Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Legislative vote history on school choice by rural district representatives in Montana (2023)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Rural School Choice Banner v3.png
Impact of school choice
Education Icon 200x200.png
on rural school districts
Portal page
States with universal school choice
Analysis of legislative representation
Polling
Studies and reports
State-specific case studies
Arguments
Policy and reform proposals
Click here to visit Ballotpedia's comprehensive portal on the impact of universal school choice on rural school districts.


Out of 150 total state legislative districts in Montana, there were 94 (63%) that contained rural school districts. Ballotpedia analyzed private school choice legislation vote histories in both chambers across partisan affiliation and according to rural school district representation.

State House Analysis Highlights
  • 58 (58%) state House seats represented at least one rural school district.

    Historical data for a vote on private school choice policy (2023)

  • The rate of support for private school choice among state House Republicans representing rural school districts was four percentage points lower than the support among state House Republicans representing urban/suburban areas without any rural school districts.
  • For rural state House Republicans, 96% voted in support and 4% voted in opposition, based on Ballotepdia's analysis.
  • For urban/suburban state House Republicans, 100% voted in support and none voted in opposition.
  • The rate of support for private school choice among state House Democrats representing rural school districts was five percentage points lower than the support among state House Democrats representing urban/suburban areas without any rural school districts.
  • For rural state House Democrats, none voted in support and 100% voted in opposition, based on Ballotepdia's analysis.
  • For urban/suburban state House Democrats, 5% voted in support and 95% voted in opposition.

  • State Senate Analysis Highlights
  • 36 (72%) state Senate seats represented at least one rural school district.

    Historical data for a vote on private school choice policy (2023)

  • The rate of support for private school choice among state Senate Republicans representing rural school districts was 12 percentage points lower than the support among state Senate Republicans representing urban/suburban areas without any rural school districts.
  • For rural state Senate Republicans, 59% voted in support and 41% voted in opposition, based on Ballotepdia's analysis.
  • For urban/suburban state Senate Republicans, 71% voted in support and 29% voted in opposition.
  • All Democrats in the state Senate voted in opposition.

    • Vote history analysis overview
    • State House vote analysis
    • State Senate vote analysis
    • List of legislators representing rural school districts


    Analysis background and methodology

    Eighteen (18) states had universal private school choice programs as of June 2025. Universal school choice programs provide public funds for alternatives to public schools, such as private schools and homeschooling, and are designed for all students to qualify.[1][2][3]

    • 15 of the 18 states were Republican trifectas, and 9 Republican trifectas did not have universal school choice.
    • All 15 Democratic trifectas did not have universal school choice.
    • Three states with universal school choice policies are divided governments, and nine divided government states do not have universal school choice.

    As of June 2025, 12 Republican trifecta states had enacted universal school choice programs since 2021. In 2025, Idaho, Tennessee, Texas, Indiana, Wyoming, and New Hampshire passed universal private school choice legislation.

    Arguments surrounding private school choice legislation may incorporate claims about the impact of private school choice on rural school districts.

    Ballotpedia aggregated and analyzed legislative vote data on private school choice in Republican trifecta states that, as of January 2025, had not enacted universal private school choice policies. This project analyzes vote history across party affiliation and between legislators representing at least one rural school district and those without any rural school districts in their districts. It also shows how many legislative districts there are in each state containing at least one rural school district and lists out the legislators representing those districts.

    Click here to see the vote history analyses for the other states.

    The analysis is based on the vote history data for full chamber floor votes on a selection of recent bills or amendments containing provisions substantively expanding or restricting private school choice programs including Education Savings Accounts (ESA), voucher programs, and education tax credit programs.

    For the analysis, Ballotpedia classified as rural any school district within an area designated by the U.S. Census Bureau as rural, which means any area not within a densely developed area with at least 2,000 housing units or a population of 5,000 or more. This analysis does not reflect any particular legislator's position on any policy or legislation. It does not evaluate reasons or motives for legislative votes.

    Analysis of vote history on school choice policies

    In 2023, HB 393 was signed into law. This bill created the Montana special needs equal opportunity education savings account program, which provides ESAs for disabled students that cover private school tuition among other approved expenses, such as certain homeschool expenses. "Yes" votes were in support of creating the program and in favor of private school choice, and "No" votes were opposed to the bill and are counted as not in favor of private school choice.[4]

    In 2023, the Senate also voted on SB 390, which would have created the Montana equality of educational opportunity education savings account program, which would have provided ESAs for students not attending public schools. "Yes" votes were in support of creating the program and in favor of private school choice, and "No" votes were opposed to the bill and are counted as not in favor of private school choice.[5]

    The House analysis below is based on votes on HB 393 (2023). The Senate analysis below is based on votes on HB 393 (2023) and votes on SB 390 (2023).




    Montana State Senate Democrat school choice voting analysis

    100% of Democrats in the Montana State Senate voted to oppose private school choice, including both the rural and urban/suburban district members.

    Analysis is based on votes on HB 393 (2023), which creates the Montana special needs equal opportunity education savings account program and SB 390 (2023), which would have created the Montana equality of educational opportunity education savings account program. Votes were counted as in support of private school choice only if the senator voted in favor of both bills. Votes were counted as opposed to private school choice if the senator voted against either of the bills.



    State House of Representatives vote analysis

    The map below shows how representatives of each House district voted on whether or not to adopt HB 393, creating the Montana special needs equal opportunity education savings account program. "Yes" votes were in support of creating the program and coded "support" to private school choice, and "No" votes were opposed to the proposed program and coded "oppose". Hover over the legislative districts to display the legislator name, party affiliation, vote tallied on HB 393, vote coding, and if the legislator's district contained at least one rural school district.[4]

    State Senate vote analysis

    The map below shows how representatives of each Senate district voted on whether or not to adopt HB 393, creating the Montana special needs equal opportunity education savings account program, and on whether or not to adopt SB 390, which would have created a different ESA program. "Yes" votes were in support of creating the programs and coded "support" to private school choice, and "No" votes were opposed to one or both of the proposed programs and coded "oppose". Hover over the legislative districts to display the legislator name, party affiliation, vote tallied on HB 393 and SB 390, vote coding, and if the legislator's district contained at least one rural school district.[4][5]

    Montana legislators representing rural school districts

    The tables below list all the members of the Montana House of Representatives and the Montana State Senate who represented as of April 2025 a legislative district that contained at least one rural school district as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. The tables include the legislators' names with a link to their Ballotpedia profiles, their district numbers, their party affiliations, and the years they were first elected. The linked Ballotpedia profiles include contact information such as their websites, facebook pages, and other social accounts.

    Montana House members representing rural school districts (April 2025)
    District Number Name Party Year first elected
    District 1 Neil Duram Republican Party 2024
    District 10 Terry Falk Republican Party 2024
    District 11 Ed Byrne Republican Party 2024
    District 12 Tracy Sharp Republican Party 2024
    District 13 Linda Reksten Republican Party 2024
    District 14 Paul Fielder Republican Party 2024
    District 15 Thedis Crowe Democratic Party 2024
    District 16 Tyson Running Wolf Democratic Party 2018
    District 17 Zachary Wirth Republican Party 2024
    District 18 Llew Jones Republican Party 2018
    District 19 Jane Weber Democratic Party 2024
    District 2 Tom Millett Republican Party 2024
    District 27 Paul Tuss Democratic Party 2024
    District 29 Valerie Moore Republican Party 2024
    District 3 Debo Powers Democratic Party 2024
    District 30 Morgan Thiel Republican Party 2024
    District 31 Frank Smith Democratic Party 2020
    District 32 Mike Fox Democratic Party 2024
    District 33 Brandon Ler Republican Party 2024
    District 34 Jerry Schillinger Republican Party 2024
    District 35 Gary Parry Republican Party 2024
    District 36 Greg Kmetz Republican Party 2024
    District 37 Shane Klakken Republican Party 2024
    District 38 Greg Oblander Republican Party 2024
    District 39 Kerri Seekins-Crowe Republican Party 2024
    District 4 Lyn Bennett Republican Party 2024
    District 40 Mike Vinton Republican Party 2024
    District 41 Jade Sooktis Democratic Party 2024
    District 42 Sidney Fitzpatrick Democratic Party 2024
    District 43 Larry Brewster Republican Party 2024
    District 53 Nelly Nicol Republican Party 2022
    District 54 Lee Deming Republican Party 2024
    District 55 Brad Barker Republican Party 2024
    District 57 Scott Rosenzweig Democratic Party 2024
    District 58 Jamie Isaly Democratic Party 2024
    District 59 Ed Stafman Democratic Party 2024
    District 6 Amy Regier Republican Party 2020
    District 61 Becky Edwards Democratic Party 2024
    District 63 Peter Strand Democratic Party 2024
    District 64 Kelly Kortum Democratic Party 2024
    District 66 Eric Matthews Democratic Party 2022
    District 69 Kenneth Walsh Republican Party 2024
    District 70 Shannon Maness Republican Party 2024
    District 71 Scott DeMarois Democratic Party 2024
    District 72 Donavon Hawk Democratic Party 2024
    District 75 Marta Bertoglio Republican Party 2020
    District 77 Jane Gillette Republican Party 2024
    District 78 Randyn Gregg Republican Party 2024
    District 80 Melissa Romano Democratic Party 2024
    District 81 Mary Caferro Democratic Party 2024
    District 85 Kathy Love Republican Party 2024
    District 88 Greg Overstreet Republican Party 2024
    District 92 Connie Keogh Democratic Party 2024
    District 93 Katie Sullivan Democratic Party 2024
    District 94 Marilyn Marler Democratic Party 2024
    District 97 Melody Cunningham Democratic Party 2024
    District 98 Jonathan Karlen Democratic Party 2024

    Montana Senate members representing rural school districts (April 2025)
    District Number Name Party Year first elected
    District 1 Mike Cuffe Republican Party 2018
    District 14 Russel Tempel Republican Party 2018
    District 15 Gregg Hunter Republican Party 2024
    District 16 Jonathan Windy Boy Democratic Party 2024
    District 17 Bob Phalen Republican Party 2024
    District 2 Dave Fern Democratic Party 2024
    District 20 Sue Vinton Republican Party 2024
    District 21 Gayle Lammers Republican Party 2024
    District 22 Daniel Zolnikov Republican Party 2022
    District 27 Vince Ricci Republican Party 2024
    District 3 Carl Glimm Republican Party 2024
    District 30 Cora Neumann Democratic Party 2024
    District 33 Christopher Pope Democratic Party 2024
    District 35 Tony Tezak Republican Party 2024
    District 36 Sara Novak Democratic Party 2024
    District 38 Becky Beard Republican Party 2024
    District 39 Wylie Galt Republican Party 2024
    District 40 Laura Smith Democratic Party 2024
    District 41 Janet Ellis Democratic Party 2018
    District 43 Jason Ellsworth Republican Party 2018
    District 44 Theresa Manzella Republican Party 2020
    District 46 Jacinda Morigeau Democratic Party 2024
    District 47 Ellie Boldman Democratic Party 2024
    District 49 Willis Curdy Democratic Party 2022
    District 5 Matt Regier Republican Party 2024
    District 7 Greg Hertz Republican Party 2024
    District 8 Susan Webber Democratic Party 2018
    District 9 Bruce Gillespie Republican Party 2018

    See also

    Other school choice-related content:

    Other education policy content


    External links

    Footnotes

    1. A District Court judge ruled on April 18, 2025, that Utah's universal school choice program, Utah Fits All, violated the Utah Constitution. The program will continue to run until the Utah Supreme Court rules on its constitutionality.
    2. A judge in Franklin County, Ohio, ruled that Ohio's EdChoice Scholarship, a universal school choice voucher program, violated the Ohio Constitution by funding private schools at the expense of public schools. The case is expected to be appealed in Ohio's Tenth District Court of Appeals.
    3. A Laramie County District Court judge instituted a preliminary injunction on Wyoming's universal Steamboat Legacy private school choice program, preventing payouts to families during litigation over the legality of the program. The program was enacted by the state legislature in March 2025 and set to begin on July 1, 2025, but was delayed on June 27, 2025, then temporarily blocked on July 15.
    4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Legiscan, "MT HB 393," accessed August 2, 2025
    5. 5.0 5.1 Legiscan, "MT SB 390," accessed August 2, 2025