Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
Iowa's 3rd Congressional District election, 2020
- Election date: Nov. 3
- Registration deadline(s): Oct. 24
- Online registration: Yes
- Same-day registration: Yes
- Recount laws
- Early voting starts: Oct. 5
- Absentee/mail voting deadline(s): Nov. 2 (postmarked); Nov. 9 (received)
- Processing, counting, and challenging absentee/mail-in ballots
- Voter ID: Non-photo ID
- Poll times: 7 a.m. to 9 p.m
2022 →
← 2018
|
Iowa's 3rd Congressional District |
---|
Democratic primary Republican primary General election |
Election details |
Filing deadline: March 13, 2020 |
Primary: June 2, 2020 General: November 3, 2020 Pre-election incumbent: Cindy Axne (Democrat) |
How to vote |
Poll times: 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. Voting in Iowa |
Race ratings |
Inside Elections: Lean Democratic Sabato's Crystal Ball: Lean Democratic |
Ballotpedia analysis |
U.S. Senate battlegrounds U.S. House battlegrounds Federal and state primary competitiveness Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2020 |
See also |
U.S. Senate • 1st • 2nd • 3rd • 4th Iowa elections, 2020 U.S. Congress elections, 2020 U.S. Senate elections, 2020 U.S. House elections, 2020 |
Incumbent Rep. Cindy Axne (D) defeated David Young (R) and Bryan Holder (L) in the general election for Iowa's 3rd Congressional District on November 3, 2020.
The race was one of 56 U.S. House rematches from 2018. In 2018, Axne defeated incumbent Young, receiving 49% of the vote to Young's 47%. In 2016, Young won re-election against Jim Mowrer (D) 53% to 40%. Before the 2018 election, the district had been represented by a Republican since 2013.
The 3rd District was one of 31 U.S. House districts that Donald Trump (R) won in the 2016 presidential election and a Democratic candidate won in the 2018 midterm elections. During the presidential election, Trump received 49% of the vote to Hillary Clinton's (D) 45% in the 3rd District. In the 2012 and 2008 presidential elections, Obama won a majority of the vote in the district.[1]
Both the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the National Republican Congressional Committee prioritized this race.[2][3] Former President Barack Obama (D) endorsed Axne and President Donald Trump (R) endorsed Young.[4][5]
The outcome of this race affected partisan control of the U.S. House of Representatives in the 117th Congress. All 435 seats in the House were up for election. At the time of the election, Democrats had a 232 to 198 majority over Republicans. The Libertarian Party had one seat. Four seats were vacant. Democrats defended 30 districts Donald Trump (R) won in 2016. Republicans defended five districts Hillary Clinton (D) won in 2016.
Iowa's 3rd Congressional District covers an area in the southwestern corner of Iowa. Polk, Dallas, Guthrie, Warren, Madison, Adair, Cass, Pottawattamie, Mills, Fremont, Page, Montgomery, Taylor, Adams, Union and Ringgold counties are included in this district.[6]
This race was one of 89 congressional races that were decided by 10 percent or less in 2020.
For more information about the Democratic primary, click here.
For more information about the Republican primary, click here.
Post-election analysis
The table below compares the vote totals in the 2020 presidential election and 2020 U.S. House election for this district. The presidential election data was compiled by Daily Kos.
Presidential and congressional election results, Iowa's 3rd Congressional District, 2020 | ||
---|---|---|
Race | Presidential | U.S. House |
Democratic candidate ![]() |
49 | 48.9 |
Republican candidate ![]() |
49.2 | 47.5 |
Difference | 0.2 | 1.4 |
Election procedure changes in 2020
Ballotpedia provided comprehensive coverage of how election dates and procedures changed in 2020. While the majority of changes occurred as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, some changes occurred for other reasons.
Iowa modified its absentee/mail-in voting procedures for the November 3, 2020, general election as follows:
- Absentee/mail-in voting: Absentee ballot application forms were sent to all registered voters in the general election.
For a full timeline about election modifications made in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, click here.
Candidates and election results
General election
General election for U.S. House Iowa District 3
Incumbent Cindy Axne defeated David Young and Bryan Holder in the general election for U.S. House Iowa District 3 on November 3, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Cindy Axne (D) | 48.9 | 219,205 |
David Young (R) | 47.5 | 212,997 | ||
![]() | Bryan Holder (L) | 3.4 | 15,361 | |
Other/Write-in votes | 0.1 | 384 |
Total votes: 447,947 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House Iowa District 3
Incumbent Cindy Axne advanced from the Democratic primary for U.S. House Iowa District 3 on June 2, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Cindy Axne | 99.2 | 76,681 |
Other/Write-in votes | 0.8 | 623 |
Total votes: 77,304 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House Iowa District 3
David Young defeated Bill Schafer in the Republican primary for U.S. House Iowa District 3 on June 2, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | David Young | 69.5 | 39,103 | |
![]() | Bill Schafer ![]() | 30.1 | 16,904 | |
Other/Write-in votes | 0.4 | 227 |
Total votes: 56,234 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
Candidate profiles
This section includes candidate profiles created in one of two ways. Either the candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey or Ballotpedia staff created a profile after identifying the candidate as noteworthy.[7] Ballotpedia staff compiled profiles based on campaign websites, advertisements, and public statements.
Party: Democratic Party
Incumbent: Yes
Political Office:
- U.S. House (Assumed office: 2019)
Biography: Axne received a bachelor’s degree in journalism from the University of Iowa and a master of business administration from the Kellogg School at Northwestern University. Axne’s professional experience included working as a manager of leadership development at the Chicago Tribune Media Group, working for the Iowa state government from 2005 to 2014, and running a digital design firm.
Show sources
Sources: YouTube, "Came Through," July 27, 2020; YouTube, "Delivered," August 18, 2020; YouTube, "Understand," accessed October 7, 2020; Cindy Axne's 2020 campaign website, "Issues," accessed October 13, 2020; Cindy Axne's 2020 campaign website, "Meet Cindy," accessed October 13, 2020; LinkedIn, "Cindy Axne," accessed October 13, 2020
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House Iowa District 3 in 2020.
Party: Republican Party
Incumbent: No
Political Office:
- U.S. House (2015-2019)
Biography: Young received a bachelor’s degree in English from Drake University. His professional experience included working as a manager loan trainee at Norwest Financial and a development officer at the Media Research Center. From 1998 to 2006, Young worked as Senator Jim Bunning’s (R) legislative director and chief of staff, and from 2006 to 2013 he worked as Senator Chuck Grassley’s (R) chief of staff.
Show sources
Sources: KCCI Des Moines, "Rep. Cindy Axne, David Young face off during 3rd District debate," October 12, 2020; David Young's 2020 campaign website, "Issues," accessed October 13, 2020; Des Moines Register, "Meet the Candidate: Iowa U.S. House 3rd District: David Young, Republican," May 9, 2014; David Young's 2020 campaign website, "Meet David," accessed October 13, 2020
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House Iowa District 3 in 2020.
Polls
- See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls
Iowa's 3rd Congressional District election, 2020: General election polls | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Date | ![]() |
![]() |
Other | Margin of error | Sample size | Sponsor |
Monmouth University | October 15-20, 2020 | 52% | 43% | 5% | ±4.8 | 426 | -- |
Monmouth University | July 25-August 3, 2020 | 48% | 42% | 10% | ±4.4 | 507 | -- |
Campaign finance
This section contains campaign finance figures from the Federal Election Commission covering all candidate fundraising and spending in this election.[8] It does not include information on fundraising before the current campaign cycle or on spending by satellite groups. The numbers in this section are updated as candidates file new campaign finance reports. Candidates for Congress are required to file financial reports on a quarterly basis, as well as two weeks before any primary, runoff, or general election in which they will be on the ballot and upon the termination of any campaign committees.[9] The chart below contains data from financial reports submitted to the Federal Election Commission.
Name | Party | Receipts* | Disbursements** | Cash on hand | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cindy Axne | Democratic Party | $6,294,903 | $6,294,921 | $19,521 | As of December 31, 2020 |
David Young | Republican Party | $3,215,370 | $3,139,879 | $88,291 | As of December 31, 2020 |
Bryan Holder | Libertarian Party | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
Source: Federal Elections Commission, "Campaign finance data," 2020. This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* According to the FEC, "Receipts are anything of value (money, goods, services or property) received by a political committee." |
District analysis
- See also: The Cook Political Report's Partisan Voter Index
- See also: FiveThirtyEight's elasticity scores
The 2017 Cook Partisan Voter Index for this district was R+1, meaning that in the previous two presidential elections, this district's results were 1 percentage points more Republican than the national average. This made Iowa's 3rd Congressional District the 226th most Republican nationally.[10]
FiveThirtyEight's September 2018 elasticity score for states and congressional districts measured "how sensitive it is to changes in the national political environment." This district's elasticity score was 1.00. This means that for every 1 point the national political mood moved toward a party, the district was expected to move 1.00 points toward that party.[11]
Race ratings
- See also: Race rating definitions and methods
Ballotpedia provides race ratings from four outlets: The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections, Sabato's Crystal Ball, and DDHQ/The Hill. Each race rating indicates if one party is perceived to have an advantage in the race and, if so, the degree of advantage:
- Safe and Solid ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge and the race is not competitive.
- Likely ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge, but an upset is possible.
- Lean ratings indicate that one party has a small edge, but the race is competitive.[12]
- Toss-up ratings indicate that neither party has an advantage.
Race ratings are informed by a number of factors, including polling, candidate quality, and election result history in the race's district or state.[13][14][15]
Race ratings: Iowa's 3rd Congressional District election, 2020 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Race tracker | Race ratings | ||||||||
November 3, 2020 | October 27, 2020 | October 20, 2020 | October 13, 2020 | ||||||
The Cook Political Report | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | |||||
Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | Tilt Democratic | |||||
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | |||||
Note: Ballotpedia updates external race ratings every week throughout the election season. |
Noteworthy endorsements
Click the links below to see endorsement lists published on candidate campaign websites, if available.
Noteworthy endorsements | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endorsement | Axne (D) | Young (R) | ||||
Newspapers and editorials | ||||||
Des Moines Register[16] | ✔ | |||||
Elected officials | ||||||
Governor Kim Reynolds (R)[17] | ✔ | |||||
President Donald Trump (R)[4] | ✔ | |||||
Individuals | ||||||
Former Vice President Joe Biden (D)[5] | ✔ | |||||
Former Representative Tom Latham (R)[17] | ✔ | |||||
Former Representative Jim Ross Lightfoot (R)[17] | ✔ | |||||
Former President Barack Obama (D)[5] | ✔ | |||||
Organizations | ||||||
U.S. Chamber of Commerce[18] | ✔ |
Timeline
2020
Campaign advertisements
This section shows advertisements released in this race. Ads released by campaigns and, if applicable, satellite groups are embedded or linked below. If you are aware of advertisements that should be included, please email us.
Cindy Axne
Supporting Axne
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opposing Young
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Young
Supporting Young
|
Opposing Axne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite group ads
Opposing Axne
|
Opposing Young
|
Campaign themes
- See also: Campaign themes
Cindy Axne
Axne’s campaign website stated the following:
“ |
Cindy’s top priority in Washington is putting Iowa families to work in good-paying jobs. She’s working to level the playing field by raising wages, protecting our unions, addressing unfair trade deals that put our workers at risk, and promoting Main Street over Wall Street. For too long, Washington politicians have put politics before Iowa families. Their failure to act has hurt the most vulnerable in our communities and hindered our small business owners and entrepreneurs from starting and growing businesses. As a small business owner, Cindy understands the challenges facing Iowans. She is fighting for our local communities by creating grant programs to support entrepreneurs and small businesses, and passing tax relief so our small businesses can grow. Cindy is also fighting to pass equal pay legislation. Here in Iowa, women and their families are losing a combined income of nearly $5 billion each year. Cindy also supports a National Paid Family Leave Act, so no one risks losing a day’s pay to care for a sick child or loved one. And, she’s fighting to increase the availability of affordable childcare so working families can save for their children’s future. In Congress, Cindy has helped grow our economy by:
Cindy was one of thousands of Iowans who received a letter from Aetna notifying her that her family would no longer be able to receive healthcare from the company. It was the third such letter in nearly four years, each one forcing Cindy to scramble to find a new plan that they could afford, while the clock was ticking down on their coverage. Sadly, her family’s story is not unique. Every day, Cindy hears stories of families leaving their businesses for health insurance or families forced to move out of Iowa because they can no longer afford health insurance here. In Congress, Cindy is fighting for a public option that allows Americans to buy into Medicare so that every American has access to affordable, high-quality healthcare. Cindy is working to maintain and improve the Affordable Care Act, stop House Republicans from allowing the return of lifetime limits, make sure that people cannot be discriminated against for having a pre-existing condition, and lower costs including prescription drugs. Finally, Iowa ranks dead last for state psychiatric beds per capita; that’s unacceptable. That’s why Cindy is working to increase funding for our mental health facilities. In Congress, Cindy serves on the Healthcare Task Force and has increased access to quality, affordable healthcare by:
As a mother of two sons in public schools, Cindy understands the importance of a high-quality education. It’s why she fought to pass all day public kindergarten after finding out that West Des Moines’ lottery system meant that half the children in the community were denied access to all day public kindergarten and received two and a half hours of education instead. For America to continue to lead the way in the global economy, it’s time we reinvest in our public schools. We must prepare our children to compete in a global market by promoting STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) programs that enable students to graduate with the skills they need to be successful in today’s workforce. Preparing the next generation for good-paying jobs that support a family requires providing young people with affordable access to community college, apprenticeships, trade schools, and four-year colleges. Cindy is fighting for a greater investment in our community colleges, and to grow apprenticeship programs and trade schools so that every student has the opportunity to succeed. She is working to expand Pell Grants and cap the interest rates on student loans so that Wall Street banks aren’t profiting by burdening young people with debt that will take them decades to repay. In Congress, Cindy has supported education by:
Cindy knows our immigration system is broken and that both parties in Washington have failed to act. In Congress, Cindy is working with Democrats and Republicans to pass bipartisan immigration reform that will strengthen border security, hold employers who hire undocumented immigrants accountable, and provide a pathway to citizenship for individuals who pay their taxes and don’t have a criminal record. Cindy believes that comprehensive reform must start with strengthening our borders. We need stronger vetting, more agents on the border, and innovative technology, including aerial drones, in order to better secure our borders and save taxpayer dollars. As a mother of two children, Cindy does not believe that children should be punished for the decisions made by their parents. Cindy supports passing the DREAM Act in order to stop the deportation of people who entered the country as children, graduated high school, and attended college or joined the military. In Congress, Cindy has helped fix our broken immigration system by:
As a fifth-generation Iowan, with farm roots in Warren County, Cindy understands the importance of supporting our rural areas. In Congress, she is fighting to rebuild our infrastructure, grow our rural economies, protect our farmers and maintain our rural quality of life. Cindy is standing up for Iowa’s family farms and that starts by ensuring the Farm Bill works for all farmers, especially new farmers and small to mid-size farms. For our rural communities to be competitive, we must reinvest in a solid infrastructure. That means repairing our roads and nearly 5,000 structurally deficient bridges, water and sewer systems, and finally making sure that everyone has access to cellular and broadband technology. Not only will that fix our infrastructure, but it will create thousands of jobs in the process. Iowa can be the leader in sustainable agriculture and renewable energy. While Cindy worked at the State of Iowa, she oversaw the Governor’s Agenda on Clean Energy and the Environment, helping to bring the wind industry to scale in Iowa. In Congress, Cindy is fighting to increase research and development in the areas of soil health, carbon sequestration, and water quality to clean up our water, improve soil for better yields, and create jobs in the process. In order to protect our rural quality of life, Cindy is fighting to protect Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates, so our rural hospitals can continue to operate and serve those who are at risk. She is fighting for funding for our public schools so they can retain quality educators, keep up with technology, and bring in more trades and apprenticeship programs for our children. She’s working to protect and grow our Main Streets by providing tax breaks for our micro businesses that make up 92% of all U.S. Businesses. Cindy is working with local communities to increase cellular and broadband access in rural communities so that employers can bring good paying jobs to our small towns. In Congress, Cindy has supported our rural communities by:
Climate change is real, and we are feeling the devastating effects. It’s already hurting America’s economy and it will only get worse if we don’t act. We have seen it first hand here in Iowa, with crippling droughts and floods putting our food supply and farmers’ livelihoods at stake. In Washington, Cindy is fighting to protect our environment and invest in renewable energy. Cindy is proud of her work on the Governor’s Agenda for Energy Efficiency and a Clean Environment, which helped bring the wind industry to scale and made Iowa the number two state in the nation in wind energy production. She’s working to bring clean energy jobs to Iowa, including solar, wind, smart grid technology, and battery storage. She is also promoting investment in more efficient cars, appliances, buildings, and industrial plants to cut energy use in half. In Congress, Cindy has protected our environment by:
Too many politicians are in the pocket of Washington special interests — and Iowa families are worse off because of it. People across Iowa feel like Congress isn’t working for them. If we’re going to fix our healthcare system, lower prescription drug costs, and build a stronger economy, we’ve got to end the pay-to-play politics and corruption that rig the system against hardworking Iowa families. Cindy introduced a seven-point plan to get money out of politics. The plan includes proposals to implement automatic voter registration at age 18, commit to holding regular town halls and publicize open meetings, require company boards to disclose political activities, improve government transparency and accountability, and end abuse of Congressional perks and information. In Congress, Cindy has worked to strengthen democracy by:
Here in Iowa and around the country, we have seen women’s rights attacked. In 2017, Iowa lost four Planned Parenthood healthcare facilities leaving over 14,000 women and men without primary care services. That’s unacceptable. As a member of Congress, Cindy is fighting to keep Washington politicians out of the personal decisions between women and their doctors. That’s why Cindy is working to ensure that Planned Parenthood funding continues, allowing women and men to continue to receive vital healthcare services. In Congress, Cindy has supported Woman’s Reproductive Rights by:
It’s been our commitment for the last 70 years; if you work hard and pay your taxes, Social Security and Medicare will be there for you when you retire. But Donald Trump’s budgets try to cut Medicare and privatize it, threatening seniors who have worked hard and paid into these systems. Cindy is working to stop Trump, honoring the promises we’ve made to seniors. As a volunteer for years with Little Brothers, Friends of the Elderly, Cindy’s seen up close how much our seniors depend on Social Security and Medicare. In Congress, Cindy is fighting Republican efforts to privatize and defund these programs so our seniors and families can live their lives with dignity. In Congress, Cindy has supported older Americans by:
Iowa’s 3rd Congressional District is home to over 40,000 veterans. These brave Iowans put their lives on the line here and abroad to keep our country safe. But we are letting them down by not doing our duty to provide them with the healthcare, support, and job opportunities to succeed in civilian life. Cindy is fighting to ensure veterans get the physical and mental healthcare they need, as well as sorely-needed skills training and job opportunities. In Congress, Cindy has supported our veterans by:
Cindy was proud when Iowa led the way on marriage equality, and now it’s the law of the land in America. But, the fight for equality is not over. Every day our family members, friends, and co-workers face discrimination in the workforce and their personal lives. Cindy is fighting to crack down on discrimination against LGBTQ Americans, and to defend the hard-won LGBTQ protections that are under assault in Washington. Cindy was proud to receive the Ally of the Year award in 2019 for her leadership in the LGBTQ community from Iowa Safe Schools, whose mission is to provide safe, supportive, and nurturing learning environments and communities for LGBTQ & allied youth. In Congress, Cindy has supported the LGBTQ community by:
|
” |
—Cindy Axne’s campaign website (2020)[24] |
David Young
Young’s campaign website stated the following:
“ |
Our economy was thriving and growing until most small businesses and larger employers were forced to shut down because of the COVID-19 pandemic. This hurt business owners, workers, entrepreneurs, investors, and consumers. While our economy is making its way back - we know what works to create a growing economy with low unemployment, high job participation, investment, increased revenues, and put more money in the pockets of hardworking Iowans. We must keep taxes low and more of a worker’s paycheck in their own pockets. Now is not the time to pain to any families struggling to make their budget. I trust Iowans with their money. Iowans know how to spend their money better than the federal government. I voted for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 which helped Iowa’s economy by helping Iowa’s workers keep more of their paychecks. Also, keeping a check on onerous, burdensome, one-size-fits-all federal rules and regulations will give businesses more freedom to bounce back, and is a priority of mine. While well intended, there are too many rules and regulations which cause more harm than good, are outdated, and can harm our economy, and more fundamentally, our liberties. The regulatory regime in any administration needs to be held accountable and transparent. I support requiring a Congressional vote on all rules and regulations, before they go into effect. Also, those who author and create rules and regulations must publicly reveal who they are by signing their names at the end of each proposed rule and regulation. Shouldn’t we know those who influence what we can and can’t do? And finally, we also must have a robust free and fair trade agenda. We have the best workers in America. And we have incredible products and valuable services. We just need markets to sell them in. Low taxation, reduced rules and regulations, a robust trade agenda, and long-term certainty of what the economic playing field looks like will help ensure a strong economy for our Iowa families.
I’m for an “all of the above” energy strategy and policy, and for producing as much of our energy as we can right here at home. This will also allow us to export energy and fuels. Iowa has helped lead the way in the cutting edge renewable fuels industry. Our renewable fuels industry is great for Iowa’s economy, our consumers, and our families. It creates good paying jobs, helps Iowans save money on their energy bills, benefits the environment by producing cleaner fuels, and it’s good for our national security by helping us become more energy independent as a nation and not dependent on other countries for our energy and fuel needs. I will always look out for our renewable fuels industries - solar, wind, geothermal, bio-fuels - here in Iowa, and work to incentivize new technologies. I’m especially proud of our farmers and agricultural industry - they are not only helping to feed America, but they’re helping to fuel America, too. We need a consistent and level playing field so our producers and farmers can plan and expand their businesses and have certainty from year to year. I will oppose efforts to weaken the law for the use of bio-fuels and stand up to any administration trying to diminish the use of bio-fuels and favor the petroleum industry.
We owe our safety and security as a nation to our veterans. They are our heroes and they and their families deserve accolades for their sacrifice. More than accolades, they deserve to be cared for by a grateful nation and her people. Veterans deserve and should receive the best healthcare for their physical, emotional, and mental health needs. And when they are not able to receive a needed service at one of our veterans hospitals or clinics, they should be able to choose the provider or specialist they need nearby at any given time. In Congress, I wrote the bipartisan bill to help fix the Veterans Crisis Line and bring accountability to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for our veterans with emotional and mental wounds. I will continue to push for accountability within the VA to ensure our veterans receive the attention and care they deserve. I am also proud to partner with veterans and community leaders in southwest Iowa to help in expediting the construction of the new Community Based Outpatient Clinic (CBOC) in Shenandoah.
Social Security and Medicare are sacred promises made between the federal government and our great seniors. I will always protect and work to strengthen those important promises and programs for our seniors. And I will join my colleagues across the aisle in a bipartisan and transparent way to preserve and strengthen Social Security and Medicare. Over a lifetime of labor, Americans have paid into these programs and are relying on them to be there when they retire. It’s also important to note, these are not ‘entitlements’. These are funds owned by, and owed back to, Americans in their golden years. Trustees of Social Security and Medicare have reported underfunding in these programs. If nothing is done to strengthen them and shore them up, by 2034 beneficiaries will only receive 75% of the benefits owed to them. That is simply unacceptable. I have been, and will continue to be, a strong ally for our seniors in Washington, D.C., to ensure they receive all the benefits they were promised and guaranteed.
Agriculture is a major part of Iowa’s heritage and history, as well as a major part of Iowa’s economy. Farmers and producers need the freedom to farm and access to many trading partners and markets, under a policy of low taxation and commonsense rules and regulations. We need to honor, encourage, and incentivize family farming. This can be done by eliminating the death tax, so a family farm can be passed down from generation to generation without part of it being sold off, split apart, and reduced. I support expanding loan assistance to the beginning farmer for land purchase, conservation enhancements, and machinery. Farming and producing can be a stressful job, and we must address the reality that mental health and other health care needs for many farmers can be many miles away, making access to care a real challenge.
Healthcare is a serious and personal issue to Iowans and their families. Politicians should never play politics with the health of our families. Our healthcare system is struggling. It’s broken. It’s too expensive, bureaucratic, complex, and confusing. Our doctors, nurses, and healthcare workers spend more time filling out government paperwork and dealing with insurance companies than they do with what they ventured into the field for - to help people and try to improve their health and lives. Those with pre-existing conditions should not be discriminated against and denied healthcare, nor should those with pre-existing conditions be priced differently. Unfortunately, there are those who want to demagogue this issue. Republicans, Democrats, Independents, and everyone in between, support access to affordable and quality care for those who have pre-existing conditions. Iowans have a right to pursue options and have choice with their healthcare coverage and providers. Choice come from a marketplace. A marketplace brings price transparency. Price transparency brings competitive pricing. And overall, this competition brings quality, affordable, and accessible healthcare. This is especially effective when Iowans are empowered with their health care dollars through a Health Savings Account or should those on the Affordable Care Act be personally empowered with their subsidy dollars instead of the insurance companies. This can also apply to helping to bring down the price of prescription drugs, especially by protecting and encouraging generic drugs as an alternative to name brands in the marketplace. I oppose a one-sized fits all government run healthcare system where private insurance is abolished and made illegal and the government instructs Iowans where and when they can receive medical attention. This invites rationing of healthcare and giving preferential treatment to those in better health. Most Iowans receive their healthcare through their employer, and they do not want to lose it. And veterans don’t want their Veterans Affairs coverage taken away. Nor do seniors want Medicare to go away or do those most vulnerable on Medicaid want to see it abolished. All lives, whether they have a disability or are in good overall heath, deserve choice in care and coverage.
We have an obligation to be good stewards of the land, air, and water and ensure future generations can prosper in a clean environment. And we can do it without a massive government intervention, such as the Green New Deal, which would absolutely decimate our economy and hurt the livelihood of our families. Our farmers and producers understand the need of protecting our soil and water, and we can help create an environment where best practices are shared and improved among everyone. Water conservation and quality is important to all Iowans. I have a record of promoting bipartisan water quality solutions and bringing players to the same table, from Des Moines Water Works to the Iowa Farm Bureau to support the same goals and solutions. And by incentivizing new practices or technologies, such as carbon sequestrations, we can promote cleaner burning renewable fuels. And Iowa can play a lead in this new economic engine, while helping the environment, creating new jobs, and making us more energy independent.
Education standards and the best decisions for our children in our classrooms must remain at the local level and not be made in a building in Washington, D.C. While those at the U.S. Department of Education may have good intentions for Iowa’s children, many of those working there have never even been in a classroom. And they see Iowa’s kids as a statistic and datapoint rather than a child with a smile and personality. This is why I supported the bipartisan repeal of the “No Child Left Behind” law and returned power and decisions about what was taught in the classroom back to the state and local levels where parents and teachers can have more input. Simply put, the most impactful decisions on a child’s education should be made as close to that child as possible with parents, teachers, and local school administrators making the decisions for the classroom. This is where there is more accountability - where a teacher knows the child’s name and hears that child’s voice.
Above K-12, I have and will continue to support funding for higher education loans and grants to provide educational assistance to those wishing to continue their education past high school. And I will seek to find workable solutions to the student loan debt issue, such as loan forgiveness in return for college graduates working in unserved or underserved geographic areas with needs in a certain career field; such as a teacher, nurse, or doctor. We must also ensure this student loan crisis doesn’t happen to future generations, and find ways to bring down the costs of higher education through better education of student loan requirements, increased use of community colleges for affordable college credits, and greater transparency and accountability for how tuition dollars are used.
We need to find ways to address the lack of quality and affordable childcare for working parents. Parents work hard, and it’s not always easy coming up with the funds for childcare or even seeing the point of working if they can’t get ahead of the costs. I support giving families relief through the tax code - whether it’s dealing with tax credits or tax deductibility - relating to the cost of childcare. There are already different proposals and options addressing childcare through this manner and I will work with my future colleagues and parents to find the best proposal to help families financially. And with a proposal set into law to help families, it will also help incentivize the formation or expansion of childcare provider services and businesses. This is a win-win for everyone.
Our immigration system is broken and desperately needs to be addressed. We must acknowledge respect for the rule of law and enforce the laws. America is the land of opportunity with offers to economically provide for one’s family. Yet, there is a right way to come here, and a wrong way to come here. But we can’t have an open border. And if we don’t like the laws, then Congress needs to work to legislatively change it. I have supported and continue to support efforts to decrease illegal immigration. A lot of this has to do with securing the border, including enhanced border security from wall construction to increasing fencing, more help from the Coast Guard and drone surveillance, ground-penetrating radar and increased monitoring at ports of entry, and much more. I do not support blanket amnesty and citizenship for those in our country illegally. I do support a strict pathway to citizenship for those identified under Deferred Action Childhood Arrivals - known as ‘Dreamers’ - who arrived in some way as a minor and not necessarily under their own control or choice - and who are non-felons. Today, some of these ‘Dreamers’ are our neighbors, co-workers, teachers, nurses, small business owners, laborers, firefighters, police officers, preachers. They go to our houses of worship and contribute to the betterment of our communities. They are even serving in the military having sworn an oath to defend the Constitution, the United States, and her people. I have supported this pathway for ‘Dreamers’ in the past when it was incorporated in a larger bill which also included ending the visa lottery, tightening chain migration to the nuclear family, establishing an E-Verify system, and providing funding and resources for the border (including wall funding). [23] |
” |
—David Young’s campaign website (2020)[25] |
District represented by a Democrat in 2020 and won by Donald Trump in 2016
This district was one of 30 Democratic-held U.S. House districts up in 2020 that Donald Trump (R) won in the 2016 presidential election. Most were expected to be among the House's most competitive elections in 2020.
2020 Democratic-held U.S. House districts won by Donald Trump in 2016 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Incumbent | Ran in 2020? | 2018 congressional margin | 2016 presidential margin | 2012 presidential margin | ||||||||
Arizona's 1st | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+7.7 | Trump+1.1 | Romney+2.5 | ||||||||
Georgia's 6th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.0 | Trump+1.5 | Romney+23.3 | ||||||||
Illinois' 14th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+5.0 | Trump+3.9 | Romney+10 | ||||||||
Illinois' 17th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+24.2 | Trump+0.7 | Obama+17 | ||||||||
Iowa's 1st | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+5.1 | Trump+3.5 | Obama+13.7 | ||||||||
Iowa's 2nd | ![]() |
Retired | Democrats+5.2 | Trump+4.1 | Obama+13.1 | ||||||||
Iowa's 3rd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+2.2 | Trump+3.5 | Obama+4.2 | ||||||||
Maine's 2nd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.3 | Trump+10.3 | Obama+8.6 | ||||||||
Michigan's 8th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+3.8 | Trump+6.7 | Romney+3.1 | ||||||||
Michigan's 11th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+6.7 | Trump+4.4 | Romney+5.4 | ||||||||
Minnesota's 2nd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+5.5 | Trump+1.2 | Obama+0.1 | ||||||||
Minnesota's 7th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+4.3 | Trump+30.8 | Romney+9.8 | ||||||||
Nevada's 3rd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+9.1 | Trump+1.0 | Obama+0.8 | ||||||||
New Hampshire's 1st | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+8.6 | Trump+1.6 | Obama+1.6 | ||||||||
New Jersey's 3rd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.3 | Trump+6.2 | Obama+4.6 | ||||||||
New Jersey's 5th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+13.7 | Trump+1.1 | Romney+3.0 | ||||||||
New Jersey's 11th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+14.6 | Trump+0.9 | Romney+5.8 | ||||||||
New Mexico's 2nd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.9 | Trump+10.2 | Romney+6.8 | ||||||||
New York's 11th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+6.5 | Trump+9.8 | Obama+4.3 | ||||||||
New York's 18th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+10.9 | Trump+1.9 | Obama+4.3 | ||||||||
New York's 19th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+5.2 | Trump+6.8 | Obama+6.2 | ||||||||
New York's 22nd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.8 | Trump+15.5 | Romney+0.4 | ||||||||
Oklahoma's 5th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.4 | Trump+13.4 | Romney+18.4 | ||||||||
Pennsylvania's 8th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+9.3 | Trump+9.6 | Obama+11.9 | ||||||||
Pennsylvania's 17th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+12.5 | Trump+2.6 | Romney+4.5 | ||||||||
South Carolina's 1st | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.4 | Trump+13.1 | Romney+18.1 | ||||||||
Utah's 4th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+0.3 | Trump+6.7 | Romney+37.0 | ||||||||
Virginia's 2nd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+2.2 | Trump+3.4 | Romney+2.3 | ||||||||
Virginia's 7th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.9 | Trump+6.5 | Romney+10.5 | ||||||||
Wisconsin's 3rd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+19.3 | Trump+4.5 | Obama+11 | ||||||||
Source: Sabato's Crystal Ball and Daily Kos |
Click here to see the five U.S. House districts represented by a Republican in 2020 and won by Hillary Clinton in 2016.
Pivot Counties
- See also: Pivot Counties by state
Thirty-one of 99 Iowa counties—31 percent—are Pivot Counties. Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.
Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Trump margin of victory in 2016 | Obama margin of victory in 2012 | Obama margin of victory in 2008 | ||||
Allamakee County, Iowa | 24.15% | 4.17% | 14.25% | ||||
Boone County, Iowa | 13.69% | 6.64% | 7.63% | ||||
Bremer County, Iowa | 13.68% | 2.68% | 9.31% | ||||
Buchanan County, Iowa | 15.02% | 13.87% | 18.48% | ||||
Cedar County, Iowa | 17.78% | 4.59% | 9.64% | ||||
Cerro Gordo County, Iowa | 7.66% | 13.38% | 20.83% | ||||
Chickasaw County, Iowa | 22.94% | 11.07% | 20.74% | ||||
Clarke County, Iowa | 28.02% | 1.47% | 2.25% | ||||
Clayton County, Iowa | 22.78% | 7.03% | 17.17% | ||||
Clinton County, Iowa | 5.12% | 22.84% | 23.03% | ||||
Des Moines County, Iowa | 6.89% | 18.41% | 23.04% | ||||
Dubuque County, Iowa | 1.23% | 14.71% | 20.77% | ||||
Fayette County, Iowa | 19.36% | 11.96% | 16.60% | ||||
Floyd County, Iowa | 14.84% | 14.63% | 21.88% | ||||
Howard County, Iowa | 20.49% | 20.95% | 25.78% | ||||
Jackson County, Iowa | 19.27% | 16.89% | 24.39% | ||||
Jasper County, Iowa | 18.13% | 7.07% | 7.50% | ||||
Jefferson County, Iowa | 0.47% | 15.97% | 20.23% | ||||
Jones County, Iowa | 19.08% | 7.78% | 10.40% | ||||
Lee County, Iowa | 16.02% | 15.49% | 16.01% | ||||
Louisa County, Iowa | 28.37% | 0.64% | 4.25% | ||||
Marshall County, Iowa | 8.31% | 9.36% | 9.35% | ||||
Mitchell County, Iowa | 24.04% | 3.37% | 12.31% | ||||
Muscatine County, Iowa | 6.26% | 15.88% | 15.64% | ||||
Poweshiek County, Iowa | 6.53% | 9.35% | 11.75% | ||||
Tama County, Iowa | 20.28% | 7.43% | 12.19% | ||||
Union County, Iowa | 27.49% | 3.86% | 3.70% | ||||
Wapello County, Iowa | 20.60% | 11.88% | 13.53% | ||||
Webster County, Iowa | 21.52% | 5.84% | 8.51% | ||||
Winneshiek County, Iowa | 0.79% | 14.74% | 22.65% | ||||
Worth County, Iowa | 21.68% | 14.53% | 22.42% |
In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump (R) won Iowa with 51.1 percent of the vote. Hillary Clinton (D) received 41.7 percent. In presidential elections between 1848 and 2016, Iowa voted Republican 69.76 percent of the time and Democratic 30.23 percent of the time. In the five presidential elections between 2000 and 2016, Iowa voted Democratic three times and Republican the other two times.[26]
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in Iowa. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[27][28]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 61 out of 100 state House districts in Iowa with an average margin of victory of 19.1 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 35 out of 100 state House districts in Iowa with an average margin of victory of 18.8 points. Clinton won four districts controlled by Republicans heading into the 2018 elections. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 39 out of 100 state House districts in Iowa with an average margin of victory of 13.3 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 65 out of 100 state House districts in Iowa with an average margin of victory of 24.5 points. Trump won 10 districts controlled by Democrats heading into the 2018 elections. |
2016 presidential results by state House district | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control |
1 | 30.96% | 67.78% | R+36.8 | 22.23% | 73.81% | R+51.6 | R |
2 | 41.86% | 56.83% | R+15 | 27.53% | 67.70% | R+40.2 | R |
3 | 31.57% | 67.31% | R+35.7 | 20.73% | 74.78% | R+54.1 | R |
4 | 15.63% | 83.55% | R+67.9 | 12.95% | 81.67% | R+68.7 | R |
5 | 33.00% | 65.90% | R+32.9 | 22.28% | 73.69% | R+51.4 | R |
6 | 44.39% | 54.40% | R+10 | 32.54% | 62.36% | R+29.8 | R |
7 | 46.87% | 51.82% | R+5 | 31.96% | 62.86% | R+30.9 | R |
8 | 43.04% | 55.84% | R+12.8 | 28.52% | 67.11% | R+38.6 | R |
9 | 54.26% | 44.65% | D+9.6 | 39.33% | 55.29% | R+16 | D |
10 | 40.15% | 58.39% | R+18.2 | 25.64% | 69.78% | R+44.1 | R |
11 | 42.76% | 56.17% | R+13.4 | 30.87% | 64.40% | R+33.5 | R |
12 | 46.14% | 52.95% | R+6.8 | 30.92% | 64.32% | R+33.4 | R |
13 | 54.28% | 44.37% | D+9.9 | 42.30% | 52.03% | R+9.7 | D |
14 | 59.33% | 39.34% | D+20 | 47.69% | 47.27% | D+0.4 | D |
15 | 57.12% | 41.17% | D+16 | 41.89% | 51.48% | R+9.6 | D |
16 | 52.01% | 46.46% | D+5.5 | 41.84% | 51.76% | R+9.9 | R |
17 | 41.10% | 57.71% | R+16.6 | 25.76% | 70.01% | R+44.3 | R |
18 | 41.98% | 56.88% | R+14.9 | 28.11% | 67.52% | R+39.4 | R |
19 | 40.80% | 57.87% | R+17.1 | 36.54% | 56.73% | R+20.2 | R |
20 | 48.77% | 49.62% | R+0.9 | 35.39% | 59.04% | R+23.6 | R |
21 | 45.01% | 53.64% | R+8.6 | 29.35% | 65.17% | R+35.8 | R |
22 | 36.78% | 62.08% | R+25.3 | 29.64% | 65.50% | R+35.9 | R |
23 | 40.72% | 57.80% | R+17.1 | 27.37% | 66.81% | R+39.4 | R |
24 | 39.86% | 58.79% | R+18.9 | 25.77% | 69.86% | R+44.1 | R |
25 | 44.34% | 54.14% | R+9.8 | 34.15% | 59.72% | R+25.6 | R |
26 | 50.18% | 48.59% | D+1.6 | 39.62% | 53.52% | R+13.9 | D |
27 | 47.15% | 51.07% | R+3.9 | 30.50% | 64.42% | R+33.9 | R |
28 | 47.30% | 51.30% | R+4 | 31.76% | 62.81% | R+31.1 | R |
29 | 56.05% | 42.50% | D+13.6 | 40.78% | 53.23% | R+12.5 | D |
30 | 47.66% | 50.85% | R+3.2 | 38.47% | 54.84% | R+16.4 | R |
31 | 61.55% | 36.86% | D+24.7 | 49.75% | 43.99% | D+5.8 | D |
32 | 72.88% | 25.37% | D+47.5 | 63.69% | 30.28% | D+33.4 | D |
33 | 67.30% | 31.37% | D+35.9 | 59.50% | 34.55% | D+25 | D |
34 | 68.16% | 30.10% | D+38.1 | 60.44% | 33.19% | D+27.2 | D |
35 | 77.01% | 21.48% | D+55.5 | 70.40% | 23.46% | D+46.9 | D |
36 | 65.21% | 33.12% | D+32.1 | 63.13% | 29.46% | D+33.7 | D |
37 | 43.30% | 55.35% | R+12 | 42.10% | 50.50% | R+8.4 | R |
38 | 49.33% | 49.21% | D+0.1 | 42.85% | 49.84% | R+7 | R |
39 | 43.02% | 55.76% | R+12.7 | 43.93% | 48.99% | R+5.1 | R |
40 | 49.31% | 49.53% | R+0.2 | 50.25% | 43.32% | D+6.9 | D |
41 | 67.93% | 30.50% | D+37.4 | 69.25% | 24.10% | D+45.2 | D |
42 | 49.85% | 48.83% | D+1 | 51.15% | 42.19% | D+9 | R |
43 | 50.58% | 48.29% | D+2.3 | 52.50% | 41.03% | D+11.5 | R |
44 | 42.52% | 56.60% | R+14.1 | 44.97% | 47.76% | R+2.8 | R |
45 | 60.66% | 36.80% | D+23.9 | 57.79% | 31.85% | D+25.9 | D |
46 | 59.66% | 37.96% | D+21.7 | 57.22% | 33.12% | D+24.1 | D |
47 | 52.11% | 46.29% | D+5.8 | 38.31% | 54.96% | R+16.6 | R |
48 | 47.95% | 50.46% | R+2.5 | 36.50% | 56.98% | R+20.5 | R |
49 | 46.50% | 51.88% | R+5.4 | 36.62% | 55.49% | R+18.9 | R |
50 | 42.94% | 55.95% | R+13 | 30.36% | 64.36% | R+34 | R |
51 | 55.19% | 43.48% | D+11.7 | 35.67% | 58.91% | R+23.2 | R |
52 | 56.04% | 42.88% | D+13.2 | 37.76% | 56.73% | R+19 | D |
53 | 60.98% | 37.92% | D+23.1 | 47.69% | 46.65% | D+1 | D |
54 | 44.96% | 53.94% | R+9 | 32.11% | 62.71% | R+30.6 | R |
55 | 55.19% | 43.44% | D+11.8 | 43.51% | 50.62% | R+7.1 | R |
56 | 52.01% | 46.73% | D+5.3 | 34.91% | 59.80% | R+24.9 | R |
57 | 49.00% | 49.98% | R+1 | 37.25% | 57.49% | R+20.2 | R |
58 | 55.60% | 43.22% | D+12.4 | 37.06% | 57.82% | R+20.8 | R |
59 | 56.29% | 42.22% | D+14.1 | 51.94% | 40.87% | D+11.1 | D |
60 | 50.15% | 48.91% | D+1.2 | 45.19% | 48.75% | R+3.6 | R |
61 | 63.73% | 35.14% | D+28.6 | 52.34% | 42.07% | D+10.3 | D |
62 | 76.37% | 22.58% | D+53.8 | 62.14% | 32.64% | D+29.5 | D |
63 | 49.95% | 48.93% | D+1 | 39.04% | 55.06% | R+16 | R |
64 | 57.83% | 41.00% | D+16.8 | 40.27% | 53.42% | R+13.1 | D |
65 | 66.77% | 31.71% | D+35.1 | 61.58% | 31.29% | D+30.3 | D |
66 | 57.43% | 41.04% | D+16.4 | 53.11% | 39.91% | D+13.2 | D |
67 | 49.18% | 49.50% | R+0.3 | 47.22% | 45.74% | D+1.5 | R |
68 | 54.45% | 44.08% | D+10.4 | 48.20% | 44.50% | D+3.7 | R |
69 | 65.87% | 32.63% | D+33.2 | 52.73% | 40.24% | D+12.5 | D |
70 | 63.00% | 35.67% | D+27.3 | 53.85% | 39.20% | D+14.7 | D |
71 | 56.62% | 42.23% | D+14.4 | 48.02% | 46.57% | D+1.5 | D |
72 | 50.86% | 47.88% | D+3 | 34.92% | 59.56% | R+24.6 | R |
73 | 54.19% | 44.65% | D+9.5 | 43.25% | 51.15% | R+7.9 | R |
74 | 67.17% | 31.21% | D+36 | 69.14% | 24.89% | D+44.3 | D |
75 | 49.36% | 49.39% | R+0 | 34.09% | 60.12% | R+26 | R |
76 | 50.61% | 47.97% | D+2.6 | 40.64% | 53.90% | R+13.3 | R |
77 | 58.46% | 40.34% | D+18.1 | 53.49% | 39.62% | D+13.9 | D |
78 | 46.21% | 51.69% | R+5.5 | 34.06% | 60.08% | R+26 | R |
79 | 35.86% | 62.79% | R+26.9 | 25.96% | 67.84% | R+41.9 | R |
80 | 45.03% | 53.56% | R+8.5 | 27.04% | 68.71% | R+41.7 | R |
81 | 56.57% | 41.86% | D+14.7 | 39.52% | 55.89% | R+16.4 | D |
82 | 49.74% | 47.90% | D+1.8 | 36.54% | 57.76% | R+21.2 | D |
83 | 58.67% | 39.72% | D+19 | 40.42% | 53.35% | R+12.9 | D |
84 | 46.37% | 52.04% | R+5.7 | 30.59% | 63.23% | R+32.6 | R |
85 | 71.79% | 26.07% | D+45.7 | 74.26% | 19.90% | D+54.4 | D |
86 | 72.99% | 24.97% | D+48 | 72.34% | 21.06% | D+51.3 | D |
87 | 62.60% | 36.08% | D+26.5 | 48.53% | 45.49% | D+3 | D |
88 | 50.88% | 47.86% | D+3 | 35.94% | 58.76% | R+22.8 | R |
89 | 63.19% | 35.77% | D+27.4 | 52.47% | 40.86% | D+11.6 | D |
90 | 73.49% | 24.97% | D+48.5 | 57.98% | 34.93% | D+23.1 | D |
91 | 57.61% | 40.97% | D+16.6 | 43.65% | 49.75% | R+6.1 | R |
92 | 53.94% | 45.00% | D+8.9 | 42.25% | 51.61% | R+9.4 | R |
93 | 56.63% | 42.22% | D+14.4 | 50.96% | 42.21% | D+8.7 | D |
94 | 45.18% | 53.87% | R+8.7 | 43.91% | 50.10% | R+6.2 | R |
95 | 52.01% | 46.69% | D+5.3 | 41.86% | 51.59% | R+9.7 | R |
96 | 51.83% | 47.01% | D+4.8 | 35.42% | 58.91% | R+23.5 | R |
97 | 50.63% | 47.95% | D+2.7 | 37.14% | 56.46% | R+19.3 | R |
98 | 65.29% | 33.50% | D+31.8 | 48.47% | 45.38% | D+3.1 | D |
99 | 59.37% | 39.28% | D+20.1 | 52.61% | 41.12% | D+11.5 | D |
100 | 62.95% | 35.58% | D+27.4 | 51.37% | 42.25% | D+9.1 | D |
Total | 52.23% | 46.40% | D+5.8 | 42.23% | 51.72% | R+9.5 | - |
Source: Daily Kos |
Candidate ballot access
The table below details filing requirements for 3rd Congressional District candidates in Iowa in the 2020 election cycle. For additional information on candidate ballot access requirements in Iowa, click here.
Filing requirements, 2020 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Office | Party | Signatures required | Signature formula | Filing fee | Filing fee formula | Filing deadline | Source |
Iowa | 3rd Congressional District | Democratic | 1,830 | 1% of votes cast for the party's candidate for governor in the district in 2018 | N/A | N/A | 3/13/2020 | Source |
Iowa | 3rd Congressional District | Republican | 1,690 | 1% of votes cast for the party's candidate for governor in the district in 2018 | N/A | N/A | 3/13/2020 | Source |
Iowa | 3rd Congressional District | Unaffiliated | 375 | Fixed number | N/A | N/A | 3/13/2020 | Source |
District election history
2018
General election
General election for U.S. House Iowa District 3
The following candidates ran in the general election for U.S. House Iowa District 3 on November 6, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Cindy Axne (D) | 49.3 | 175,642 |
David Young (R) | 47.1 | 167,933 | ||
![]() | Bryan Holder (L) | 2.0 | 7,267 | |
![]() | Mark Elworth Jr. (Legal Medical Now Party) | 0.6 | 2,015 | |
![]() | Paul Knupp (G) | 0.5 | 1,888 | |
![]() | Joe Grandanette (Independent) | 0.4 | 1,301 | |
Other/Write-in votes | 0.1 | 195 |
Total votes: 356,241 (100.00% precincts reporting) | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House Iowa District 3
Cindy Axne defeated Eddie Mauro and Pete D'Alessandro in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Iowa District 3 on June 5, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Cindy Axne | 58.0 | 32,910 |
![]() | Eddie Mauro | 26.4 | 15,006 | |
![]() | Pete D'Alessandro | 15.6 | 8,874 |
Total votes: 56,790 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Heather Ryan (D)
- Theresa Greenfield (D)
- Austin Frerick (D)
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House Iowa District 3
Incumbent David Young advanced from the Republican primary for U.S. House Iowa District 3 on June 5, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | David Young | 100.0 | 21,712 |
Total votes: 21,712 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
2016
Heading into the election, Ballotpedia rated this race as a race to watch. Incumbent David Young (R) defeated Jim Mowrer (D), Bryan Holder (L), Claudia Addy (I), and Joe Grandanette (I) in the general election on November 8, 2016. Young defeated Joe Grandanette in the Republican primary on June 7, 2016, while Mowrer defeated Desmund Adams and Mike Sherzan in the Democratic primary.[29][30]
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | ![]() |
53.4% | 208,598 | |
Democratic | Jim Mowrer | 39.7% | 155,002 | |
Libertarian | Bryan Holder | 3.9% | 15,372 | |
Independent | Claudia Addy | 1.6% | 6,348 | |
Independent | Joe Grandanette | 1.2% | 4,518 | |
N/A | Write-in | 0.1% | 449 | |
Total Votes | 390,287 | |||
Source: Iowa Secretary of State |
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
49.6% | 13,024 | ||
Mike Sherzan | 36.5% | 9,573 | ||
Desmund Adams | 13.9% | 3,650 | ||
Total Votes | 26,247 | |||
Source: Iowa Secretary of State |
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
85.2% | 17,977 | ||
Joe Grandanette | 14.8% | 3,134 | ||
Total Votes | 21,111 | |||
Source: Iowa Secretary of State |
2014
The 3rd Congressional District of Iowa held an election for the U.S. House of Representatives on November 4, 2014. David Young (R) defeated Staci Appel (D), Edward Wright (L) and Bryan Jack Holder (I) in the general election.
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | Staci Appel | 42.2% | 119,109 | |
Republican | ![]() |
52.8% | 148,814 | |
Libertarian | Ed Wright | 3.2% | 9,054 | |
Independent | Bryan Jack Holder | 1.5% | 4,360 | |
Write-in | Other | 0.3% | 729 | |
Total Votes | 282,066 | |||
Source: Iowa Secretary of State Official Results |
See also
- United States House of Representatives elections in Iowa, 2020
- United States House of Representatives elections, 2020
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' presidential results by congressional district for 2016, 2012, and 2008," accessed June 24, 2020
- ↑ DCCC, "Frontline," February 7, 2019
- ↑ GOP Youngs Guns, "Young Guns," accessed October 13, 2020
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Twitter, "Donald Trump on May 22, 2020," accessed October 13, 2020
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Cindy Axne's 2020 campaign website, "Endorsements," accessed October 13, 2020
- ↑ Iowa Redistricting Map "Map" accessed July 24, 2012
- ↑ Candidate Connection surveys completed before September 26, 2019, were not used to generate candidate profiles. In battleground primaries, Ballotpedia based its selection of noteworthy candidates on polling, fundraising, and noteworthy endorsements. In battleground general elections, all major party candidates and any other candidates with the potential to impact the outcome of the race were included.
- ↑ Fundraising by primary candidates can be found on the race's respective primary election page. Fundraising by general election candidates can be found on the race's general election page.
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "2022 Quarterly Reports," accessed March 2, 2022
- ↑ Cook Political Report, "Introducing the 2017 Cook Political Report Partisan Voter Index," April 7, 2017
- ↑ FiveThirtyEight, "Election Update: The Most (And Least) Elastic States And Districts," September 6, 2018
- ↑ Inside Elections also uses Tilt ratings to indicate an even smaller advantage and greater competitiveness.
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Nathan Gonzalez," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Kyle Kondik," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Charlie Cook," April 22, 2018
- ↑ Facebook, "Cindy Axne on October 17, 2020," accessed October 18, 2020
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 David Young's 2020 campaign website, "Endorsements," accessed October 13, 2020
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 Twitter, "Cindy Axne on September 2, 2020," accessed October 13, 2020
- ↑ Monmouth University, "IOWA: DEMS LEAD IN 3 OF 4 HOUSE RACES," October 22, 2020
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedreg
- ↑ Twitter, "Jacob Rubashkin on October 16, 2020
- ↑ The Cook Political Report, "2020 House Race Ratings," accessed October 13, 2020
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Cindy Axne’s campaign website, “Issues,” accessed October 13, 2020
- ↑ David Young’s campaign website, “Issues,” accessed October 13, 2020
- ↑ 270towin.com, "Iowa," accessed June 1, 2017
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017
- ↑ Iowa Secretary of State, "Candidate Listing by Office," accessed March 19, 2016
- ↑ The New York Times "Iowa Caucus Results," June 7, 2016