Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Caucus

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Election Policy Banner 2024.png



Election Policy VNT Logo.png

Primary election
Primary elections by state
Closed primary
Open primary
Semi-closed primary
Top-two primary
Final-five voting
Non-primary nominations
Primary cancellations

Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker

Select a state from the menu below to learn more about its election administration.

A caucus is a political party gathering in which party members choose candidates for an election. At a caucus, participants may debate about the candidates; in addition, the voting process itself may not be conducted by secret ballot. Instead, caucus-goers may vote by raising hands or gathering in groups organized by preferred candidate. A primary election, by contrast, is an election in which voters select their preferred candidates by casting secret ballots.[1][2]

Historically, caucuses were the dominant method by which the major political parties determined their presidential nominees. Today, caucuses are less common than primary elections. However, political parties in some states still conduct caucuses as part of the presidential nominating process. In the 2024 presidential election cycle, at least one party used a caucus in eight states.[3]

The Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee, the governing bodies for the nation's two major parties, establish their own guidelines for the presidential nomination process.[3][1]

Caucuses and presidential nominations

Hover over the terms below to display definitions.

Ballot access laws
Primary election
Caucus
Delegate
Election Policy VNT Logo.png

A political party formally nominates its presidential candidate at a national nominating convention. At this convention, state delegates select the party's nominee. Prior to the nominating convention, the states conduct presidential preference primaries or caucuses. Generally speaking, only state-recognized parties — such as the Democratic Party and the Republican Party — conduct primaries and caucuses. These elections measure voter preference for the various candidates and help determine which delegates will be sent to the national nominating convention.[4][5][6]

The Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee, the governing bodies of the nation's two major parties, establish their own guidelines for the presidential nomination process. State-level affiliates of the parties also have some say in determining rules and provisions in their own states.

In 2024, both Democrats and Republicans used a primary system in 41 states, and both Democrats and Republicans used a caucus system in three states. In five states, Democrats used a primary system, while Republicans used a caucus.[7] In one state, Wyoming, Democrats used a primary system, while Republicans awarded delegates at their state party convention.[3]



Support and opposition

Support

Jim DeGraffenreid, Nevada's Republican national committeeman, wrote in a 2023 op-ed that caucuses promote more meaningful engagement between voters:[8]

For Republicans who choose to participate in the full caucus, they have the opportunity to discuss the candidates with their neighbors before the votes are cast. They can also suggest items for the party platform, and sign up to be delegates to the county and state conventions. It is the purest and most traditional form of democracy, reminiscent of a time when voters understood that the right and responsibility to cast an educated vote was worth an hour or two of their time every couple of years.[9]
—Jim DeGraffenreid

Kathy O'Bradovich, writing for the Des Moines Register in 2015, argued that caucuses provide candidates that otherwise would be ignored a chance to win:[10]

It ensures that there is at least one place where a candidate with a compelling message has a shot at winning, regardless of money or national fame. Iowans take their responsibility seriously, informing themselves of the issues, turning out to meet candidates and expecting them to answer questions. That won't happen everywhere else.[9]
—Kathy O'Bradovich

Opposition

In a 2024 opinion piece for the Idaho Statesman, Dan Gookin wrote that Idaho should move away from its presidential caucus system. He argued the system disenfranchises some residents and that voters prefer a presidential primary:[11]

Firehouse caucuses are characterized by their limited accessibility and potential barriers to participation–all attributes that risk disenfranchising a significant portion of Idaho’s Republican voters. As I understand it, constituents have a slim window of time to arrive before doors lock. Inside, the GOP runs the show — not unbiased government officials.[9]
—Dan Gookin

In 2016, the Boston Globe editorial board argued that caucuses are undemocratic and should be abandoned in favor of primaries:[12]

The structural and systemic flaws that characterize state caucuses work against the democratic process in a way that primaries, where polls are open longer and vote tallies are more often standardized, do not. In a caucus, voters who aren’t physically able to sit in a school gymnasium and debate the merits of their candidate with their neighbors get shut out. And obscure rules that vary from state to state governing delegate allotment and proxy balloting make for confusing inconsistencies when tallying results.[9]
The Boston Globe

See also

Footnotes