Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
Angela Walser
Angela Walser (Libertarian Party) ran for election to the Alabama House of Representatives to represent District 8. She lost in the general election on November 8, 2022.
Walser completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. Click here to read the survey answers.
Biography
Angela Walser's career experience includes working as an educator.[1]
Elections
2022
See also: Alabama House of Representatives elections, 2022
General election
General election for Alabama House of Representatives District 8
Incumbent Terri Collins defeated Angela Walser in the general election for Alabama House of Representatives District 8 on November 8, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Terri Collins (R) | 84.8 | 7,234 |
![]() | Angela Walser (L) ![]() | 14.7 | 1,255 | |
Other/Write-in votes | 0.5 | 46 |
Total votes: 8,535 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Republican primary election
The Republican primary election was canceled. Incumbent Terri Collins advanced from the Republican primary for Alabama House of Representatives District 8.
Campaign themes
2022
Ballotpedia survey responses
See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection
Angela Walser completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Walser's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.
Collapse all
|- As has been magnified in recent years and elections, the two-party system has been even more damaging to society than the various laws and practices they have put into place. More and more we see the two major parties demanding their members move further and further to extremes. Most of this human family finds themselves on neither extreme, but are actually rational, compassionate, humble, and concerned about the world around them, and desire to improve it. My own desire to improve the world drives me to work to move away from the false dichotomy of a two party system, to remind everyone of common sense, and to create a space where people can feel free to determine their views without feeling a need to align to the limits of two parties
- We have been conditioned by the world around us to look at society's ills and think, "Someone should do something about that. Isn't there a law???" However, lawmakers tend to be inexperienced in specific issue solutions, may have ulterior motives, and are trying to work within a faulty system. The government machine is not an efficient one, and rarely solves as many problems as it creates. Actual solutions are best put in place by private groups, working to become educated on which solution best fits their community, how to implement it, and how it can be continuously improved and optimized. Unfortunately, there are often road blocks put in their way by the government. The easiest way to improve a situation? Take the government out of it
- Imagine, instead of a false dichotomy of only two extreme parties, a world where voters educate themselves on candidates from a wide variety of parties (or perhaps even without party associations), determine which candidate they feel will best represent their personal interests in government, and then vote for that candidate. To ensure their vote is not "wasted", they could then further report their second, third, etc. choices, so that their voice is still represented, should their first choice fail to be elected. This utopian ideal is not so far out of reach - ranked choice voting systems are in place and being used in states such as Maine and Alaska, and Alabama has an opportunity to join.
As a rule, none of the above issues have been made better by asking the clunky government machine to try and solve them.
Generally, my stance on any single issue topic is that the greatest way to improve that issue's relationship to the life of individuals is simple: Decentralize it. Remove inefficient and sometimes downright harmful government regulations and return the choices to the individual. Let family structures, churches, charities, private social welfare groups, and other similar institutions work unhindered so that experts who are qualified to help can help, and individuals can move forward unfettered.
Policymaking should take all viewpoints into account, and should be civil, focused on lawmakers vs. the problem. But policymaking is not about compromise. It is not about trading and meeting in the middle, giving and taking from a pool of citizens' rights to try and appease all of the members in the room where it happens. Instead, policymaking should be focused on what the governing body can do to better allow citizens to help themselves. On how to provide *more* freedoms and liberties to the citizens, to allow private organizations to move forward unhindered.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
See also
2022 Elections
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on June 21, 2022