Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Arizona's 1st Congressional District election, 2020 (August 4 Democratic primary)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search


2022
2018
Arizona's 1st Congressional District
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
Democratic primary
Republican primary
General election
Election details
Filing deadline: April 6, 2020
Primary: August 4, 2020
General: November 3, 2020

Pre-election incumbent:
Tom O'Halleran (Democratic)
How to vote
Poll times: 6 a.m. to 7 p.m.
Voting in Arizona
Race ratings
Cook Political Report: Lean Democratic
Inside Elections: Likely Democratic
Sabato's Crystal Ball: Likely Democratic
Ballotpedia analysis
U.S. Senate battlegrounds
U.S. House battlegrounds
Federal and state primary competitiveness
Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2020
See also
Arizona's 1st Congressional District
1st2nd3rd4th5th6th7th8th9th
Arizona elections, 2020
U.S. Congress elections, 2020
U.S. Senate elections, 2020
U.S. House elections, 2020


Incumbent Tom O'Halleran defeated challenger Eva Putzova in the Democratic primary for Arizona's 1st Congressional District on August 4, 2020. O'Halleran received 59% of the vote to Putzova's 41%. O'Halleran, a former Republican member of the state legislature, was first elected to the seat as a Democrat in 2016 and did not face a primary challenger in 2018.

At the time of the election, O'Halleran was the co-chairman of the Blue Dog Coalition, a group of Democratic members of the U.S. House which describes itself as an organization of "pragmatic Democrats, appealing to the mainstream values of the American public."[1] O'Halleran served eight years as a Republican member of the state legislature. His endorsers included Everytown for Gun Safety, the League of Conservation Voters, and Planned Parenthood Action Fund.

Putzova, a former member of the Flagstaff City Council and nonprofit administrator, said she was running to limit the amount of power held by corporations. She compared her policy agenda to the fight for freedom in her native Czechoslovakia during the communist era, saying she would fight for "Freedom from illness and medical bills, freedom from crushing student loan debt, freedom to enjoy a healthy life on this planet."[2] Putzova's endorsers included 2020 presidential candidate Marianne Williamson (D), Brand New Congress, and Our Revolution.

As of June 30, 2020, O'Halleran had raised $2,000,000 to Putzova's $325,000. The only reported instances of satellite spending in the race were a $750 expenditure by Together We Thrive Super PAC and a $45 expenditure by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, both in support of O'Halleran.[3]

The 1st District was one of 30 districts nationwide held by a Democrat at the time of the 2020 election that Donald Trump (R) carried in 2016, and was the only such district in Arizona. Trump carried the district by a margin of 1.1 percentage points, while O'Halleran won re-election in 2018 by a margin of 7.7 percentage points. Click here to learn more about what's at stake in the general election.

A primary election is an election in which registered voters select a candidate that they believe should be a political party's candidate for elected office to run in the general election. They are also used to choose convention delegates and party leaders. Primaries are state-level and local-level elections that take place prior to a general election. Arizona utilizes a semi-closed primary system. Unaffiliated voters may choose which party's primary they will vote in, but voters registered with a party can only vote in that party's primary.[4][5][6]

For information about which offices are nominated via primary election, see this article.

Click on candidate names below to view their key messages:


O'Halleran

Putzova


This page focuses on Arizona's 1st Congressional District Democratic primary. For more in-depth information on the district's Republican primary and the general election, see the following pages:

Election procedure changes in 2020

See also: Changes to election dates, procedures, and administration in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, 2020

Ballotpedia provided comprehensive coverage of how election dates and procedures changed in 2020. While the majority of changes occurred as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, some changes occurred for other reasons.

Arizona made no changes to its August 4, 2020, primary election.

For a full timeline about election modifications made in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, click here.


Candidates and election results

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for U.S. House Arizona District 1

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Tom O'Halleran
Tom O'Halleran
 
58.6
 
47,083
Image of Eva Putzova
Eva Putzova Candidate Connection
 
41.4
 
33,248

Total votes: 80,331
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Candidate profiles

This section includes candidate profiles created in one of two ways. Either the candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey or Ballotpedia staff created a profile after identifying the candidate as noteworthy.[7] Ballotpedia staff compiled profiles based on campaign websites, advertisements, and public statements.


Image of Tom O'Halleran

WebsiteFacebookTwitterYouTube

Party: Democratic Party

Incumbent: Yes

Political Office: 

U.S. House of Representatives (Assumed office: 2017)

Arizona State Senate (2007-2009)

Arizona House of Representatives (2001-2007)

Biography:  A native of Chicago, O'Halleran joined the city's police force in 1966 and was promoted to officer and sergeant before being commissioned as a homicide investigator. O'Halleran joined the Chicago Board of Trade in 1979 and would serve two terms on its board of directors. After retiring from trading, O'Halleran relocated to Arizona.



Key Messages

The following key messages were curated by Ballotpedia staff. For more on how we identify key messages, click here.


O'Halleran's campaign website said he was running to fix a crisis in American leadership: "We will have differences along the way. We won’t always agree on the best way forward. But if we start talking to one another instead of pointing our fingers, we’ll realize that we can work together to solve the big problems facing our community and country."


O'Halleran said the federal government needed to reassess its priorities: "We need to improve educational achievement, fight to bring rural America off Congress' backburner, rebuild our crumbling infrastructure, and work towards a living wage so that families can stay together and prosper."


Show sources

This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House Arizona District 1 in 2020.

Image of Eva Putzova

WebsiteFacebookTwitterYouTube

Party: Democratic Party

Incumbent: No

Political Office: Flagstaff City Council (2014-2018)

Biography:  A native of Slovakia, Putzova moved to Flagstaff in 2000, working in the energy sector for three years before joining the staff of Northern Arizona University. At the time of her 2020 campaign, Putzova's most recent professional experience was as national communications and technology director for Restaurant Opportunities Centers United, a nonprofit group describing its mission as improving working conditions for restaurant workers. Putzova received a master's degree from the University of Economics in Bratislava.



Key Messages

The following key messages were curated by Ballotpedia staff. For more on how we identify key messages, click here.


Putzova referred to her upbringing in Czechoslovakia and the fall of the Communist government, saying, "In many ways, we are fighting for the same freedom in America right now. Freedom from illness and medical bills, freedom from crushing student loan debt, freedom to enjoy a healthy life on this planet."


Putzova said too many politicians put corporations' interests ahead of individuals': "For too long, working people have been put second to the priorities of corporations. Our representatives should answer to the people, not their corporate donors. I‘m determined to bring a perspective of fairness, inclusion, justice, peace, and democracy into Congress."


Show sources

This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House Arizona District 1 in 2020.

Noteworthy primary endorsements

This section lists endorsements issued in this election. If you are aware of endorsements that should be included, please email us.

Democratic primary endorsements
Endorsement O'Halleran Putzova
Newspapers and editorials
Pinal Central[8]
Individuals
Former 2020 presidential candidate Marianne Williamson (D)[9]
Organizations
350 Action[10]
American Federation of Teachers[11]
Brand New Congress[10]
End Citizens United[12]
Everytown for Gun Safety[13]
Human Rights Campaign[14]
League of Conservation Voters[15]
NARAL Pro-Choice America PAC[16]
Our Revolution[10]
Planned Parenthood Action Fund[17]

Campaign themes

See also: Campaign themes

Tom O'Halleran

O'Halleran's campaign website stated the following:

Jobs and the Economy
Read Tom's Jobs Plan

Tom believes that in order for our economy to grow, we must end policies that pressure middle class families and take action to create good-paying jobs. The deck has been stacked against middle-class families and small businesses for too long. Hard-working Arizonans are having a hard time affording a basic standard of living, and many can no longer afford to send their own children to our state universities—that’s not right.

Tom’s economic policies are aimed toward boosting the economy and supporting the small businesses and hard-working families who drive our economy. By investing in education, job-training, research, and infrastructure, we can keep our competitive advantage as a state and country and prepare for the jobs of the future. To keep our competitive edge, we must also modernize our tax and regulatory system to foster innovation and replace outdated or burdensome regulations. It is also time for the American public, whose wages have remained stagnant over decades, to receive a well-deserved raise and equal pay for equal work. In the 116th Congress, Tom voted to raise the the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour over the next six years through annual increases. The U.S. economy is prosperous, but its rewards are going to corporations and the rich—people who work for a living have been cut out of the deal. That has to change.

Natural resources and tourism are major components of Arizona’s economy. Tom O’Halleran has been a leader on forestry and water issues both inside and outside of the legislature, and led the effort to protect the Grand Canyon and surrounding areas from new uranium mining claims. He will continue his work to protect our natural resources for future generations and protect this vital part of our economy.

Tom believes that we must leave future generations with more opportunities.

Social Security and Medicare
Tom has a proven track record of protecting Social Security and Medicare from those who support dangerous schemes to privatize the programs, hand them over the Wall Street or turn them into “vouchers.” He knows that Social Security is not an “entitlement program”—it is a commitment that has been made to America’s seniors after a lifetime of work. Over decades, America's workers and small businesses have paid into the Social Security trust fund, and now they should not have their retirement security threatened by politicians and special interests in Washington. Social Security is also crucial to the stability of our economy. That is why Tom will always fight against any attempt to privatize Social Security or reduce its benefits.

Many of the same politicians and special interests who would like to privatize Social Security also propose to end the Medicare guarantee. This would leave millions of American seniors struggling to pay the high cost of medical care and prescription drugs. This is unacceptable, and Tom O’Halleran will always fight against any attempt replace Medicare with a voucher scheme.

Veterans
There is no more sacred commitment than the one we have made with America’s veterans. We must take care of those who have fought for our freedom by ensuring that they have proper access to their veterans’ benefits, healthcare, and ensuring that we have programs to help with job placement and training.

The perpetual mismanagement of the VA hospitals around the country is unacceptable and has a detrimental impact to the health and well being of our veterans. This is not consistent with our values, and it is our obligation to ensure that the brave men and women who have served in our armed forces do not have to struggle to see their doctor. In many cases, the VA lacks the medical specialists to care for all the vets who need treatment. In these cases, veterans should be able to get the care they need outside the VA system, on the VA’s dime.

While in the Arizona State Legislature, Tom led a successful effort that doubled the number of benefit counselors in the state of Arizona. Tom’s commitment is to continue this fight as long as any veteran has to wait a day too long for care or is not being provided the benefits they earned.

In the House of Representatives, Tom has introduced legislation to clean up the VA, secure housing for homeless veterans in Pinal country, and create job and development opportunities for returned servicemembers in the solar industry. O'Halleran worked with his colleagues in Congress and local and state advocates to secure funding for new veterans homes in rural Arizona--one in Flagstaff and one in Yuma. Ground broke on the Flagstaff home in June of 2019. O'Halleran has also introduced additional legislation to construct veterans nursing homes on tribal lands. Caseworkers on O'Halleran's staff work tirelessly to return federal dollars and owed benefits to veterans and their families.

Education
Investing in our children’s education not only benefits the individual child and families, but also is an investment in our state and country’s economic future. As both a parent and a grandparent, Tom knows our children’s education is one of the most important parts of their lives, and that we all want to see our kids have a better future. Education is the most critical factor for future wage earning and being able to provide for their future families. A solid education creates responsible and engaged citizens. Science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education is important for a knowledge-based economy. And we must remember the importance of vocational training. After decades of schools falling farther behind other countries, it is time to make education a priority again for our children in America and Arizona.

While in the legislature, Tom led a bipartisan group that passed all-day kindergarten and made substantial investments in all levels of our schools, including research facilities at our three state universities that have been an economic driver and created good-paying jobs. Due in part to O'Halleran's efforts, Arizona has, in recent years, become a leader in technological innovation throughout the country.

Among other education initiatives, Tom has fought for funding teacher salaries and to retain soft capital (money that goes toward books and computers). He worked to maintain funding for new schools and school maintenance, which helped local property tax payers not pay as high a rate as they otherwise would to maintain their schools. In the House of Representatives, he is a member of the Congressional Pre-K Caucus, and has fought for more substanstial funding to address crumbling, chronically underfunded Bureau of Indian Education schools across Arizona's First District.

Immigration
There is perhaps no greater example of gridlock in Washington than this issue of immigration reform. The federal government has continually failed to secure our borders or fix America’s broken immigration system. While there is broad consensus on the steps that we can take to improve our system, immigration reform has stalled because of a lack of will among some politicians and others who would rather have a political issue to complain about than actually solve our problem. The security of our citizens and the rule of law are too important to be stalled based on purely political considerations. Congress has an obligation to act and fix this problem.

Tom supports immigration reform that secures our border, keeps families together, and meets the needs of our economy. He fully supports the DREAM Act, which allows young people who were brought to this country as children the chance to pursue their education, join the military, or contribute to our workforce as hardworking doctors, teachers, scientists, and more.

Tom was an early supporter of the Gang of Eight's comprehensive immigration reform package that passed the U.S. Senate in 2013 with the help of Senator John McCain. This groundbreaking legislation failed in the House because it was never brought to the floor for a vote, a clear example of the kind of government Tom is fighting to correct.

The broken immigration system disproportionately affects Arizona and fixing it is critical to our economy. Tom will work toward reform that keeps our communities safe, our economy strong, and our families together.[18]

—Tom O'Halleran's campaign website (2020)[19]


Eva Putzova

Putzova's campaign website stated the following:

Medicare for All
Health care is a right, not a privilege. I support universal, affordable, quality healthcare for all Americans. A Medicare-For-All-type single payer plan would improve health, save lives, and cost less.

First People First
Indigenous People face more social, economic, and political barriers to a decent life than any other group of people in our society. In close consultation with Indigenous leaders, I will fight for greater federal support for the resources the tribes need to provide a decent life for all their members. I will also use my voice in congress to address issues facing Indigenous people such as homelessness, police violence, domestic abuse, and societal racism. While the past injustices are inexcusable and cannot be undone, we can decide right here and right now to apologize to the Indigenous People for the governmentally endorsed and perpetuated cultural genocide and commit to stop these policies from causing more harm.

Tuition-Free College
The costs of higher education should not become a burden to young people that they carry with them for the rest of their lives. All of us reap the benefits of an educated population so all of us should support those who seek to obtain college degrees. Tuition-free higher education is not only possible, it is necessary if we want to unleash the creative potential of our youth.​

Workers' Rights
Over the last 30 years, wages have remained flat for most workers while corporate profits have soared. One reason for stagnant wages is the loss of workers’ bargaining power as labor unions have been decimated by corporate attacks. The other reason is the low federal minimum wage. I will support legislation to allow workers to more easily unionize and to raise the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour.

LGBTQ+ Rights
Love is love is love is love. People who identify as LGBTQ+ need strong protections against discrimination in housing, employment, healthcare, education and other social policies. We need to expand resources for LGBTQ+ youth to be treated as equal in every sense, are protected against bullying, and can thrive in their schools.

A Green New Deal
There is no longer any question that the climate is rapidly changing due to the burning of fossil fuels and concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere. Extreme weather events are now the norm and will increase in intensity. We need to transition as quickly as possible to renewable energy production and use. Along with other newly elected members of congress I support a "Green New Deal" that would set an ambitious but necessary goal to help stabilize the climate and therefore our global society.

Reproductive Health
Everyone should have the right to control their own bodies free of government interference. All reproductive health services should be free of charge and available to everyone. The decision on whether to terminate a pregnancy belongs to the individual and no one else.

Immigration Overhaul
People fleeing violence, poverty, and marginalization should be offered refuge and shelter here first while their final immigration status is processed in an orderly manner. Rather than breaking up families and putting children in cages we should help them reside in safe communities where they can work, go to school, and live freely while awaiting the disposition of their case. I oppose the demonization of immigrants and support a path to citizenship for DACA recipients and the millions of immigrants who have been contributing members of our society and from whose labor we have greatly benefitted.​

No More Wars
The invasions and continuing American military occupation of Afghanistan, Iraq, and other countries in the greater Middle East has been a human, economic, and environmental disaster for people here and abroad. Millions of lives have been lost or ruined and trillions of dollars have been wasted that could have been spent on healthcare, education, and a "Green New Deal" here at home. I oppose all undeclared, illegal wars of choice and will work hard to ensure that congress asserts its constitutional oversight responsibility over the executive branch on matters of war and peace.[18]

—Eva Putzova's campaign website (2020)[20]


Campaign finance

This section contains campaign finance figures from the Federal Election Commission covering all candidate fundraising and spending in this election.[21] It does not include information on fundraising before the current campaign cycle or on spending by satellite groups. The numbers in this section are updated as candidates file new campaign finance reports. Candidates for Congress are required to file financial reports on a quarterly basis, as well as two weeks before any primary, runoff, or general election in which they will be on the ballot and upon the termination of any campaign committees.[22] The chart below contains data from financial reports submitted to the Federal Election Commission.

Name Party Receipts* Disbursements** Cash on hand Date
Tom O'Halleran Democratic Party $3,416,902 $3,359,687 $63,147 As of December 31, 2020
Eva Putzova Democratic Party $419,050 $398,166 $20,883 As of December 31, 2020

Source: Federal Elections Commission, "Campaign finance data," 2020. This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

* According to the FEC, "Receipts are anything of value (money, goods, services or property) received by a political committee."
** According to the FEC, a disbursement "is a purchase, payment, distribution, loan, advance, deposit or gift of money or anything of value to influence a federal election," plus other kinds of payments not made to influence a federal election.


General election race ratings

See also: Race rating definitions and methods

Ballotpedia provides race ratings from four outlets: The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections, Sabato's Crystal Ball, and DDHQ/The Hill. Each race rating indicates if one party is perceived to have an advantage in the race and, if so, the degree of advantage:

  • Safe and Solid ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge and the race is not competitive.
  • Likely ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge, but an upset is possible.
  • Lean ratings indicate that one party has a small edge, but the race is competitive.[23]
  • Toss-up ratings indicate that neither party has an advantage.

Race ratings are informed by a number of factors, including polling, candidate quality, and election result history in the race's district or state.[24][25][26]

Race ratings: Arizona's 1st Congressional District election, 2020
Race trackerRace ratings
November 3, 2020October 27, 2020October 20, 2020October 13, 2020
The Cook Political ReportLean DemocraticLean DemocraticLean DemocraticLean Democratic
Inside Elections with Nathan L. GonzalesLikely DemocraticLikely DemocraticLikely DemocraticLikely Democratic
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal BallLikely DemocraticLikely DemocraticLikely DemocraticLikely Democratic
Note: Ballotpedia updates external race ratings every week throughout the election season.

What's at stake in the general election?

U.S. House elections were held on November 3, 2020, and coincided with the 2020 presidential election. All 435 House districts were up for election, and the results determined control of the U.S. House in the 117th Congress.

At the time of the election, Democrats had a 232-197 advantage over Republicans. There was one Libertarian member, and there were five vacancies. Republicans needed to gain a net 21 seats to win control of the House. Democrats needed to gain seats or lose fewer than 14 net seats to keep their majority.

In the 2018 midterm election, Democrats had a net gain of 40 seats, winning a 235-200 majority in the House. Heading into the 2018 election, Republicans had a 235-193 majority with seven vacancies.

In the 25 previous House elections that coincided with a presidential election, the president's party had gained House seats in 16 elections and lost seats in nine. In years where the president's party won districts, the average gain was 18. In years where the president's party lost districts, the average loss was 27. Click here for more information on presidential partisanship and down-ballot outcomes.


District analysis

See also: The Cook Political Report's Partisan Voter Index
See also: FiveThirtyEight's elasticity scores

The 2017 Cook Partisan Voter Index for this district was R+2, meaning that in the previous two presidential elections, this district's results were 2 percentage points more Republican than the national average. This made Arizona's 1st Congressional District the 218th most Republican nationally.[27]

FiveThirtyEight's September 2018 elasticity score for states and congressional districts measured "how sensitive it is to changes in the national political environment." This district's elasticity score was 1.05. This means that for every 1 point the national political mood moved toward a party, the district was expected to move 1.05 points toward that party.[28]

District represented by a Democrat in 2020 and won by Donald Trump in 2016

See also: U.S. House districts represented by a Democrat in 2020 and won by Donald Trump in 2016

This district was one of 30 Democratic-held U.S. House districts up in 2020 that Donald Trump (R) won in the 2016 presidential election. Most were expected to be among the House's most competitive elections in 2020.


2020 Democratic-held U.S. House districts won by Donald Trump in 2016
District Incumbent Ran in 2020? 2018 congressional margin 2016 presidential margin 2012 presidential margin
Arizona's 1st Democratic Party Tom O'Halleran Yes Democrats+7.7 Trump+1.1 Romney+2.5
Georgia's 6th Democratic Party Lucy McBath Yes Democrats+1.0 Trump+1.5 Romney+23.3
Illinois' 14th Democratic Party Lauren Underwood Yes Democrats+5.0 Trump+3.9 Romney+10
Illinois' 17th Democratic Party Cheri Bustos Yes Democrats+24.2 Trump+0.7 Obama+17
Iowa's 1st Democratic Party Abby Finkenauer Yes Democrats+5.1 Trump+3.5 Obama+13.7
Iowa's 2nd Democratic Party Dave Loebsack Retired Democrats+5.2 Trump+4.1 Obama+13.1
Iowa's 3rd Democratic Party Cindy Axne Yes Democrats+2.2 Trump+3.5 Obama+4.2
Maine's 2nd Democratic Party Jared Golden Yes Democrats+1.3 Trump+10.3 Obama+8.6
Michigan's 8th Democratic Party Elissa Slotkin Yes Democrats+3.8 Trump+6.7 Romney+3.1
Michigan's 11th Democratic Party Haley Stevens Yes Democrats+6.7 Trump+4.4 Romney+5.4
Minnesota's 2nd Democratic Party Angie Craig Yes Democrats+5.5 Trump+1.2 Obama+0.1
Minnesota's 7th Democratic Party Collin Peterson Yes Democrats+4.3 Trump+30.8 Romney+9.8
Nevada's 3rd Democratic Party Susie Lee Yes Democrats+9.1 Trump+1.0 Obama+0.8
New Hampshire's 1st Democratic Party Chris Pappas Yes Democrats+8.6 Trump+1.6 Obama+1.6
New Jersey's 3rd Democratic Party Andrew Kim Yes Democrats+1.3 Trump+6.2 Obama+4.6
New Jersey's 5th Democratic Party Josh Gottheimer Yes Democrats+13.7 Trump+1.1 Romney+3.0
New Jersey's 11th Democratic Party Mikie Sherrill Yes Democrats+14.6 Trump+0.9 Romney+5.8
New Mexico's 2nd Democratic Party Xochitl Torres Small Yes Democrats+1.9 Trump+10.2 Romney+6.8
New York's 11th Democratic Party Max Rose Yes Democrats+6.5 Trump+9.8 Obama+4.3
New York's 18th Democratic Party Sean Maloney Yes Democrats+10.9 Trump+1.9 Obama+4.3
New York's 19th Democratic Party Antonio Delgado Yes Democrats+5.2 Trump+6.8 Obama+6.2
New York's 22nd Democratic Party Anthony Brindisi Yes Democrats+1.8 Trump+15.5 Romney+0.4
Oklahoma's 5th Democratic Party Kendra Horn Yes Democrats+1.4 Trump+13.4 Romney+18.4
Pennsylvania's 8th Democratic Party Matt Cartwright Yes Democrats+9.3 Trump+9.6 Obama+11.9
Pennsylvania's 17th Democratic Party Conor Lamb Yes Democrats+12.5 Trump+2.6 Romney+4.5
South Carolina's 1st Democratic Party Joe Cunningham Yes Democrats+1.4 Trump+13.1 Romney+18.1
Utah's 4th Democratic Party Ben McAdams Yes Democrats+0.3 Trump+6.7 Romney+37.0
Virginia's 2nd Democratic Party Elaine Luria Yes Democrats+2.2 Trump+3.4 Romney+2.3
Virginia's 7th Democratic Party Abigail Spanberger Yes Democrats+1.9 Trump+6.5 Romney+10.5
Wisconsin's 3rd Democratic Party Ron Kind Yes Democrats+19.3 Trump+4.5 Obama+11
Source: Sabato's Crystal Ball and Daily Kos


Click here to see the five U.S. House districts represented by a Republican in 2020 and won by Hillary Clinton in 2016.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. Blue Dog Coalition, "About Us," accessed July 24, 2020
  2. Youtube, "People First," June 24, 2020
  3. Open Secrets, "Arizona District 01 Race 2020 - Outside Spending," accessed July 24, 2020
  4. National Conference of State Legislatures, "State Primary Election Types," accessed July 19, 2024
  5. Citizens Clean Elections Commission, "Primary Election," accessed July 19, 2024
  6. Arizona State Legislature, "Arizona Revised Statutes 16-467," accessed July 19 2024
  7. Candidate Connection surveys completed before September 26, 2019, were not used to generate candidate profiles. In battleground primaries, Ballotpedia based its selection of noteworthy candidates on polling, fundraising, and noteworthy endorsements. In battleground general elections, all major party candidates and any other candidates with the potential to impact the outcome of the race were included.
  8. [https://twitter.com/TomOHalleran/status/1285629325799239682 Twitter, "Tom O'Halleran on July 21, 2020," accessed July 22, 2020
  9. Twitter, "Eva Putzova on January 19, 2020," accessed July 22, 2020
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Eva Putzova 2020 campaign website, "Home," accessed July 22, 2020
  11. Twitter, "Tom O'Halleran on July 31, 2020," accessed July 31, 2020
  12. Twitter, "Tom O'Halleran on January 21, 2020," accessed July 22, 2020
  13. Twitter, "Tom O'Halleran on July 13, 2020," accessed July 22, 2020
  14. Twitter, "Tom O'Halleran on May 21, 2020," accessed July 22, 2020
  15. [https://twitter.com/TomOHalleran/status/1283166969513091076 Twitter, "Tom O'Halleran on July 14, 2020," accessed July 22, 2020
  16. [https://twitter.com/TomOHalleran/status/1281057488679436288 Twitter, "Tom O'Halleran on July 8, 2020," accessed July 22, 2020
  17. Twitter, "Tom O'Halleran on January 22, 2020," accessed July 22, 2020
  18. 18.0 18.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  19. Tom O'Halleran 2020 campaign website, "Issues," accessed July 22, 2020
  20. Eva Putzova 2020 campaign website, "Issues," accessed July 22, 2020
  21. Fundraising by primary candidates can be found on the race's respective primary election page. Fundraising by general election candidates can be found on the race's general election page.
  22. Federal Election Commission, "2022 Quarterly Reports," accessed March 2, 2022
  23. Inside Elections also uses Tilt ratings to indicate an even smaller advantage and greater competitiveness.
  24. Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Nathan Gonzalez," April 19, 2018
  25. Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Kyle Kondik," April 19, 2018
  26. Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Charlie Cook," April 22, 2018
  27. Cook Political Report, "Introducing the 2017 Cook Political Report Partisan Voter Index," April 7, 2017
  28. FiveThirtyEight, "Election Update: The Most (And Least) Elastic States And Districts," September 6, 2018


Senators
Representatives
District 1
District 2
Eli Crane (R)
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
Vacant
District 8
District 9
Republican Party (6)
Democratic Party (4)
Vacancies (1)