Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Texas' 24th Congressional District election, 2020
- Election date: Nov. 3
- Registration deadline(s): Oct. 5
- Online registration: No
- Same-day registration: No
- Recount laws
- Early voting starts: Oct. 13
- Absentee/mail voting deadline(s): Nov. 3 (postmarked); Nov. 4 (received)
- Processing, counting, and challenging absentee/mail-in ballots
- Voter ID: Photo ID
- Poll times: 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.
Beth Van Duyne (R) defeated Candace Valenzuela (D) and three other candidates in the general election for Texas' 24th Congressional District on November 3, 2020. Incumbent Rep. Kenny Marchant (R), who was first elected in 2004, did not run for re-election.
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) targeted Texas’ 24th in 2020.[1] Both the DCCC and the National Republican Congressional Committee offered support to their respective candidates.[2][3]
In 2016 and 2018, Marchant defeated challenger Jan McDowell (D) 56% to 39% and 51% to 48%, respectively. The district was last represented by a Democrat in 2005. Beto O'Rourke (D) won the district in the 2018 Texas Senate election with 51% of the vote to Ted Cruz’s (R) 48%. Cruz won the statewide election.[4]
Donald Trump (R) defeated Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election 51% to 45%. In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won the district with 60% of the vote to Barack Obama’s (D) 38%.
Third party, independent, and write-in candidates included Darren Hamilton (L), Mark Bauer (I), and Stephen Kuzmich (I).
The outcome of this race affected partisan control of the U.S. House of Representatives in the 117th Congress. All 435 seats in the House were up for election. At the time of the election, Democrats had a 232 to 198 majority over Republicans. The Libertarian Party had one seat. Four seats were vacant. Democrats defended 30 districts Donald Trump (R) won in 2016. Republicans defended five districts Hillary Clinton (D) won in 2016.
Texas' 24th Congressional District is located in the northern portion of the state and includes portions of Tarrant, Denton and Dallas counties.[5]
Darren Hamilton, Mark Bauer, and Stephen Kuzmich completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection Survey. Click here to view their responses.
Darren Hamilton participated in a Candidate Conversation with Ballotpedia and EnCiv. Click here to watch.
This race was one of 89 congressional races that were decided by 10 percent or less in 2020.
For more information about the Democratic primary, click here.
For more information about the Republican primary, click here.
Post-election analysis
The table below compares the vote totals in the 2020 presidential election and 2020 U.S. House election for this district. The presidential election data was compiled by Daily Kos.
Presidential and congressional election results, Texas' 24th Congressional District, 2020 | ||
---|---|---|
Race | Presidential | U.S. House |
Democratic candidate ![]() |
51.9 | 47.5 |
Republican candidate ![]() |
46.5 | 48.8 |
Difference | 5.4 | 1.3 |
Election procedure changes in 2020
Ballotpedia provided comprehensive coverage of how election dates and procedures changed in 2020. While the majority of changes occurred as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, some changes occurred for other reasons.
Texas modified its absentee/mail-in voting, candidate filing, and early voting procedures for the November 3, 2020, general election as follows:
- Absentee/mail-in voting: Local election officials could not reject an absentee ballot due to a perceived signature mismatch unless the voter was given a pre-rejection notice of this finding and a "meaningful opportunity to cure his or her ballot's rejection." Return locations for absentee/mail-in ballots were limited to one per county.
- Candidate filing procedures: The petition deadline for independent candidates for non-presidential office was extended to August 13, 2020.
- Early voting: Early voting began on October 13, 2020.
For a full timeline about election modifications made in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, click here.
Candidates and election results
General election
General election for U.S. House Texas District 24
Beth Van Duyne defeated Candace Valenzuela, Darren Hamilton, Steve Kuzmich, and Mark Bauer in the general election for U.S. House Texas District 24 on November 3, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Beth Van Duyne (R) | 48.8 | 167,910 | |
![]() | Candace Valenzuela (D) | 47.5 | 163,326 | |
![]() | Darren Hamilton (L) ![]() | 1.6 | 5,647 | |
![]() | Steve Kuzmich (Independent) ![]() | 1.2 | 4,229 | |
![]() | Mark Bauer (Independent) ![]() | 0.8 | 2,909 |
Total votes: 344,021 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Watch the Candidate Conversation for this race!
Democratic primary runoff election
Democratic primary runoff for U.S. House Texas District 24
Candace Valenzuela defeated Kim Olson in the Democratic primary runoff for U.S. House Texas District 24 on July 14, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Candace Valenzuela | 60.4 | 20,003 |
Kim Olson ![]() | 39.6 | 13,131 |
Total votes: 33,134 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House Texas District 24
The following candidates ran in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Texas District 24 on March 3, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Kim Olson ![]() | 41.0 | 24,442 | |
✔ | ![]() | Candace Valenzuela | 30.4 | 18,078 |
![]() | Jan McDowell | 10.0 | 5,965 | |
Crystal Fletcher (Unofficially withdrew) | 5.7 | 3,386 | ||
![]() | Richard Fleming | 5.1 | 3,010 | |
![]() | Sam Vega ![]() | 4.5 | 2,677 | |
John Biggan ![]() | 3.4 | 1,996 |
Total votes: 59,554 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House Texas District 24
Beth Van Duyne defeated David Fegan, Desi Maes, Sunny Chaparala, and Jeron Liverman in the Republican primary for U.S. House Texas District 24 on March 3, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Beth Van Duyne | 64.3 | 32,067 | |
David Fegan ![]() | 20.7 | 10,295 | ||
![]() | Desi Maes ![]() | 5.8 | 2,867 | |
![]() | Sunny Chaparala ![]() | 5.6 | 2,808 | |
![]() | Jeron Liverman ![]() | 3.6 | 1,809 |
Total votes: 49,846 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
Libertarian convention
Libertarian convention for U.S. House Texas District 24
Darren Hamilton advanced from the Libertarian convention for U.S. House Texas District 24 on March 21, 2020.
Candidate | ||
✔ | ![]() | Darren Hamilton (L) ![]() |
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Candidate profiles
This section includes candidate profiles created in one of two ways. Either the candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey or Ballotpedia staff created a profile after identifying the candidate as noteworthy.[6] Ballotpedia staff compiled profiles based on campaign websites, advertisements, and public statements.
Party: Democratic Party
Incumbent: No
Political Office:
- Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Board of Trustees (2017-2019)
Biography: Valenzuela graduated from Claremont McKenna College with a bachelor's degree in government. As of her 2020 campaign, her professional experience included working with special-needs students and being a youth mentor and tutor.
Show sources
Sources: Fort Worth Star-Telegram, "34-year-old school board member enters race against Texas Rep. Marchant," April 15, 2019; Fort Worth Star-Telegram, "Meet the Texas Democrats running for Congress in District 24," February 12, 2020; Candace Valenzuela's 2020 campaign website, "Protecting and Improving Public Education," accessed October 1, 2020; Candance Valenzuela 2020 campaign website, "Home," accessed February 19, 2020; LinkedIn, "Candace Valenzuela," accessed October 1, 2020
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House Texas District 24 in 2020.
Party: Republican Party
Incumbent: No
Political Office:
- Mayor of Irving (2011-2017)
- Irving City Councillor (2004-2010)
Biography: Van Duyne received a bachelor’s degree in government and law from Cornell University. She worked as a consultant, as president of BCI Marketing Group, and as a regional administrator for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in the Trump administration.
Show sources
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House Texas District 24 in 2020.
Party: Independent
Incumbent: No
Political Office: None
Submitted Biography: "Mark Bauer built a career in journalism around uniting stakeholders from a variety of perspectives. He believes the two-party system has proven ineffective at producing solutions for our country's shared interests. Mark advocates for a third way in order to open a free market of ideas to address the challenges and opportunities confronting Texans in this new decade. That is why Mark is running as an Independent for Congress in Texas' 24th District. He will seek out pragmatic and fact-based solutions for the economic prosperity of all Americans while respecting the individual liberties that have served as our bedrock since our nation's founding."
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House Texas District 24 in 2020.
Party: Libertarian Party
Incumbent: No
Political Office: None
Submitted Biography: "I am an information technologies manager for a small company. Statistics and analysis are my stock in trade. I am also a veteran of the United States Marine Corps having served in that body for 8 years including in Desert Shield and Desert Storm. One thing Marines know how to do well is fight for a cause that we hold sacred. American politics is dominated by two political parties - the old parties - which seems stupid because no developed country in the world is limited to two political parties. And over the past few decades, the old parties have become increasingly distant in their respective ideological entrenchment leaving no middle ground upon which they agree. Libertarians, as a centrist party, are well aware of this "political no-mans-land" because, despite their zealous devotion to their respective ideologies, the old parties agree that no one else is allowed to "play on their field", and any attempts to bridge the gap between them are summarily attacked from both sides. If, like me, you have long experienced the "battle fatigue" of old party candidates whose ONLY goal seems to be to "beat the other guy by whatever means necessary", then perhaps it's time to look farther afield. I firmly believe that the residents of north Texas deserve a congressional representative who understands their needs, who lives in their area and shares their lives, and is willing to fight for the ideals that mean the most to all of us regardless of extreme ideology."
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House Texas District 24 in 2020.
Party: Independent
Incumbent: No
Political Office: None
Submitted Biography: "I have lived in north Texas since grade school and raised a family here. I care deeply about our community and Country. Like many, I am dissatisfied with our political leaders and the dysfunction of our government. I am running for Congress because the American political system is broken, our Country is hurting and our Country is in danger. Elected officials need to represent us, not the far right and the far left of their own parties. I am the candidate for reasonably minded voters who want to put Country over party. I am the candidate for voters who want a candidate that is fiscally conservative and socially moderate. I have a proven track record as a problem solver and reasonable person who will listen and can see both sides of issues. While I do have strong beliefs, I am willing to work together with people who have different beliefs to work towards common sense solutions. Always keeping in mind that our most important beliefs are the beliefs that unite us as Americans: freedom, democracy, free markets, shared sacrifice, human rights, respect for three equal branches of government and the rule of law. "
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House Texas District 24 in 2020.
Candidate Conversations
Click below to watch the conversation for this race.
Polls
- See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls
Texas' 24th Congressional District election, 2020: General election polls | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Date | ![]() |
![]() |
Other | Margin of error | Sample size | Sponsor |
Victoria Research & Consulting | July 31-August 2, 2020 | 48% | 41% | 10% | ±4.9 | 400 | House Majority PAC |
RMG Research | July 27-August 2, 2020 | 36% | 36% | 27% | ±4.5 | 500 | U.S. Term Limits |
Campaign finance
The chart below contains data from financial reports submitted to the Federal Election Commission.
Name | Party | Receipts* | Disbursements** | Cash on hand | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candace Valenzuela | Democratic Party | $4,945,026 | $4,933,059 | $11,967 | As of December 31, 2020 |
Beth Van Duyne | Republican Party | $3,430,323 | $3,361,913 | $68,410 | As of December 31, 2020 |
Darren Hamilton | Libertarian Party | $570 | $212 | $358 | As of November 23, 2020 |
Mark Bauer | Independent | $26,342 | $26,542 | $-200 | As of December 31, 2020 |
Steve Kuzmich | Independent | $175,504 | $201,332 | $2,073 | As of December 10, 2020 |
Source: Federal Elections Commission, "Campaign finance data," 2020. This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* According to the FEC, "Receipts are anything of value (money, goods, services or property) received by a political committee." |
District analysis
- See also: The Cook Political Report's Partisan Voter Index
- See also: FiveThirtyEight's elasticity scores
The 2017 Cook Partisan Voter Index for this district was R+9, meaning that in the previous two presidential elections, this district's results were 9 percentage points more Republican than the national average. This made Texas' 24th Congressional District the 151st most Republican nationally.[7]
FiveThirtyEight's September 2018 elasticity score for states and congressional districts measured "how sensitive it is to changes in the national political environment." This district's elasticity score was 1.11. This means that for every 1 point the national political mood moved toward a party, the district was expected to move 1.11 points toward that party.[8]
Race ratings
- See also: Race rating definitions and methods
Ballotpedia provides race ratings from four outlets: The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections, Sabato's Crystal Ball, and DDHQ/The Hill. Each race rating indicates if one party is perceived to have an advantage in the race and, if so, the degree of advantage:
- Safe and Solid ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge and the race is not competitive.
- Likely ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge, but an upset is possible.
- Lean ratings indicate that one party has a small edge, but the race is competitive.[9]
- Toss-up ratings indicate that neither party has an advantage.
Race ratings are informed by a number of factors, including polling, candidate quality, and election result history in the race's district or state.[10][11][12]
Race ratings: Texas' 24th Congressional District election, 2020 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Race tracker | Race ratings | ||||||||
November 3, 2020 | October 27, 2020 | October 20, 2020 | October 13, 2020 | ||||||
The Cook Political Report | Lean Democratic | Toss-up | Toss-up | Toss-up | |||||
Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales | Tilt Democratic | Toss-up | Toss-up | Toss-up | |||||
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | |||||
Note: Ballotpedia updates external race ratings every week throughout the election season. |
Noteworthy endorsements
This section lists noteworthy endorsements issued in this election, including those made by high-profile individuals and organizations, cross-party endorsements, and endorsements made by newspaper editorial boards. It also includes a bulleted list of links to official lists of endorsements for any candidates who published that information on their campaign websites. Please note that this list is not exhaustive. If you are aware of endorsements that should be included, please click here.
Click the links below to see endorsement lists published on candidate campaign websites, if available.
Noteworthy endorsements | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endorsement | Valenzuela (D) | Van Duyne (R) | ||||
Newspapers and editorials | ||||||
The Dallas Morning News[13] | ✔ | |||||
Fort Worth Star-Telegram[14] | ✔ | |||||
Elected officials | ||||||
Senator Kamala Harris (D)[15] | ✔ | |||||
President Donald Trump (R)[16] | ✔ | |||||
Individuals | ||||||
Former Vice President Joe Biden (D)[15] | ✔ | |||||
Former President Barack Obama (D)[15] | ✔ |
Timeline
2020
Campaign advertisements
This section shows advertisements released in this race. Ads released by campaigns and, if applicable, satellite groups are embedded or linked below. If you are aware of advertisements that should be included, please email us.
Candace Valenzuela
Supporting Valenzuela
|
|
|
|
Beth Van Duyne
Supporting Van Duyne
|
|
|
|
|
Opposing Valenzuela
|
|
|
Satellite group ads
Opposing Van Duyne
|
|
Opposing Valenzuela
|
Campaign themes
- See also: Campaign themes
Candace Valenzuela
Valenzuela’s campaign website stated the following:
“ |
Responding to the Economic Impacts of COVID-19 The classic lethargic D.C. response won’t cut it this time around; just like communities all around America, North Texas families and small businesses need immediate access to real support and relief. In Congress, Candace will work to build a 21st-century social and economic support infrastructure that will be integral to rising from this crisis and limiting damage in future crises. In Congress, Candace will:
Responding to the Public Health Impacts of COVID-19 No one should go broke paying for healthcare in America, whether it be COVID-19 related costs or not. That’s why Candace supports a robust public health care option. In Congress, Candace will:
Fighting for Criminal Justice Reform & Demanding Police Accountability Candace also understands that the frustration of protestors and their calls for reform go well beyond discriminatory policing. To create lasting structural change, we need a nuanced and multi-disciplinary approach to reform. Candace knows the complexities of racial inequities in our communities. As an educator, Candace saw how black and brown students as young as pre-K often received disproportionate punishments for acting up in class. As a child, Candace and her siblings experienced the same inordinately harsh and criminalized treatment that too many black and brown kids still face today. That’s why she worked to shut-down the school-to-prison pipeline while on the Carrollton-Farmers Branch school board and will continue to fight to nip injustice in the bud while in Congress. To achieve true racial justice in America, we need deep structural reforms across our criminal justice system, across our health care system, across our public housing system, and across our education system.That’s the agenda Candace supports, and that’s the perspective she’ll bring to Congress. In Congress, Candace will:
Defending a Woman's Right to Choose Defending a woman’s right to choose does not stop at being pro-choice, which is why Candace champions policies like paid family and medical leave, universal pre-k and more. Candace will work with groups like EMILY’s List, Planned Parenthood and NARAL to ensure that a woman’s right to choose is protected. In Congress, Candace will:
Expanding Job and Skill Training As a former school board trustee, Candace worked to expand vocational and STEM academies in the district’s K-12 schools. Candace knows first hand how this training empowers young workers and benefits the local economy. We need more federal investment in these programs to fill the current skills gap in Texas and across the country. In Congress, Candace will:
Comprehensive Immigration Reform We need to break through the partisan gridlock in Washington to pass comprehensive immigration reform that honors our nation's history as a nation of immigrants. Candace’s great-grandparents immigrated to the United States from Mexico and her great-grandfather fought in World War I. For generations, her family has been committed to serving our country and many other immigrant families do the same. Throughout our nation’s history immigrants have provided tremendous value both culturally and economically. In Texas 24, immigrants have more than $5 billion in spending power per year and contribute nearly $2 billion in local, state and federal taxes. However, our immigrant communities face tremendous adversity due to an antiquated, convoluted immigration process and divisive politicians. In dealing with the millions of people living in this country without documentation, Candace wants to provide a pathway to citizenship for Dreamers—the people brought to the United States as children and know no other home—as well as the rest of our undocumented resident population. We will all benefit from allowing undocumented immigrants to come out of the shadows and further participate in our economy and society as a whole. Candace believes we also need to reform our asylum laws so that asylum cases are just, humane and dealt with in an efficient manner. A common partisan political argument used by anti-immigrant lawmakers is that immigration leads to crime, but data shows this isn’t true. For immigrants who do commit violent crimes, we should not provide a path to citizenship. However, the overwhelming majority of immigrants are adding tremendous value to our society and have the opportunity to add more if we give them a path to citizenship. We are a nation of immigrants, and we need to recognize how inclusiveness has been and once again can be one of our greatest strengths. In Congress, Candace will:
Protecting Our Environment We need to do everything we can to combat climate change while we still have the chance. We need to focus on investing in renewable energy options, such as solar, wind, and geothermal, while massively reducing our dependence on coal, gas, and oil. Yes, even in Texas we can provide strong incentives for the business community to help combat climate change, alongside a massive investment from the federal government. Part of this investment must establish programs to train and retrain workers for jobs in the renewable energy industry. While many critics of plans for shifting our society to renewable energy sources and greener infrastructure often attack them as being too expensive, it is absolutely vital to remember that there will be a much greater monetary cost if we fail to halt climate change. As we are hit with increasingly severe weather events, the damage to our cities and towns will also increase, becoming more and more expensive to recover from. As food production suffers, feeding our families will cost more as well. Many people expect fighting climate change to come with serious sacrifice, but an investment made in moving to a more environmentally-friendly society actually means an influx of new jobs for a wide range of workers, more affordable energy, and a newer, safer infrastructure. We have the opportunity to make saving the planet benefit us economically as well as environmentally, and Candace knows we can make it a reality if we work together. In Congress, Candace will:
Making Housing Accessible to All With our fast-growing population, Texas is facing an affordable housing crisis. Nearly half of Texans spend more than 30% of their household income on housing costs, exceeding the recommended level by experts. The largest obstacle we face is on the supply side, as there are just 30 units available per 100 Extremely Low Income (ELI) renters, according to the National Low Income Housing Coalition. We are in desperate need of more affordable housing, and we need to remove unnecessary zoning laws that drive up the costs of construction. In the wealthiest nation in the world, Candace believes that no one should be without shelter. In Congress, Candace will:
Preventing Gun Violence Candace grew up in El Paso and often went to the Walmart where the recent mass shooting occurred. She had friends who were at the Walmart during the shooting, and while they fortunately were not harmed physically, the incident has taken a major toll mentally. We all live under the fear of a mass shooting happening any time we are in public and that must end. In Congress, Candace will:
Protecting and Improving Public Education We need to view education as an investment in our people. We have the opportunity to educate and train the workers of the 21st century and grow our economy from the middle out, rather than the top down. True opportunity means giving every child the opportunity to learn and grow regardless of their zip code, and allow any one who wants to attend college to do so without being saddled with student debt for years after graduation. But college is not right for everyone, so we also need to invest in job training for 21st century jobs in our K-12 schools. As a former school board trustee, Candace has expanded STEM academies and job training in our schools and our community is already reaping the economic benefits. Candace wants to make those opportunities a reality for all children living in TX-24. In Congress, Candace will use her experience to:
Protecting Medicare and Social Security In Congress, Candace will:
Protecting Our Democracy and Ending Political Corruption Texans deserve representatives who will fight against the dark money flooding into our nation’s capital. That’s why Candace is not taking corporate PAC contributions and is focused on reducing special interest influence in Washington. This will be an uphill battle, but the COVID-19 epidemic has put issues of corruption front and center. Texans are fed up, and it’s time for bold changes to the way business is done in Washington. In Congress, Candace will:
Making Healthcare Accessible for Everyone The Affordable Care Act made great progress, but health care access is still far too limited and health care costs continue to skyrocket in the U.S. The U.S. is the only developed nation that does not guarantee its citizens access to health care, and we pay more for our health care and our prescription drugs, per capita, by far. Candace believes that investing in health care for all Americans is not only the morally right thing to do, but it will also save taxpayers money long-term by making workers more productive, increasing preventive care so that we catch illnesses early, and negotiating prescription drug prices down. Candace believes that health care is a human right. In Congress, Candace will:
Addressing Income Inequality and the Shrinking Middle Class As the cost of living in our country has increased over the last few decades, wages have remained stagnant, putting more and more families in the same position Candace was in as a child. We’ve invested insufficiently in education and job training and the federal minimum wage has not increased in well over a decade, while health care costs regularly send people into bankruptcy, and an entire generation has been crippled by student debt. Many Americans are working two or three jobs just to make enough money to survive. Candace will fight for Texans who are struggling to get by. In Congress, Candace will:
|
” |
—Candace Valenzuela’s campaign website (2020)[23] |
Beth Van Duyne
Van Duyne’s campaign website stated the following:
“ |
What is an example of how you led a team or group toward achieving an important goal? In order to help educate other city council members and earn their support for the ethics policy, I brought in a team from Irving-based Kimberly Clark who had one of the best business ethics policies. They were able to explain the importance of the creation of such a policy and how each person needed to be part of the development in order for the policy to be meaningful. Understanding that I had some council members who would be opposed to initiating a new policy, I asked a couple of them to chair the development so they would know their contribution was valued and important. The result was an ethics policy that, for the first time, established term limits for council and Mayor, and prohibited council members from receiving campaign contributions from individuals or businesses doing work with the City as well as established rules of conduct to ensure the people of Irving could feel more confident about the integrity of our elected officials. Why are you running for this office? Why should voters choose you over your opponent? People are sick and tired of Congress playing political games and just focusing on attacking each other. Many folks I have been speaking with are deeply troubled by the rise of Socialism we are seeing in America. I promise to be a voice in Congress that is always focused on getting things done to help us grow and create more opportunities for our families future generations. What political leader do you most admire and why? The House voted along party lines to impeach President Donald Trump formally accusing him of abusing his office in a scheme to coerce Ukraine to tarnish a political rival then stonewalling Congress by withholding documents. What’s your position on the impeachment? A U.S. appeals court recently ruled the “individual mandate” of the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional, but said other aspects of the law require further review. What changes, if any, would you make to this law? Additionally, we need to expand the use of health savings accounts, allow people to purchase insurance across state lines, and make healthcare plans portable so they follow the individual. The American people deserve more options, more freedom, and more choice in how they use their precious dollars to pay for their healthcare needs. What specific criminal justice reforms would you champion? The need for criminal justice reform that I am hearing about as I talk with voters, especially in Dallas County, is how District Attorneys and prosecutors are systemically pleading down cases or refusing to prosecute cases because they simply do not want to put criminals in jail. By not prosecuting crimes of a violent nature or crimes against others, criminals are released back into our neighborhoods where they commit further crimes because the deterrent has been removed. We especially need the prosecution of violent crimes in order for those convictions to be registered with the National Instant Criminal Background Check system (NICS) and thereby prevent violent offenders from being able to lawfully purchase firearms Do you support President Trump’s imposition of tariffs on consumer goods American companies buy from China? If you disagree with these or other tariffs what will you do if elected to address it? What measures, if any, should Congress take to fix asylum laws? Along the way, children are kidnapped, girls are sold into sex trafficking, and people are held hostage so the cartels can demand even more payments from the families. This year alone, hundreds of children were identified as being “recycled” as child slaves in order to help adults, to whom they had no familial relation, cross our border because they were a “family unit”. Rather than allow this utterly destructive criminal operation to continue, we should amend asylum laws to state that people seeking asylum must do so from the nearest safe country from where they are leaving. The “Remain in Mexico” policy is already helping to stop the surges of illegal immigrants claiming asylum and crossing our borders. Additional adjustments are necessary to prevent the cartels from taking further advantage of people and our own broken system. How should the next Congress address illegal immigration? Please be specific about the millions of people in this country illegally. For those in our country who are not committing crimes or have been in the US since they were children, we should create a pathway to legal status (not citizenship) that would require them to pass a criminal background check and remain crime free, pay fines for breaking our immigration laws, and learn English. Those who honorably serve in our military could be allowed a path to citizenship provided they meet a certain number of years of service and are discharged with a clean service record. Congress writes the budget for the United States. What is one area that Congress should invest much more heavily in, and why? What should we be spending much less on? At a time of record tax receipts and a growing economy, Congress must show broad restraint on federal spending in order to bring down the federal deficit and eventually reduce debt. Additionally, we need to continue to reduce federal regulations which only serve to increase the size of government and make the cost of doing business higher. What action, if any, should Congress take in response to mass killings involving firearms? There is no real secret to preventing more gun crimes: violent criminals need to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law to put them in jail and prevent them from making a legal purchase; DAs need to get serious about putting violent offenders away; and all convictions of violent offense must be submitted to the NICS database to ensure these offenders cannot purchase firearms in the future. Additionally, cities, counties, and states may need to fund additional officers to patrol high crime areas to stop the majority of killings in the United States. I would also support new measures that require felony and violent offenses by minors (aged 15-17) to be reported to NICS so those individuals would not be able to legally buy a firearm in the future. The facts are: violent crime overall is down, the vast majority of gun crimes are committed in a very few counties in the United States, and within those counties gun crimes are more prevalent in certain areas. It is no coincidence that Governor Abbott recently ordered a surge of DPS officers into certain areas of Dallas County and the Mayor of Dallas has created his first task force to deal with gun violence predominating in specific areas. What is the greatest threat to American security, and how should America respond? What specifically should Congress do to help? Congress needs to ensure we are properly funded and focused on emerging technological advances, how those can be weaponized, how we can defend against them and not allow our nation to fall into a technology gap that has us losing a war because we have no concept of how it is being waged and how to counter what an adversary may be doing. For this generation, a technological arms race is occurring right now and our nation needs to be at the leading edge of this race. The second greatest threat to American security comes from the drug cartels who control routes into the United States, have significant relationships with street gangs, are poisoning a generation of Americans, and damaging untold numbers of lives through human slavery and sex trafficking. We must treat the cartels like foreign terrorist operations and bring far more resources to bear on stopping them. The House recently passed legislation to restore protections of the Voting Rights Act that were undone when the Supreme Court struck down federal oversight of elections in states with a history of discrimination against minority communities. Do you support this measure? Why or why not? What is your view on the science of man-made climate change? What solutions, if any, do you support to address climate change? Given the remarkable transformation in technology, especially here in Texas, that has allowed our country to become nearly energy independent and driven the development of more clean burning natural gas power plants, we are enjoying a period where emissions are reducing and air is cleaner. Certainly, we can do more by supporting the further development of more sources of baseload power. I am particularly interested in next generation nuclear reactors that are smaller, safer, can be sited virtually anywhere and create much less waste. They are emission free and provide the kind of reliable baseload power that wind and solar simply cannot do. Continuing to move our nation toward strong, reliable energy production that produces less emissions would also help show countries like China and India that there are better ways forward for energy development than more coal plants. What should be done to address the hundreds of thousands of students in deep student loan debt? Should the responsibility of offering federal student loans be removed from the U.S. Department of Education? As one of many who paid their way through college with loans and part time jobs, I know how difficult it can be and the stress it can cause. I also know how much I valued it, having paid for it. Ten years after graduating magna cum laude from Cornell University, I was finally able to pay off the last of my student loans. I am incredibly sympathetic to today’s students and what they are facing to pay off the loans they have incurred. The good news is, we are in one of the best job markets in a very long time for new graduates from high school or college. Which means those with a college degree, especially ones where the degree fits a high demand, will be able to earn higher salaries than students who are unfortunate enough to graduate during a recession or a stagnant growth period. Congress should look to leverage the tight labor market by making changes to tax law that would create Education 401K accounts and encourage employers to use those and match contributions from employees with the purpose of more quickly paying down student debt. Ideally, a tight labor market would then create competition among employers to offer the best Education 401K matching program so they could draw new graduates to their company. While I am not a fan of the student loan guarantees from the federal government, at present they are necessary for us to continue developing and helping deserving students have access to higher education. However, I would like to see public universities, especially those with large endowments (the UT System has an endowment nearly $31 Billion), start programs where they are investing in their own students and serving as the primary lenders. This will ensure the University has “skin in the game” to not only help the student graduate but also be educated in a degree that will help the student financially. Finally, at the high school level, we need to be encouraging classes in financial literacy so students make better financial choices. [22] |
” |
—Beth Van Duyne’s campaign website (2020)[24] |
Pivot Counties
- See also: Pivot Counties by state
One of 254 Texas counties—0.4 percent—is a Pivot County. Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.
Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Trump margin of victory in 2016 | Obama margin of victory in 2012 | Obama margin of victory in 2008 | ||||
Jefferson County, Texas | 0.48% | 1.61% | 2.25% |
In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump (R) won Texas with 52.2 percent of the vote. Hillary Clinton (D) received 43.2 percent. In presidential elections between 1900 and 2016, Texas cast votes for the winning presidential candidate 66.7 percent of the time. In that same time frame, Texas supported Democratic candidates slightly more often than Republicans, 53.3 to 46.7 percent. The state, however, favored Republicans in every presidential election between 2000 and 2016.
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in Texas. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[25][26]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 54 out of 150 state House districts in Texas with an average margin of victory of 37.4 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 65 out of 150 state House districts in Texas with an average margin of victory of 36.4 points. Clinton won 10 districts controlled by Republicans heading into the 2018 elections. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 96 out of 150 state House districts in Texas with an average margin of victory of 36.2 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 85 out of 150 state House districts in Texas with an average margin of victory of 34.5 points. |
2016 presidential results by state House district | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control |
1 | 26.82% | 72.17% | R+45.3 | 22.76% | 75.13% | R+52.4 | R |
2 | 20.93% | 77.91% | R+57 | 17.59% | 79.78% | R+62.2 | R |
3 | 22.26% | 76.65% | R+54.4 | 21.37% | 75.80% | R+54.4 | R |
4 | 25.04% | 73.93% | R+48.9 | 22.70% | 74.70% | R+52 | R |
5 | 23.75% | 75.33% | R+51.6 | 20.20% | 77.72% | R+57.5 | R |
6 | 28.44% | 70.49% | R+42 | 28.89% | 67.98% | R+39.1 | R |
7 | 27.14% | 71.97% | R+44.8 | 24.48% | 73.09% | R+48.6 | R |
8 | 24.96% | 74.07% | R+49.1 | 21.12% | 76.63% | R+55.5 | R |
9 | 27.47% | 71.73% | R+44.3 | 22.23% | 76.13% | R+53.9 | R |
10 | 25.56% | 73.21% | R+47.7 | 25.20% | 71.62% | R+46.4 | R |
11 | 26.75% | 72.23% | R+45.5 | 24.48% | 72.79% | R+48.3 | R |
12 | 36.06% | 62.67% | R+26.6 | 32.54% | 64.35% | R+31.8 | R |
13 | 22.71% | 76.25% | R+53.5 | 20.47% | 77.18% | R+56.7 | R |
14 | 34.77% | 62.91% | R+28.1 | 38.79% | 54.03% | R+15.2 | R |
15 | 21.79% | 76.77% | R+55 | 28.86% | 66.69% | R+37.8 | R |
16 | 18.22% | 80.76% | R+62.5 | 18.80% | 78.35% | R+59.5 | R |
17 | 37.30% | 60.79% | R+23.5 | 33.92% | 62.02% | R+28.1 | R |
18 | 27.18% | 71.69% | R+44.5 | 23.96% | 73.47% | R+49.5 | R |
19 | 22.22% | 76.79% | R+54.6 | 17.21% | 81.00% | R+63.8 | R |
20 | 26.22% | 72.13% | R+45.9 | 25.81% | 70.27% | R+44.5 | R |
21 | 23.92% | 74.97% | R+51.1 | 21.50% | 76.09% | R+54.6 | R |
22 | 66.82% | 32.57% | D+34.3 | 65.95% | 31.80% | D+34.1 | D |
23 | 44.24% | 54.56% | R+10.3 | 40.89% | 55.86% | R+15 | R |
24 | 25.11% | 73.48% | R+48.4 | 27.42% | 68.20% | R+40.8 | R |
25 | 28.74% | 69.92% | R+41.2 | 27.55% | 69.14% | R+41.6 | R |
26 | 35.86% | 62.95% | R+27.1 | 45.81% | 50.71% | R+4.9 | R |
27 | 68.80% | 30.44% | D+38.4 | 70.03% | 27.23% | D+42.8 | D |
28 | 34.81% | 64.22% | R+29.4 | 43.01% | 53.21% | R+10.2 | R |
29 | 35.44% | 63.32% | R+27.9 | 41.21% | 54.83% | R+13.6 | R |
30 | 30.24% | 68.64% | R+38.4 | 26.80% | 70.36% | R+43.6 | R |
31 | 61.89% | 37.31% | D+24.6 | 55.47% | 42.31% | D+13.2 | D |
32 | 41.43% | 56.92% | R+15.5 | 42.04% | 53.45% | R+11.4 | R |
33 | 26.49% | 72.25% | R+45.8 | 31.27% | 64.67% | R+33.4 | R |
34 | 54.64% | 44.24% | D+10.4 | 53.40% | 43.18% | D+10.2 | D |
35 | 66.43% | 32.71% | D+33.7 | 63.43% | 33.59% | D+29.8 | D |
36 | 74.73% | 24.41% | D+50.3 | 73.70% | 23.21% | D+50.5 | D |
37 | 69.28% | 29.75% | D+39.5 | 68.98% | 27.77% | D+41.2 | D |
38 | 66.13% | 32.95% | D+33.2 | 65.76% | 30.74% | D+35 | D |
39 | 74.02% | 25.10% | D+48.9 | 70.48% | 26.40% | D+44.1 | D |
40 | 75.32% | 23.68% | D+51.6 | 70.73% | 25.91% | D+44.8 | D |
41 | 56.64% | 42.35% | D+14.3 | 59.53% | 36.87% | D+22.7 | D |
42 | 75.54% | 23.57% | D+52 | 73.73% | 23.49% | D+50.2 | D |
43 | 46.96% | 52.09% | R+5.1 | 43.79% | 53.10% | R+9.3 | R |
44 | 30.83% | 67.97% | R+37.1 | 30.22% | 65.99% | R+35.8 | R |
45 | 41.83% | 55.19% | R+13.4 | 44.53% | 49.14% | R+4.6 | R |
46 | 76.62% | 20.14% | D+56.5 | 78.16% | 16.34% | D+61.8 | D |
47 | 39.32% | 58.05% | R+18.7 | 46.98% | 47.16% | R+0.2 | R |
48 | 56.86% | 39.56% | D+17.3 | 65.17% | 28.12% | D+37 | D |
49 | 70.19% | 24.89% | D+45.3 | 76.63% | 16.65% | D+60 | D |
50 | 57.79% | 38.81% | D+19 | 63.38% | 30.05% | D+33.3 | D |
51 | 78.49% | 17.43% | D+61.1 | 79.52% | 14.04% | D+65.5 | D |
52 | 42.57% | 54.91% | R+12.3 | 46.12% | 47.56% | R+1.4 | R |
53 | 22.29% | 76.50% | R+54.2 | 20.74% | 76.30% | R+55.6 | R |
54 | 45.85% | 53.04% | R+7.2 | 44.07% | 51.07% | R+7 | R |
55 | 33.08% | 65.48% | R+32.4 | 31.96% | 63.28% | R+31.3 | R |
56 | 29.70% | 69.02% | R+39.3 | 31.16% | 64.82% | R+33.7 | R |
57 | 25.97% | 73.09% | R+47.1 | 22.50% | 75.69% | R+53.2 | R |
58 | 21.12% | 77.52% | R+56.4 | 18.84% | 77.90% | R+59.1 | R |
59 | 21.36% | 77.31% | R+56 | 19.19% | 77.44% | R+58.2 | R |
60 | 15.70% | 83.09% | R+67.4 | 13.33% | 84.19% | R+70.9 | R |
61 | 16.19% | 82.54% | R+66.3 | 14.49% | 82.74% | R+68.3 | R |
62 | 24.72% | 73.77% | R+49.1 | 20.89% | 76.05% | R+55.2 | R |
63 | 26.39% | 72.13% | R+45.7 | 30.22% | 65.26% | R+35 | R |
64 | 37.33% | 60.30% | R+23 | 40.00% | 54.49% | R+14.5 | R |
65 | 40.84% | 57.52% | R+16.7 | 46.51% | 48.62% | R+2.1 | R |
66 | 37.46% | 61.15% | R+23.7 | 46.24% | 49.45% | R+3.2 | R |
67 | 37.26% | 61.08% | R+23.8 | 44.69% | 50.41% | R+5.7 | R |
68 | 17.78% | 81.15% | R+63.4 | 14.23% | 83.37% | R+69.1 | R |
69 | 23.27% | 75.20% | R+51.9 | 20.26% | 76.12% | R+55.9 | R |
70 | 29.25% | 69.37% | R+40.1 | 32.82% | 62.78% | R+30 | R |
71 | 22.84% | 75.76% | R+52.9 | 21.49% | 74.23% | R+52.7 | R |
72 | 23.33% | 75.26% | R+51.9 | 21.45% | 74.81% | R+53.4 | R |
73 | 20.22% | 78.37% | R+58.2 | 21.25% | 75.11% | R+53.9 | R |
74 | 56.99% | 41.57% | D+15.4 | 56.27% | 39.58% | D+16.7 | D |
75 | 72.33% | 26.62% | D+45.7 | 73.74% | 21.38% | D+52.4 | D |
76 | 76.91% | 21.86% | D+55.1 | 77.93% | 17.86% | D+60.1 | D |
77 | 64.07% | 34.29% | D+29.8 | 68.79% | 25.97% | D+42.8 | D |
78 | 54.41% | 44.15% | D+10.3 | 59.28% | 35.16% | D+24.1 | D |
79 | 64.73% | 34.12% | D+30.6 | 68.62% | 26.73% | D+41.9 | D |
80 | 68.25% | 30.91% | D+37.3 | 65.06% | 32.31% | D+32.7 | D |
81 | 24.20% | 74.66% | R+50.5 | 26.33% | 70.49% | R+44.2 | R |
82 | 19.38% | 79.31% | R+59.9 | 20.58% | 75.76% | R+55.2 | R |
83 | 21.27% | 77.50% | R+56.2 | 19.94% | 76.49% | R+56.5 | R |
84 | 34.95% | 63.28% | R+28.3 | 35.12% | 59.58% | R+24.5 | R |
85 | 37.99% | 61.03% | R+23 | 41.09% | 56.10% | R+15 | R |
86 | 16.18% | 82.55% | R+66.4 | 16.16% | 80.17% | R+64 | R |
87 | 22.12% | 76.56% | R+54.4 | 21.74% | 74.43% | R+52.7 | R |
88 | 19.06% | 79.89% | R+60.8 | 16.48% | 80.59% | R+64.1 | R |
89 | 31.79% | 66.67% | R+34.9 | 36.08% | 59.03% | R+23 | R |
90 | 73.70% | 25.21% | D+48.5 | 74.97% | 21.48% | D+53.5 | D |
91 | 30.45% | 67.90% | R+37.5 | 32.14% | 63.08% | R+30.9 | R |
92 | 37.22% | 61.08% | R+23.9 | 40.54% | 54.66% | R+14.1 | R |
93 | 38.26% | 60.21% | R+21.9 | 40.40% | 54.84% | R+14.4 | R |
94 | 38.10% | 60.29% | R+22.2 | 40.87% | 54.30% | R+13.4 | R |
95 | 76.11% | 22.99% | D+53.1 | 74.24% | 22.89% | D+51.4 | D |
96 | 40.22% | 58.60% | R+18.4 | 42.55% | 53.74% | R+11.2 | R |
97 | 38.92% | 59.59% | R+20.7 | 42.59% | 52.42% | R+9.8 | R |
98 | 23.57% | 75.01% | R+51.4 | 28.91% | 66.33% | R+37.4 | R |
99 | 30.70% | 67.69% | R+37 | 32.12% | 63.36% | R+31.2 | R |
100 | 77.89% | 21.07% | D+56.8 | 77.24% | 19.30% | D+57.9 | D |
101 | 64.01% | 34.87% | D+29.1 | 66.06% | 30.36% | D+35.7 | D |
102 | 45.32% | 53.02% | R+7.7 | 52.27% | 42.74% | D+9.5 | R |
103 | 69.87% | 28.77% | D+41.1 | 73.55% | 22.33% | D+51.2 | D |
104 | 72.70% | 26.36% | D+46.3 | 75.60% | 20.85% | D+54.7 | D |
105 | 46.48% | 52.14% | R+5.7 | 52.13% | 43.60% | D+8.5 | R |
106 | 30.86% | 67.69% | R+36.8 | 35.83% | 59.70% | R+23.9 | R |
107 | 46.89% | 51.83% | R+4.9 | 52.37% | 43.40% | D+9 | D |
108 | 39.31% | 58.99% | R+19.7 | 50.32% | 44.01% | D+6.3 | R |
109 | 81.75% | 17.68% | D+64.1 | 81.55% | 16.42% | D+65.1 | D |
110 | 88.74% | 10.77% | D+78 | 86.76% | 11.25% | D+75.5 | D |
111 | 77.24% | 22.06% | D+55.2 | 77.40% | 20.17% | D+57.2 | D |
112 | 43.50% | 55.03% | R+11.5 | 48.28% | 47.10% | D+1.2 | R |
113 | 46.31% | 52.53% | R+6.2 | 49.13% | 47.23% | D+1.9 | R |
114 | 43.48% | 55.23% | R+11.7 | 52.14% | 43.21% | D+8.9 | R |
115 | 43.23% | 55.27% | R+12 | 51.54% | 43.64% | D+7.9 | R |
116 | 60.53% | 37.80% | D+22.7 | 63.73% | 31.10% | D+32.6 | D |
117 | 51.99% | 46.85% | D+5.1 | 53.23% | 42.14% | D+11.1 | D |
118 | 55.33% | 43.41% | D+11.9 | 55.58% | 40.41% | D+15.2 | D |
119 | 60.26% | 38.58% | D+21.7 | 60.13% | 36.08% | D+24.1 | D |
120 | 64.75% | 34.11% | D+30.6 | 63.51% | 32.10% | D+31.4 | D |
121 | 37.61% | 60.88% | R+23.3 | 43.42% | 51.69% | R+8.3 | R |
122 | 30.87% | 67.87% | R+37 | 37.75% | 57.87% | R+20.1 | R |
123 | 61.36% | 36.80% | D+24.6 | 65.02% | 30.27% | D+34.7 | D |
124 | 60.94% | 37.65% | D+23.3 | 62.19% | 33.04% | D+29.1 | D |
125 | 59.11% | 39.59% | D+19.5 | 61.62% | 33.69% | D+27.9 | D |
126 | 36.72% | 62.08% | R+25.4 | 43.00% | 52.94% | R+9.9 | R |
127 | 29.60% | 69.21% | R+39.6 | 34.90% | 61.23% | R+26.3 | R |
128 | 26.59% | 72.37% | R+45.8 | 28.77% | 68.15% | R+39.4 | R |
129 | 33.88% | 64.47% | R+30.6 | 40.06% | 55.33% | R+15.3 | R |
130 | 22.81% | 75.91% | R+53.1 | 27.96% | 68.06% | R+40.1 | R |
131 | 83.65% | 15.69% | D+68 | 84.29% | 13.35% | D+70.9 | D |
132 | 39.77% | 58.92% | R+19.2 | 45.68% | 50.04% | R+4.4 | R |
133 | 30.41% | 68.14% | R+37.7 | 41.12% | 54.52% | R+13.4 | R |
134 | 41.74% | 56.39% | R+14.7 | 55.09% | 39.61% | D+15.5 | R |
135 | 39.86% | 58.83% | R+19 | 46.82% | 48.89% | R+2.1 | R |
136 | 41.43% | 55.34% | R+13.9 | 47.69% | 45.16% | D+2.5 | R |
137 | 63.91% | 34.49% | D+29.4 | 67.00% | 28.92% | D+38.1 | D |
138 | 39.30% | 59.18% | R+19.9 | 47.85% | 47.78% | D+0.1 | R |
139 | 75.62% | 23.61% | D+52 | 76.12% | 20.61% | D+55.5 | D |
140 | 70.10% | 28.98% | D+41.1 | 75.09% | 21.87% | D+53.2 | D |
141 | 87.41% | 12.07% | D+75.3 | 85.19% | 12.59% | D+72.6 | D |
142 | 77.41% | 21.97% | D+55.4 | 76.20% | 20.97% | D+55.2 | D |
143 | 67.18% | 31.86% | D+35.3 | 71.02% | 26.02% | D+45 | D |
144 | 50.77% | 47.88% | D+2.9 | 57.75% | 38.37% | D+19.4 | D |
145 | 60.26% | 38.28% | D+22 | 66.92% | 28.72% | D+38.2 | D |
146 | 78.82% | 20.05% | D+58.8 | 79.43% | 17.32% | D+62.1 | D |
147 | 78.07% | 20.30% | D+57.8 | 78.99% | 16.78% | D+62.2 | D |
148 | 56.59% | 41.08% | D+15.5 | 63.82% | 30.50% | D+33.3 | D |
149 | 58.76% | 40.12% | D+18.6 | 64.25% | 32.50% | D+31.8 | D |
150 | 30.28% | 68.55% | R+38.3 | 36.63% | 59.18% | R+22.6 | R |
Total | 41.40% | 57.19% | R+15.8 | 43.48% | 52.53% | R+9.1 | - |
Source: Daily Kos |
Candidate ballot access
The table below details filing requirements for 24th Congressional District candidates in Texas in the 2020 election cycle. For additional information on candidate ballot access requirements in Texas, click here.
Filing requirements, 2020 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Office | Party | Signatures required | Signature formula | Filing fee | Filing fee formula | Filing deadline | Source |
Texas | 24th Congressional District | Democratic or Republican | N/A | N/A | $3,125.00 | Fixed number | 12/9/2019 | Source |
Texas | 24th Congressional District | Unaffiliated | 500 | 5% of all votes cast for governor in the district in the last election; not to exceed 500 | N/A | N/A | 12/9/2019 (declaration of intent); 8/13/2020 (final filing deadline) | Source |
District election history
2018
General election
General election for U.S. House Texas District 24
Incumbent Kenny Marchant defeated Jan McDowell and Mike Kolls in the general election for U.S. House Texas District 24 on November 6, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Kenny Marchant (R) | 50.6 | 133,317 |
![]() | Jan McDowell (D) ![]() | 47.5 | 125,231 | |
![]() | Mike Kolls (L) | 1.8 | 4,870 |
Total votes: 263,418 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House Texas District 24
Jan McDowell defeated John Biggan, Edward Allen, and Joshua Andrew Imhoff in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Texas District 24 on March 6, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Jan McDowell ![]() | 52.5 | 14,551 |
John Biggan | 21.5 | 5,970 | ||
Edward Allen | 20.0 | 5,556 | ||
Joshua Andrew Imhoff | 6.0 | 1,663 |
Total votes: 27,740 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House Texas District 24
Incumbent Kenny Marchant defeated Johnathan Davidson in the Republican primary for U.S. House Texas District 24 on March 6, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Kenny Marchant | 74.4 | 30,310 |
![]() | Johnathan Davidson | 25.6 | 10,425 |
Total votes: 40,735 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
2016
Heading into the election, Ballotpedia rated this race as safely Republican. Incumbent Kenny Marchant (R) defeated Jan McDowell (D), Mike Kolls (L) and Kevin McCormick (G) in the general election on November 8, 2016. No candidates faced any primary opposition on March 1, 2016.[27][28]
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | ![]() |
56.2% | 154,845 | |
Democratic | Jan McDowell | 39.3% | 108,389 | |
Libertarian | Mike Kolls | 3.1% | 8,625 | |
Green | Kevin McCormick | 1.4% | 3,776 | |
Total Votes | 275,635 | |||
Source: Texas Secretary of State |
2014
The 24th Congressional District of Texas held an election for the U.S. House of Representatives on November 4, 2014. Incumbent Kenny Marchant (R) defeated Patrick McGehearty (D) and Mike Kolls (L) in the general election.
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | ![]() |
65% | 93,712 | |
Democratic | Patrick McGehearty | 32.3% | 46,548 | |
Libertarian | Mike Kolls | 2.6% | 3,813 | |
Total Votes | 144,073 | |||
Source: Texas Secretary of State |
State profile
- See also: Texas and Texas elections, 2019
Partisan data
The information in this section was current as of January 22, 2020
Presidential voting pattern
- Texas voted Republican in all seven presidential elections between 2000 and 2024.
Congressional delegation
- Following the 2018 elections, both U.S. senators from Texas were Republicans.
- Twenty-three of Texas' 36 U.S. representatives were Republicans and 13 were Democrats.
State executives
- Republicans held six of Texas' nine state executive offices. The other three offices were nonpartisan.
- Texas' governor was Republican Greg Abbott.
State legislature
- Republicans controlled the Texas State Senate with a 19-12 majority.
- Republicans controlled the Texas House of Representatives with a 83-67 majority.
Texas Party Control: 1992-2025
Three years of Democratic trifectas • Twenty-three years of Republican trifectas
Scroll left and right on the table below to view more years.
Year | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Governor | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
Senate | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
House | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
|
|
Demographic data for Texas | ||
---|---|---|
Texas | U.S. | |
Total population: | 27,429,639 | 316,515,021 |
Land area (sq mi): | 261,232 | 3,531,905 |
Race and ethnicity** | ||
White: | 74.9% | 73.6% |
Black/African American: | 11.9% | 12.6% |
Asian: | 4.2% | 5.1% |
Native American: | 0.5% | 0.8% |
Pacific Islander: | 0.1% | 0.2% |
Two or more: | 2.5% | 3% |
Hispanic/Latino: | 38.4% | 17.1% |
Education | ||
High school graduation rate: | 81.9% | 86.7% |
College graduation rate: | 27.6% | 29.8% |
Income | ||
Median household income: | $53,207 | $53,889 |
Persons below poverty level: | 19.9% | 11.3% |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015) Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in Texas. **Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here. |
See also
- United States House of Representatives elections in Texas, 2020
- United States House of Representatives elections, 2020
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ DCCC, "DCCC Chairwoman Cheri Bustos Adds Six Candidates to DCCC ‘Red To Blue’ Program," July 16, 2020
- ↑ NRCC, "McCarthy Announces Seven “Young Guns” in Final Phase of Young Guns Program," April 14, 2020
- ↑ DCCC, "DCCC Chairwoman Cheri Bustos Adds Six Candidates to DCCC ‘Red To Blue’ Program," July 16, 2020
- ↑ Business Insider, "Everything you need to know about Texas' 24th Congressional District House race between Beth Van Duyne and Candace Valenzuela," August 28, 2020
- ↑ Texas Redistricting Map, "Map," accessed July 24, 2012
- ↑ Candidate Connection surveys completed before September 26, 2019, were not used to generate candidate profiles. In battleground primaries, Ballotpedia based its selection of noteworthy candidates on polling, fundraising, and noteworthy endorsements. In battleground general elections, all major party candidates and any other candidates with the potential to impact the outcome of the race were included.
- ↑ Cook Political Report, "Introducing the 2017 Cook Political Report Partisan Voter Index," April 7, 2017
- ↑ FiveThirtyEight, "Election Update: The Most (And Least) Elastic States And Districts," September 6, 2018
- ↑ Inside Elections also uses Tilt ratings to indicate an even smaller advantage and greater competitiveness.
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Nathan Gonzalez," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Kyle Kondik," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Charlie Cook," April 22, 2018
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 The Dallas Morning News, "We recommend: A list of all our candidate recommendations for the general election," October 9, 2020
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 Fort Worth Star-Telegram, "Our recommendation for suburban Fort Worth voters in hottest Texas congressional race," October 16, 2020
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 Candace Valenzuela's 2020 campaign website, "Endorsements," accessed October 1, 2020
- ↑ Beth Van Duyne's 2020 campaign website, "Endorsements," accessed October 1, 2020
- ↑ Twitter, "Dave Wasserman on November 2, 2020," accessed November 2, 2020
- ↑ Twitter, "Jacob Rubashkin on October 28, 2020," accessed October 29, 2020
- ↑ Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball, "2020 Rating Changes," accessed October 1, 2020
- ↑ U.S. Term Limits, "TX-24 POLL: IF VALENZUELA STRESSES TERM LIMITS, SHE’LL BEAT VAN DUYNE," August 6, 2020
- ↑ House Majority PAC, "TX-24_poll," August 6, 2020
- ↑ 22.0 22.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Candace Valenzuela’s campaign website, “Issues,” accessed October 1, 2020
- ↑ Beth Van Duyne’s campaign website, “Beth VanDuyne 2020 – DMN Primary Questionnaire – 1-10-20,” accessed October 1, 2020
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017
- ↑ Texas Secretary of State, "2016 March Primary Election Candidate Filings by County," accessed December 15, 2015
- ↑ The New York Times, "Texas Primary Results," March 1, 2016