Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

Idaho oversight of federal grants

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Federalism Banner-Blue.png
Federalism
Federalism Icon 200x200.png

Key terms
Court cases
Major arguments
State responses to federal mandates
Federalism by the numbers
Index of articles about federalism

Federal grants make up a significant portion of state budgets, providing funding for programs in health care, education, infrastructure, and public assistance.[1][2] These funds are typically accompanied by policy conditions or reporting requirements that shape how states implement federally funded programs. In response, states have developed varying oversight systems to review, approve, and monitor federal funding.

This page summarizes federal grant funding and oversight in Idaho. It includes data on how federal dollars contribute to the state budget, highlights Idaho’s position relative to other states, and analyzes key laws related to grant coordination, transparency, and accountability. This research was last updated in September 2025.

HIGHLIGHTS
  • In fiscal year 2023, 31.0% of Idaho’s total state revenue came from intergovernmental sources—primarily federal grants—the 7th-lowest share nationwide. The state received approximately $4.5 billion in federal funds.[1]
  • Idaho law assigned federal grant oversight primarily to the Division of Financial Management, requiring state agencies to submit annual reports detailing their use, expiration, and obligations for federal funds, and to prepare contingency plans if federal funding decreased by 50% or more.
  • This article includes information about the following topics:

    Background

    Federal grants are a major source of funding for state governments, supporting programs in areas such as health care, education, transportation, and public assistance.[2] These funds are distributed through a variety of mechanisms—including block grants, categorical grants, and formula-based programs—and are typically accompanied by policy conditions, reporting requirements, or other administrative mandates.

    Federal grants are reported as part of a state’s intergovernmental revenue, a category tracked annually by the United States Census Bureau. Intergovernmental revenue includes funds transferred from both federal and local governments, but federal sources account for the vast majority. In 2022, approximately 98% of intergovernmental revenue received by states came from the federal government.[3] In 2023—the most recent year for which data is available—states collectively received about $1.12 trillion in intergovernmental revenue, representing 36.7% of all general revenue.[1]

    Because of the scale and conditional nature of federal funding, many states have adopted statutory and administrative frameworks to oversee how agencies apply for, accept, and manage federal grants. These frameworks reflect broader federalism concerns—such as how states balance fiscal dependence with administrative autonomy, and how they respond to federal mandates that may influence state policy priorities.

    This research was last updated in July 2025.

    Top federal funding programs to states

    In fiscal year 2023, the federal government distributed over $1 trillion in grants to states. The largest programs included Medicaid, highway funding, rental assistance, and child nutrition. Medicaid alone accounted for 56.8% of federal grants to states, and the top 20 programs combined made up approximately 87.8% of total federal grant outlays to states.[4]


    Federal funding to Idaho

    Amount of federal grants to Idaho

    In 2023, Idaho received approximately $4.5billion in intergovernmental revenue out of a total $4.5 billion in state revenue, the 7th-lowest nationwide.[1] The national average was approximately $22.3 billion per state. Across all states, intergovernmental revenue totaled about $1.12 trillion out of $3.04 trillion in general revenue.[1] In 2022, approximately 98% of intergovernmental revenue states received came from the federal government.[3]


    Percentage of Idaho budget funded by the federal government

    In fiscal year 2023, 31.0% of Idaho’s total state revenue came from intergovernmental sources—primarily federal grants—compared to 36.7% for state governments nationwide.[1] Idaho had the 7th-lowest percentage of state revenue funded by the federal government.


    Intergovernmental revenue by state

    This table shows the percentage and amount of each state's total revenue that came from intergovernmental sources—primarily federal grants—in fiscal year 2023. It lists states in descending order by the share of revenue from these sources and includes total state revenue, intergovernmental revenue, and the percentage for each state. The data highlights how dependent each state is on federal funding as a portion of its overall budget.

    Intergovernmental revenue by state, 2023
    State Total revenue (thousands) Intergovernmental revenue (thousands) Percent
    Louisiana $44,396,718 $22,899,720 51.6%
    Arizona $60,891,976 $29,948,016 49.2%
    Missouri $45,073,525 $20,888,653 46.3%
    Wyoming $8,357,625 $3,792,590 45.4%
    Alaska $11,883,137 $5,341,732 45.0%
    Montana $10,689,677 $4,710,013 44.1%
    Kentucky $46,180,553 $20,254,290 43.9%
    Mississippi $26,046,854 $11,310,571 43.4%
    Rhode Island $12,286,091 $5,288,136 43.0%
    Oklahoma $37,833,350 $16,255,253 43.0%
    West Virginia $18,871,691 $8,025,296 42.5%
    Tennessee $48,344,600 $20,223,947 41.8%
    South Dakota $6,278,267 $2,570,818 40.9%
    Arkansas $29,702,938 $12,104,414 40.8%
    Georgia $70,031,565 $28,344,731 40.5%
    Indiana $62,196,503 $25,102,743 40.4%
    Alabama $44,884,391 $17,879,389 39.8%
    Maine $13,604,269 $5,360,431 39.4%
    New Hampshire $10,340,297 $4,052,066 39.2%
    South Carolina $46,113,727 $17,785,656 38.6%
    Nebraska $15,493,777 $5,972,778 38.5%
    Texas $213,481,319 $82,164,797 38.5%
    Pennsylvania $127,986,754 $49,211,832 38.5%
    Ohio $98,348,911 $37,785,734 38.4%
    Florida $141,946,520 $53,706,466 37.8%
    New York $259,552,404 $96,814,839 37.3%
    Michigan $90,192,191 $33,060,736 36.7%
    Vermont $9,063,120 $3,293,531 36.3%
    Colorado $41,909,412 $15,138,043 36.1%
    Maryland $58,597,846 $21,004,254 35.8%
    North Carolina $81,064,214 $28,814,153 35.5%
    Oregon $51,612,303 $17,510,543 33.9%
    New Mexico $40,359,510 $13,628,893 33.8%
    Nevada $24,219,218 $8,040,101 33.2%
    Iowa $31,265,753 $10,333,642 33.1%
    Washington $74,164,396 $24,480,102 33.0%
    California $417,100,727 $137,666,813 33.0%
    Minnesota $60,090,592 $19,468,582 32.4%
    Illinois $111,409,197 $35,838,931 32.2%
    Wisconsin $49,805,740 $15,984,042 32.1%
    Massachusetts $80,850,200 $25,519,880 31.6%
    New Jersey $100,285,531 $31,191,180 31.1%
    Connecticut $38,016,037 $11,800,021 31.0%
    Idaho $14,453,559 $4,456,686 30.8%
    Delaware $13,462,717 $4,105,552 30.5%
    Virginia $81,975,174 $23,958,775 29.2%
    North Dakota $10,349,350 $2,876,346 27.8%
    Utah $31,293,027 $8,603,744 27.5%
    Kansas $27,507,628 $7,524,382 27.4%
    Hawaii $19,221,682 $5,057,226 26.3%

    Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State Government Finances


    Idaho statutes on federal grant oversight

    Many states have statutory provisions that govern the oversight, approval, transparency, and auditing of federal grants received within the state. These laws typically assign responsibilities to executive agencies, the governor’s office, and the legislature to ensure proper management and accountability of federal funds. This research was last updated in September 2025.

    Executive oversight of federal grants

    Executive oversight of federal grants refers to statutes that assign responsibility to the governor’s office to review, approve, coordinate, or manage federal grants across the state.

    Ballotpedia did not identify any Idaho statutes that assigned federal grant oversight to the executive branch.

    Legislative oversight and transparency

    Legislative oversight and transparency refers to statutes requiring reports to or involvement from the legislature in managing or approving federal grants.

    Ballotpedia did not identify any Idaho statutes that assigned federal grant oversight to the legislative branch.

    Audit and financial oversight

    Audit and financial oversight refers to statutes related to auditing, financial tracking, or compliance for federal funds.

    Idaho Code § 67-702 authorized the Legislative Services Office, under direction of the Legislative Council, to perform the state’s annual audit of federal financial assistance in accordance with federal requirements.[5]

    67-702. AUDIT FUNCTION OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES OFFICE. (1) The legislative services office at the direction of the legislative council has authority to:

    ...

    (b) Perform an annual audit of federal financial assistance provided to the state that meets the requirements established by the federal government;[6]

    Agency oversight of federal grants

    Agency oversight of federal grant applications refers to statutes that establish procedures or requirements for how state agencies request or acknowledge federal funding.

    Idaho Code § 67-1917 required state agencies receiving or expecting federal funds to report their use, expiration dates, and matching obligations to the Division of Financial Management as part of their annual budget submissions. It also required state agencies facing a 50% or greater reduction in federal funding to submit a contingency plan outlining how they would reduce or continue services without shifting costs to state resources.[7]

    67-1917. REPORTS BY PARTICIPATING STATE AGENCIES. (1) Any state agency that receives federal funds, anticipates receipt of federal funds or administers a program supported by federal funds shall provide reports on the use of federal funds as part of each agency’s annual budget request to the division of financial management. The postsecondary educational institutions shall be provided an exception to these requirements and shall submit an audited schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the preceding fiscal year to the office of the state board of education, which shall consolidate such information and submit a report to the division of financial management. The reports required of all other agencies shall:

    (a) Delineate the federal funds received for the preceding fiscal year;

    (b) Delineate the federal funds to be utilized by the state agency for the current and upcoming fiscal year. The report shall include federal funds appropriated by the legislature, federal funds continuously appropriated and any programs supported by federal funds, the loss of which may impact the continuity or delivery of services;

    (c) Identify the date, if known, on which federal funds are set to expire;

    (d) Identify any obligations, agreements, joint exercise of powers agreements, maintenance of effort agreements, or memoranda of understanding that may be impacted by federal or state decisions regarding federal receipts, including any state matching requirements; and

    (e) Calculate the percentage that constitutes federal funds to the total appropriation for the state agency for the fiscal year.

    (2) If an agency receives notice of a reduction in federal funding from a specific federal grant of fifty percent (50%) or more from the previous year’s funding, it shall develop a plan to either reduce or eliminate the services provided through the grant or to continue the services without a shift to state resources. The plan shall be included in the report required under subsection (1) of this section.

    (3) As used in this section, "federal funds" means any financial assistance made by the United States government, or any agency thereof, whether a contract, grant subsidy, augmentation, reimbursement or in any other form.[6]

    Other state oversight of federal grants

    Click on a state to find out its oversight of federal grants, including how it reviews, approves, and manages federal funding through statutes, executive procedures, and legislative reporting.

    Nevada oversight of federal grantsAlaska oversight of federal grantsHawaii oversight of federal grantsArizona oversight of federal grantsUtah oversight of federal grantsNew Mexico oversight of federal grantsColorado oversight of federal grantsWyoming oversight of federal grantsCalifornia oversight of federal grantsOregon oversight of federal grantsWashington oversight of federal grantsIdaho oversight of federal grantsMontana oversight of federal grantsNorth Dakota oversight of federal grantsSouth Dakota oversight of federal grantsNebraska oversight of federal grantsKansas oversight of federal grantsOklahoma oversight of federal grantsTexas oversight of federal grantsMinnesota oversight of federal grantsIowa oversight of federal grantsMissouri oversight of federal grantsArkansas oversight of federal grantsLouisiana oversight of federal grantsMississippi oversight of federal grantsAlabama oversight of federal grantsWisconsin oversight of federal grantsIllinois oversight of federal grantsTennessee oversight of federal grantsKentucky oversight of federal grantsIndiana oversight of federal grantsMichigan oversight of federal grantsOhio oversight of federal grantsGeorgia oversight of federal grantsFlorida oversight of federal grantsSouth Carolina oversight of federal grantsNorth Carolina oversight of federal grantsVirginia oversight of federal grantsWest Virginia oversight of federal grantsPennsylvania oversight of federal grantsNew York oversight of federal grantsVermont oversight of federal grantsNew Hampshire oversight of federal grantsMassachusetts oversight of federal grantsRhode Island oversight of federal grantsConnecticut oversight of federal grantsNew Jersey oversight of federal grantsDelaware oversight of federal grantsMaryland oversight of federal grantsDistrict of Columbia oversight of federal grantsMaine oversight of federal grantsUS map.png


    See also

    External links

    Footnotes