Massachusetts Question 3, Changes to Alcohol Retail Licensing Initiative (2022)

Massachusetts Question 3
Election date November 8, 2022
Topic Alcohol
Status d Defeated
Type State statute	Origin Citizens

Massachusetts Question 3, the Changes to Alcohol Retail Licensing Initiative, was on the ballot in Massachusetts as an indirect initiated state statute on November 8, 2022. The ballot measure was defeated.

A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to: incrementally increase the combined number of retail beer and wine licenses and all alcoholic beverage licenses (including liquor) an establishment could own from no more than nine in 2022 to no more than 18 by 2031; limit the maximum number of licenses for the sale of all alcoholic beverages an establishment could own to seven;  prohibit in-store automated or self-checkout sales of alcohol; change the formula used to calculate fines by using gross profits on all retail sales rather than the gross profits on the sale of alcohol; and add out-of-state driver's licenses to the list of approved identification under the State Liquor Control Act.

A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative that would make changes to alcohol retail licensing, fining, and operations.

Election results

Massachusetts Question 3
Result		Votes	Percentage
Yes		1,069,921	44.90%
No		1,312,906	55.10%

Results are officially certified.

Source

Overview

What would Question 3 have done?

See also: Text of measure

Question 3 would have incrementally increased the statewide limit on the combined number of retail alcohol licenses an establishment could have, which includes licenses for all alcoholic beverages (including liquor) and for wine, malt, and beer. The measure proposed the following limit increases:

• from nine licenses to 12 on January 1, 2023,
• from 12 licenses to 15 on January 1, 2027, and
• from 15 licenses to 18 on January 1, 2031.

The measure would have limited the maximum number of licenses for the sale of all alcoholic beverages an establishment could have to seven beginning in 2023 unless the retailer already holds more than seven on December 31, 2022.

Question 3 would have also prohibited in-store automated and self-checkout sales of alcohol. It would have also changed the formula used to calculate fines for selling to underage consumers by using gross profits on all retail sales instead of gross profits on alcoholic beverage sales. At the time of the election, the formula to calculate fines equals 50% of the daily gross profits on the sale of alcohol multiplied by the number of license suspension days. Fines are levied in lieu of suspension of a license.

Question 3 would have also changed the laws governing identification cards for alcohol purchases to include a valid motor vehicle license issued by another state.

Who supported and opposed Question 3?

See also: Supports and Opposition

21st Century Alcohol Retail Reform Committee led the campaign in support of Question 3. The committee has reported $1.1 million in contributions with $701,049 of the total from the Massachusetts Package Stores Association. The association wrote on its website, "Why vote yes on Question #3? Balance will be restored by decreasing the number of full liquor licenses allowed by an individual or corporation from nine (9) to seven (7), while progressively increasing the number of beer and wine licenses from nine (9) to eighteen (18), minus any full liquor licenses owned by the corporation or individual. To improve public safety, self-checkout of alcohol beverages will be prohibited and a fine for selling to a minor will be based on gross sales, not just for alcohol beverages. The initiative petition also helps the entire alcohol beverages industry by allowing for valid out of state IDs to be relied upon. Massachusetts is the only state in the U.S. that does not permit a retailer to reasonably rely on valid out-of-state IDs."

Food Stores for Consumer Choice was registered in opposition to Question 3. The committee had reported $12.50 in contributions. Massachusetts Fine Wines & Spirits, LLC (Total Wine) reported $2.6 million in independent expenditures to oppose Question 3. Ryan Kearney, general counsel for the Retailers Association of Massachusetts, said, "We consider this to be overreach and a blatant attempt to stifle competition from businesses that seek to offer a wide array of products." Brian Houghton, senior vice president of the Massachusetts Food Association, said, "It is not fair or rational to limit multi-store grocers to a limited number of full licenses they can hold statewide simply because they sell food."

Text of measure

Ballot question

The ballot question was as follows:

“

Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives on or before May 3, 2022?

”

Ballot summary

The final ballot summary for Question 3 was as follows.

“

This proposed law would increase the statewide limits on the combined number of licenses for the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption (including licenses for 'all alcoholic beverages' and for 'wines and malt beverages') that any one retailer could own or control: from 9 to 12 licenses in 2023; to 15 licenses in 2027; and to 18 licenses in 2031. Beginning in 2023, the proposed law would set a maximum number of 'all alcoholic beverages' licenses that any one retailer could own or control at 7 licenses unless a retailer currently holds more than 7 such licenses. The proposed law would require retailers to conduct the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption through face-to-face transactions and would prohibit automated or self-checkout sales of alcoholic beverages by such retailers. The proposed law would alter the calculation of the fine that the Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission may accept in lieu of suspending any license issued under the State Liquor Control Act. The proposed law would modify the formula for calculating such fee from being based on the gross profits on the sale of alcoholic beverages to being based on the gross profits on all retail sales. The proposed law would also add out-of-state motor vehicle licenses to the list of the forms of identification that any holder of a license issued under the State Liquor Control Act, or their agent or employee, may choose to reasonably rely on for proof of a person’s identity and age.

”

Full text

The full text of the measure is below:

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2022

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The secretary of state wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 11, and the FRE is 60. The word count for the ballot title is 26.

The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 19, and the FRE is 23. The word count for the ballot summary is 243.

Support

21st Century Alcohol Retail Reform Committee led the campaign in support of Question 3.

Supporters

Corporations

• Sav-Mor Spirits

Unions

• Massachusetts Package Stores Association

Arguments

• Massachusetts Package Stores Association: "Why vote yes on Question #3? Balance will be restored by decreasing the number of full liquor licenses allowed by an individual or corporation from nine (9) to seven (7), while progressively increasing the number of beer and wine licenses from nine (9) to eighteen (18), minus any full liquor licenses owned by the corporation or individual. To improve public safety, self-checkout of alcohol beverages will be prohibited and a fine for selling to a minor will be based on gross sales, not just for alcohol beverages. The initiative petition also helps the entire alcohol beverages industry by allowing for valid out of state IDs to be relied upon. Massachusetts is the only state in the U.S. that does not permit a retailer to reasonably rely on valid out-of-state IDs."

Official arguments

The following is the argument in support of Question 3 found in the Official Voter Information Guide:

Official Voter Information Guide: A YES vote fulfills consumer desire for expanded convenience in a reasonable and balanced manner that also protects against illegal sales. A YES vote expands convenience by gradually increasing the total number of alcoholic beverage licenses that any person or company can own. Package stores, convenience stores, supermarkets, superstore retailers, and others will be able to apply for additional licenses for their existing locations that do not currently sell alcohol and for new locations they open. A YES vote simultaneously enhances public safety and encourages vigilance by retailers through prohibiting self-checkout of alcohol beverages and basing the fine for selling to a minor on a store’s total sales and not just its alcohol sales. A YES vote also supports state tourism and brings Massachusetts in line with every other state in the country by allowing for valid out of state IDs to be relied upon by alcohol beverage retailers. ---Robert Mellion, 21st Century Alcohol Retail Reform Committee

Opposition

Food Stores for Consumer Choice led the campaign in opposition to Question 3.

Opponents

Corporations

• Cumberland Farms
• Total Wine

Unions

• Massachusetts Food Association
• New England Convenience Store and Energy Marketers Association

Organizations

• Retailers Association of Massachusetts

Arguments

• Ryan Kearney, general counsel for Retailers Association of Massachusetts: "We consider this to be overreach and a blatant attempt to stifle competition from businesses that seek to offer a wide array of products."
• Brian Houghton, senior vice president of the Massachusetts Food Association: "It is not fair or rational to limit multi-store grocers to a limited number of full licenses they can hold statewide simply because they sell food."
• John Hurst, president of the Retailers Association of Massachusetts: "If you’re a package store, you’re going to take a fine in order to stay open. But if you’re a convenience store or food store, and all of the sudden you’re going from being fined on your alcohol sales to your food, gasoline... you can’t shut down and stop selling gasoline and food to your customers. You can’t have that exorbitant fine. You’ll just stop selling alcohol — and that was the intent."

Official arguments

The following is the argument in opposition to Question 3 found in the Official Voter Information Guide:

Official Voter Information Guide: Our alcohol licensing laws do need serious reforms, but this ballot measure is not the answer. It offers an incomplete solution to a complex problem, doing little to promote competition or expand consumer choice. Despite some superficially popular provisions designed to entice voters, it fails to lift outdated restrictions on local decision-making, while in fact moving Massachusetts backwards in several significant ways: (1)imposing unfair penalties against retailers who sell more than just alcohol, like grocers and other food stores; (2) outlawing convenient and reliable point-of-sale technologies already in widespread use by retailers across the state; (3) decreasing the number of full liquor licenses that retailers can own. This flawed approach favors special interests in the alcohol industry, at the expense of cash-strapped consumers and their favorite local retailers. We deserve more. Vote NO on this question, and instead ask your state lawmakers to support comprehensive legislation that will actually make a difference. ---Food Stores for Consumer Choice

Campaign finance

The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recent scheduled reports that Ballotpedia has processed, which covered through January 20, 2023.

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Massachusetts ballot measures

There was one committee registered in support of the measure: 21st Century Alcohol Retail Reform Committee. The committee reported $1.1 million in contributions. There was one committee registered in opposition to the measure: Food Stores for Consumer Choice. The committee did not report cash contributions. Massachusetts also required other organizations that spend money to support or oppose ballot measures to report amounts to the Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance. Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance reported $12,858.92 spent in opposition to Question 3. Massachusetts Fine Wines & Spirits, LLC (Total Wine) reported $2.7 million in opposition to Question 3.

	Cash Contributions	In-Kind Contributions	Total Contributions	Cash Expenditures	Total Expenditures
Support	$991,300.00	$139,955.04	$1,131,255.04	$991,300.00	$1,131,255.04
Oppose	$0.00	$12.50	$12.50	$0.00	$12.50
Total	$991,300.00	$139,967.54	$1,131,267.54	$991,300.00	$1,131,267.54

Support

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in support of the ballot measure.

Committees in support of Question 3
Committee	Cash Contributions	In-Kind Contributions	Total Contributions	Cash Expenditures	Total Expenditures
21st Century Alcohol Retail Reform Committee	$991,300.00	$139,955.04	$1,131,255.04	$991,300.00	$1,131,255.04
Total	$991,300.00	$139,955.04	$1,131,255.04	$991,300.00	$1,131,255.04

Donors

The following table shows the top donor to the committee registered in support of the ballot measure.

Donor	Cash Contributions	In-Kind Contributions	Total Contributions
Massachusetts Package Stores Association	$635,380.00	$65,668.80	$701,048.80
Julio's Liquors	$6,000.00	$8,180.19	$14,180.19
Deerfield Spirit Shoppe	$10,000.00	$0.00	$10,000.00
Liquors 44	$7,500.00	$0.00	$7,500.00
Jay's Wine & Spirits	$0.00	$6,291.25	$6,291.25

Opposition

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in opposition to the ballot measure.

Committees in support of Question 3
Committee	Cash Contributions	In-Kind Contributions	Total Contributions	Cash Expenditures	Total Expenditures
Food Stores for Consumer Choice	$0.00	$12.50	$12.50	$0.00	$12.50
Total	$0.00	$12.50	$12.50	$0.00	$12.50

Methodology

To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.

Media editorials

See also: 2022 ballot measure media endorsements

Ballotpedia identified the following media editorial board as taking positions on Question 3.

Ballotpedia lists the positions of media editorial boards that support or oppose ballot measures. This does not include opinion pieces from individuals or groups that do not represent the official position of a newspaper or media outlet. Ballotpedia includes editorials from newspapers and outlets based on circulation and readership, political coverage within a state, and length of publication. You can share media editorial board endorsements with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Support

• The Boston Globe Editorial Board: "The chain stores beckon — so cheap and convenient. But spending too much money in a big box can feel like a betrayal of the small, mom-and-pop stores that give our neighborhoods life. Striking a balance is key to building a healthy economy and healthy communities. And Question 3 on the Massachusetts ballot is a good if imperfect step toward striking that balance in one sector, at least: alcohol sales. The Globe urges a yes vote on the measure. ... Overall, though, Question 3 is a good compromise. It gives chains like Trader Joe’s and BJ’s Wholesale Club and Total Wine a chance to sell beer and wine in more locations, in a win for consumers. But it wouldn’t blow up the caps altogether. And that means neighborhood package stores will still have a fighting chance."
• The Berkshire Eagle Editorial Board: "Ballot Question 3 asks voters to approve lifting the cap on the number of liquor licenses that a single retailer can control in Massachusetts as well as several minor adjustments to the state’s alcohol sale laws. ... Since the Legislature has unfortunately left that responsibility to the voters once again, The Eagle endorses a yes vote on Question 3."
• The Harvard Crimson Editorial Board: "If passed, Ballot Question Three could be a win for packies over big corporations (albeit one born out of compromise!) and those in favor of a more safe and more fun nightlife involving responsible alcohol consumption. Our state can do better than second-to-Utah; our local stores deserve protection and our consumers deserve the ability to buy low-grade alcohol at more locations. For those reasons, we urge voters to vote yes on Ballot Question Three."

Opposition

You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Polls

See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls and 2022 ballot measure polls

Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Massachusetts Question 3, Changes to Alcohol Retail Licensing Initiative (2022)
Poll	Dates	Sample size	Margin of error	Support	Oppose	Undecided

UMass Amherst/WCVB	10/20/22 - 10/26/22	700 RV	± 4.3%	39%	38%	23%
	Question: "Question 3 - Would increase the statewide limit on the combined number of licenses for the sale of alcoholic beverages for off premises consumption that any one retailer could own or control."

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Background

Massachusetts alcohol licensing and regulation

The Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission (ABCC) is authorized to oversee the manufacturing, importing, exporting, storing, transporting, and selling of alcoholic beverages in the state. Local Licensing Authorities (LLA) are authorized to issue retail licenses for on-premises consumption (restaurants, hotels, clubs, and general-on-premises) and off-premises consumption (package stores, grocery stores, and convenience stores). The licensing process requires (i) the LLA to grant a license; (ii) the ABCC to approve the license; and (iii) the LLA to issue the license upon receipt of the licensing fee. State law requires a license quota system that limits the number of licenses the LLA can issue in an area based on population.

Types of alcohol licenses

At the time of the election, there are three classifications of retail licenses: on-premise license, special license, and off-premise license. There are four categories of retail liquor licenses: all alcoholic beverages (wine, malt beverages, and distilled spirits), wine only, malt beverages only, and wine and malt beverages. Currently, state law limits the number of all alcoholic beverage licenses to nine per establishment.

For calendar year 2019, the ABCC reported 9,425 on-premise licenses, 3,052 off-premise licenses, and 28 package store licenses issued.

Fines for selling to underage consumers

As of 2022, state law imposes a fine for selling to underage consumers that is equal to 50% of the daily gross profits on the sale of alcohol multiplied by the number of license suspension days. Fines are levied in lieu of suspension of a license.

Consumer identification to purchase alcohol

At the time of the election, Massachusetts law did not explicitly authorize retailers to accept valid driver's licenses issued by another state as a form of identification to purchase alcohol. The law states:

“

Any licensee, or agent or employee thereof, under this chapter who reasonably relies on such a liquor purchase identification card or motor vehicle license issued pursuant to section eight of chapter ninety, or on an identification card issued under section 8E of chapter 90, or on a valid passport issued by the United States government, or by the government, recognized by the United States government, of a foreign country, or a valid United States issued military identification card, for proof of a person's identity and age shall not suffer any modification, suspension, revocation or cancellation of such license, nor shall he suffer any criminal liability, for delivering or selling alcohol or alcoholic beverages to a person under twenty-one years of age.

”

Alcohol on the ballot, 2022

Three initiatives related to alcohol were certified for the 2022 ballot in Colorado. One initiative was certified for the 2022 ballot in Massachusetts.

Year	Measure	Description	Outcome
2022	Colorado Retail Liquor Store Licenses Initiative	Incrementally increases the number of retail liquor store licenses an individual may own or hold a share in
2022	Colorado Grocery and Convenience Store Wine Sales Initiative	Creates a new fermented malt beverage and wine retailer license to allow grocery stores, convenience stores, and other businesses that are licensed to sell beer to also sell wine and conduct wine tastings
2022	Colorado Alcohol Delivery Service Initiative	Allows retail establishments licensed to sell alcohol for off-site consumption to offer a delivery service or provide for a third-party alcohol delivery service
2022	Massachusetts Changes to Alcohol Retail Licensing Initiative	Incrementally increase the statewide limit on the combined number of retail alcohol licenses an establishment can have, including licenses for all alcoholic beverages and for wine and beer; prohibit self-checkout sales of alcohol; other changes

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing the initiative process in Massachusetts

The state process

In Massachusetts, the number of signatures required to qualify an indirect initiated state statute for the ballot is equal to 3.5 percent of the votes cast for governor in the most recent gubernatorial election. No more than one-quarter of the verified signatures on any petition can come from a single county. The process for initiated state statutes in Massachusetts is indirect, which means the legislature has a chance to approve initiatives with successful petitions directly without the measure going to the voters. A first round of signatures equal to 3 percent of the votes cast for governor is required to put an initiative before the legislature. A second round of signatures equal to 0.5 percent of the votes cast for governor in the last election is required to put the measure on the ballot if the legislature rejects or declines to act on a proposed initiated statute. Signatures for initiated statutes in Massachusetts are collected in two circulation periods. The first period runs from the third Wednesday in September to two weeks prior to the first Wednesday in December, a period of nine weeks. If the proposed law is not adopted by the first Wednesday of May, petitioners then have until the first Wednesday of July (eight weeks) to request additional petition forms and submit the second round of signatures.

The requirements to get an initiated state statute certified for the 2022 ballot:

• Signatures required (first round): 80,239 signatures
• Signatures required (second round): 13,374 signatures
• Deadline (first round): The deadline to submit the first round of signatures to the secretary of state was December 1, 2021. Signatures needed to be submitted to local registrars by November 17, 2021.
• Deadline (second round): The deadline to submit the second round of signatures was July 6, 2022.

If enough signatures are submitted in the first round, the legislature must act on a successful petition by the first Wednesday of May. The measure only goes on the ballot if the legislature does not pass it and if the second round of signatures is successfully collected.

Details about this initiative

• Question 3 was filed by Robert Mellion, the executive director of the Massachusetts Package Stores Association (MPSA).
• On September 1, 2021, the attorney general cleared the initiative for signature gathering.
• On November 26, 2021, MPSA announced that the campaign had gathered more than 80,000 signatures.
• On December 1, 2021, MPSA announced that they had submitted 109,000 certified signatures to the secretary of state.
• At the end of December, the secretary of state certified the petition to the legislature.
• The state legislature did not pass the initiative before the May deadline. The campaign was cleared to gather a second round of signatures.
• On July 7, the state elections office reported that the initiative had filed a second round of signatures.
• On July 14, the secretary of state informed the campaign they had qualified for the ballot.

Cost per required signature

Sponsors of the measure hired Spoonworks Inc. to collect signatures for the petition to qualify this measure for the ballot. A total of $723,500.00 was spent to collect the 93,613 valid signatures required to put this measure before voters, resulting in a total cost per required signature (CPRS) of $7.73.

Lawsuit

  

Lawsuit overview
Issue: Whether the initiative contains subjects that are unrelated
Court: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Ruling: Ruled in favor of the defendants; the subjects are related.
Plaintiff(s): Cumberland Farms	Defendant(s): Massachusetts Package Store Association
Plaintiff argument: The initiative contains several subjects that are unrelated; therefore, the initiative should not have been cleared for circulation.	Defendant argument: The subjects addressed in the initiative are mutually dependent.

  Source: The Eagle-Tribune

Cumberland Farms filed a lawsuit against the initiative arguing that it contained unrelated subjects. On June 13, 2022, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the initiative "presents voters with an integrated scheme” that “does not require a voter to cast a single vote on dissimilar subjects."

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Massachusetts

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Massachusetts.

How to vote in Massachusetts

Poll times

In Massachusetts, most polling places are open from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. However, municipalities may open their polls as early as 5:45 a.m. An individual who is in line at the time polls close must be allowed to vote.

Registration

Check your voter registration status here.

To vote in Massachusetts, one must be a United States citizen, a resident of Massachusetts, and at least 18 years old on or before Election Day.

The deadline for registration is 10 days prior to the election. A voter can register online, by mail, or in person at any registration office or the Registry of Motor Vehicles. A form of identification is required to register. The following are acceptable forms of identification:

• Valid driver's license
• State-issued identification card
• Current utility bill
• Bank statement
• Paystub
• Government-issued check
• Any other government document displaying the voter's name and address

Automatic registration

Massachusetts automatically registers eligible individuals to vote through the Department of Motor Vehicles, division of medical assistance, health insurance connector authority, and other agencies that collect what state law defines as reliable citizenship information.

Online registration

See also: Online voter registration

Massachusetts has implemented an online voter registration system. Residents can register to vote by visiting this website.

Same-day registration

Massachusetts does not allow same-day voter registration.

Residency requirements

To register to vote in Massachusetts, you must be a resident of the state. State law does not specify a length of time for which you must have been a resident to be eligible.

Verification of citizenship

See also: Laws permitting noncitizens to vote in the United States

Massachusetts does not require proof of citizenship for voter registration. An individual must attest that they are a U.S. citizen when registering to vote. According to the state's voter registration application, the penalty for an illegal registration is a "fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than five years or both."

All 49 states with voter registration systems require applicants to declare that they are U.S. citizens in order to register to vote in state and federal elections, under penalty of perjury or other punishment. Seven states — Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Wyoming — have laws requiring verification of citizenship at the time of voter registration, whether in effect or not. In three states — California, Maryland, and Vermont — at least one local jurisdiction allows noncitizens to vote in some local elections. Noncitizens registering to vote in those elections must complete a voter registration application provided by the local jurisdiction and are not eligible to register as state or federal voters.

Verifying your registration

The Elections and Voting page, run by the Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth office, allows residents to check their voter registration status online.

Voter ID requirements

Massachusetts does not require voters to present identification (ID) while voting, in most cases.

However, voters will be asked to show ID in the following circumstances:

“

You are voting for the first time in Massachusetts in a federal election; You are an inactive voter; You are casting a provisional or challenged ballot; The poll worker has a reasonable suspicion that leads them to request identification.

”

The following list of accepted ID was current as of August 2024:

• A driver's license
• A state ID card
• A recent utility bill
• A rent receipt or lease.
• A copy of a voter registration affidavit
• A letter from a school dormitory or housing office
• Any other printed identification which contains your name and address

Click here for the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' page on accepted ID to ensure you have the most current information.

“

Acceptable identification must include your name and the address at which you are registered to vote. Examples of acceptable identification include: a driver's license, state-issued ID card, recent utility bill, rent receipt, lease, a copy of a voter registration affidavit, or any other printed identification which contains the voter's name and address.

”

See also

2022 measures

• 2022 ballot measures
• Alcohol on the ballot
• 2022 petition deadlines

Massachusetts

• Massachusetts ballot measures
• Massachusetts initiative laws

News and analysis

• Ballot measure lawsuits
• Ballot measure readability
• Ballot measure polls
• Ballot measure signature costs

External links

• Petition text