Kansas Constitutional Amendment 2, County Sheriff Election and Recall Amendment (2022)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Kansas Constitutional Amendment 2
Flag of Kansas.png
Election date
November 8, 2022
Topic
Elections and campaigns
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

Kansas Constitutional Amendment 2, the County Sheriff Election and Recall Amendment, was on the ballot in Kansas as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 8, 2022.[1] The ballot measure was approved.

A "yes" vote supported amending the state Constitution to require the election of county sheriffs in counties that had not abolished the office as of January 2022 and provide that sheriffs may be recalled from office or removed by a writ of quo warranto initiated by the attorney general.

A "no" vote opposed this amendment to require counties to elect sheriffs, thereby maintaining that counties can elect to operate under a consolidated law enforcement agency according to state law.


Election results

Kansas Constitutional Amendment 2

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

588,417 61.64%
No 366,167 38.36%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What did Constitutional Amendment 2 add to the state's constitution?

See also: Measure design

The amendment amended the Kansas Constitution to require the election of county sheriffs in counties that had not abolished the office as of January 2022 and provide that sheriffs may be recalled from office or removed by a writ of quo warranto initiated by the attorney general. Riley County abolished its sheriff’s office in 1974 and is the only county in Kansas without a sheriff.[2]

Why does Riley County not have a sheriff?

See also: Consolidated county law enforcement agencies

In 1974, Riley County adopted a consolidated law enforcement agency and is the only county of the state's 105 that does not have a sheriff. The consolidation included Riley County Sheriff’s Office, the Manhattan Police Department, and the Ogden Police Department.[3]

At the time of the election, Kansas state law provided that counties may adopt a consolidated county law enforcement agency. A consolidated county law enforcement agency "assumes control of the principal law enforcement duties presently held by the county and the cities therein." The law enforcement agency would not have a sheriff but rather a police director appointed by the law enforcement agency board.[4]

Who supported and opposed Constitutional Amendment 2?

See also: Support and Opposition

The amendment received support from Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt (R), Kansas Sheriffs Association, and Johnston County Sheriff's Office. Attorney General Schmidt said, "The office of sheriff has deep historical roots, and the longstanding practice of election rather than appointment makes sheriffs uniquely accountable to the people. I commend the large bipartisan majorities in the Legislature for giving Kansas voters the opportunity to enshrine the elected office of sheriff in our state constitution, and I look forward to supporting and campaigning for this amendment this fall."[5]

The amendment was opposed by State Representatives Sydney Carlin (D), Mike Dodson (R), and Dennis Highberger (D), as well as Kurt Moldrup, the interim director of the Riley County Police Department. State Rep. Michael Dodson (R) said, "If a county wishes to have a sheriff, that’s a great choice. Likewise, if a county wishes to consolidate, they should be able to do that."[6]

Measure design

See also: Text of measure

Constitutional Amendment 2 amended the Kansas Constitution to require the election of county sheriffs in counties that had not abolished the office as of January 2022 and provide that sheriffs may be recalled from office or removed by a writ of quo warranto initiated by the attorney general. Under the amendment, the term of a county sheriff is four years. Riley County abolished its sheriff’s office in 1974 and is the only county in Kansas without a sheriff.[2]

At the time of the election, state law provided for the election of a county sheriff for four years, except where counties have adopted, through a ballot measure, a consolidated county law enforcement agency that "assumes control of the principal law enforcement duties presently held by the county and the cities therein." The law enforcement agency would not have a sheriff. This is the case in Riley County.[4]

At the time of the election, state law provided voters can recall a sheriff by submitting a petition containing valid signatures equal to at least 40% of the voters who voted in the last sheriff election.[7]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for the amendment was as follows:[2]

Shall the following be adopted?

§ 2. County and township officers. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), each county shall elect a sheriff for a term of four years by a majority of the qualified electors of the county voting thereon at the time of voting designated for such office pursuant to law in effect on January 11, 2022, and every four years thereafter.

(b) The provisions of subsection (a) shall not apply to a county that abolished the office of sheriff prior to January 11, 2022. Such county may restore the office of sheriff as provided by law and such restoration shall be irrevocable. A county that restores the office of sheriff shall elect a sheriff by a majority of the qualified electors of the county voting thereon for a term of four years. Such sheriff shall have such qualifications and duties as provided by law. The time of voting for the office of sheriff may be provided for by the legislature pursuant to section 18 of article 2 of this constitution.

(c) The filling of vacancies and the qualifications and duties of the office of sheriff shall be as provided by law.

(d) The legislature shall provide forsuch other county and townshipofficers as may be necessary.

§ 5. Removal of officers. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), all county and township officers may be removed from office, in such manner and for such cause, as shall be prescribed by law.

(b) A county sheriff only may be involuntarily removed from office by recall election pursuant to section 3 of article 4 of this constitution or a writ of quo warranto initiated by the attorney general.[8]

Ballot summary

The ballot summary for the amendment was as follows:[2]

This amendment would preserve the right of citizens of each county that elected a county sheriff as of January 11, 2022, to continue electing the county sheriff. The amendment would also provide that a county sheriff only may be involuntarily removed from office pursuant to either a recall election or a writ of quo warranto initiated by the attorney general.


A vote for this proposition would preserve the right of citizens of each county that elected a county sheriff as of January 11, 2022, to continue electing the county sheriff via popular vote. The amendment would also direct that a county sheriff only may be involuntarily removed from office pursuant to either a recall election or a writ of quo warranto initiated by the attorney general.

A vote against this proposition would not make any changes to the constitution and would retain current law concerning the election of a sheriff and the procedures for involuntary removal of a sheriff from office.[8]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article 9, Kansas Constitution

The measure amended sections 2 and 5 of Article 9 of the state constitution. The following underlined text was added, and struck-through text was deleted:[2] Note: Hover over the text and scroll to see the full text.

Section 2:

County and Township Officers

(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), each county shall elect a sheriff for a term of four years by a majority of the qualified electors of the county voting thereon at the time of voting designated for such office pursuant to law in effect on January 11, 2022, and every four years thereafter.

(b) The provisions of subsection (a) shall not apply to a county that abolished the office of sheriff prior to January 11, 2022. Such county may restore the office of sheriff as provided by law and such restoration shall be irrevocable. A county that restores the office of sheriff shall elect a sheriff by a majority of the qualified electors of the county voting thereon for a term of four years. Such sheriff shall have such qualifications and duties as provided by law. The time of voting for the office of sheriff may be provided for by the legislature pursuant to section 18 of article 2 of this constitution.

(c) The filling of vacancies and the qualifications and duties of the office of sheriff shall be as provided by law.

The legislature shall provide for such other county and township officers as may be necessary.

Section 5:

Removal of Officers

(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), all county and township officers may be removed from office, in such manner and for such cause, as shall be prescribed by law.

(b) A county sheriff only may be involuntarily removed from office by recall election pursuant to section 3 of article 4 of this constitution or a writ of quo warranto initiated by the attorney general. [8]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2022

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 12, and the FRE is 43. The word count for the ballot title is 267.

The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 18, and the FRE is 23. The word count for the ballot summary is 157.


Support

Supporters

Officials

Unions

  • Kansas Sheriffs Association

Organizations

  • Johnson County Sheriff's Office

Arguments

  • State Rep. Eric Smith (R): "I just want you to consider the idea that when you have an elected sheriff out there, that individual serves you and serves your constituents as an individual who has to uphold those values that they were elected on, and you can hold them accountable for that."
  • Douglas County Sherriff Jay Armbrister: "Throughout my career and in the more recent experience of being elected Douglas County Sheriff, I have seen the importance of the people having the opportunity to elect a law enforcement position that serves an entire county. Especially as a way to provide input and feedback on policy and how a sheriff’s office should serve a community."
  • Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt (R): "The office of sheriff has deep historical roots, and the longstanding practice of election rather than appointment makes sheriffs uniquely accountable to the people. I commend the large bipartisan majorities in the Legislature for giving Kansas voters the opportunity to enshrine the elected office of sheriff in our state constitution, and I look forward to supporting and campaigning for this amendment this fall."
  • Graham County Sheriff Cole Presley: "It's just a matter of just preserving people's rights to vote. It doesn't give us any more authority, it doesn't give us any more power, the statutes are still statutes, and what laws we enforce are still subject to the legislature. So, we don't gain anything other than knowing we always have an office."


Opposition

Opponents

Officials

Organizations

  • ACLU of Kansas

Individuals

  • Kurt Moldrup - Director of the Riley County Police Department

Arguments

  • State Rep. Michael Dodson (R): "If a county wishes to have a sheriff, that’s a great choice. Likewise, if a county wishes to consolidate, they should be able to do that."
  • State Rep. Dennis Highberger (D): "As far as I can tell the office of elected sheriff is under no threat whatsoever in at least 103 counties. Allowing the citizens of the entire state to vote to tell an individual county that it must have an elected sheriff is just as much an infringement of local control as when a majority of members of this body vote to tell my community what it can and can’t do."

Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Kansas ballot measures

Ballotpedia has not identified any committees registered in support of or opposition to the amendment.[9]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Media editorials

See also: 2022 ballot measure media endorsements

Ballotpedia identified the following media editorial boards as taking positions on the measure.

Ballotpedia lists the positions of media editorial boards that support or oppose ballot measures. This does not include opinion pieces from individuals or groups that do not represent the official position of a newspaper or media outlet. Ballotpedia includes editorials from newspapers and outlets based on circulation and readership, political coverage within a state, and length of publication. You can share media editorial board endorsements with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Support

Ballotpedia did not identify media editorial boards in support of the ballot measure.

You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Opposition

  • The Wichita Eagle Editorial Board: "The land mine here is that Question 2 would make it easier for corrupt sheriffs to stay in office by stripping district attorneys of the authority to bring ouster proceedings for neglect of duty or official misconduct. If Question 2 passes, only the attorney general could do that. ... [A] 'No' vote is the obvious choice."


Background

Kansas county sheriffs

At the time of the election, state law provided counties that do not operate under a consolidated county law enforcement agency must elect a sheriff for a four-year term. State law requires county sheriffs to be a citizen of the United States and a qualified elector of the county; possess a high-school education or its recognized equivalent; and to have never been "convicted of or pleaded guilty or entered a plea of nolo contendere to any felony charge, a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, or to any violation of any federal or state laws or city ordinances relating to gambling, liquor or narcotics."[10]

At the time of the election, state law provided voters can recall a sheriff by submitting a petition containing valid signatures equal to at least 40% of the voters who voted in the last sheriff election.[7]

Consolidated county law enforcement agencies

Kansas state law provides that counties may adopt a consolidated county law enforcement agency. A consolidated county law enforcement agency "assumes control of the principal law enforcement duties presently held by the county and the cities therein." The law enforcement agency would not have a sheriff but rather a police director appointed by the law enforcement agency board. The law limits which counties can adopt such agency by the following population and assessed taxable tangible valuation thresholds:[4]

  • between 5,000 and 12,000 in population with $75 million in assessed value;
  • between 3,800 and 4,300 in population with $21 million to $24 million in assessed value; and
  • between 3,000 and 4,000 in population with $28 million to $50 million in assessed value.

In order to adopt a consolidated county law enforcement agency, the county commissioners must submit a ballot question to county voters either via a referral by the commissioners or a citizen-initiated petition. A majority vote is required to adopt a consolidated county law enforcement agency.[4]

In 1974, Riley County adopted a consolidated law enforcement agency and is the only county of the state's 105 that does not have a sheriff. The consolidation included Riley County Sheriff’s Office, the Manhattan Police Department, and the Ogden Police Department.[3]

Related ballot measures

Ballotpedia tracked the following ballot measures related to county sheriff elections and appointments:

State

In November 2000, Connecticut approved Question 1 by a margin of 65.6% to 34.4%. The measure removed county sheriffs as constitutional officers.

Local

In November 2020, King County, Washington approved Charter Amendment 5 by a margin of 55.6% to 44.4%. The amendment returned the office of the sheriff from an elected position to an appointed position that is appointed by the county executive and confirmed by the county council.

Referred constitutional amendments in Kansas

See also: List of Kansas ballot measures

From 1995 through 2020, the state legislature referred ten constitutional amendments to the ballot. Voters approved eight and rejected two of the referred amendments. Most of the amendments (7 of 10) were referred to ballots in even-numbered election years. The average number of amendments appearing on an odd-year ballot was between zero and one. The approval rate at the ballot box was 80 percent during the 25-year period from 1995 through 2020. The rejection rate was 20 percent. There were no referred amendments on the ballot in 2020.

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Kansas Constitution

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a two-thirds (66.67%) vote is required in both the Kansas State Senate and the Kansas House of Representatives.

This amendment was introduced as House Joint Resolution 5022 (HCR 5022) on January 13, 2022. On February 23, 2022, the state House passed HCR 5022 in a vote of 97-24, with four absent and not voting. The Senate passed the resolution with amendments on March 23, 2022, by a vote of 36-2. The House voted not to concur with the amendments and requested a conference committee. The Senate voted to rescind its amendments to the resolution in a vote of 39-1 on April 1, 2022. On April 26, the House adopted the conference committee report by a vote of 91 to 31 with three absent.[1]

Vote in the Kansas State Senate
April 1, 2022
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 27  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total3910
Total percent97.5%2.5%0.0%
Democrat1010
Republican2900

Vote in the Kansas House of Representatives
April 26, 2022
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 84  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total91313
Total percent72.8%24.8%2.4%
Democrat8301
Republican8312

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Kansas

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Kansas.

How to vote in Kansas


See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Kansas State Legislature, "HCR 5022 Overview," accessed February 23, 2022
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Kansas State Legislature, "HCR 5022 Text," accessed February 23, 2022
  3. 3.0 3.1 Riley County, Kansas, "Law Enforcement Agency Board," accessed May 31, 2022
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Kansas State Legislature, "KS Stat § 19-4468 (2017)," accessed April 5, 2022
  5. Office of the Attorney General, "AG Derek Schmidt statement on legislative approval of elected county sheriff constitutional amendment," April 26, 2022
  6. Kansas Reflector, "Kansas House advances constitutional amendment requiring elected sheriffs," February 22, 2022
  7. 7.0 7.1 Kansas State Legislature, "KS Stat §25-4311 (2017)," accessed April 5, 2022
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  9. Kansas Secretary of State, "Campaign finance," accessed May 24, 2022
  10. Kansas Revised Statute, "Chapter 19- Article 8," accessed June 2, 2022
  11. Kansas Office of Revisor of Statutes, "25-106. Hours of voting; change of hours, how made; rules and regulations," accessed November 4, 2024
  12. State of Kansas Secretary of State, “Frequently Asked Questions” accessed July 25, 2024
  13. Kansas Office of the Secretary of State, "Kansas Voter Registration Instructions," accessed July 25, 2024
  14. Kansas Secretary of State, "Kansas Voter Registration Application," accessed November 1, 2024
  15. United States District Court for the District of Kansas, "Fish v. Kobach and Bednasek v. Kobach: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law," June 18, 2018
  16. The Topeka Capital-Journal, "Kobach's office tells counties to stop asking for proof of citizenship," June 20, 2018
  17. AP News, "Kansas hopes to resurrect proof-of-citizenship voting law," March 18, 2019
  18. United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, "Fish v. Schwab: Opinion and Order," April 29, 2020
  19. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  20. 20.0 20.1 20.2 20.3 Kansas Secretary of State, "Elections - FAQ," accessed July 25, 2024