Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
Florida Amendment 12, Lobbying Restrictions Amendment (2018)
- General election: Nov. 6
- Voter registration deadline: Oct. 9
- Early voting: Oct. 27 - Nov. 3[2]
- Absentee voting deadline: Nov. 6
- Online registration: Yes
- Same-day registration: No
- Voter ID: Photo ID required
- Poll times: 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
Florida Amendment 12 | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Election date November 6, 2018 | |
Topic Government accountability | |
Status![]() | |
Type Commission-referral | Origin Legislative commission |
Florida Amendment 12, the Lobbying Restrictions Amendment was on the ballot in Florida as a commission referral on November 6, 2018. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported prohibiting public officials from lobbying for compensation during the official's term in office and for six years after the official leaves office and prohibiting public officials from using the office to obtain a disproportionate benefit. |
A "no" vote opposed prohibiting public officials from lobbying for compensation during the official's term in office and for six years after the official leaves office and prohibiting public officials from using the office to obtain a disproportionate benefit. |
Election results
Florida Amendment 12 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
6,116,404 | 78.92% | |||
No | 1,633,249 | 21.08% |
Overview
How did this measure get on the ballot?
The Florida Constitution Revision Commission (CRC) voted 30-4 to place Amendment 12 on the ballot for the election. The 37-member commission, which meets every 20 years to propose changes to the Florida Constitution, is unique amongst the states. Florida is the only state with a commission empowered to refer constitutional amendments to the ballot. Republicans, including legislative leaders and Gov. Rick Scott, appointed 33 of the commissioners. Attorney General Pam Bondi (R) also served on the commission. Jorge Labarga, chief justice of the Florida Supreme Court, appointed the three remaining members.
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title was as follows:[3]
“ |
LOBBYING AND ABUSE OF OFFICE BY PUBLIC OFFICERS.[4] |
” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary was as follows:[3]
“ |
Expands current restrictions on lobbying for compensation by former public officers; creates restrictions on lobbying for compensation by currently serving public officers; provides exceptions; prohibits certain abuses of public office for personal benefit.[4] |
” |
Constitutional changes
- See also: Florida Constitution
Amendment 12 amended Section 8 of Article II and Section 13 of Article V of the Florida Constitution and add a new section to Article XII of the state constitution. The following underlined text was added and struck-through text was deleted:[3]
Note: Hover over the text and scroll to see the full text.
Section 8 of Article II
Ethics in Government.—A public office is a public trust. The people shall have the right to secure and sustain that trust against abuse. To assure this right:
(a) All elected constitutional officers and candidates for such offices and, as may be determined by law, other public officers, candidates, and employees shall file full and public disclosure of their financial interests.
(b) All elected public officers and candidates for such offices shall file full and public disclosure of their campaign finances.
(c) Any public officer or employee who breaches the public trust for private gain and any person or entity inducing such breach shall be liable to the state for all financial benefits obtained by such actions. The manner of recovery and additional damages may be provided by law.
(d) Any public officer or employee who is convicted of a felony involving a breach of public trust shall be subject to forfeiture of rights and privileges under a public retirement system or pension plan in such manner as may be provided by law.
(e) No member of the legislature or statewide elected officer shall personally represent another person or entity for compensation before the government body or agency of which the individual was an officer or member for a period of two years following vacation of office. No member of the legislature shall personally represent another person or entity for compensation during term of office before any state agency other than judicial tribunals. Similar restrictions on other public officers and employees may be established by law.
(f)(1) For purposes of this subsection, the term “public officer” means a statewide elected officer, a member of the legislature, a county commissioner, a county officer pursuant to Article VIII or county charter, a school board member, a superintendent of schools, an elected municipal officer, an elected special district officer in a special district with ad valorem taxing authority, or a person serving as a secretary, an executive director, or other agency head of a department of the executive branch of state government.
(2) A public officer shall not lobby for compensation on issues of policy, appropriations, or procurement before the federal government, the legislature, any state government body or agency, or any political subdivision of this state, during his or her term of office.
(3) A public officer shall not lobby for compensation on issues of policy, appropriations, or procurement for a period of six years after vacation of public position, as follows:
- a. A statewide elected officer or member of the legislature shall not lobby the legislature or any state government body or agency.
- b. A person serving as a secretary, an executive director, or other agency head of a department of the executive branch of state government shall not lobby the legislature, the governor, the executive office of the governor, members of the cabinet, a department that is headed by a member of the cabinet, or his or her former department.
- c. A county commissioner, a county officer pursuant to Article VIII or county charter, a school board member, a superintendent of schools, an elected municipal officer, or an elected special district officer in a special district with ad valorem taxing authority shall not lobby his or her former agency or governing body.
(4) This subsection shall not be construed to prohibit a public officer from carrying out the duties of his or her public office.
(5) The legislature may enact legislation to implement this subsection, including, but not limited to, defining terms and providing penalties for violations. Any such law shall not contain provisions on any other subject.
(f) (g) There shall be an independent commission to conduct investigations and make public reports on all complaints concerning breach of public trust by public officers or employees not within the jurisdiction of the judicial qualifications commission.
(g) (h)(1) A code of ethics for all state employees and nonjudicial officers prohibiting conflict between public duty and private interests shall be prescribed by law.
(2) A public officer or public employee shall not abuse his or her public position in order to obtain a disproportionate benefit for himself or herself; his or her spouse, children, or employer; or for any business with which he or she contracts; in which he or she is an officer, a partner, a director, or a proprietor; or in which he or she owns an interest. The Florida Commission on Ethics shall, by rule in accordance with statutory procedures governing administrative rulemaking, define the term “disproportionate benefit” and prescribe the requisite intent for finding a violation of this prohibition for purposes of enforcing this paragraph. Appropriate penalties shall be prescribed by law.
(h) (i) This section shall not be construed to limit disclosures and prohibitions which may be established by law to preserve the public trust and avoid conflicts between public duties and private interests.
(i) (j) Schedule—On the effective date of this amendment and until changed by law:
(1) Full and public disclosure of financial interests shall mean filing with the custodian of state records by July 1 of each year a sworn statement showing net worth and identifying each asset and liability in excess of $1,000 and its value together with one of the following:
a. A copy of the person’s most recent federal income tax return; or
b. A sworn statement which identifies each separate source and amount of income which exceeds $1,000. The forms for such source disclosure and the rules under which they are to be filed shall be prescribed by the independent commission established in subsection (f), and such rules shall include disclosure of secondary sources of income.
(2) Persons holding statewide elective offices shall also file disclosure of their financial interests pursuant to subsection (i)(1) paragraph (1).
(3) The independent commission provided for in subsection (f) (g) shall mean the Florida Commission on Ethics.
Section 13 of Article V
Prohibited Activities Ethics in the judiciary.—(a) All justices and judges shall devote full time to their judicial duties. They A justice or judge shall not engage in the practice of law or hold office in any political party.
(b) A former justice or former judge shall not lobby for compensation on issues of policy, appropriations, or procurement before the legislative or executive branches of state government for a period of six years after he or she vacates his or her judicial position. The legislature may enact legislation to implement this subsection, including, but not limited to, defining terms and providing penalties for violations. Any such law shall not contain provisions on any other subject.
Schedule of Article XII
Prohibitions regarding lobbying for compensation and abuse of public position by public officers and public employees.—The amendments to Section 8 of Article II and Section 13 of Article V shall take effect December 31, 2022; except that the amendments to Section 8(h) of Article II shall take effect December 31, 2020, and:
- (a) The Florida Commission on Ethics shall, by rule, define the term “disproportionate benefit” and prescribe the requisite intent for finding a violation of the prohibition against abuse of public position by October 1, 2019, as specified in Section 8(h) of Article II.
- (b) Following the adoption of rules pursuant to subsection (a), the legislature shall enact implementing legislation establishing penalties for violations of the prohibition against abuse of public position to take effect December 31, 2020.[4]
Readability score
- See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2018
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The Florida Constitution Revision Commission wrote the ballot language for this measure.
In 2018, for the 167 statewide measures on the ballot, the average ballot title or question was written at a level appropriate for those with between 19 and 20 years of U.S. formal education (graduate school-level of education), according to the FKGL formula. Read Ballotpedia's entire 2018 ballot language readability report here. |
Support
Commissioner Don Gaetz sponsored the proposal in the Florida Constitution Revision Commission that became Amendment 12.
Supporters
- Republican Party of Palm Beach County[5]
Opposition
Opponents
- Florida Family Policy Council[6]
- Democratic Progressive Caucus of Florida[7]
- Save My Constitution opposed this measure, as well as every other measure placed on the November 2018 ballot by the Florida Constitution Revision Commission. The group consisted of former state and federal lawmakers including Jim Kallinger (R), Jeff Kottkamp (R), Jennifer Carroll (R), Sandy Adams (R), and Connie Mack (R). The group argued that the measures are confusing and misleading and were placed on the ballot in a deceptive way by bundling multiple subjects in a single proposal.[8]
- Tampa Bay Young Republicans[9]
Media editorials
- See also: 2018 ballot measure media endorsements
Support
- The Sun-Sentinel said: "This amendment from the commission bars state officials — including agency heads, judges and local elected officials — from becoming paid lobbyists before local, state or federal agencies. (They could still lobby in connection with their official duties.) It would prohibit them from lobbying their former agencies until six years after they have left office. Presently, legislators, governors and Cabinet members must sit out two years before lobbying their former colleagues, but that hasn’t stopped lobbying firms from hiring former lawmakers to give “advice” while the two-year clock runs. The main objection to Amendment 12 is that six years is too drastic and would discourage qualified people from running for office. But if your motive for running is to become a lobbyist, perhaps “public service” isn’t your proper calling. We recommend a yes vote."[10]
- The Naples Daily News said: "This amendment alone won’t clean up all that can be addressed to improve government ethics in the state. Campaign finance reform to control the influence of money on political campaigns and the meting out of harsher, quicker and more frequent penalties by the Florida Ethics Commission also would help. Amendment 12 is an improvement, however, and deserves a 'yes' vote."[11]
- The Palm Beach Post said: "Two more CRC-sponsored amendments also have merit. Amendment 12 would expand ethics rules on lobbying. Amendment 13 would ban the outdated and inhumane activity of greyhound racing."[12]
- The Herald-Tribune said: "The lobby industry has grown exponentially in recent years, providing greater and more lucrative opportunities for state officials to leverage their influence and public office for personal financial gain. ... Legislators and other elected officials are not going to advance the cause of ethics reform; it’s up to voters to assert their will. We strongly recommend voting YES, for Amendment 12."[13]
- Ocala Star-Banner said: "The lobby industry has grown exponentially in recent years, providing greater and more lucrative opportunities for state officials to leverage their influence and public office for personal financial gain. As Gaetz noted, legislators and other elected officials are not going to advance the cause of ethics reform; it’s up to voters to assert their will. We recommend voting YES on Amendment 12."[14]
- The Independent Florida Alligator said: "Vote YES - The Lobbying and Abuse of Office by Public Officers Amendment would bar public officials from lobbying while in office and six years afterward and prevent current officeholders from profiting from their position."[15]
- The Orlando Sentinel said: "Considering the lack of trust in government today, it’s hard to imagine what the downside to this amendment is. This largely stops the revolving door that leads from public service to private profit. To increase public trust in government, vote yes on Amendment 12."[16]
- The Miami Herald said: "However, we’ve seen too many lawmakers skirt even that rule by acting as, say, paid consultants before the time is up. Plus, there’s the perception, to say nothing of the reality, that some legislators are auditioning for their next job when they should be serving their constituents. Many government-watchdog groups support this amendment. We do, too."[17]
Opposition
- The News-Press said: "No on Amendment 12: It expands ethics rules for public officials, banning those who are officials/employees from lobbying the state and federal government during their terms of office and for six years after they leave office. The current rule is two years. Officials are not allowed to use their office for private gain and the Legislature should be cracking down on those who do through laws it already has."[18]
- The Tampa Bay Times said: "This amendment would prevent the governor, Cabinet members, agency heads, state lawmakers and local elected officials from getting paid to lobby their former colleagues for six years after leaving office. Judges would also be banned from lobbying the Legislature or executive branch for six years. Although this amendment would move toward stopping the revolving door from elected office to paid lobbyist, it puts an unfair six-year burden on those who might otherwise consider public office and would be good candidates. It doesn’t belong in the Constitution. On Amendment 12, the Tampa Bay Times recommends voting No."[19]
- The Tallahassee Democrat said: "[Amendments 5, 7, 10, 12, and 13] are the detritus of the Constitution Revision Commission, with little or no impact on the lives of average Floridians, the kind of multi-tasking snowballing the CRC littered its amendments with — unrelated topics cobbled together in take-it-or-leave-it propositions. For most of them, we say leave it."[20]
- Your Observer said: "Few things irritate voters more than former elected and public officials becoming rich, fat-cat lobbyists. Amendment 12 would triple the amount of time former public officials would be barred from lobbying their former colleagues. But this proposed six-year ban can also be construed as government overreach into individuals’ free speech and pursuit of happiness. It would limit individual freedom. Six years is too long. We recommend: Vote no."[21]
- The Treasure Coast Newspapers said: "While we support enhanced ethics rules for public officials, we have concerns about enshrining such specific limits in the state's governing document. That would make them more difficult to adjust in the future. These rules should be addressed transparently by the state Legislature."[22]
Additional editorial endorsements
In addition to the above editorial endorsements, the following outlets have also endorsed a no vote on the measure:
Campaign finance
Total campaign contributions: | |
Support: | $0.00 |
Opposition: | $0.00 |
Ballotpedia did not identify any ballot measure committees registered in support of Amendment 12 or in opposition to Amendment 12.[25]
Polls
- See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls
The following poll was conducted by Cherry Communications and commissioned by the Florida Chamber of Commerce to gauge voter support and opposition toward the amendments on Florida's 2018 ballot. A total of 605 likely voters were polled, including 237 Republicans, 249 Democrats, and 119 others.[26]
Support and Opposition for Amendment 12 | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Support | Oppose | Undecided | Margin of error | Sample size | ||||||||||||||
Florida Chamber of Commerce Poll 5/25/18 - 6/2/18 | 55% | 18% | 27% | +/-4.0 | 605 | ||||||||||||||
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org. |
Path to the ballot
The Florida Constitution Revision Commission referred the constitutional amendment to the ballot for the general election on November 6, 2018.[27] The Florida CRC is a 37-member commission provided for in the state constitution that reviews and proposes changes to the Florida Constitution. The CRC refers constitutional amendments directly to the ballot for a public vote, which makes the commission unique amongst the states. Florida is the only state with a commission empowered to refer constitutional amendments to the ballot. The CRC convenes every 20 years.
Proposal 6007
In the CRC, the ballot measure was known as Proposal 6007. The measure needed to receive the vote of 22 commissions. On April 16, 2018, a total of 30 members (81.08 percent) voted "yes" on Proposal 6007. Four members (10.81 percent) voted "no" on the proposal. Three members (8.11 percent) did not vote.[27]
Proposal 6007 was a revision of Proposal 39.[27]
The following table illustrates how individual commissioners voted on Proposal 6007:[28]
Commissioner | Appointed by | Occupation | Vote |
---|---|---|---|
Anna Marie Hernandez Gamez | Senate president | Former President, Cuban American Bar Association; Attorney | ![]() |
Arthenia Joyner | Chief Justice | Former State Senator; Attorney | ![]() |
Belinda Keiser | Governor | Vice Chancellor, Keiser University | ![]() |
Bob Solari | Senate president | County Commissioner, Indian River County; Former President and Manager, RMS Financial Services; Former President and Director, International Citrus Corporation and Incitco Realty, Inc. | ![]() |
Brecht Heuchan | Governor | CEO, ContributionLink, LLC; Owner, The Labrador Company | ![]() |
Carlos Beruff (Chair) | Governor | CEO, Medallion Homes | ![]() |
Carolyn Timmann | Senate president | Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller of Martin County | ![]() |
Chris Nocco | House speaker | Sheriff of Pasco County | ![]() |
Chris Smith | Senate president | Former State Senator; Attorney | ![]() |
Chris Sprowls | House speaker | State Representative | ![]() |
Darlene Jordan | Governor | Executive Director, Gerald R. Jordan Foundation; Former Assistant Attorney General of Massachusetts | ![]() |
Darryl Rouson | House speaker | State Senator | ![]() |
Don Gaetz | Senate president | Former State Senator; Retired Vice Chairman, VITAS Healthcare Corporation | ![]() |
Emery Gainey | Governor | Director of Law Enforcement, Victim Services & Criminal Justice, Florida Department of Legal Affairs | ![]() |
Erika Donalds | House speaker | Member, Collier County School Board; CFO, CCO, and Partner, Dalton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co., LLC | ![]() |
Frank Kruppenbacher | Governor | Chairman, Greater Orlando Aviation Authority; Attorney | ![]() |
Fred Karlinsky | Governor | Co-Chair, Greenberg Traurig’s Insurance Regulatory and Transactions Practice Group | ![]() |
Gary Lester | Governor | Developer and VP, The Villages for Community Relations; President, The Villages Charter School | ![]() |
Hank Coxe | Chief Justice | Former President, The Florida Bar; Attorney | ![]() |
Jacqui Thurlow-Lippisch | Senate president | Former Mayor of Sewall's Point; Realtor | ![]() |
Jeanette Nuñez | House speaker | State Representative | ![]() |
John Stemberger | House speaker | President & General Counsel, Florida Family Policy Council | ![]() |
John Stargel[29] | Governor | Judge of the Tenth Judicial Circuit Court | ![]() |
Jose Felix Diaz | House speaker | State Representative | ![]() |
Lisa Carlton | Governor | Former State Senator; Co–Owner and Manager, Mabry Carlton Ranch | ![]() |
Marva Johnson | Governor | Chair, Florida State Board of Education; Regional VP of State Government Affairs, Charter Communications | ![]() |
Nicole Washington | Governor | State Policy Consultant, Lumina Foundation | ![]() |
Pam Bondi | Automatic | Attorney General | N/A |
Pam Stewart | Governor | Commissioner, Department of Education | N/A |
Patricia Levesque | Senate president | Executive Director, Foundation for Florida’s Future; CEO, Foundation for Excellence in Education | ![]() |
Rich Newsome | House speaker | Senior Partner, Newsome Melton | ![]() |
Roberto Martinez | Chief Justice | Former U.S. Attorney for South Florida; Attorney | ![]() |
Sherry Plymale | Senate president | Former Member, State Board of Community Colleges | ![]() |
Timothy Cerio | Governor | Former General Counsel to Governor Scott; Attorney | ![]() |
Tom Grady | Governor | Former State Representative; CEO, Continental Equities Group and GradyLaw | N/A |
Tom Lee | House speaker | State Senator; VP and Director, Sabal Homes of Florida | ![]() |
William “Bill” Schifino, Jr. | Senate president | President, The Florida Bar; Attorney | ![]() |
Proposal 39
Commissioner Don Gaetz was the lead sponsor of Proposal 39. The proposal was designed to prohibit legislators, statewide elected officials, and judges from personally representing another person for compensation before the legislature or government agencies, other than judicial tribunals, and prohibit political subdivisions from having lobbyists to advocate for or against an appropriation from the legislature or executive budget request to benefit that subdivision. On March 19, 2018, Proposal 39 was approved 28 to five with four commissioners not voting.[30] Proposal 39 needed to receive a simple majority vote of the commissioners to move forward. Proposal 39 was amended during the final floor vote on April 16, 2018.
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Florida
Poll times
In Florida, all polls are open from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. local time. Florida is divided between the Eastern and Central time zones. An individual who is in line at the time polls close must be allowed to vote.[31]
Registration requirements
- Check your voter registration status here.
To vote in Florida, one must be at least 18 years of age, a citizen of the United States, and a legal resident of Florida and the county in which he or she intends to vote. Pre-registration is available beginning at 16 years of age.[32][33]
Voters may retrieve registration applications at the following locations:[32]
- Local elections offices
- Public assistance agencies
- Disability services agencies
- Independent living centers
- Military recruitment offices
- Public libraries
- Drivers license office
- Tax collector's office
- The office of any entity authorized by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to issue fishing, hunting, or trapping permits
A registration form is also available online. The form can be printed and submitted via mail.[33]
Click here to find your county Supervisor of Elections.
Automatic registration
Florida does not practice automatic voter registration.
Online registration
- See also: Online voter registration
Florida has implemented an online voter registration system. Residents can register to vote by visiting this website.
Voters may also apply for or modify their voter registration status while renewing their driver's license through the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles’ online renewal system here.
Same-day registration
Florida does not allow same-day voter registration.
Residency requirements
To register to vote in Florida, you must be a resident of the state. State law does not specify a length of time for which you must have been a resident to be eligible.
Verification of citizenship
Florida does not require proof of citizenship for voter registration. An individual must attest that they are a U.S. citizen when registering to vote. According to the state's voter registration application, "it is a 3rd degree felony to submit false information." [34]
All 49 states with voter registration systems require applicants to declare that they are U.S. citizens in order to register to vote in state and federal elections, under penalty of perjury or other punishment.[35] Seven states — Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Wyoming — have laws requiring verification of citizenship at the time of voter registration, whether in effect or not. In three states — California, Maryland, and Vermont — at least one local jurisdiction allows noncitizens to vote in some local elections. Noncitizens registering to vote in those elections must complete a voter registration application provided by the local jurisdiction and are not eligible to register as state or federal voters.
Verifying your registration
The page Voter Information Lookup, run by the Florida Department of State, allows residents to check their voter registration status online.
Voter ID requirements
Florida requires voters to present photo identification with a signature while voting.[36][37]
The following list of accepted ID was current as of July 2024. Click here for the Florida Secretary of State's page on accepted ID to ensure you have the most current information.
- Florida driver’s license
- Florida identification card issued by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles
- United States passport
- Debit or credit card
- Military identification
- Student identification
- Retirement center identification
- Neighborhood association identification
- Public assistance identification
- Veteran health identification card issued by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs
- License to carry a concealed weapon or firearm issued pursuant to s. 790.06
- Employee identification card issued by any branch, department, agency, or entity of the federal government, the state, a county, or a municipality
A voter who presents an ID without a signature must show a second form of identification that includes the voter’s signature.
State profile
Demographic data for Florida | ||
---|---|---|
Florida | U.S. | |
Total population: | 20,244,914 | 316,515,021 |
Land area (sq mi): | 53,625 | 3,531,905 |
Race and ethnicity** | ||
White: | 76% | 73.6% |
Black/African American: | 16.1% | 12.6% |
Asian: | 2.6% | 5.1% |
Native American: | 0.3% | 0.8% |
Pacific Islander: | 0.1% | 0.2% |
Two or more: | 2.4% | 3% |
Hispanic/Latino: | 23.7% | 17.1% |
Education | ||
High school graduation rate: | 86.9% | 86.7% |
College graduation rate: | 27.3% | 29.8% |
Income | ||
Median household income: | $47,507 | $53,889 |
Persons below poverty level: | 19.8% | 11.3% |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015) Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in Florida. **Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here. |
Presidential voting pattern
- See also: Presidential voting trends in Florida
Florida voted Republican in five out of the seven presidential elections between 2000 and 2024.
Pivot Counties (2016)
Ballotpedia identified 206 counties that voted for Donald Trump (R) in 2016 after voting for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012. Collectively, Trump won these Pivot Counties by more than 580,000 votes. Of these 206 counties, four are located in Florida, accounting for 1.94 percent of the total pivot counties.[38]
Pivot Counties (2020)
In 2020, Ballotpedia re-examined the 206 Pivot Counties to view their voting patterns following that year's presidential election. Ballotpedia defined those won by Trump won as Retained Pivot Counties and those won by Joe Biden (D) as Boomerang Pivot Counties. Nationwide, there were 181 Retained Pivot Counties and 25 Boomerang Pivot Counties. Florida had three Retained Pivot Counties and one Boomerang Pivot County, accounting for 1.66 and 4.00 percent of all Retained and Boomerang Pivot Counties, respsectively.
More Florida coverage on Ballotpedia
- Elections in Florida
- United States congressional delegations from Florida
- Public policy in Florida
- Endorsers in Florida
- Florida fact checks
- More...
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Counties could add additional early voting days from October 22 through October 26 and/or November 4.
- ↑ Counties could add additional early voting days from October 22 through October 26 and/or November 4.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Florida Constitution Revision Commission, "Proposal 6007," accessed April 16, 2018
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ Palm Beach GOP on Facebook, October 18, 2018, 11:40 am Facebook post, accessed October 19, 2018
- ↑ Florida Family Action, "2018 Ballot Amendment Voter Guide," accessed October 19, 2018
- ↑ Democratic Progressive Caucus of Florida, "2018 Ballot Amendments Recommendations," accessed October 14, 2018
- ↑ The Ledger, "Former elected officials fight ballot proposals," accessed August 23, 2018
- ↑ TBYR, "2018 Florida Constitutional Amendments Recommendations," accessed November 1, 2018
- ↑ Sun Sentinel, "Five good — seven bad — amendments for Florida’s Constitution | Editorial," accessed October 8, 2018
- ↑ Naples News, "Editorial: Our final recommendations on amendments," accessed October 10, 2018
- ↑ Palm Beach Post, "Editorial: Reject ‘bundled’ amendments 6, 7 and 10 offered by CRC," accessed October 13, 2018
- ↑ Herald Tribune, "Editorial: Amendments 10, 11, 12, 13," accessed October 18, 2018
- ↑ Ocala Star-Banner, "Editorial: No on 10, but yes on 11, 12," accessed October 24, 2018
- ↑ The Independent Florida Alligator, "The Alligator's endorsements for Constitutional amendments and referenda," accessed October 31, 2018
- ↑ The Orlando Sentinel, "Editorial: Florida's Election 2018: Our endorsements for governor, U.S. Senate, U.S. House and the amendments," accessed October 31, 2018
- ↑ Miami Herald, "Learn how 12 Florida amendments affect your life, and your wallet, before you vote," accessed November 4, 2018
- ↑ News-Press, "Editorial: Proposed amendments too much of a gamble; vote 'no' on 11 of them," accessed October 8, 2018
- ↑ Tampa Bay Times, "Times recommends: Vote yes on Amendment 4, no on all of the rest," accessed October 8, 2018
- ↑ Tallahassee Democrat, "Florida's constitutional amendments: Vote 'yes' on 4 and 11, 'no' on rest | Our opinion," accessed October 12, 2018
- ↑ Your Observer, "A look at the rest of the questions on the ballot," accessed October 13, 2018
- ↑ Treasure Coast Palm, "How to vote on 12 constitutional amendments on Nov. 6 ballot | Our view," accessed October 13, 2018
- ↑ Jacksonville, "Editorial: Sorting out confusing amendments for the voters," accessed October 15, 2018
- ↑ Daily Commercial, "Our Opinion: Our recommendations on the amendments," accessed October 23, 2018
- ↑ Florida Division of Elections, "Campaign Finance Database," accessed April 20, 2018
- ↑ Sunshine State News, "Poll Points to Trouble for Many Ballot Proposals," accessed July 24, 2018
- ↑ 27.0 27.1 27.2 Florida Constitution Revision Commission, "Proposal 6007 Overview," accessed April 16, 2018
- ↑ Florida Constitution Revision Commission, "Proposal 6007 Vote," April 16, 2018
- ↑ Stargel was a subsititute commissioner for Jose “Pepe” Armas
- ↑ Florida Constitution Revision Commission, "Proposal 39," accessed April 16, 2018
- ↑ Florida Secretary of State, "FAQ - Voting," accessed July 23, 2024
- ↑ 32.0 32.1 Florida Division of Elections, "National Voter Registration Act (NVRA)," accessed July 23, 2024
- ↑ 33.0 33.1 Florida Division of Elections, "Register to Vote or Update your Information," accessed July 23, 2024
- ↑ Florida Department of State, "Florida Voter Registration Application Instructions and Form," accessed November 1, 2024
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ Florida Division of Elections, "Election Day Voting," accessed July 22, 2024
- ↑ Florida Division of Elections, "Florida History: Voter ID at the Polls," accessed July 22, 2024
- ↑ The raw data for this study was provided by Dave Leip of Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections.
![]() |
State of Florida Tallahassee (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |