Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Godfrey Santos Plata

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Godfrey Santos Plata
Image of Godfrey Santos Plata
Elections and appointments
Last election

November 3, 2020

Education

Bachelor's

University of Richmond, 2006

Graduate

University of California, Berkeley, 2010

Contact

Godfrey Santos Plata (Democratic Party) ran for election to the California State Assembly to represent District 53. He lost in the general election on November 3, 2020.

Santos Plata completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Godfrey Plata was born in Marikina, Philippines. He earned an undergraduate degree from the University of Richmond in 2006 and a graduate degree from the University of California, Berkeley in 2010.[1]

Elections

2020

See also: California State Assembly elections, 2020

General election

General election for California State Assembly District 53

Incumbent Miguel Santiago defeated Godfrey Santos Plata in the general election for California State Assembly District 53 on November 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Miguel Santiago
Miguel Santiago (D)
 
56.3
 
63,776
Image of Godfrey Santos Plata
Godfrey Santos Plata (D) Candidate Connection
 
43.7
 
49,580

Total votes: 113,356
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Nonpartisan primary election

Nonpartisan primary for California State Assembly District 53

Incumbent Miguel Santiago and Godfrey Santos Plata advanced from the primary for California State Assembly District 53 on March 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Miguel Santiago
Miguel Santiago (D)
 
62.9
 
35,515
Image of Godfrey Santos Plata
Godfrey Santos Plata (D) Candidate Connection
 
37.1
 
20,923

Total votes: 56,438
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Campaign themes

2020

Videos for Ballotpedia

Video submitted to Ballotpedia
Released January 14, 2020
Video submitted to Ballotpedia
Released January 21, 2020

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Godfrey Santos Plata completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2020. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Santos Plata's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

Godfrey Santos Plata is a 35 year old Filipino immigrant, Koreatown renter, and former public school teacher dedicated to supporting public school teachers as they mobilize around issues important to them and their students. He knows first-hand what it's like to have a class of 49 students. Over the last 13 years, Godfrey has worked against the school-to-prison pipeline and has been a fierce advocate for protecting and improving our public education system. He proudly joined picket lines with teachers in 2019.

A graduate of LA and Long Beach Unified schools, Godfrey holds degrees from the University of Richmond and UC Berkeley. He was raised by parents whose union jobs secured wages and benefits, allowing them into the middle class. Representing a district of renters, immigrant workers, and their families, Godfrey is a democrat who prioritizes people over profits by rejecting corporate and developer PAC money.

If elected, Godfrey would be the first assembly-person in California's 140-year history to be both an immigrant and a member of the LGBTQ community; the first Filipino assembly-person ever to represent the greater Los Angeles area; and just the second renter to join the assembly in which tenants are represented by just one renter, while more than 25% of legislators are landlords.
  • I'm an immigrant renter and former public school teacher running to ensure regular, everyday people are represented in policy-making.
  • We're fighting for fundamental rights for all people in District 53: a safe place to sleep; enough money for our cost of living; strong public schools; and a healthy life.
  • Putting people over profits, we're taking zero funds from corporate PACs or big real estate/development companies -- two out-sized influencers in policy-making.
RENT, HOMELESSNESS, AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING: Protecting renters; accelerating services for the unhoused; and prioritizing affordable and subsidized housing options

WORKERS, WAGES, AND QUALITY OF LIFE: Supporting workers and their rights to unionize; fair wages, hours, and benefits; and a just transition to universal health care and clean energy communities

STRENGTHENING PUBLIC EDUCATION: Working toward free day-care, early childhood education, and higher education; maintaining strong traditional public school systems for all kids; and ensuring transparency and equity of resource allocation

Moreover, my experiences in this campaign have illuminated the many barriers that regular people have to becoming involved in the democratic process of elections, as potential candidates and as voters. We must work harder to remove the out-sized power of corporate money, big businesses, and the ultra-rich on elections, and ensure the accessibility of elections and civic life to all people in our communities, regardless of language, immigration status, race, ethnicity, ability, class, gender, and more. We will never be able to live out the ideals of a democratic election process with the current laws and policies that govern elections, even in a state as purportedly progressive as California.
Our elected officials must be connected to their communities; clear about priorities for their districts; and committed to unwavering principles that allow their voters to understand where they stand on different issues, and how they will lead.

As a campaign, we've created our policy agenda specifically by knocking at doors and calling phones of thousands of constituents, to ensure that we were absolutely connected to our base and clear about the top priorities of our community members and their neighborhoods. We only solidified our final intent to run for this office after doing so, to ensure that we're the appropriate representative for our community's needs.

Additionally, we've been incredibly clear about these priorities and further decision-making principles on our campaign website. Beyond the priorities of our campaign, as we come across other legislative needs, I actively seek to name, resist, and reverse policies that perpetuate:
-anti-blackness, racism, and xenophobia;
-gender injustice and trans and homophobia;
-inequities perpetuated by capitalism and colonialism; and
-oppression and suppression based on ability, language, or migration status.

Constituents can expect that I will lead with that lens. Where I do not have the lived experiences to develop a strong enough perspective, I commit to ensuring that those who are impacted most by policy issues are at the table to lead the conversation.
I have a 3 year old nephew and a 10 month old niece. Both of them are first two people in our family to be born in the United States. It is incredibly important to me that they inherit a world in which people are not relegated to second-class-citizenship simply because of where they were born or how they got to the United States; their race, ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation; the zip code they can afford to live in; or their ability to navigate life. My purpose in life is to contribute to that future by building power among and for communities that have been historically marginalized, through work in education, civic life, and the arts. It is also important to me that my nephew and niece see me, their uncle, involved as a leader in this work, so that they know how powerful someone can be who is Filipino, an immigrant, a person of color, and gay. We have to be the examples for future generations that our generations have always sought in others, whether we found those examples or not.
I have a few small memories of my childhood in the Philippines, but my first vivid historical event in the United States was of the LA riots (or, the LA uprising) in 1992. I was 7 years old and in the second grade. I was a Filipino immigrant -- here in the US, often an ethnicity combined with other Asian/Asian American groups -- and a student at an LA Unified elementary school that served (and still serves) a predominantly Black/African-American community. I remember only having 11 students coming to our class during some days of the uprising, and I remember with clarity the ways in which Asian and Black communities were pit against each other in the media. I remember hearing non-Black adults tell me, in what I know now to be racially coded language, to "be careful of who I hang around" or to not be friends with "bad influences." As a second grader, I remember forming immediate skepticism in the perspectives of these adults, because their racially-charged comments were not reflective of my strongly positive and familial experiences with the Black leaders, parents, and students of my school community, and not reflective of the histories we learned of Black Americans across the United States. This was absolutely a formative historical moment for me -- having to navigate racial dynamics among people of color in the diverse communities that raised me, and question racist narratives perpetuated by the media and adopted by people who purported to love and care for me.
One of the biggest differences between our state assembly and our state senate is the number of constituents each assembly-person and senator represents. In California, we've got 80 assembly-members, each representing more than 450,000 constituents, while our 40 state senators each represent almost double the number of Californians. This means that our representatives in our assembly theoretically should have closer insight into the challenges experienced by regular, everyday people in our communities, because they have fewer people to represent and can engage more of them as part of their jobs. Organizing and engaging with community members not typically engaged by politicians is a cornerstone of the type of campaign I am running and the type of leader I aspire to become, and having a smaller jurisdiction as an assemblymember gives me the opportunity to work toward that ideal.

At the same time, California decided on 80 as the number of assembly-members in the late 1800s, which -- at the time -- gave assembly-members even more oversight into representing the needs of their constituents, because California's population was much smaller at the time. Now that California has grown, too many assembly-members have too diverse and large of a constituency to accurately advocate for a set of needs that would benefit their district community. We need to re-evaluate the number of representatives we have in the assembly to be able to better account for the growth of population California has experienced in the 140 years since California decided to have just 80 assembly members.
As with any job, it is helpful for individuals to have prior experiences that set them up to understand the type of work they'll be doing and the type of systems they'll be navigating.

And as with any team, it is helpful for teams of people to have diverse experiences and perspectives in order to generate the strongest possible solutions to challenges, to enable creative and critical thinking in their work, and to reduce the chances that communities will be marginalized by a dominant majority.

We must elect our state legislators with this in mind.

While I have never been a state legislator, I understand the process of making law and policy because I support public school teachers to understand that process themselves, so they can advocate for issues that are important to them. Given my work in schools and communities, I also understand the necessity of building relationships with others -- even those you may not always see eye to eye -- in order to serve a larger people and purpose. And, most importantly, I bring the experience of someone who lives the everyday realities of our community to the table.

As a renter, immigrant, educator, and LGBTQ person, I am currently represented by people who may have legislative experience, but who have the privilege of owning their homes, who were born in the United States, who have never worked in our public school system, or who don't know the challenges that LGBTQ people still face navigating our personal and professional lives. If we only ever elected legislators with direct experience in state legislation, we'd be subjecting ourselves and our communities to an incredibly narrow set of perspectives. We must balance the types of experiences our legislators bring to Sacramento in order to enact the best possible laws and policies for our communities.
I am not interested in pursuing political office as a career. In my adult life, I've dedicated my life to serving communities of color either directly in our schools, working with teachers to serve in our communities, or by supporting teachers to be able to advocate around issues facing their students and schools. I think it is incredibly important to be building people power from the ground up, and I am committed to doing so. I'm running for our state assembly because regular, everyday people don't have enough direct representation in our state legislature that can speak from the perspective of a renter, immigrant, or educator -- three significant perspectives that matter to our community and at this particular moment in time, three significant perspectives that overlap with my own life experiences and identity. I would only ever express interest in future political offices again if there were specific representative needs that I felt positioned enough to represent. Otherwise, I would support others to run, particularly new first-time candidates representative of historically-marginalized communities.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on January 13, 2020


Current members of the California State Assembly
Leadership
Majority Leader:Cecilia Aguiar-Curry
Minority Leader:James Gallagher
Representatives
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
Mia Bonta (D)
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
Alex Lee (D)
District 25
Ash Kalra (D)
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
District 48
District 49
Mike Fong (D)
District 50
District 51
Rick Zbur (D)
District 52
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
District 66
District 67
District 68
District 69
District 70
Tri Ta (R)
District 71
District 72
District 73
District 74
District 75
District 76
District 77
District 78
District 79
District 80
Democratic Party (60)
Republican Party (20)