Know your vote. Take a look at your sample ballot now!

History of ranked-choice voting (RCV) ballot measures

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 12:19, 10 April 2025 by Ryan Byrne (contribs) (→‎State ranked-choice voting ballot measures)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
History of ranked-choice voting (RCV) ballot measures

Ranked-choice voting (RCV)
Electoral systems on the ballot
Local electoral systems on the ballot
Electoral systems by state

Select a historical topic page from the menu below.

The ballot measure has played a role in shaping electoral systems in the U.S., including ranked-choice voting (RCV) for state and local elections.

Since 1915, there have been more than 150 ballot measures to adopt or repeal ranked-choice voting systems. Ashtabula, Ohio, was the first jurisdiction to approve a ranked-choice voting measure in 1915.

RCV is an electoral system in which voters rank candidates on their ballots. RCV can be used for single-winner elections or multi-winner elections; when used for multi-winner elections, the system has also been called single-transferable vote or proportional representation. These terms were often used to describe multi-winner RCV before the 1970s. You can learn more about ranked-choice voting systems and policies here.

This page provides an overview of ranked-choice voting (RCV) state and local ballot measures since 1965.

  • From 1965 through 2024, there were 12 statewide ballot measures in eight states. Ten (83.3%) were to adopt RCV, and two (16.7%) were to repeal or preempt RCV.
  • Ballotpedia has located 71 local ballot measures to adopt RCV. Voters approved 52 (78.9%) and rejected 15 (21.1%).
  • There were eight local ballot measures to repeal RCV. Voters approved four (50.0%) and rejected four (50.0%).
  • The year with the most local RCV ballot measures was 2022, when nine were on the ballot in nine jurisdictions. Voters approved seven of them.
  • The state with the most local ballot measures related to RCV is California, where there have been 13.

On this page, you will find lists of states and local jurisdictions where RCV measures appeared on the ballot, and campaign finance information for political action committees surrounding state RCV ballot measures.

HIGHLIGHTS
  • November 2024: On November 5, voters decided on six state ballot measures that proposed enacting, repealing, or preempting RCV in Alaska, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Nevada, and Oregon.
  • Most Expensive Campaign: In 2022, voters approved Nevada Question 3. A total of $25.44 million was raised between campaigns. Supporters received $23.0 million. Opponents received $2.4 million.
  • Most Active Donor: The Action Now Initiative (ANI) contributed the most in support of state RCV measures with a total of $10.6 million distributed between the state ballot measures since 2016.
  • State ranked-choice voting ballot measures

    As of 2025, voters in eight states had decided on 12 state ballot measures related to ranked-choice voting.

    • Ten (83.3%) were to adopt RCV, and two (16.7%) were to repeal or preempt RCV.
    • The average vote on a ballot measure to adopt RCV was 45.7% to 54.3%.
    • Alaska had three ballot measures about RCV, the most relative to other states.
    • The ballot measure with the narrowest margin was Alaska Ballot Measure 2 in 2024, which received 49.9% of the vote. Ballot Measure 2 would have repealed the state's top-four RCV system, adopted two years earlier.
    • The ballot measure with the widest margin was Idaho Proposition 1, which was defeated, with 69.6% voting against the initiative. Proposition 1 would have enacted a top-four RCV system in Idaho.

    List of state ballot measures by year

    The following table provides a list of state ranked-choice voting (RCV) ballot measures:

    State Year Type Measure Position Yes No Outcome
    Alaska 2024 Initiative Ballot Measure 2: Repeal Top-Four RCV Initiative Anti-RCV 49.88% 50.12%
    Defeatedd
    Colorado 2024 Initiative Proposition 131: Top-Four RCV Initiative Pro-RCV 46.47% 53.53%
    Defeatedd
    Idaho 2024 Initiative Proposition 1: Top-Four RCV Initiative Pro-RCV 30.38% 69.62%
    Defeatedd
    Missouri 2024 Referral Amendment 7: Require Citizenship to Vote and Prohibit RCV Amendment Anti-RCV 68.44% 31.56%
    Approveda
    Nevada 2024 Initiative Question 3: Top-Five RCV Initiative Pro-RCV 47.04% 52.96%
    Defeatedd
    Oregon 2024 Referral Measure 117: RCV for Federal and State Elections Measure Pro-RCV 42.30% 57.70%
    Defeatedd
    Nevada 2022 Initiative Question 3: Top-Five RCV Initiative Pro-RCV 52.94% 47.06%
    Approveda
    Alaska 2020 Initiative Ballot Measure 2: Top-Four RCV and Campaign Finance Laws Initiative Pro-RCV 50.55% 49.45%
    Approveda
    Massachusetts 2020 Initiative Question 2: RCV Initiative Pro-RCV 45.22% 54.78%
    Defeatedd
    Maine 2018 Initiative Question 1: Overturn RCV Delayed Enactment and Automatic Repeal Legislation Referendum Pro-RCV 53.88% 46.12%
    Approveda
    Maine 2016 Initiative Question 5: RCV Initiative Pro-RCV 52.12% 47.88%
    Approveda
    Alaska 2002 Initiative Ballot Measure 1: RCV Initiative Pro-RCV 36.27% 63.73%
    Defeatedd


    Campaign finance totals

    The following table lists each measure's support and opposition campaign totals, if available.

    Measure Support Opposition Total Outcome
    Alaska Ballot Measure 2, Repeal Top-Four Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (2024) $538,596.93 $15,496,407.30 $16,035,004.23
    Defeatedd
    Colorado Proposition 131, Top-Four Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (2024) $14,655,331.91 $458,719.77 $15,114,051.68
    Defeatedd
    Idaho Proposition 1, Top-Four Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (2024) $5,621,307.06 $231,401.21 $5,852,708.27
    Defeatedd
    Missouri Amendment 7, Require Citizenship to Vote and Prohibit Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment (2024) $0.00 $1,651.57 $1,651.57
    Approveda
    Nevada Question 3, Top-Five Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (2024) $28,962,650.00 $3,260,000.00 $32,222,650.00
    Defeatedd
    Oregon Measure 117, Ranked-Choice Voting for Federal and State Elections Measure (2024) $10,701,951.23 $14,115.00 $10,716,066.23
    Defeatedd
    Nevada Question 3, Top-Five Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (2022) $23,018,271.58 $2,425,000.00 $25,443,271.58
    Approveda
    Alaska Ballot Measure 2, Top-Four Ranked-Choice Voting and Campaign Finance Laws Initiative (2020) $6,844,544.33 $579,426.18 $7,423,970.51
    Approveda
    Massachusetts Question 2, Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (2020) $10,179,108.24 $8,475.74 $10,187,583.98
    Defeatedd
    Maine Question 1, Ranked-Choice Voting Delayed Enactment and Automatic Repeal Referendum (June 2018) $1,577,811.98 $0.00 $1,577,811.98
    Approveda
    Maine Question 5, Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (2016) $2,944,419.44 $0.00 $2,944,419.44
    Approveda


    Top donors

    Support

    The table below lists the top five donors to campaigns supporting ranked-choice voting state ballot measures.

    Donor Measure(s) Contribution total
    Article IV Alaska Ballot Measure 2 (2024)
    Idaho Proposition 1 (2024)
    Nevada Question 3 (2024)
    Oregon Measure 117 (2024)
    $27,850,000.00
    Unite America Alaska Ballot Measure 2 (2024)
    Alaska Ballot Measure 2 (2020)
    Colorado Proposition 131 (2024)
    Idaho Proposition 1 (2024)
    Massachusetts Question 2 (2020)
    Nevada Question 3 (2022)
    Nevada Question 3 (2024)
    $25,856,858.00
    Action Now Initiative Alaska Ballot Measure 2 (2024)
    Alaska Ballot Measure 2 (2020)
    Maine Question 1 (2018)
    Maine Question 5 (2016)
    Massachusetts Question 2 (2020)
    Nevada Question 3 (2022)
    $12,592,933.00
    Katherine Gehl Massachusetts Question 2 (2020)
    Nevada Question 3 (2022)
    $6,251,050.00
    Kathryn Murdoch Colorado Proposition 131 (2024)
    Massachusetts Question 2 (2020)
    $5,500,000.00

    Opposition

    The table below lists the top five donors to campaigns opposing ranked-choice voting state ballot measures.

    Donor Measure Contribution total
    Nevada Alliance Nevada Question 3 (2024)
    Nevada Question 3 (2022)
    $4,425,000.00
    Nevada Conservation League Nevada Question 3 (2022) $310,000.00
    Majority Forward Nevada Question 3 (2022) $250,000.00
    Republican State Leadership Committee Alaska Ballot Measure 2 (2020) $150,000.00
    Ranked Choice Education Association Alaska Ballot Measure 2 (2024) $152,000.00

    Local ranked-choice voting ballot measures

    Between 1965 and 2024, 79 ranked-choice voting (RCV) local ballot measures were on the ballot in 58 jurisdictions in 19 states.

    • California has had the most—13—local RCV ballot measures compared to other states.
    • Colorado has had the second most—10—local RCV ballot measures.

    There are also cities and counties that have adopted RCV without a ballot measure. A full list of jurisdictions where RCV has been adopted is available here.

    The following map shows the local jurisdictions that have voted on ranked-choice voting ballot measures:

    Timeline

    From 1965 through 1997, seven local jurisdictions decided on six ballot measures to adopt or repeal ranked-choice voting (RCV). Four of those measures were to adopt RCV, and two of them were to repeal RCV.

    Between 1998 and 2011, voters decided on 32 measures in 28 jurisdictions—approving 25 (78.13%) and rejecting seven (21.87%). There were no local measures on ballots again until 2015.

    Between 2015 and November 2024, voters decided on 41 measures in 34 jurisdictions. Voters approved 33 (80.5%) and rejected eight (19.5%).

    The year with the greatest number of local ranked-choice voting (RCV) measures on the ballot was 2022, when there were nine.

    The following chart shows the number of ranked-choice voting ballot measures per year since 1965:

    List of local ballot measures by topic

    The following table shows the number of ranked-choice voting measures by topic.

    Local ranked-choice vote measures by topic and outcome, 1965 - April 2025
    Topic Total Approved Approved (%) Defeated Defeated (%)
      Adopt RCV 72 57 79.2% 15 20.08%
      Repeal RCV 8 4 50.0% 4 50.0%
    Total 80 61 76.3% 19 23.7%


    List of local ranked-choice voting ballot measures

    2025

    Jurisdiction State Type Title Description Result Yes Votes No Votes
    Skokie IL

    Initiative

    Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative Adopt ranked-choice voting for city elections

    Approveda

    6,800 (59%)

    4,812 (41%)


    1965-2024

    The following table provides a list of ranked-choice voting local ballot measures from 1965 to 2024.

    Jurisdiction State Year Title Adopt or Repeal Yes vote No vote Status
    Richmond California 2024 Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 54.39% 45.61%
    Approveda[1]
    Washington, D.C. D.C. 2024 Initiative 83, Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative Adopt 72.89% 27.11%
    Approveda
    Oak Park Illinois 2024 Ranked-Choice Voting for Village President and Board of Trustees Initiative Adopt 79.57% 20.43%
    Approveda
    Peoria Township Illinois 2024 Ranked-Choice Voting Advisory Question Adopt 67.13% 32.87%
    Approveda
    Bloomington Minnesota 2024 Question 1, Repeal of Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative Repeal 48.71% 51.29%
    Defeatedd
    Redondo Beach California 2023 Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment Adopt 76.67% 23.33%
    Approveda
    Easthampton Massachusetts 2023 Question 1, Multi-Winner Ranked-Choice Voting Advisory Question Adopt 61.76% 38.24%
    Approveda
    East Lansing Michigan 2023 Question 3, Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative Adopt 52.48% 47.52%
    Approveda
    Kalamazoo Michigan 2023 Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative Adopt 70.97% 29.03%
    Approveda
    Royal Oak Michigan 2023 Proposal B, Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative Adopt 50.53% 49.47%
    Approveda
    Minnetonka Minnesota 2023 Repeal of Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative Repeal 41.34% 58.66%
    Defeatedd
    Burlington Vermont 2023 Question 6: Ranked-Choice Voting for Mayor, School Commissioner, and Ward Election Officer Amendment Adopt 64.42% 35.58%
    Approveda
    Clark County Washington 2022 Amendment 10: Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 41.94% 58.06%
    Defeatedd
    San Juan County Washington 2022 Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 45.64% 54.36%
    Defeatedd
    Seattle Washington 2022 Proposition 1A and 1B: Approval Voting Initiative and Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 50.95% 49.05%
    Approveda
    Multnomah County Oregon 2022 Measure 26-232: Ranked-Choice Voting for County Elections Amendment Adopt 69.09% 30.91%
    Approveda
    Portland Oregon 2022 Measure 26-228: Changes to City Governance and Ranked-Choice Voting Adopt 58.10% 41.90%
    Approveda
    Portland Maine 2022 Question 4: Proportional Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment Adopt 63.59% 36.41%
    Approveda
    Evanston Illinois 2022 Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 82.58% 17.42%
    Approveda
    Fort Collins Colorado 2022 Ballot Question 2C: Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment Adopt 58.15% 41.85%
    Approveda
    Ojai California 2022 Measure M: Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 55.84% 44.16%
    Approveda
    Burlington Vermont 2021 Question 4: Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment Adopt 64.44% 35.56%
    Approveda
    Austin Texas 2021 Proposition E: Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative Adopt 57.95% 42.05%
    Approveda
    Ann Arbor Michigan 2021 Proposal B: Ranked-Choice Voting Charter Amendment Adopt 72.83% 27.17%
    Approveda
    Westbrook Maine 2021 Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative Adopt 62.94% 37.06%
    Approveda
    Broomfield Colorado 2021 Question 2A: Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 51.90% 48.10%
    Approveda
    Minnetonka Minnesota 2020 Question 1: Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment Adopt 54.71% 45.29%
    Approveda
    Bloomington Minnesota 2020 Question 3: Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment Adopt 51.19% 48.81%
    Approveda
    Portland Maine 2020 Ranked-Choice Voting for City Council and School Board Measure Adopt 81.24% 18.76%
    Approveda
    Boulder Colorado 2020 Measure 2E: Ranked-Choice Voting for Mayor Amendment Adopt 78.14% 21.86%
    Approveda
    Albany California 2020 Measure BB: Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 73.27% 26.73%
    Approveda
    Eureka California 2020 Measure C: Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment Adopt 61.05% 38.95%
    Approveda
    Easthampton Massachusetts 2019 Question 1: Ranked-Choice Voting for Mayor Measure Adopt 55.32% 44.68%
    Approveda
    Easthampton Massachusetts 2019 Question 2: Ranked-Choice Voting for City Council Measure Adopt 55.62% 44.38%
    Approveda
    Lowell Massachusetts 2019 Question 1: Ranked-Choice Voting Advisory Question Adopt 49.07% 50.93%
    Defeatedd
    New York City New York 2019 Ballot Question 1: Elections Charter Amendment Adopt 73.61% 26.39%
    Approveda
    Memphis Tennessee 2018 Referendum Ordinance No. 5669: Repeal of Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Repeal 37.41% 62.59%
    Defeatedd
    Santa Clara California 2018 Measure A: District Council Elections and Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment Adopt 47.78% 52.22%
    Defeatedd
    Amherst Massachusetts 2018 Amherst Home Rule Charter, Ballot Initiatives, and Ranked-Choice Voting Commission Amendment Adopt 58.43% 41.57%
    Approveda
    Benton County Oregon 2016 Measure 2-100: Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 54.18% 45.82%
    Approveda
    Duluth Minnesota 2015 Question 2: Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative Adopt 25.30% 74.70%
    Defeatedd
    Fort Collins Colorado 2011 Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative Adopt 38.63% 61.37%
    Defeatedd
    Burlington Vermont 2010 Question 5: Repeal of Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Repeal 51.98% 48.02%
    Approveda
    Portland Maine 2010 Question 1: Ranked-Choice Voting for Mayor Measure Adopt 52.29% 47.71%
    Approveda
    Aspen Colorado 2010 Aspen Referendum 2B: Repeal of Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Repeal 65.28% 34.72%
    Approveda
    Aspen Colorado 2009 Referendum 2A: Continue Ranked-Choice Voting Advisory Question Adopt 49.78% 50.22%
    Defeatedd
    Pierce County Washington 2009 Amendment 3: Repeal of Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Repeal 70.65% 29.35%
    Approveda
    St. Paul Minnesota 2009 Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 52.45% 47.55%
    Approveda
    Cincinnati Ohio 2008 Issue 8:Proportional Representation for City Council Initiative Adopt 47.24% 52.76%
    Defeatedd
    Glendale Arizona 2008 Proposition 404: Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative Adopt 45.20% 54.80%
    Defeatedd
    Memphis Tennessee 2008 Referendum 5: Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 70.70% 29.30%
    Approveda
    Santa Fe New Mexico 2008 Amendment 5: Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 65.02% 34.98%
    Approveda
    Telluride Colorado 2008 Question 202: Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative Adopt 67.08% 32.92%
    Approveda
    Aspen Colorado 2007 Referendum 2E: Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 76.78% 23.22%
    Approveda
    Clallam County Washington 2007 Amendment 1: Allow for Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 45.38% 54.62%
    Defeatedd
    Sarasota Florida 2007 Question 2: Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative Adopt 77.61% 22.39%
    Approveda
    Springfield Illinois 2007 Ranked-Choice Voting for Military and Overseas Voters Measure Adopt 91.01% 8.99%
    Approveda
    Pierce County Washington 2006 Amendment 3: Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 52.93% 47.07%
    Approveda
    Minneapolis Minnesota 2006 Question 1: Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment Adopt 64.95% 35.05%
    Approveda
    Oakland California 2006 Measure O: Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment (November 2006) Adopt 68.63% 31.37%
    Approveda
    Davis California 2006 Measure L: Multi-Winner Ranked-Choice Voting Advisory Question Adopt 55.41% 44.59%
    Approveda
    Burlington Vermont 2005 Question 5: Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 64.46% 35.54%
    Approveda
    Takoma Park Maryland 2005 Ranked-Choice Voting Advisory Question Adopt 83.63% 16.37%
    Approveda
    Ferndale Michigan 2004 Proposal B: Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 69.75% 30.25%
    Approveda
    Berkeley California 2004 Measure I: Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 72.25% 27.75%
    Approveda
    Carbondale Colorado 2003 Home Rule Charter and Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment Adopt 80.06% 19.94%
    Approveda
    Basalt Colorado 2002 Referendum 2A: Home Rule Charter and Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment Adopt 74.44% 25.56%
    Approveda
    San Francisco California 2002 Proposition A: Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 55.48% 44.52%
    Approveda
    Eugene Oregon 2001 Measure 20-51: Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 34.41% 65.59%
    Defeatedd
    San Leandro California 2000 Measure F: Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 63.05% 36.95%
    Approveda
    Vancouver Washington 1999 Amendment 1: Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 52.91% 47.09%
    Approveda
    Multnomah County Oregon 1998 Measure 26-85: Repeal Election Runoff Requirement and Allow RCV Measure Adopt 40.07% 59.93%
    Defeatedd
    Santa Clara County California 1998 Measure F: Allow for Ordinance for Ranked-Choice Voting Measure Adopt 53.93% 46.07%
    Approveda
    San Francisco California 1996 Proposition H: Preference Voting for Board of Supervisors Measure Adopt 43.60% 56.40%
    Defeatedd
    Cincinnati Ohio 1991 Issue 6: Proportional Representation for City Council Amendment Adopt 44.84% 55.16%
    Defeatedd
    Cincinnati Ohio 1988 Issue 2: Proportional Representation for City Council Amendment Adopt 45.39% 54.61%
    Defeatedd
    Ann Arbor Michigan 1976 Proposal B: Repeal of Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative Repeal 62.43% 37.57%
    Approveda
    Ann Arbor Michigan 1974 Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative Adopt 52.55% 47.45%
    Approveda
    Cambridge Massachusetts 1965 Question 1: Repeal of Proportional Representation Initiative Repeal 45.69% 54.31%
    Defeatedd


    See also

    Footnotes

    1. Note: Although Measure L was approved, Measure L and Measure J were conflicting ballot measures. As both received a majority of votes, the one that received the most votes was enacted. Measure J received more votes than Measure L. Therefore, Measure J was enacted and Measure L was not.