Florida Right to Medical Marijuana Initiative, Amendment 2 (2014)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Amendment 2
Flag of Florida.png
Quick stats
Type:Constitutional amendment
Constitution:Florida Constitution
Referred by:Citizens
Status:On the ballot

The Florida Right to Medical Marijuana Initiative, Amendment 2 is on the November 4, 2014 ballot in the state of Florida as an initiated constitutional amendment. The measure, upon voter approval, would legalize medical marijuana. Specifically, the measure would guarantee the following:[1]

  • That medical use of marijuana by a qualifying patient or personal caregiver is not subject to criminal or civil liability or sanctions under state law.
  • That a licensed physician is not subject to criminal or civil liability or sanctions for issuing medical marijuana to a person diagnosed with a "debilitating medical condition" under state law.
  • That registered medical marijuana treatment centers are not subject to criminal or civil liability or sanctions under state law.

The measure defines a "debilitating medical condition" as cancer, multiple sclerosis, glaucoma, hepatitis C, HIV, AIDS, ALS, Crohn's disease, Parkinson's disease "or other conditions for which a physician believes that the medical use of marijuana would likely outweigh the potential health risks for a patient."[1]

The Florida Department of Health would be responsible for regulating medical marijuana. The department would issue and regulate patient identification cards, personal caregiver identification cards, develop procedures related to medical marijuana treatment centers and institute regulations defining reasonable amounts of marijuana for medical use. The department would be required to protect the confidentiality of all patients.[1]

The constitutional amendment contains six limitations on how the amendment's language can be construed:[1]

  • The amendment does not “affect laws relating to non-medical use, possession, production or sale of marijuana.”
  • The amendment does not authorize “the use of medical marijuana by anyone other than a qualifying patient.”
  • The amendment does not allow for the “operation of a motor vehicle, boat, or aircraft while under the influence of marijuana.”
  • The amendment does not require accommodations for medical marijuana use “in any place of education or employment, or of smoking medical marijuana in any public place.”
  • The amendment does not require “any health insurance provider or any government agency or authority to reimburse any person for expenses related to the medical use of marijuana.”
  • The amendment does not require “the violation of federal law or purports to give immunity under federal law.”

The measure is sponsored by People United for Medical Marijuana.[1]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The official title reads as follows:[1]

Use of Marijuana for Certain Medical Conditions[2]

Ballot summary

The official ballot text reads as follows:[1]

Allows the medical use of marijuana for individuals with debilitating diseases as determined by a licensed Florida physician. Allows caregivers to assist patients’ medical use of marijuana. The Department of Health shall register and regulate centers that produce and distribute marijuana for medical purposes and shall issue identification cards to patients and caregivers. Applies only to Florida law. Does not authorize violations of federal law or any non-medical use, possession or production of marijuana.[2]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article X, Florida Constitution

Amendment 2 would add a Section 29 to Article X of the Florida Constitution.[1]

The amendment’s full text can be read here.

Fiscal note

The fiscal note developed by the Financial Impact Estimating Conference reads as follows:[3]

Increased costs from this amendment to state and local governments cannot be determined. There will be additional regulatory and enforcement activities associated with the production and sale of medical marijuana. Fees will offset at least a portion of the regulatory costs. While sales tax may apply to purchases, changes in revenue cannot reasonably be determined since the extent to which medical marijuana will be exempt from taxation is unclear without legislative or state administrative action.[2]


Charlotte’s Web

On June 16, 2014, Gov. Rick Scott (R) signed Senate Bill 1030, also known as the “Compassionate Medical Cannabis Act of 2014.” The legislation legalized low-tetrahydrocannabinol cannabis, such as the strain Charlotte’s Web, for medical patients suffering from cancer or "a physical medical condition that chronically produces symptoms of seizures," such as epilepsy, "or severe and persistent muscle spasms." The law requires physician approval and for the potential user’s physician to determine that “no other satisfactory alternative treatment options exist for that patient.” SB1030 also authorized medical centers to conduct research on low-tetrahydrocannabinol (low-THC) cannabis.[4] The measure will become effective on January 1, 2015. Gov. Scott said, "As a father and grandfather, you never want to see kids suffer. I am proud to stand today with families who deserve the ability to provide their children with the best treatment available"[5]

Gov. Scott also signed Senate Bill 1700. The law exempts the identification of patients and physicians from public records related to the medical use of low-tetrahydrocannabinol cannabis. The bill does allow, however, access to such information by law enforcement agencies, low-THC marijuana dispensing organizations, physicians, relevant health care regulatory boards, and researches under certain circumstances. SB 1700 will be in effect until October 2, 2019.[6]

Florida is the 22nd state to enact legislation legalizing some level of access to medical cannabis.[7]



People United for Medical Marijuana is leading the campaign in support of the measure.[8]

Multiple media outlets have predicted that the measure will aid Florida Democrats, especially in the state’s gubernatorial and lieutenant gubernatorial election, since the initiative may bring out young people, who tend to vote more Democratic.[9][10] Ana Cruz, former executive director of the Florida Democratic Party, said, “I wish that it didn't take medical marijuana on the ballot to motivate our young voters to go and vote because there's far too much at stake for them and their children. But listen, we'll take it any way we can get it.”[11]



Former officials




Ben Pollara, campaign manager of United for Care, offered counter arguments to what he considered the opposition's four main arguments:[26]

  • Claim #1: "Medical marijuana will destroy families like alcohol and other drugs have." Pollara replied, "Florida voters understand that passing Amendment 2 will grant medical marijuana access to really sick people. Conversations of addiction are not really germane. And to the effect that it is, common substitutes prescribed to use instead of medical marijuana are opiates, which are highly addictive. Using medical marijuana legally should decrease addictions in Florida to Oxycodone and Percocet."
  • Claim #2: "The medical marijuana issue is a Republican versus Democrat issue." Pollara replied, "Medical marijuana is a nonpartisan issue. In a poll conducted by Republicans in Republican-held state senate districts, 78 percent supported medical marijuana. And in the polls we conducted, that number has always been well above 50 percent."
  • Claim #3: "Children do not need medical marijuana to treat epilepsy since there are clinical trials they can participate in." Pollara replied, "Kevin [Sabet] is talking about clinical trials on CBD-based pharmaceuticals. It doesn't take into account kids suffering from seizures because they can't apply to be in study since it doesn't exist in Florida. It's like applying to Harvard. Parents are desperate. I'm not a parent, but I would want treatment for my child immediately and not wait. Medical marijuana is not particularly dangerous, and suffering children shouldn't have to wait for any real pharmaceutical research."
  • Claim #4: "The wording in the amendment is too lenient and will make medical marijuana available to anyone." Pollara replied, "If there was any doubt, the Florida Supreme Court has already ruled that the amendment will only be used in cases of debilitating illness. The purpose of the amendment is to allow the medical use of marijuana for individuals with debilitating diseases as determined by a licensed Florida physician. In its wording, the amendment specifically says 'Nothing in this section authorizes the use of medical marijuana by anyone other than a qualifying patient."

People United for Medical Marijuana, the initiative's sponsoring organization, issued a rebuttal to the opposing campaign video put out by Drug Free Florida:

CLAIM: In reference to the availability of medical marijuana, the website asserts “anyone who wants pot will get it.”

FACT: This is simply not true. In their decision placing Amendment 2 on the November ballot, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed that only patients with “debilitating” diseases and medical conditions would qualify for medical marijuana.

CLAIM: “Teens will be able to legally purchase pot without their parents’ consent.”

FACT: Wrong again. In order to purchase medical marijuana, you would need a doctor’s recommendation. Under Florida law, barring a few extenuating circumstances, physicians are not allowed to provide medical treatment to minors without parental or guardian consent, so this is a groundless concern.

CLAIM: Amendment 2 will lead to a “pill mill”-like scenario in Florida. “Pot docs” will “spring up next to restaurants, schools, churches and supermarkets.”

FACT: Look no further than the State of Florida to see that this claim is baseless. The State of Florida’s office of Economic and Demographic Research has already addressed this issue. They have said the physician examination requirement, the application process with the Department of Health, the regulatory structure that would be implemented by that same body and subsequent protective laws that may be passed by the legislature would make this scenario extremely unlikely. (See pages 10-11 of OEDR Financial Information Statement)

CLAIM: The website further contends that “felons-even drug dealers” would be able to qualify as caregivers in order to administer medical cannabis to severely ill patients.

FACT: This claim requires the reader to assume that the state will implement Amendment 2 in an irresponsible way. If the amendment is passed, the Florida Department of Health will be tasked with issuing detailed regulations regarding qualification requirements for caregivers. During that process United for Care will fight alongside any organization that, like us, is concerned about making sure nobody with a record of dealing drugs can become a qualified caregiver.

“When it comes to the credibility of anything that comes from Drug Free Florida, it’s best to consider the source,” Pollara concluded. “The organization is chaired by Carlton Turner, a former Reagan-era drug policy aide who had to abandon his position following his statements on marijuana leading to homosexuality. If his views were too extreme for the Reagan administration in 1986, how can we take anything he or his organization says seriously?” [2]

—People United for Medical Marijuana, [27]

Other arguments in support of the measure include:

  • Sen. Jeff Clemens (D-27) said, "This 60's reefer madness attitude has to go away. We all know now that this is not a dangerous drug and it's actually much safer than other drugs."[28]
  • Kim Russell, founder of People United for Medical Marijuana, said that she began legalization efforts shortly after her father was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease. Some research claims that the drug can help alleviate the symptoms. In response to claims that politics is the motivating factor, Russell says, "It's freedom and it's also compassion."[29]
  • NORML's Allen Saint Pierre criticized the Chamber of Commerce's stance as being anti-business, saying, "Somebody has to grow this stuff. Somebody has to transport it. Somebody to market it. Somebody has to package it and somebody has to sell it. One would think the Chamber of Commerce gets that and would be in favor of having more business, more revenue, etc., etc. All we’ve been arguing is to try to take an illegitimate, underground business and bring it above ground so they can become members of the Chamber of Commerce. That’s how twisted this all is."[30]

Campaign contributions

Total campaign cash Campaign Finance Ballotpedia.png
as of July 8, 2014
Category:Ballot measure endorsements Support: $5,480,763
Circle thumbs down.png Opposition: $2,742,670

As of July 8, 2014, People United for Medical Marijuana has received $5,480,763 in contributions.[31]

PAC info:

PAC Amount raised Amount spent
People United for Medical Marijuana $5,480,763 $5,130,368
Total $5,480,763 $5,130,368

Top 5 contributors:

Donor Amount
The Morgan Law Firm, PA $3,535,897
Barbara A. Stiefel $400,000
John Morgan $250,000
Center for Drug Policy Reform $270,000
John Holloway $50,000


Florida No On 2 2014.png
Dont Let Florida Go to Pot 2014.png

Drug Free Florida is leading the campaign in opposition to the initiative.[32] The organization has hired Republican consultant Tre’ Evers.[13]

The Florida Sheriffs Association (FSA) and Save Our Society From Drugs, along with other anti-marijuana organizations, launched Don't Let Florida Go to Pot (DLFGP).[33] The organization plans on campaigning against medical marijuana, except the Charlotte's Web strain, and taking contributions, but will not be campaigning against Amendment 2 specifically due to the FSA's tax status.[34] DLFGP has no intentions of initiating a political action committee and will therefore be running an "educational campaign."[35]

Opponents of Amendment 2 have called the amendment a "de facto legalization" of marijuana.[36]




  • Florida Family Policy Council[41]
  • Florida Medical Association[42]
  • Institute on Global Drug Policy[43]
  • Drug Policy Institute
  • Palm Beach County Substance Awareness Coalition[28]
  • Florida Police Chiefs Association
  • Florida Sheriffs Association
  • Florida Chamber of Commerce
  • Save Our Society from Drugs
  • Brevard County Medical Society[44]


  • Sheldon Adelson, casino and hotel magnate[45]


Drug Free Florida's "The Devil is in the Details" campaign video.

Drug Free Florida, the committee opposing Amendment 2, criticized the measure for containing four loopholes. They argued:

Amendment 2 does not require a doctor’s prescription in order to obtain medical pot, because a prescription would violate federal law. Amendment 2 authors define “debilitating medical condition” as any condition from back pain to trouble sleeping. As a result, anyone who wants pot will get it.

Amendment 2 allows so-called “caregivers” to dispense medical pot. Caregivers do not need medical training. They can be felons - even drug dealers. It will be easier to get a caregiver’s license than a driver’s license.

Under Amendment 2, teens and children will be able to legally purchase pot without their parents’ consent. Amendment 2 places no age restrictions on pot smoking.

Amendment 2 places no restrictions on the location of seedy pot shops. Like “pill mills,” look for “pot docs” to spring up next to restaurants, schools, churches and supermarkets. [2]

—Drug Free Florida, [32]

Drug Free Florida's "The Pot-for-Anyone-Who-Wants-It Loophole" campaign video.

US Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-23), chairperson of the Democratic National Committee, stated her opposition to Amendment 2:

I have concerns that it is written too broadly and stops short of ensuring strong regulatory oversight from state officials. Other states have shown that lax oversight and ease of access to prescriptions can lead to abuse, fraud, and accidents. Also, given Florida's recent history in combating the epidemic of 'pill mills' and dubious distinction as having among the highest incidents of fraud, I do not believe we should make it easier for those seeking to abuse the drug to have easy access to it.

As a cancer survivor, mother and lawmaker, I am acutely empathetic to the suffering of people with terminal illnesses and chronic pain. My view is that approval of the use of marijuana as a medical treatment should be handled responsibly and in a regulated manner that ensures its approval does not do more harm than good. [2]

—US Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-23), [39]

Other arguments against the initiative include:

  • Gov. Rick Soctt (R) said that he would not vote for the initiative, saying, "I have a great deal of empathy for people battling difficult diseases and I understand arguments in favor of this initiative. But, having seen the terrible effects of alcohol and drug abuse first-hand, I cannot endorse sending Florida down this path and I would personally vote against it."[37]
  • Attorney General Pam Bondi (R) filed a challenge to the Florida Supreme Court. She argued, “The proposal hides the fact that the Amendment would make Florida one of the most lenient medical-marijuana states, allowing use for limitless 'other conditions' specified by any physician. With no 'condition' off limits, physicians could authorize marijuana for anything, any time, to anyone, of any age. But rather than tell voters of this extraordinary scope, the summary uses language to prey on voters' understandable sympathies for Florida's most vulnerable patients — those suffering 'debilitating diseases.’”[46]
  • Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-4), who pushed for the legalization of the Charlotte’s Web strain of marijuana in the legislature, stated opposition to a “John Morgan financed” initiative because it would lead to a “[marijuana] dispensary on every corner” and anyone with “high anxiety will be begging doctors for a marijuana joint.”[40]
  • Jeff Kadel of the Palm Beach County Substance Awareness Coalition said, "With our history with the pill mills and the doctors, there's going to be no shortage of people writing these certificates for whatever medical reason is necessary."[28]

Campaign contributions

As of July 8, 2014, Drug Free Florida Committee has received $2,742,670 in contributions.[31]

PAC info:

PAC Amount raised Amount spent
Drug Free Florida Committee $2,742,670 $112,510
Total $2,742,670 $112,510

Top contributors:

Donor Amount
Sheldon Adelson $2,500,000
Carol Jenkins Barnett Family Trust $100,000
Mel F. Sembler $100,000
Neal Communities of Southwest Florida $10,000
Malcolm K. Beyer, Jr. $5,000

Media editorial positions

2014 measures
Flag of Florida.png
November 4
Amendment 1
Amendment 2
Amendment 3
Local measures
See also: Endorsements of Florida ballot measures, 2014


  • Bradenton Herald said, "This is about compassion for those whose medical conditions are not suitably eased by pharmaceuticals traditionally prescribed for cancer, multiple sclerosis and other grave diseases. Fears about drug abuse are indeed worrisome, but the amendment proposal charges the Legislature with adopting regulations that should bar that possibility. Should Floridians approve the November ballot issue, the state would become the first in the South and the 21st in the nation to legalize medical marijuana. The trend is clear. Cannabis has lost the demonization once embraced by a majority of Americans."[47]
  • Sun Sentinel said, "But no matter what happens in the election nine months from now, Florida lawmakers should act to legalize a new form of pot that offers no drug-induced high, but plenty of relief for seriously ill children. The time for medical marijuana, in one form or another, has come for Florida. This is not about legalizing recreational pot. Period. This is not about Florida becoming the first state in the South to legalize medical marijuana."[48]

Other opinions

  • Tampa Bay Times said, "It is understandable that the private market sees medical marijuana as the next big thing. But patient health and public safety should be paramount. It would help voters make a more informed decision in November on medical marijuana if the state provided greater clarity on how it would carry out the amendment's intent to help specific patients without turning Florida into the next California."[49]


See also: Polls, 2014 ballot measures
Florida Amendment 2 (2014)
Poll Support OpposeUndecidedMargin of ErrorSample Size
Quinnipiac University Poll
11/12/2013 - 11/13/2013
Public Policy Polling
1/16/2014 - 1/21/2014
Gravis Marketing
1/30/2014 - 1/31/2014
University of North Florida
3/06/2014 - 3/14/2014
Gravis Marketing
4/23/14 - 4/25/14
Quinnipiac University Poll
4/23/14 - 4/28/14
Anzalone Liszt Grove Research and Public Opinion Strategies
5/25/14 - 6/5/14
Quinnipiac University Poll
7/17/14 - 7/21/14
AVERAGES 73% 21.5% 5.38% +/-3.31 1,002.88
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing the initiative process in Florida


Supporters needed to collect a minimum of 683,149 valid signatures by February 1, 2014 in order to qualify the measure for the November 2014 ballot. People United for Medical Marijuana announced that the organization collected more than 1.1 million signatures on January 15, 2014.[50] 786,371 valid signatures were recorded by the Division of Elections.[51]

Court evaluation

In Florida, all initiative ballot titles and summaries must be approved by the Florida Supreme Court prior to certification. The court either validates or invalidates the measure’s language. The Florida Supreme Court ruled on January 27, 2014, in a 4-3 decision, that the measure's text is valid, accurate and constitutional.[52]

On December 5, 2013, the high court held a hearing on the measure's language.[53] The initiative faced opposition from Attorney General Pam Bondi (R). She argued, "The proposal [language] hides the fact that the Amendment would make Florida one of the most lenient medical-marijuana states, allowing use for limitless 'other conditions' specified by any physician. With no 'condition' off limits, physicians could authorize marijuana for anything, any time, to anyone, of any age. But rather than tell voters of this extraordinary scope, the summary uses language to prey on voters' understandable sympathies for Florida's most vulnerable patients — those suffering 'debilitating diseases." PolitiFact Florida rated her statement as "mostly true."[54] Solicitor General Allen Winsor went as far as saying that "other conditions" may include people who "don't even have to have a disease."[53] The Florida Legislature also filed an opinion against the initiative.[55]


Justices Barbara Pariente, Fred Lewis, Peggy Quince and James Perry concluded that the amendment would be “accurately represented on the ballot.” Their affirmative ruling stated, "Voters are given fair notice as to the chief purpose and scope of the proposed amendment, which is to allow a restricted use of marijuana for certain ― debilitating medical conditions. We conclude that the voters will not be affirmatively misled regarding the purpose of the proposed amendment because the ballot title and summary accurately convey the limited use of marijuana, as determined by a licensed Florida physician."[56]

Chief Justice Ricky Polston and Justices Jorge Labarga and Charles Canady all dissented against the amendment. All three dissenting judges were appointed by Former Gov. Charlie Crist (D), who supports the measure.[57] Polston’s arguments were summarized in the ruling as: “(1) the summary “promises a narrow and limited marijuana program—the precise opposite of what the [a]mendment would deliver”; (2) the summary fails to disclose that physicians who authorize patients’ use of medical marijuana consistent with the amendment allegedly will receive broad tort and disciplinary immunity; and (3) the summary wrongly suggests that the amendment “allows” activities that are plainly illegal under federal law.”[55]

See also

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

Additional reading

External links

Basic information




  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Florida Department of State, "Use of Marijuana for Certain Medical Conditions," accessed January 14, 2014
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
  3. Florida Office of Economic & Demographic Research, "Financial Impact Statement," accessed January 27, 2014
  4. Florida Senate, "Senate Bill 1030," accessed June 26, 2014
  5. Reuters, "Florida governor signs law allowing limited medical marijuana use," June 16, 2014
  6. Florida Senate, "Senate Bill 1700," accessed June 26, 2014
  7. Sunshine State News, "Bill Signing Makes Florida 22nd State to Pass Medical Marijuana Legislation," June 16, 2014
  8. People United for Medical Marijuana, "Homepage," accessed June 30, 2014
  9. Bloomberg, “Florida Pot Vote Seen Helping Democrat Become Governor”, January 14, 2014
  10. Reuters, “Analysis: Florida Democrats may get buzz from medical marijuana”, January 27, 2014
  11. Minneapolis Star Tribune, "Medical marijuana measure in Florida a key test of pot's political potency for Democrats," April 14, 2014
  12. Bloomberg, "Florida Pot Vote Seen Helping Democrat Become Governor," January 13, 2014
  13. 13.0 13.1 The Tampa Tribune, "“Vote No on 2” anti-marijuana campaign commences," May 15, 2014
  14. Orlando Sun Sentinel, "'Glimmer of hope' for medical marijuana in Florida," December 30, 2013
  15. Broward Palm Beach New Times, "Medical Marijuana: Alan Clendenin, Florida Democratic Vice Chair, Breaks With Wasserman Schultz on Amendment 2," June 9, 2014
  16. Miami Herald, "Poll: 82 percent favor medical marijuana, plurality support pot legalization," November 21, 2013
  17. Florida Cannabis Action Network
  18. Digital Journal, "Marijuana Holdings Americas Sponsors Florida Cannabis Industry Association, Commits To Florida Medical Marijuana Ballot Initiative," April 2, 2014
  19. WTSP 10, "Moms form group in support of medical marijuana," May 26, 2014
  20. Tampa Bay Times, "Florida union endorses medical marijuana measure," June 24, 2014
  21. Libertarian Party of Florida
  22. News-Press, "Attorney John Morgan puts $1.8M into marijuana drive," January 13, 2014
  23. Design & Trend, "Marijuana 'Professor' Teaches Weed Classes In Florida In Preparation For Legalization," February 7, 2014
  24. Russia Today, "Billionaire George Soros behind major push for marijuana legalization," April 3, 2014
  25. FLA-gov, "Keith Stegath," accessed July 1, 2014
  26. Broward Palm Beach New Times', "United for Care's Ben Pollara Counters Arguments by Anti-Medical Marijuana Crowd," March 17, 2014
  27. United for Care, "United for Care Pans Launch of New Anti-Amendment 2 Website,Video," May 15, 2014
  28. 28.0 28.1 28.2 WPTV, "Medical marijuana: Florida Supreme Court approves ballot amendment, voters to decide on marijuana," January 28, 2014
  29. Herald-Tribune, "New push in Florida for medical marijuana," July 8, 2013
  30. 30.0 30.1 The Florida Times-Union, "Economic impact of medical marijuana in Florida an open question," February 1, 2014
  31. 31.0 31.1 Florida Secretary of State, "Campaign Finance," accessed July 8, 2014
  32. 32.0 32.1 Drug Free Florida, "Homepage," accessed June 30, 2014
  33. Don't Let Florida Go to Pot, "Homepage," accessed June 30, 2014
  34. Broward Palm Beach New Times, "Florida Sheriffs Launch Medical Marijuana Opposition Campaign," April 25, 2014
  35. Orlando Sentinel, "Sheriffs take lead against legalizing medical pot," May 1, 2014
  36. Tallahassee Democrat, "Amendment 2 opponents say it's 'de facto legalization' of marijuana," July 17, 2014
  37. 37.0 37.1 Idaho Statesman, "Gov. Scott will vote against medical marijuana," January 21, 2014
  38. The News Herald, "Medical marijuana case headed to Florida Supreme Court," December 5, 2013
  39. 39.0 39.1 Broward Palm Beach New Times, "Debbie Wasserman Schultz Calls Medical Marijuana Initiative "Too Broad," June 6, 2014
  40. 40.0 40.1 The Gainesville Sun, "Andrew Skerritt: Good news for medical marijuana supporters," January 20, 2014
  41. Bradenton Herald, "Florida pols look out of touch in medical marijuana," January 13, 2014
  42. The Tampa Tribune, "Statewide vote puts Florida at forefront of marijuana debate," January 27, 2014
  43. WTSP, "Medical marijuana debate to be held at University of Tampa," February 20, 2014
  44. Ocala Star Banner, "Base Amendment 2 vote on fact, not emotion," May 18, 2014
  45. Bradenton Herald, "Florida medical marijuana opponents gain money and allies," June 11, 2014
  46. Tampa Bay Times, "PolitiFact Florida: Medical marijuana amendment has lenient 'condition' clause," January 5, 2014
  47. Bradenton Herald, "Good wins for medical marijuana, land conservation: both FL constitutional amendment proposals make ballot," January 29, 2014
  48. Sun Sentinel, "Florida medical marijuana: Legalize one way or another," January 28, 2014
  49. Tampa Bay Times, "Editorial: Florida's urgent need for medical marijuana rules," May 16, 2014
  50. Sunshine State News, "United For Care Gathers 1.1 Million Signatures for Marijuana Petition," January 15, 2014
  51. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named sos
  52. Orlando Sentinel, "Medical marijuana amendment gets green light from Supreme Court," January 27, 2014
  53. 53.0 53.1 Tampa Bay Times, "Florida Supreme Court justices question marijuana ballot language," December 5, 2013
  54. PolitiFact Florida, "Pam Bondi says amendment would make Florida one of the most lenient medical marijuana states," December 17, 2013
  55. 55.0 55.1 Florida Supreme Court, "Decision on SC13-2006 and SC13-2132," accessed January 29, 2014
  56. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named miami
  57. CBS Miami, "Florida Supreme Court Clears Way For Medical Marijuana On Ballot," January 27, 2014