
NAIJ attorneys disagreed with DOJ’s assessment, arguing that IJs do not serve in management roles because management responsibilities would prevent them from focusing on immigration hearings. Moreover, the attorneys contended that orders issued by IJs can be appealed and reviewed, which limits their ability to set agency policy.
FLRA is expected to issue a decision later this year.
IJs are a type of federal administrative adjudicator employed by DOJ to preside over special classes of administrative adjudication proceedings pertaining to immigration, including removal proceedings. The department employed 424 immigration judges as of May 2019.
See also
- Ballotpedia's administrative state coverage
- Immigration judge
- Federal administrative adjudicators
- U.S. Department of Justice
- Federal Labor Relations Authority
External links
Footnotes
