Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Texas' 10th Congressional District election, 2020 (July 14 Democratic primary runoff)
- Primary runoff date: July 14
- Primary type: Open
- Registration deadline(s): Unknown
- Online registration: No
- Same-day registration: No
- Early voting starts: July 6
- Absentee/mail voting deadline(s): Unknown
- Voter ID: Photo ID
- Poll times: 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.
Polling places: Polling locations are subject to change. Click here to access the state's official polling site locator. For more information, contact your state election officials.
Mike Siegel defeated Pritesh Gandhi in the Democratic primary runoff for Texas' 10th Congressional District on July 14, 2020. The runoff was originally scheduled for May 26, 2020, but Governor Greg Abbott (R) postponed the election due to the coronavirus pandemic.[1][2] Siegel advanced to the general election on November 3, 2020.
The candidates focused on healthcare and the environment. Gandhi said he would support "Medicare for all that want it." Siegel said he supported a single-payer, universal healthcare option.[3][4] On the environment, Gandhi said he supported a "carbon fee and dividends as a way to immediately reduce emissions." Siegel said he supported the Green New Deal platform. He said, "We have 10 years to cut greenhouse gas emissions by half, or else face increasing floods, droughts, fires, heat waves, and other catastrophic events."[3][4]
The Austin American-Statesman editorial board endorsed Gandhi, writing, "District 10 Democrats have a tough choice, but in our view Gandhi has the greatest potential to move the needle in Congress."[5] The Austin Chronicle and The Houston Chronicle endorsed Siegel, citing his 2018 campaign, environmental policy, and experience as a teacher and assistant city attorney in Austin.[6] For a complete list of endorsements, click here.
In the 2018 general election, incumbent Michael McCaul (R) defeated Siegel (D) 51% to 47%. In 2016, McCaul defeated Tawana Cadien (D) 57% to 38%. The 2017 Cook Partisan Voter Index for this district was R+9, meaning that in the previous two presidential elections, this district's results were nine percentage points more Republican than the national average.[7] Click here to learn more about what was at stake in the general election.
This page focuses on Texas' 10th Congressional District Democratic primary runoff. For more in-depth information on the district's Republican primary and the general election, see the following pages:
- Texas' 10th Congressional District election, 2020 (March 3 Republican primary)
- Texas' 10th Congressional District election, 2020
Election procedure changes in 2020
Ballotpedia provided comprehensive coverage of how election dates and procedures changed in 2020. While the majority of changes occurred as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, some changes occurred for other reasons.
Texas modified its primary election process as follows:
- Election postponements: The primary runoff elections were postponed from May 26 to July 14.
- Political party events: The Republican Party of Texas convention, scheduled for July 16-18 in Houston, was cancelled. The party conducted its convention online.
For a full timeline about election modifications made in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, click here.
Candidates and election results
Democratic primary runoff election
Democratic primary runoff for U.S. House Texas District 10
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Mike Siegel | 54.2 | 26,799 |
![]() | Pritesh Gandhi | 45.8 | 22,629 |
Total votes: 49,428 (100.00% precincts reporting) | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Candidate profiles
This section includes candidate profiles created in one of two ways. Either the candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey or Ballotpedia staff created a profile after identifying the candidate as noteworthy.[8] Ballotpedia staff compiled profiles based on campaign websites, advertisements, and public statements.
Party: Democratic Party
Incumbent: No
Political Office: None
Biography: Gandhi received a medical degree from the Tufts University School of Medicine. At the time of his campaign, he was a primary care physician and the clinical assistant professor of population health at Dell Medical School.
Show sources
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House Texas District 10 in 2020.
Party: Democratic Party
Incumbent: No
Political Office: None
Biography: Siegel worked as a public school teacher with Teach for America and co-founded two nonprofit education organizations. After graduating from law school, he worked as an employment lawyer and as an Austin city attorney.
Show sources
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House Texas District 10 in 2020.
Noteworthy primary endorsements
This section includes noteworthy endorsements issued in the primary, added as we learn about them. Click here to read how we define noteworthy primary endorsements. If you are aware of endorsements that should be included, please email us.
Runoff endorsements
Endorsements made after the March 3 Democratic primary election and ahead of the July 14 runoff are shown in the table below. The "Previous endorsee" column shows when a runoff endorsement came from a person or group that endorsed a different candidate in the primary election. If you are aware of endorsements that should be included, please email us.
Click on the links below to explore each candidate's full list of endorsements on their campaign websites:
Democratic runoff endorsements | |||
---|---|---|---|
Endorsement | Gandhi | Siegel | Previous endorsee |
Newspapers and editorials | |||
Austin American-Statesman[9] | ✔ | Pritesh Gandhi | |
The Houston Chronicle[10] | ✔ | Mike Siegel | |
Elected officials | |||
U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)[11] | ✔ | -- | |
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)[12] | ✔ | -- | |
U.S. Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.)[13] | ✔ | -- | |
Congresswoman Judy Chu (D)[14] | ✔ | -- | |
Congresswoman Ami Bera (D)[15] | ✔ | -- | |
Organizations | |||
Planned Parenthood Action Fund[9] | ✔ | -- | |
Giffords: Courage to Fight Gun Violence[16] | ✔ | -- |
Primary endorsements
This table covers endorsements made ahead of the March 3 primary.
Democratic primary endorsements | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endorsement | Gandhi | Hutcheson | Siegel | |||
Newspapers and editorials | ||||||
Austin American-Statesman[5] | ✔ | |||||
The Austin Chronicle[10] | ✔ | |||||
The Houston Chronicle[6] | ✔ | |||||
Elected officials | ||||||
Congressman Ted Lieu (D)[17] | ✔ | |||||
Congressman Ro Khanna (D)[17] | ✔ | |||||
Congresswoman Grace Meng (D)[18] | ✔ | |||||
Organizations | ||||||
AFL-CIO[17] | ✔ | |||||
NARAL Pro-Choice America[19] | ✔ | |||||
EMILY's List[20] | ✔ | |||||
Sunrise Movement[17] | ✔ | |||||
Asian American and Pacific Islander Members of Congress PAC[19] | ✔ | |||||
314 Action[19] | ✔ | |||||
350 Action[17] | ✔ | |||||
Our Revolution[17] | ✔ | |||||
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers[17] | ✔ | |||||
Communications Workers of America[17] | ✔ | |||||
National Union of Healthcare Workers[17] | ✔ | |||||
Progressive Change Campaign Committee[17] | ✔ | |||||
Serve America PAC[21] | ✔ | |||||
Working Families Party[17] | ✔ | |||||
Brand New Congress[17] | ✔ |
Campaign themes
The following campaign themes and policy positions were listed on the candidates' campaign websites in February 2020, if available.
Pritesh Gandhi
“ |
Climate Change: Twelve Miles of Life When we think about global warming and climate change it is easy to imagine our planet as a large, immutable force. But, all known life exists in only twelve vertical miles, from the top of Mount Everest to the bottom of the Mariana Trench. Think about that for a second… Yet, we have members of Congress that continue to deny the evidence that is staring them in the face – that climate change is real In 2017, the United States saw four hurricanes make landfall, three of which caused massive damage, and two of which were Category 5s – the result of warming waters building stronger storms. The next year, we saw the deadliest wildfires in our country’s history. Across the country, our farmers are being disrupted at a catastrophic pace as crops are impacted by a changing climate. If we don’t match the warnings of record-flooding along our Gulf Coast, of record-charring on the Gold Coast, of record crop failures from coast-to-coast, and of record coughing in our exam rooms and living rooms with the urgency they require, the damage we are doing to our climate will become irreversible and we will have left our kids and grandkids in greater peril than we may ever know. I will fight for: Clean air & clean water by reinstating the Obama-era climate policies and unshackling the EPA. Historic investments in expanding Texas’ production of low-carbon energy sources (we are a national leader in wind energy production). Investing in efficiency to reduce energy costs for consumers while avoiding environmental impacts (e.g., retrofitting existing housing stock). Investing in conservation to protect green spaces, wildlife, and our habitat. Investments in R&D with the national innovation system of universities, national labs, and industry to unleash new economic opportunity as we navigate the transition to a low-carbon world. Carbon fee & dividends as a way to immediately reduce emissions. Re-entry into the Paris Climate Agreement. Linking this transition to renewable energy with a focus on vocational and technical skills training because without environmental justice we cannot scale these efforts. Common-Sense Gun Safety Physicians like me see the trauma caused by our weak gun safety laws every day. In 2012, weeks after the tragedy at Sandy Hook, I founded a group, Doctors Against Gun Violence, while I was doing my residency at Tulane Hospital in New Orleans. Along with fellow physicians, I crisscrossed the state of Louisiana providing a louder voice to promote evidence-based research in a campaign for common-sense gun safety laws. Fund gun violence research. After decades of the NRA placating gun manufacturers and bullying our elected officials to turn a blind eye, Congress is finally taking action to understand our gun violence crisis. However, the Senate is now blocking $50 million in funding for the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institutes of Health to study gun violence. The Senate should fund these efforts immediately. Congress should implement these changes immediately: Pass Universal Background Checks. No person should be able to purchase a deadly firearm from another person without first passing a background check that ensures they don’t have a criminal history, or a history of violence against themselves or others, that prohibits them from owning a gun. Support Extreme Risk Protection Orders. Allow physicians and family members to report individuals – who are a risk to themselves or others – to law enforcement and allow law enforcement to temporarily revoke access to firearms with the order of a judge. Ban Assault Weapons and Large-Capacity Magazines. No civilian should have a weapon of war for personal use. Congress should ban the purchase of assault weapons and large-capacity magazines. Congress should also take steps to regulate the estimated 15 million assault weapons that are already in circulation, including establishing voluntary buy-back programs. Close the Partner and Stalker Loopholes. Congress should expand the list of persons prohibited from purchasing a firearm to include individuals with a history of domestic violence and stalking. End Gun Industry Immunity. Treat the gun industry just like any other and allow victims of gun violence to seek civil compensation from irresponsible gun manufacturers. Congress should close this NRA favored loophole in our civil justice system. Health is a Fundamental Human Right I am a physician. I take care of sick people. And I am fed up with America’s systems making people sicker. Let’s be clear: we have rules and regulations attempting to make using care as difficult as possible – a cynical attempt at reducing healthcare utilization in our state and country. Not too long ago, I met a woman who had complained of abdominal pain and progressive weight loss for years. She had ignored signs of colon cancer because cost put the evaluation she needed out of reach. I treat patients with arthritis, unable to afford medications or specialists. I see working-class adults suffering from back and neck pain for years because the expense of physical therapy keeps relief out of reach. We can do better. And we will. No American should be without insurance. This means Congress should pass legislation that expands Medicare for all that want it. And, this legislation needs to meaningfully engage on social determinants of health such as housing, poverty, food insecurity, and education. As we fight for universal coverage, we need to be practical about the realities of the pace of social change. Congress should also pursue changes to our current system that will immediately improve the health of communities because we maintain a moral obligation to help families now. While fighting for universal coverage, Congress should implement these changes immediately:
Humanity at Our Border I am the son of immigrants. The immigrant experience defines the American narrative. These stories are ones of courage and will: mothers who come to our border seeking refuge from violence, scholars who come to study, families who seek a better life. We must call out unjust and cruel policies that seek to punish, demean, and harm immigrants and their families. I will fight for our shared humanity by:
Investing in Our Workforce I believe in our workforce. At one point in our history, our government did too. We were committed to a flourishing middle class and we built protections for workers and their families. And then we walked away. We walked away from investing in the most important aspect of our economy – our workforce. We walked away from labor protections and unions. We walked away from basic support for working families. America has arrived at an economy where 1% of our citizens hold 40% of the wealth, while the majority of our citizens say they are one unexpected bill away from economic ruin. We can do better.
I will fight for investment in worker training and economic development: Increasing funding for workforce training opportunities outside of the four-year degree, including high school pre-apprenticeship programs, apprenticeships, and occupational credentials Fostering industry partnerships with high schools and community colleges to create training-to-work pipelines Directing economic development and incentives to rural and underserved communities I will fight for working families:
I will fight for investments for workers who are between jobs:
And we must protect and expand Social Security for our nation’s workers, who have contributed to the program for their lifetime. Investing in Rural Communities Washington is leaving rural Texas communities behind. Too many Texas families have to choose between rural communities they’ve grown up in and economic opportunities in the larger cities. Over the last couple of decades we have witnessed a historic decline in the middle class with a widening income inequality gap and yet, legislators in DC do nothing to keep our families together in rural America. We can do better. In Congress, I will fight to: End the trade war and tariffs that are hurting farmers and ranchers. Support legislation, such as HR 1328 (ACCESS BROADBAND ACT), to increase access to broadband internet in rural communities to open up access to the world economy and health care advances, like telemedicine. Build on Texas’ strength as a wind energy leader by investing in the expansion of renewable energy production. Expand access to capital for rural entrepreneurs and small business owners by supporting legislation such as H.R. 2409 (Expanding Access to Capital for Rural Job Creators Act). Pass Medicaid expansion which will at least ensure that Texans benefit from the millions of federal dollars that we have left on the table – this is support that we could have been receiving to maintain and bolster our rural hospitals and safety net system. Protecting Women’s Health As a primary care doctor, I have witnessed women’s rights be chipped away slowly in Texas. I am running for Congress to stop the assault on women’s health. I believe that reproductive justice should never be on the table to be leveraged in budget or legislative negotiations. I will fight for women’s health by:
Restoring Faith in American Democracy Americans are losing faith in government, and for good reason. Congress must take bold action to protect voting rights, get dark money out of politics, and end legalized corruption by elected officials. Congress should implement these changes immediately to restore confidence in our elections: Disclose “Dark Money” spending in our elections. Dark money groups who operate as non-profit social welfare organizations spend millions in our election while hiding who is funding them. Congress must pass the DISCLOSE Act [H.R. 6239—115th Congress] and bring transparency to our elections. Make voting easier. Automatic voter registration, same day voter registration, no-reason absentee voting, and ending felon disenfranchisement are common sense ways to make it easier for Americans to participate in our democracy. The Senate must pass H.R. 1 [For the People Act of 2019] and implement these changes. End partisan gerrymandering. The federal courts have failed to fix the problem of partisan redistricting, so Congress must act. Congress must pass legislation implementing non-partisan redistricting reform. Overturn Citizens United. The Citizens United ruling opened the floodgates to dark money in political campaigns. Congress must pass H.J. 2 [Democracy for All Amendment] a constitutional amendment overturning Citizens United. Congress should implement these changes immediately to restore confidence in our governance: Stop the revolving door. Members of Congress and their senior staff face only minimal “cooling off periods” between government service and becoming a registered lobbyist. This practice breeds corruption and must end. Congress must pass a 10 year lobbying ban for Members of Congress and their senior staff. Ban individual stock ownership by Members of Congress. Congressman McCaul made more than 7,000 stock trades over a two year period. And, he’s not alone. Members of Congress routinely trade stock; often those trades involve companies whom their committee has industry oversight. Congress must ban individual stock ownership for Members of Congress. Mandate the disclosure of tax returns for Presidential candidates. In 2016, President Trump ended the long established practice of voluntary tax return disclosure by candidates for President. These disclosures are an important vetting mechanism to ensure Presidential candidates don’t have conflicts of interest or are compromised by a forgien entity. Congress must pass legislation mandating the disclosure of at least 10 years of tax returns for all presidential candidates. [22] |
” |
—Pritesh Gandhi 2020 campaign website[3] |
Mike Siegel
“ |
Fighting for our shared values We need a bold vision My work in public service, as an educator and civil rights advocate, has shown me that we are strongest when we work together. Right now, our economy and political system is not working for most Americans. Huge corporations use their money and influence to rig the game to their own advantage. To build a stronger America, a country that truly serves the greater good, we need a movement. Healthcare Health care is a human right. It is essential to everything we do: our personal and family health, our ability to work and run businesses, our financial stability and our plans for retirement. We must chart a path that guarantees high quality healthcare for every American. I support efforts to guarantee universal care, including current proposals for Medicare for All. The United States is a wealthy nation that spends far too much on far too little care. With Medicare for All, we will save billions of dollars a year, and instead of paying for burdensome paperwork requirements and bonuses for corporate CEOs, we will provide healthcare for 30 million uninsured Americans and tens of millions more who currently have insufficient protection. The TX-10 incumbent, Michael McCaul, is complicit in every Republican attack on our healthcare. He voted dozens of times to repeal the Affordable Care Act, including its protections for pre-existing conditions. He has also done nothing while rural hospitals are closed. My commitment is to fight for the people of the Texas 10th, for your health and your security. Until we achieve Medicare for All, we must defend the important gains we have made for Medicare and Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program and the Affordable Care Act. We must lower prescription drug prices and pursue other important reforms. And most of all, we must put people before profits, and ensure every American has the care and support they need. Voting Rights Mike Siegel has been fighting for equal opportunity and social justice for the last twenty years, first as a public school teacher and then as a civil rights lawyer. As an educator and union organizer, community activist and trial attorney, Mike has committed himself to advocating for disadvantaged communities and working for a better future. In 2018, Mike was the Democratic nominee in the Texas 10th Congressional District, taking on a longtime Republican incumbent in a heavily gerrymandered district. His opponent, Michael McCaul, is one of the richest members of Congress and won his 2016 election by 19 points. With a grassroots campaign backed by organized labor, Indivisible groups, and other progressive organizations and activists, Mike narrowed the gap to 4 points on Election Day, surprising many outside observers. Now, TX-10 is on the national “battleground” lists for both parties, and Mike is running again. One of the highlights of Mike’s 2018 campaign was his fight for voting rights at Prairie View A&M University. The historically-black college in Waller County has been the source of a series of struggles for voting rights dating back several decades. In 2018, on the eve of the voter registration deadline, local officials told PVAMU students they would not be able to vote on Election Day without signing an affidavit swearing to their residence — an unnecessary impediment to voting that would surely suppress voter turnout. Mike joined together with local Democrats to protest this policy, and in the course of delivering a demand letter, Mike’s local organizer was arrested. As a result, Mike was featured on Rachel Maddow, and a day later, the Texas Secretary of State forced Waller County to reverse its policy on student voting. Public education is the foundation of our democracy. If every student has the opportunity to learn and succeed, the American Dream continues. But if we weaken public education—through for-profit schemes, attacks on teachers’ unions, systemic under-funding and the like—we lose the heart of our nation. My beliefs about public education are informed by my own experience attending public schools, and my work as a public school teacher. I taught third grade, fifth grade, and eighth grade; I ran after-school and summer programs; and I organized as a member of the teacher’s union. I’ve seen what is possible, when students and parents and teachers and administrators unite in pursuit of quality education. And I’ve seen the threats from those who would sell our public resources to the highest bidder, and attack our system of education as a way to reduce political opposition. As your representative, I will fight for:
And as your representative, I will fight against:
Public education is essential to what this country stands for. Elect a teacher who will protect our schools for the generations to come. Green New Deal for TX-10 Over the past century, fossil fuels have raised the standard of living for people around the world and fueled a boom in the Texas economy. But this same boom has led us to a crisis: we have 10 years to cut greenhouse gas emissions by half, or else face increasing floods, droughts, fires, heat waves, and other catastrophic events. Poor and working people, people of color, seniors, and people with disabilities are among those most at risk; we only need to look at the impact of Hurricane Harvey, and recent industrial disasters in Houston to see the truth. In order to solve this massive crisis, we need massive solutions. The Green New Deal is designed to confront the twin crises of climate change and inequality. It is a plan to take immediate action to (1) address climate change, and create millions of jobs in the process; (2) guarantee a just transition for affected workers and their families, including a jobs guarantee, so they will not suffer as we rebuild the American economy; and (3) remedy the legacy of environmental injustice and focus resources on those communities that have been on the front lines of fossil fuel pollution. The original New Deal had a project in every Congressional district, and here in the Texas 10th, we have a project ready to implement. In Fayette County, the Fayette Coal Plant was built 40 years ago with the promise of “clean” coal power, but has instead poisoned the groundwater, polluted the air, killed livestock and crops, and created a corridor of cancer cases, childhood asthma, and other calamitous health impacts. The plant should be immediately closed; funds allocated to clean up coal ash waste and other pollution; and new industry developed to employ local workers in a sustainable industry for the 21st Century. We have begun the work of a Green New Deal for Texas. In September 2019, my campaign was the first to organize a town hall event on the Green New Deal, bringing together national & local experts across politics, labor, economics, agriculture, environmental justice, and youth climate organizing. The highlights and complete town hall video are below. Dignity for Workers by Protecting and Growing Union Membership The labor movement has won tremendous gains for Americans, from minimum wage laws and safe working conditions to healthcare guarantees, Social Security, pensions and more. For several decades, however, unions and workers have been under attack. The results of this right-wing assault are clear: more people in poverty, a massive gap between rich and poor, millions of people working multiple jobs just to survive. At this moment in history, when progressive movements are winning hearts and minds with plans for “Medicare for All” and a “Green New Deal,” we must also put the fight for unions at the front of the agenda. We must ensure that every American who wants it has a good job and is treated with dignity. We must also protect the right to organize. We know that corporations have increasing power, as massive companies like Amazon and Walmart control millions of jobs. The only way to balance out this concentration of wealth is with worker power. Mike Siegel has been a union activist and labor ally throughout his professional career. He was raised in a union family; his mom was a machinist and organizer with the International Association of Machinists, and his father is a labor lawyer for farmworkers, janitors, and healthcare workers. Mike earned his first union card in 1999, as a public school teacher and member of the National Education Association; he was elected as a site representative and national delegate. As a civil rights lawyer, Mike represented unions, and later joined AFSCME as an employee of the City of Austin. He has earned the endorsements of numerous unions as the Democratic nominee for Congress in 2018 and again as a candidate for 2020. As your representative, Mike Siegel will fight to expand the union movement, and support the following demands:
Medicare For All: The debate about private vs. public insurance often revolves around the concept of “choice.” Those who support private insurance say it allows workers to choose the insurance they like. The truth is, it allows workers to choose health insurance if their boss likes that insurance as well. Medicare for All eliminates this need for employers to agree with their employees about what healthcare is best – you can choose what doctor to see whether or not your employer agrees. Medicare for All also allows people to have not only more healthcare options but also more employment options; workers will not be forced to stay in jobs they don’t like just because that job offers them health insurance. Relying on employer based insurance means unions are forced to negotiate for better coverage instead of better working conditions, and we know that people using employer-based insurance already lose their health care constantly. Finally, employer-based insurance burdens businesses with intense administrative & financial costs. We’re going to put an end to it. Police Reform and Racial Justice Our nation is grappling with a 401-year history of racism and oppression. With the police killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, and so many more, millions of us are in the streets to demand justice, to demand that Black Lives Matter, and to demand an end to impunity for police murder. This movement is layered on top of existing crises, including COVID-19, a healthcare crisis and an economic depression, that all disproportionately impact the Black community. We are seeing that Black workers are more likely to be the “essential workers” who face the greatest risk of exposure to COVID-19. We are seeing that Black Americans are among those most likely to die from COVID-19. We live in a country with an “original sin” of slavery that resulted in enormous class disparities, with a legacy of Jim Crow and “redlining” in housing practices, where Black mothers face overwhelming maternal mortality rates, and where a Black baby is more likely to be born into poverty and live in a community with under-resourced public schools. As plain as day, we can see that the American Dream has not been for everyone. And of course the Black community is not the only community that faces systematic racism in this country. Contrary to ideals that many of us hold, the United States has not provided equal opportunity for all. Latino, Asian, Middle Eastern and Native American communities face unique assaults and oppressions on a daily basis, from our police forces, our economic institutions, and society in general. In Texas we see anti-immigrant sentiment, anti-Muslim sentiment, anti-Asian sentiment — much of it coming, unfortunately, from the leaders in power, in the White House and the Texas Capitol. I come to this struggle as a civil rights lawyer who has taken on suits to challenge racist police practices, to stop housing discrimination, to challenge anti-immigrant policies and fight for voting rights. I taught in public schools in Houston, New York City, and Oakland, California, working to meet the needs of diverse students, including Black children. As a candidate for Congress, I’ve fought to protect the right to vote of students at Prairie View A&M, a historically Black college in the Texas 10th. I’ve spoken out, I’ve marched, I’ve organized and filed lawsuits, dedicating myself to the struggle against racism and inequality. I also come to this work as a father and husband. As a white man who is married to a Black woman, and who is the father of Black children. When my wife Hindatu and I met in Houston, Texas in 1999, neither of us knew the path ahead. We were first-year public school teachers with our lives ahead of us. 21 years later we are raising two children in Texas. For the greater community, and for our children, we are committed to the fight for true public safety, justice, and equality for all. And given our background in teaching, we know first-hand how poverty and inequality are deeply rooted and intersectional challenges. Policing is connected to housing. Housing is connected with jobs. Jobs are connected with education. We can’t just change policing policy without addressing the underlying structure of our society To that end, I believe we must work on multiple fronts, to directly address racism in police practices, while also working to address the essential preconditions to equality and opportunity. To address racism in policing, I support demands including the following:
To advance the American Dream of equality for all, I support demands including the following:
Corporate PAC Money We are in a fight for our democracy. Big monied interests and corporations are buying our politicians. Our campaign is rejecting corporate PAC money because I want to represent the people, not large corporations. Pro-Choice I believe that reproductive choice is a universal human right. Women should have simple, informed, and universal access to all aspects of reproductive care. Common Sense Gun Reform We must take action to stop gun violence in America. As a political issue, gun control is complex: there are many proposals, opinions, and ideas out there for helping turn the tide of gun violence in this country. There’s a lot to talk about. But in the short term, I want to make you three promises and suggest three principles that should guide our efforts towards reducing gun violence. I promise you this:
As we go forward and try to get something done, here are three principles that should guide us:
Crushing College Debt The new generation has been sold a promise that we couldn’t keep. We were promised that with a college education, comes a good paying job. Millions of people are struggling because of their large amounts of debt. We must undo this damage. I support College For All. Empowering our LGBTQIA+ Community This campaign recognizes the long struggle of the movements for gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, questioning, intersex, and asexual rights. There have been huge strides toward equality and justice in the 50 years since the Stonewall Riots of 1969, but true equality is still a horizon we continue to fight toward. We know that LGBTQIA+ people still experience higher rates of discrimination, homelessness, suicide, police profiling, incarceration, poverty, and violence stemming from hate than the rest of the country, and these outcomes worsen dramatically for Black, Latino, and indigenous people. Many of our hard-fought victories are currently under attack by the Trump administration and the current balance of the Supreme Court, so we need a Legislative branch packed full of allies. As a parent and family member, as a teacher and organizer, as a civil rights lawyer, I am committed to fighting for the dignity and right of self-determination of every member of our community. When elected, I will work to:
Criminal Justice Reform As a civil rights lawyer and a former school teacher, I see the United States’ criminal justice system as a reflection of our democracy. The Bill of Rights lays out great aspirations: due process, the right to legal counsel, a ban on cruel and unusual punishment, the guarantee of equal protection under the law. But in practice, the system has achieved mixed results, with justice for some and oppression for others. Here in Texas, our work is to undo the legacy of Jim Crow injustice. We have an extremely inequitable system of policing, prosecution, and incarceration, a system that is biased against poor people and people of color. The vast majority of prisoners have not been convicted of a crime – they are in jail because they cannot afford bail. We continue to arrest, prosecute and jail non-violent drug offenders, but most Texans and Americans support drug legalization. And while the jails are full of people who have committed property crimes and other non-violent offenses, we rarely if ever prosecute corporate criminals, including those who steal from working Texans and pollute our air and water. As your next Congressperson, I will fight for a criminal justice reform agenda, including the work to:
The Work in TX-10 The Texas 10th is a part of the national movement for criminal justice reform. A few years ago, Sandra Bland died in police custody in Waller County after an unconstitutional arrest. The movement for justice for Sandra Bland continues to inspire organizers and reformers across Texas. On November 20, 2019, the State of Texas is preparing to execute Rodney Reed, an African-American man from Bastrop County who was convicted of murder twenty-two years ago. Rodney Reed’s case represents what Jim Crow injustice can look like: a rigged investigation, untested DNA evidence, flawed “expert” witnesses, even a confession that has not been considered by the court. Mike has joined the movement to free Rodney Reed, using his campaign to amplify this grave injustice. Immigration The U.S. immigration system is broken. The government is not managing migration in an efficient or effective manner, and often fails to treat human beings with the dignity and respect we each deserve. One of the greatest qualities of the United States is how this country has provided sanctuary and opportunities for people from around the world. In the process, immigrants have enriched our culture, strengthened our economy, and made America a better place for everyone. My own family has benefited from this legacy of America: my Protestant ancestors who escaped persecution in Britain, and my Jewish ancestors who fled pogroms in Eastern Europe, all came here for a better life. My wife was born in Nigeria, grew up in Pittsburgh, attended university and veterinary school and is a thriving businesswoman in Austin. My children are growing up in a vibrant community of rich cultures and perspectives. I want the United States to implement a humane border policy that is consistent with international law. We must end the practice of criminalizing asylum-seekers, and the related programs that encourage the detention of vulnerable individuals and families. We must take the profit motive out of immigration enforcement by outlawing private immigration jails. We must look at comprehensive reform of U.S. immigration agencies currently housed under the Department of Homeland Security – including ICE and Customs and Border Patrol, agencies that have shocked the world with their cruel treatment of migrant families. This is why we must build consensus on comprehensive immigration reform: • I support a path to citizenship for Dreamers, people with Temporary Protected Status, and undocumented immigrants and families who are living and working in the United States. • I support the Reuniting Families Act, which will reform the visa system, strengthen family reunification, and address some of the bureaucratic challenges in our immigration system. • I support rescinding harmful and punitive policies like the Muslim Ban and the practice of deporting veterans, which violate the promise of our democratic nation and do not make us safer. • I oppose the Border Wall, which is a wasteful, ineffective monument to hatred. • I support the repeal of Section 1325, the law which allows for family separation. • I support investing in immigration courts and social services that will allow for the efficient processing of claims and cases. Finally, in terms of international relations, we must address the root causes of increased migration from the South. Domestically, we should end the War on Drugs, a racist and wasteful policy that only destroys families within the United States, but that also exacerbates the scourge of drug cartels and narco governments. And outside our borders, we must support democracy in Latin America, oppose dictatorships and corruption, and promote economic development, the development of civil society, and protections for workers and their unions. By promoting stable conditions and addressing the push factors for migration in Mexico and Central America, we can reduce the number of individuals and families forced to seek protection within our borders. Housing is not an option. People need shelter. The United States is in the middle of a decades-long affordable housing crisis, which is pushing people out of their homes and neighborhoods. Almost 20 million Americans spend over half their income on housing while over 500,000 Americans are experiencing homelessness. Speculators drive up costs at rates that far outpace income growth, in the process pushing renters and homeowners out of their chosen neighborhoods. We must reform federal housing and financial policy to protect our homes and neighborhoods, and to ensure that we are meeting the needs of local communities instead of the profit expectations of investors. We must address the legacy of racial discrimination in housing by prioritizing distressed frontline communities with a reparative framework. And our housing policy must address the climate crisis by making existing public and municipal housing more sustainable while we build millions of new, environmentally-sound public housing units. In his professional career, Mike has taken on slum landlords and fought to protect low-income renters. As a city attorney in Texas, Mike successfully sued apartment complex owners who refused to maintain good quality housing, in the process achieving long-term affordable housing guarantees for hundreds of families. He also sued the Texas Governor to stand up for renters who use housing vouchers, challenging the de facto housing discrimination that still divides our cities and determines who has opportunity, and who does not. As your representative, Mike will fight for housing for all, and will support policy initiatives like the following:
|
” |
—Mike Siegel 2020 campaign website[4] |
Campaign advertisements
This section shows advertisements released in this race. Ads released by campaigns and, if applicable, satellite groups are embedded or linked below. If you are aware of advertisements that should be included, please email us.
Pritesh Gandhi
|
Mike Siegel
|
|
Polls
- See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls
If you are aware of polls conducted in this race, please email us.
Campaign finance
The chart below contains data from financial reports submitted to the Federal Election Commission.
There are currently no declared candidates in this race. Know of one we missed? Click here to let us know.
Satellite spending
Satellite spending, commonly referred to as outside spending, describes political spending not controlled by candidates or their campaigns; that is, any political expenditures made by groups or individuals that are not directly affiliated with a candidate. This includes spending by political party committees, super PACs, trade associations, and 501(c)(4) nonprofit groups.[23][24][25]
This section lists satellite spending in this race reported by news outlets in alphabetical order. If you are aware of spending that should be included, please email us.
Primaries in Texas
A primary election is an election in which registered voters select a candidate that they believe should be a political party's candidate for elected office to run in the general election. They are also used to choose convention delegates and party leaders. Primaries are state-level and local-level elections that take place prior to a general election. Texas utilizes an open primary system. Voters do not have to register with a party in advance in order to participate in that party's primary. The voter must sign a pledge stating the following (the language below is taken directly from state statutes)[26]
“ | The following pledge shall be placed on the primary election ballot above the listing of candidates' names: 'I am a (insert appropriate political party) and understand that I am ineligible to vote or participate in another political party's primary election or convention during this voting year.'[22] | ” |
For information about which offices are nominated via primary election, see this article.
What was at stake in the general election
U.S. House elections were held on November 3, 2020, and coincided with the 2020 presidential election. All 435 House districts were up for election, and the results determined control of the U.S. House in the 117th Congress.
At the time of the election, Democrats had a 232-197 advantage over Republicans. There was one Libertarian member, and there were five vacancies. Republicans needed to gain a net 21 seats to win control of the House. Democrats needed to gain seats or lose fewer than 14 net seats to keep their majority.
In the 2018 midterm election, Democrats had a net gain of 40 seats, winning a 235-200 majority in the House. Heading into the 2018 election, Republicans had a 235-193 majority with seven vacancies.
In the 25 previous House elections that coincided with a presidential election, the president's party had gained House seats in 16 elections and lost seats in nine. In years where the president's party won districts, the average gain was 18. In years where the president's party lost districts, the average loss was 27. Click here for more information on presidential partisanship and down-ballot outcomes.
General election race ratings
- See also: Race rating definitions and methods
Ballotpedia provides race ratings from four outlets: The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections, Sabato's Crystal Ball, and DDHQ/The Hill. Each race rating indicates if one party is perceived to have an advantage in the race and, if so, the degree of advantage:
- Safe and Solid ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge and the race is not competitive.
- Likely ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge, but an upset is possible.
- Lean ratings indicate that one party has a small edge, but the race is competitive.[27]
- Toss-up ratings indicate that neither party has an advantage.
Race ratings are informed by a number of factors, including polling, candidate quality, and election result history in the race's district or state.[28][29][30]
Race ratings: Texas' 10th Congressional District election, 2020 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Race tracker | Race ratings | ||||||||
November 3, 2020 | October 27, 2020 | October 20, 2020 | October 13, 2020 | ||||||
The Cook Political Report | Toss-up | Lean Republican | Lean Republican | Lean Republican | |||||
Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales | Lean Republican | Likely Republican | Likely Republican | Likely Republican | |||||
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball | Lean Republican | Lean Republican | Lean Republican | Lean Republican | |||||
Note: Ballotpedia updates external race ratings every week throughout the election season. |
District analysis
- See also: The Cook Political Report's Partisan Voter Index
- See also: FiveThirtyEight's elasticity scores
The 2017 Cook Partisan Voter Index for this district was R+9, meaning that in the previous two presidential elections, this district's results were 9 percentage points more Republican than the national average. This made Texas' 10th Congressional District the 145th most Republican nationally.[31]
FiveThirtyEight's September 2018 elasticity score for states and congressional districts measured "how sensitive it is to changes in the national political environment." This district's elasticity score was 0.95. This means that for every 1 point the national political mood moved toward a party, the district was expected to move 0.95 points toward that party.[32]
Pivot Counties
- See also: Pivot Counties by state
One of 254 Texas counties—0.4 percent—is a Pivot County. Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.
Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Trump margin of victory in 2016 | Obama margin of victory in 2012 | Obama margin of victory in 2008 | ||||
Jefferson County, Texas | 0.48% | 1.61% | 2.25% |
In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump (R) won Texas with 52.2 percent of the vote. Hillary Clinton (D) received 43.2 percent. In presidential elections between 1900 and 2016, Texas cast votes for the winning presidential candidate 66.7 percent of the time. In that same time frame, Texas supported Democratic candidates slightly more often than Republicans, 53.3 to 46.7 percent. The state, however, favored Republicans in every presidential election between 2000 and 2016.
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in Texas. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[33][34]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 54 out of 150 state House districts in Texas with an average margin of victory of 37.4 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 65 out of 150 state House districts in Texas with an average margin of victory of 36.4 points. Clinton won 10 districts controlled by Republicans heading into the 2018 elections. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 96 out of 150 state House districts in Texas with an average margin of victory of 36.2 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 85 out of 150 state House districts in Texas with an average margin of victory of 34.5 points. |
2016 presidential results by state House district | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control |
1 | 26.82% | 72.17% | R+45.3 | 22.76% | 75.13% | R+52.4 | R |
2 | 20.93% | 77.91% | R+57 | 17.59% | 79.78% | R+62.2 | R |
3 | 22.26% | 76.65% | R+54.4 | 21.37% | 75.80% | R+54.4 | R |
4 | 25.04% | 73.93% | R+48.9 | 22.70% | 74.70% | R+52 | R |
5 | 23.75% | 75.33% | R+51.6 | 20.20% | 77.72% | R+57.5 | R |
6 | 28.44% | 70.49% | R+42 | 28.89% | 67.98% | R+39.1 | R |
7 | 27.14% | 71.97% | R+44.8 | 24.48% | 73.09% | R+48.6 | R |
8 | 24.96% | 74.07% | R+49.1 | 21.12% | 76.63% | R+55.5 | R |
9 | 27.47% | 71.73% | R+44.3 | 22.23% | 76.13% | R+53.9 | R |
10 | 25.56% | 73.21% | R+47.7 | 25.20% | 71.62% | R+46.4 | R |
11 | 26.75% | 72.23% | R+45.5 | 24.48% | 72.79% | R+48.3 | R |
12 | 36.06% | 62.67% | R+26.6 | 32.54% | 64.35% | R+31.8 | R |
13 | 22.71% | 76.25% | R+53.5 | 20.47% | 77.18% | R+56.7 | R |
14 | 34.77% | 62.91% | R+28.1 | 38.79% | 54.03% | R+15.2 | R |
15 | 21.79% | 76.77% | R+55 | 28.86% | 66.69% | R+37.8 | R |
16 | 18.22% | 80.76% | R+62.5 | 18.80% | 78.35% | R+59.5 | R |
17 | 37.30% | 60.79% | R+23.5 | 33.92% | 62.02% | R+28.1 | R |
18 | 27.18% | 71.69% | R+44.5 | 23.96% | 73.47% | R+49.5 | R |
19 | 22.22% | 76.79% | R+54.6 | 17.21% | 81.00% | R+63.8 | R |
20 | 26.22% | 72.13% | R+45.9 | 25.81% | 70.27% | R+44.5 | R |
21 | 23.92% | 74.97% | R+51.1 | 21.50% | 76.09% | R+54.6 | R |
22 | 66.82% | 32.57% | D+34.3 | 65.95% | 31.80% | D+34.1 | D |
23 | 44.24% | 54.56% | R+10.3 | 40.89% | 55.86% | R+15 | R |
24 | 25.11% | 73.48% | R+48.4 | 27.42% | 68.20% | R+40.8 | R |
25 | 28.74% | 69.92% | R+41.2 | 27.55% | 69.14% | R+41.6 | R |
26 | 35.86% | 62.95% | R+27.1 | 45.81% | 50.71% | R+4.9 | R |
27 | 68.80% | 30.44% | D+38.4 | 70.03% | 27.23% | D+42.8 | D |
28 | 34.81% | 64.22% | R+29.4 | 43.01% | 53.21% | R+10.2 | R |
29 | 35.44% | 63.32% | R+27.9 | 41.21% | 54.83% | R+13.6 | R |
30 | 30.24% | 68.64% | R+38.4 | 26.80% | 70.36% | R+43.6 | R |
31 | 61.89% | 37.31% | D+24.6 | 55.47% | 42.31% | D+13.2 | D |
32 | 41.43% | 56.92% | R+15.5 | 42.04% | 53.45% | R+11.4 | R |
33 | 26.49% | 72.25% | R+45.8 | 31.27% | 64.67% | R+33.4 | R |
34 | 54.64% | 44.24% | D+10.4 | 53.40% | 43.18% | D+10.2 | D |
35 | 66.43% | 32.71% | D+33.7 | 63.43% | 33.59% | D+29.8 | D |
36 | 74.73% | 24.41% | D+50.3 | 73.70% | 23.21% | D+50.5 | D |
37 | 69.28% | 29.75% | D+39.5 | 68.98% | 27.77% | D+41.2 | D |
38 | 66.13% | 32.95% | D+33.2 | 65.76% | 30.74% | D+35 | D |
39 | 74.02% | 25.10% | D+48.9 | 70.48% | 26.40% | D+44.1 | D |
40 | 75.32% | 23.68% | D+51.6 | 70.73% | 25.91% | D+44.8 | D |
41 | 56.64% | 42.35% | D+14.3 | 59.53% | 36.87% | D+22.7 | D |
42 | 75.54% | 23.57% | D+52 | 73.73% | 23.49% | D+50.2 | D |
43 | 46.96% | 52.09% | R+5.1 | 43.79% | 53.10% | R+9.3 | R |
44 | 30.83% | 67.97% | R+37.1 | 30.22% | 65.99% | R+35.8 | R |
45 | 41.83% | 55.19% | R+13.4 | 44.53% | 49.14% | R+4.6 | R |
46 | 76.62% | 20.14% | D+56.5 | 78.16% | 16.34% | D+61.8 | D |
47 | 39.32% | 58.05% | R+18.7 | 46.98% | 47.16% | R+0.2 | R |
48 | 56.86% | 39.56% | D+17.3 | 65.17% | 28.12% | D+37 | D |
49 | 70.19% | 24.89% | D+45.3 | 76.63% | 16.65% | D+60 | D |
50 | 57.79% | 38.81% | D+19 | 63.38% | 30.05% | D+33.3 | D |
51 | 78.49% | 17.43% | D+61.1 | 79.52% | 14.04% | D+65.5 | D |
52 | 42.57% | 54.91% | R+12.3 | 46.12% | 47.56% | R+1.4 | R |
53 | 22.29% | 76.50% | R+54.2 | 20.74% | 76.30% | R+55.6 | R |
54 | 45.85% | 53.04% | R+7.2 | 44.07% | 51.07% | R+7 | R |
55 | 33.08% | 65.48% | R+32.4 | 31.96% | 63.28% | R+31.3 | R |
56 | 29.70% | 69.02% | R+39.3 | 31.16% | 64.82% | R+33.7 | R |
57 | 25.97% | 73.09% | R+47.1 | 22.50% | 75.69% | R+53.2 | R |
58 | 21.12% | 77.52% | R+56.4 | 18.84% | 77.90% | R+59.1 | R |
59 | 21.36% | 77.31% | R+56 | 19.19% | 77.44% | R+58.2 | R |
60 | 15.70% | 83.09% | R+67.4 | 13.33% | 84.19% | R+70.9 | R |
61 | 16.19% | 82.54% | R+66.3 | 14.49% | 82.74% | R+68.3 | R |
62 | 24.72% | 73.77% | R+49.1 | 20.89% | 76.05% | R+55.2 | R |
63 | 26.39% | 72.13% | R+45.7 | 30.22% | 65.26% | R+35 | R |
64 | 37.33% | 60.30% | R+23 | 40.00% | 54.49% | R+14.5 | R |
65 | 40.84% | 57.52% | R+16.7 | 46.51% | 48.62% | R+2.1 | R |
66 | 37.46% | 61.15% | R+23.7 | 46.24% | 49.45% | R+3.2 | R |
67 | 37.26% | 61.08% | R+23.8 | 44.69% | 50.41% | R+5.7 | R |
68 | 17.78% | 81.15% | R+63.4 | 14.23% | 83.37% | R+69.1 | R |
69 | 23.27% | 75.20% | R+51.9 | 20.26% | 76.12% | R+55.9 | R |
70 | 29.25% | 69.37% | R+40.1 | 32.82% | 62.78% | R+30 | R |
71 | 22.84% | 75.76% | R+52.9 | 21.49% | 74.23% | R+52.7 | R |
72 | 23.33% | 75.26% | R+51.9 | 21.45% | 74.81% | R+53.4 | R |
73 | 20.22% | 78.37% | R+58.2 | 21.25% | 75.11% | R+53.9 | R |
74 | 56.99% | 41.57% | D+15.4 | 56.27% | 39.58% | D+16.7 | D |
75 | 72.33% | 26.62% | D+45.7 | 73.74% | 21.38% | D+52.4 | D |
76 | 76.91% | 21.86% | D+55.1 | 77.93% | 17.86% | D+60.1 | D |
77 | 64.07% | 34.29% | D+29.8 | 68.79% | 25.97% | D+42.8 | D |
78 | 54.41% | 44.15% | D+10.3 | 59.28% | 35.16% | D+24.1 | D |
79 | 64.73% | 34.12% | D+30.6 | 68.62% | 26.73% | D+41.9 | D |
80 | 68.25% | 30.91% | D+37.3 | 65.06% | 32.31% | D+32.7 | D |
81 | 24.20% | 74.66% | R+50.5 | 26.33% | 70.49% | R+44.2 | R |
82 | 19.38% | 79.31% | R+59.9 | 20.58% | 75.76% | R+55.2 | R |
83 | 21.27% | 77.50% | R+56.2 | 19.94% | 76.49% | R+56.5 | R |
84 | 34.95% | 63.28% | R+28.3 | 35.12% | 59.58% | R+24.5 | R |
85 | 37.99% | 61.03% | R+23 | 41.09% | 56.10% | R+15 | R |
86 | 16.18% | 82.55% | R+66.4 | 16.16% | 80.17% | R+64 | R |
87 | 22.12% | 76.56% | R+54.4 | 21.74% | 74.43% | R+52.7 | R |
88 | 19.06% | 79.89% | R+60.8 | 16.48% | 80.59% | R+64.1 | R |
89 | 31.79% | 66.67% | R+34.9 | 36.08% | 59.03% | R+23 | R |
90 | 73.70% | 25.21% | D+48.5 | 74.97% | 21.48% | D+53.5 | D |
91 | 30.45% | 67.90% | R+37.5 | 32.14% | 63.08% | R+30.9 | R |
92 | 37.22% | 61.08% | R+23.9 | 40.54% | 54.66% | R+14.1 | R |
93 | 38.26% | 60.21% | R+21.9 | 40.40% | 54.84% | R+14.4 | R |
94 | 38.10% | 60.29% | R+22.2 | 40.87% | 54.30% | R+13.4 | R |
95 | 76.11% | 22.99% | D+53.1 | 74.24% | 22.89% | D+51.4 | D |
96 | 40.22% | 58.60% | R+18.4 | 42.55% | 53.74% | R+11.2 | R |
97 | 38.92% | 59.59% | R+20.7 | 42.59% | 52.42% | R+9.8 | R |
98 | 23.57% | 75.01% | R+51.4 | 28.91% | 66.33% | R+37.4 | R |
99 | 30.70% | 67.69% | R+37 | 32.12% | 63.36% | R+31.2 | R |
100 | 77.89% | 21.07% | D+56.8 | 77.24% | 19.30% | D+57.9 | D |
101 | 64.01% | 34.87% | D+29.1 | 66.06% | 30.36% | D+35.7 | D |
102 | 45.32% | 53.02% | R+7.7 | 52.27% | 42.74% | D+9.5 | R |
103 | 69.87% | 28.77% | D+41.1 | 73.55% | 22.33% | D+51.2 | D |
104 | 72.70% | 26.36% | D+46.3 | 75.60% | 20.85% | D+54.7 | D |
105 | 46.48% | 52.14% | R+5.7 | 52.13% | 43.60% | D+8.5 | R |
106 | 30.86% | 67.69% | R+36.8 | 35.83% | 59.70% | R+23.9 | R |
107 | 46.89% | 51.83% | R+4.9 | 52.37% | 43.40% | D+9 | D |
108 | 39.31% | 58.99% | R+19.7 | 50.32% | 44.01% | D+6.3 | R |
109 | 81.75% | 17.68% | D+64.1 | 81.55% | 16.42% | D+65.1 | D |
110 | 88.74% | 10.77% | D+78 | 86.76% | 11.25% | D+75.5 | D |
111 | 77.24% | 22.06% | D+55.2 | 77.40% | 20.17% | D+57.2 | D |
112 | 43.50% | 55.03% | R+11.5 | 48.28% | 47.10% | D+1.2 | R |
113 | 46.31% | 52.53% | R+6.2 | 49.13% | 47.23% | D+1.9 | R |
114 | 43.48% | 55.23% | R+11.7 | 52.14% | 43.21% | D+8.9 | R |
115 | 43.23% | 55.27% | R+12 | 51.54% | 43.64% | D+7.9 | R |
116 | 60.53% | 37.80% | D+22.7 | 63.73% | 31.10% | D+32.6 | D |
117 | 51.99% | 46.85% | D+5.1 | 53.23% | 42.14% | D+11.1 | D |
118 | 55.33% | 43.41% | D+11.9 | 55.58% | 40.41% | D+15.2 | D |
119 | 60.26% | 38.58% | D+21.7 | 60.13% | 36.08% | D+24.1 | D |
120 | 64.75% | 34.11% | D+30.6 | 63.51% | 32.10% | D+31.4 | D |
121 | 37.61% | 60.88% | R+23.3 | 43.42% | 51.69% | R+8.3 | R |
122 | 30.87% | 67.87% | R+37 | 37.75% | 57.87% | R+20.1 | R |
123 | 61.36% | 36.80% | D+24.6 | 65.02% | 30.27% | D+34.7 | D |
124 | 60.94% | 37.65% | D+23.3 | 62.19% | 33.04% | D+29.1 | D |
125 | 59.11% | 39.59% | D+19.5 | 61.62% | 33.69% | D+27.9 | D |
126 | 36.72% | 62.08% | R+25.4 | 43.00% | 52.94% | R+9.9 | R |
127 | 29.60% | 69.21% | R+39.6 | 34.90% | 61.23% | R+26.3 | R |
128 | 26.59% | 72.37% | R+45.8 | 28.77% | 68.15% | R+39.4 | R |
129 | 33.88% | 64.47% | R+30.6 | 40.06% | 55.33% | R+15.3 | R |
130 | 22.81% | 75.91% | R+53.1 | 27.96% | 68.06% | R+40.1 | R |
131 | 83.65% | 15.69% | D+68 | 84.29% | 13.35% | D+70.9 | D |
132 | 39.77% | 58.92% | R+19.2 | 45.68% | 50.04% | R+4.4 | R |
133 | 30.41% | 68.14% | R+37.7 | 41.12% | 54.52% | R+13.4 | R |
134 | 41.74% | 56.39% | R+14.7 | 55.09% | 39.61% | D+15.5 | R |
135 | 39.86% | 58.83% | R+19 | 46.82% | 48.89% | R+2.1 | R |
136 | 41.43% | 55.34% | R+13.9 | 47.69% | 45.16% | D+2.5 | R |
137 | 63.91% | 34.49% | D+29.4 | 67.00% | 28.92% | D+38.1 | D |
138 | 39.30% | 59.18% | R+19.9 | 47.85% | 47.78% | D+0.1 | R |
139 | 75.62% | 23.61% | D+52 | 76.12% | 20.61% | D+55.5 | D |
140 | 70.10% | 28.98% | D+41.1 | 75.09% | 21.87% | D+53.2 | D |
141 | 87.41% | 12.07% | D+75.3 | 85.19% | 12.59% | D+72.6 | D |
142 | 77.41% | 21.97% | D+55.4 | 76.20% | 20.97% | D+55.2 | D |
143 | 67.18% | 31.86% | D+35.3 | 71.02% | 26.02% | D+45 | D |
144 | 50.77% | 47.88% | D+2.9 | 57.75% | 38.37% | D+19.4 | D |
145 | 60.26% | 38.28% | D+22 | 66.92% | 28.72% | D+38.2 | D |
146 | 78.82% | 20.05% | D+58.8 | 79.43% | 17.32% | D+62.1 | D |
147 | 78.07% | 20.30% | D+57.8 | 78.99% | 16.78% | D+62.2 | D |
148 | 56.59% | 41.08% | D+15.5 | 63.82% | 30.50% | D+33.3 | D |
149 | 58.76% | 40.12% | D+18.6 | 64.25% | 32.50% | D+31.8 | D |
150 | 30.28% | 68.55% | R+38.3 | 36.63% | 59.18% | R+22.6 | R |
Total | 41.40% | 57.19% | R+15.8 | 43.48% | 52.53% | R+9.1 | - |
Source: Daily Kos |
Candidate ballot access
The table below details filing requirements for 10th Congressional District candidates in Texas in the 2020 election cycle. For additional information on candidate ballot access requirements in Texas, click here.
Filing requirements, 2020 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Office | Party | Signatures required | Signature formula | Filing fee | Filing fee formula | Filing deadline | Source |
Texas | 10th Congressional District | Democratic or Republican | N/A | N/A | $3,125.00 | Fixed number | 12/9/2019 | Source |
Texas | 10th Congressional District | Unaffiliated | 500 | 5% of all votes cast for governor in the district in the last election; not to exceed 500 | N/A | N/A | 12/9/2019 (declaration of intent); 8/13/2020 (final filing deadline) | Source |
District election history
2018
General election
General election for U.S. House Texas District 10
Incumbent Michael McCaul defeated Mike Siegel and Mike Ryan in the general election for U.S. House Texas District 10 on November 6, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Michael McCaul (R) | 51.1 | 157,166 |
![]() | Mike Siegel (D) ![]() | 46.8 | 144,034 | |
![]() | Mike Ryan (L) | 2.2 | 6,627 |
Total votes: 307,827 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary runoff election
Democratic primary runoff for U.S. House Texas District 10
Mike Siegel defeated Tawana W. Cadien in the Democratic primary runoff for U.S. House Texas District 10 on May 22, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Mike Siegel ![]() | 70.2 | 12,181 |
Tawana W. Cadien | 29.8 | 5,164 |
Total votes: 17,345 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House Texas District 10
The following candidates ran in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Texas District 10 on March 6, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Mike Siegel ![]() | 40.0 | 15,434 |
✔ | Tawana W. Cadien | 18.0 | 6,938 | |
![]() | Tami Walker | 15.6 | 6,015 | |
![]() | Madeline Eden | 14.3 | 5,514 | |
Matt Harris | 7.3 | 2,825 | ||
![]() | Kevin Nelson | 4.1 | 1,589 | |
![]() | Richie DeGrow | 0.8 | 302 |
Total votes: 38,617 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House Texas District 10
Incumbent Michael McCaul defeated John Cook in the Republican primary for U.S. House Texas District 10 on March 6, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Michael McCaul | 80.1 | 41,881 |
John Cook | 19.9 | 10,413 |
Total votes: 52,294 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
2016
Heading into the election, Ballotpedia rated this race as safely Republican. Incumbent Michael McCaul (R) defeated Tawana Cadien (D) and Bill Kelsey (L) in the general election on November 8, 2016. McCaul ran unopposed in the Republican primary on March 1, 2016, while Tawana Cadien defeated Scot Gallaher for the Democratic nomination.[35][36]
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | ![]() |
57.3% | 179,221 | |
Democratic | Tawana Cadien | 38.4% | 120,170 | |
Libertarian | Bill Kelsey | 4.2% | 13,209 | |
Total Votes | 312,600 | |||
Source: Texas Secretary of State |
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
51.9% | 22,660 | ||
Scot Gallaher | 48.1% | 20,961 | ||
Total Votes | 43,621 | |||
Source: Texas Secretary of State |
Click [show] for previous cycle election results. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014
2012
|
State profile
- See also: Texas and Texas elections, 2019
Partisan data
The information in this section was current as of January 22, 2020
Presidential voting pattern
- Texas voted Republican in all seven presidential elections between 2000 and 2024.
Congressional delegation
- Following the 2018 elections, both U.S. senators from Texas were Republicans.
- Twenty-three of Texas' 36 U.S. representatives were Republicans and 13 were Democrats.
State executives
- Republicans held six of Texas' nine state executive offices. The other three offices were nonpartisan.
- Texas' governor was Republican Greg Abbott.
State legislature
- Republicans controlled the Texas State Senate with a 19-12 majority.
- Republicans controlled the Texas House of Representatives with a 83-67 majority.
Texas Party Control: 1992-2025
Three years of Democratic trifectas • Twenty-three years of Republican trifectas
Scroll left and right on the table below to view more years.
Year | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Governor | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
Senate | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
House | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
|
|
Demographic data for Texas | ||
---|---|---|
Texas | U.S. | |
Total population: | 27,429,639 | 316,515,021 |
Land area (sq mi): | 261,232 | 3,531,905 |
Race and ethnicity** | ||
White: | 74.9% | 73.6% |
Black/African American: | 11.9% | 12.6% |
Asian: | 4.2% | 5.1% |
Native American: | 0.5% | 0.8% |
Pacific Islander: | 0.1% | 0.2% |
Two or more: | 2.5% | 3% |
Hispanic/Latino: | 38.4% | 17.1% |
Education | ||
High school graduation rate: | 81.9% | 86.7% |
College graduation rate: | 27.6% | 29.8% |
Income | ||
Median household income: | $53,207 | $53,889 |
Persons below poverty level: | 19.9% | 11.3% |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015) Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in Texas. **Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here. |
See also
- Texas' 10th Congressional District election, 2020 (March 3 Democratic primary)
- Texas' 10th Congressional District election, 2020 (March 3 Republican primary)
- Texas' 10th Congressional District election, 2020
- United States House elections in Texas, 2020 (March 3 Democratic primaries)
- United States House elections in Texas, 2020 (March 3 Republican primaries)
- United States House Democratic Party primaries, 2020
- United States House Republican Party primaries, 2020
- United States House of Representatives elections, 2020
- U.S. House battlegrounds, 2020
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ The Marshall News Messenger, "Governor postpones primary election runoffs," March 20, 2020
- ↑ Office of the Texas Governor, "Governor Abbott Postpones Runoff Primary Election In Response To COVID-19," March 20, 2020
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Pritesh Gandhi 2020 campaign website, "Key Issues," accessed February 17, 2020
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Mike Siegel 2020 campaign website, "Issues," accessed February 17, 2020
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Austin American-Statesman, "Chronicle Endorsements for the March 3 Primary Election," accessed February 18, 2020
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 The Houston Chronicle, "We recommend Mike Siegel in the Democratic primary for U.S. Rep. District 10," accessed February 21, 2020
- ↑ Cook Political Report, "Introducing the 2017 Cook Political Report Partisan Voter Index," April 7, 2017
- ↑ Candidate Connection surveys completed before September 26, 2019, were not used to generate candidate profiles. In battleground primaries, Ballotpedia based its selection of noteworthy candidates on polling, fundraising, and noteworthy endorsements. In battleground general elections, all major party candidates and any other candidates with the potential to impact the outcome of the race were included.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Facebook, "Pritesh Gandhi 2020 campaign," accessed March 30, 2020
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 The Houston Chronicle, "Editorial: We recommend Mike Siegel in the Democratic runoff for U.S. Rep. District 10," June 25, 2020 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "chronendorse" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ Facebook, "Mike Siegel 2020 campaign," accessed June 15, 2020
- ↑ Twitter, "Elizabeth Warren on June 20, 2020," accessed June 23, 2020
- ↑ Twitter, "Pritesh Gandhi on June 27, 2020," accessed July 8, 2020
- ↑ Twitter, "Pritesh Gandhi 2020 campaign," accessed June 12, 2020
- ↑ Twitter, "Pritesh Gandhi 2020 campaign," accessed June 12, 2020
- ↑ Giffords: Courage to Fight Gun Violence, "Pritesh Gandhi," accessed June 12, 2020
- ↑ 17.00 17.01 17.02 17.03 17.04 17.05 17.06 17.07 17.08 17.09 17.10 17.11 Mike Siegel 2020 campaign website, "Supporters," accessed February 18, 2020
- ↑ ASPIRE PAC, "ASPIRE ENDORSES PRITESH GANDHI FOR TEXAS’ 10th CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT," accessed June 12, 2020
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedclubendorses
- ↑ EMILY's List, "EMILY’S LIST ENDORSES SHANNON HUTCHESON IN TEXAS’ 10TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT," accessed February 18, 2020
- ↑ Email communication with Serve America PAC dated June 25, 2020.
- ↑ 22.0 22.1 22.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ OpenSecrets.org, "Outside Spending," accessed September 22, 2015
- ↑ OpenSecrets.org, "Total Outside Spending by Election Cycle, All Groups," accessed September 22, 2015
- ↑ National Review.com, "Why the Media Hate Super PACs," November 6, 2015
- ↑ Texas Statutes, "Section 172.086," accessed October 7, 2024
- ↑ Inside Elections also uses Tilt ratings to indicate an even smaller advantage and greater competitiveness.
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Nathan Gonzalez," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Kyle Kondik," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Charlie Cook," April 22, 2018
- ↑ Cook Political Report, "Introducing the 2017 Cook Political Report Partisan Voter Index," April 7, 2017
- ↑ FiveThirtyEight, "Election Update: The Most (And Least) Elastic States And Districts," September 6, 2018
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017
- ↑ Texas Secretary of State, "2016 March Primary Election Candidate Filings by County," accessed December 15, 2015
- ↑ The New York Times, "Texas Primary Results," March 1, 2016