Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Phillip Peters

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was last updated during the official's most recent election or appointment. Please contact us with any updates.
Phillip Peters
Image of Phillip Peters
Kern County Board of Supervisors District 1
Tenure

2021 - Present

Term ends

2029

Years in position

4

Predecessor
Prior offices
Kern High Board of Trustees Trustee Area 4

Elections and appointments
Last elected

March 5, 2024

Education

High school

Garces Memorial High School

Personal
Profession
Business owner
Contact

Phillip Peters is a member of the Kern County Board of Supervisors in California, representing District 1. He assumed office on January 4, 2021. His current term ends on January 8, 2029.

Peters won re-election to the Kern County Board of Supervisors to represent District 1 in California outright in the primary on March 5, 2024, after the general election was canceled.

Biography

Email editor@ballotpedia.org to notify us of updates to this biography.

Peters was born and raised in Bakersfield, California. He is a husband and father and owns an industrial waste water recycling and cleaning business. Peters is involved in the Kern County Farm Bureau, the Workforce Investment Board and the Association of Builders and Contractors.[1]

Elections

2024

See also: Municipal elections in Kern County, California (2024)

Nonpartisan primary election

Nonpartisan primary for Kern County Board of Supervisors District 1

Incumbent Phillip Peters won election outright against David Fluhart and Mary Little in the primary for Kern County Board of Supervisors District 1 on March 5, 2024.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Phillip Peters
Phillip Peters (Nonpartisan)
 
60.7
 
22,070
David Fluhart (Nonpartisan)
 
26.1
 
9,471
Mary Little (Nonpartisan)
 
13.2
 
4,806

Total votes: 36,347
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Endorsements

Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Peters in this election.

2020

See also: Municipal elections in Kern County, California (2020)

Nonpartisan primary election

Nonpartisan primary for Kern County Board of Supervisors District 1

Phillip Peters won election outright against David Fluhart and Daures Stephens in the primary for Kern County Board of Supervisors District 1 on March 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Phillip Peters
Phillip Peters (Nonpartisan)
 
52.2
 
25,062
David Fluhart (Nonpartisan)
 
24.4
 
11,697
Image of Daures Stephens
Daures Stephens (Nonpartisan) Candidate Connection
 
23.4
 
11,215

Total votes: 47,974
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

2014

See also: Kern High School District elections (2014)

Four seats on the Kern High School District Board of Trustees were up for general election on November 4, 2014. In Trustee Area 1, incumbent Mike Williams faced challenger Aurora Cooper and won re-election. The Trustee Area 2 seat was up for election due to a vacancy on the board. Jeff Flores was the only candidate to file for the seat. He ran unopposed and won the election by default. The Trustee Area 4 race featured incumbent Martha McCuen Miller and challengers Anna Laven and Phillip Peters. Peters defeated Miller and Laven to win a seat on the board. In Trustee Area 5, incumbent Bryan Batey ran unopposed and won re-election by default.

Results

Kern High School District,
Trustee Area 4 General Election, 4-year term, 2014
Party Candidate Vote % Votes
     Nonpartisan Green check mark transparent.pngPhillip Peters 36.5% 7,923
     Nonpartisan Martha McCuen Miller Incumbent 34.6% 7,504
     Nonpartisan Anna Laven 28.9% 6,274
Total Votes 21,701
Source: Kern County Registrar of Voters, "Official Final Results: November 4, 2014 Consolidated General Election," accessed December 19, 2014

Funding

Peters reported $7,200.00 in contributions and $2,659.24 in expenditures to the Kern County Registrar of Voters as of September 30, 2014, leaving his campaign with $4,540.76 cash on hand.[2]

Endorsements

Peters received endorsements from Assemblywoman Shannon Grove (R) and Assemblyman Tim Donnelly (R).[3] He also received endorsements from several community leaders. A list of his supporters can be found here.

Campaign themes

2024

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Phillip Peters did not complete Ballotpedia's 2024 Candidate Connection survey.

2020

Phillip Peters did not complete Ballotpedia's 2020 Candidate Connection survey.

2014

Peters highlighted the following issues on his campaign website:

OBJECTIVES:
  • Improve opportunities for Career Technical Education.

For many students, college is a great pathway to a career in their field of interest. For some students however, college can be a financial burden which carries no guarantee of employment. Additionally, seventy-one percent of college seniors last year graduated with an average of $29,400 dollars in debt. In Kern County alone last month, nearly 58% of jobs were in the following categories: Farming, mining, logging, construction, manufacturing, trade, transportation, utilities, leisure and hospitality. Kern County is in the top five counties in the nation for both crop value and oil production. By not offering more vocational training and by not promoting alternate pathways to success, we are doing our students a disservice.

  • Provide parents with options for their children’s education.

Charter schools just make sense. They introduce an element of healthy competition into the education system, which means that providers (schools) must strive for excellence in order to better serve their customers (students). According to a report by the Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) at Stanford University, Los Angeles charter school students significantly outperformed their public school counterparts. The gains were particularly large for schools serving low-income Hispanic students. Charter schools are more accountable, better suited to serve a variety of children and provide smaller class sizes and more individual attention. On top of all of these benefits comes a greater level of parental involvement, which not only create stronger families but would also help to curb the high expulsion rates in the district.

  • Stand up FOR local government, stand-up TO federal regulation.

As we all know, Common Core has become an area of intense debate, and unbiased information is hard to come by. From the Constitution to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, our country has time and again affirmed that education is not to be regulated by the federal government. The right to determine how best to educate our kids is a duty that has been entrusted to the states, which allows more input from both parents and educators. While Common Core is not technically mandated by the federal government, it is in effect mandated by the enticement of federal dollars. While states should all hold their students to the highest possible academic standards, there are better ways to establish it than a one-size-fits-all federal program. Parents, teachers and administrators, working together with policy makers can best establish and provide programs to meet the needs of their students.

  • Ensure accountability, transparency and effective communication at all levels.

Many district residents are familiar with the case at Independence High School regarding the alleged sexual assault of a female autistic student. While the Kern High School District did accept responsibility, the situation was admittedly mishandled from the very beginning. During the course of a lawsuit filed by the victim’s family, there was an unjustifiable lack of communication between Self-Insured Schools of California (SISC) and the Kern High School District (KHSD). SISC, acting on behalf of the KHSD, had an obligation to report developments and settlement offers in the course of the lawsuit, which it did not. Additionally, SISC hired a private investigator to follow and video tape the autistic student. Although investigating parties involved in lawsuits is common practice, it was not in the best interest of the student and KHSD should have been informed, then immediately put a stop to it. If elected to the KHSD Board of Trustee’s, Phillip will hold accountable every agency and department in the district, and ensure that if they are not acting in our student’s best interest, then they will no longer represent the KHSD.[4]

—Phillip Peters' campaign website (2014)[5]

See also


External links

Footnotes