Oklahoma Intangible Tax Ban Amendment, State Question 766 (2012)
|State Question 766|
|Referred by:||Oklahoma State Legislature|
- See also: 2012 ballot measure election results
The following are official election results
|Oklahoma State Question 766|
These results are from the Oklahoma State Elections Board.
Text of the measures
The following is the ballot language that appeared on the ballot:
|“|| This measure amends Section 6A of Article 10 of the Oklahoma Constitution. At present that section exempts some intangible personal property from ad valorem property taxation. This measure would exempt all intangible personal property from ad valorem property taxation.
An ad valorem property tax is a tax imposed upon the value of property.
Intangible Personal Property is property whose value is not derived from its physical attributes, but rather from what it represents or evidences.
Intangible Personal Property which is still currently taxed but would not be taxed if the measure is adopted, includes items such as:
If adopted, the measure would apply to property taxation starting with the tax year that begins on January 1, 2013.
Shall the proposal be approved?
For the proposal - Yes
Against the proposal - No
According to state reports, the question stemmed from a lawsuit by Southwestern Bell Telephone complaining with the Court of Tax Review of the ad valorem tax assessments of its property by the State Board of Equalization from 2005-2007
After a settlement was reached, there was still the matter to be resolved of Southwestern Bell’s claim that all of its intangible property was exempt from ad valorem taxation. Reports said that both parties involved in the lawsuit stated that this was up to the interpretation of law by the Court of Tax Review.
Then, the Court ruled that only the intangible property set forth in the Oklahoma Constitution was exempt. Southwestern Bell appealed the ruling, but was the appeal was dismissed.
After this ruling, members of the business community in the state, particularly a coalition of Chamber of Commerce and other businesses in the state, pressured lawmakers to bring the issue to a vote.
- Norman Chamber of Commerce President John Woods stated, “The court was very specific in its requirement that all intangible property not currently exempted should be taxed. One assessor’s opinion, unfortunately, is not enough guarantee to prevent a massive tax burden to be imposed on local businesses.”
- Woods also stated, "If the state question fails, it would result in one of the largest tax increases on businesses in state history. There is already a growing coalition of businesses that support this exemption."
- According to a post by Americans for Tax Reform, when speaking about this measure and State Question 758, "If passed, both measures will help increase economic growth and provide Oklahomans with some much needed relief in mid the current economic uncertainty. Prohibiting the taxation of intangible property and capping property tax increases to three percent is necessary to assist Oklahoma in a full economic recovery.
- Norman School Superintendent Joe Siano stated, "State Question 766 alone would have about a $600,000 impact on schools and it’s about a $33 million impact to public schools in general. You can take each one of these tax reductions independently and say, ‘that’s not going to hurt very much,’ but when you take them together and couple it with the fact that schools are being funded at less than 2008 levels, I think you’re facing a critical problem."
- Tax specialist Michelle Cantrell stated in her blog about the measure, "SQ 766 has widespread implications that could drain tens of millions of dollars from schools, fire and police protection, and other vital services, while potentially boosting homeowners’ property taxes. As our economy has become more service- and technology-oriented, the value of a company is increasingly based upon intangible assets. In 1975, intangible assets comprised around 2 percent of the net asset book value of S&P 500 companies; by 2005, it was over 40 percent, and the trend is likely to continue. If SQ 766 passes, Oklahoma will find itself increasingly limited in its ability to tax properties.”
Path to the ballot
The Oklahoma State Legislature can approve a proposed amendment by a majority vote. However, if the state legislature wants the proposed amendment to go on a special election ballot, it has to approve the amendment by a 2/3rds vote.
The measure was approved by the Oklahoma State Senate on May 22, 2012 with a vote of 31 to 14, sending it to the Oklahoma House of Representatives for a full vote, where it was also approved for ballot access.
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 News 9.com, "Oklahoma Lawmakers Seek Vote On Intangible Tax Ban", May 22, 2012
- ↑ Oklahoma Board of Elections, "Oklahoma State Questions 2012", Retrieved October 3, 2012
- ↑ Norman Transcript, "Why is State Question 766 on the ballot?", September 15, 2012
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Claremore Progress, "SQ 766 - Ballot question stacking up as hot-button item", September 18, 2012
- ↑ ATR.org, "Ballot Measures Would Provide Needed Tax Relief for Oklahoma", Retrieved October 1, 2012
State of Oklahoma
Oklahoma City (capital)
|State executive officers||
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Treasurer | State Auditor and Inspector | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Commissioner of Insurance | Commissioner of Agriculture | Director of Wildlife Conservation | Commissioner of Labor | Commissioner of Corporations |