Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Ballot access for presidential candidates
In order to get on the ballot, a candidate for president of the United States must meet a variety of complex, state-specific filing requirements and deadlines. These regulations, known as ballot access laws, determine whether a candidate or party will appear on an election ballot. These laws are set at the state level. A presidential candidate must prepare to meet ballot access requirements well in advance of primaries, caucuses, and the general election.
There are three basic methods by which an individual may become a candidate for president of the United States.
- An individual can seek the nomination of a political party. Presidential nominees are selected by delegates at national nominating conventions. Individual states conduct caucuses or primary elections to determine which delegates will be sent to the national convention.[1]
- An individual can run as an independent. Independent presidential candidates typically must petition each state to have their names printed on the general election ballot. For the 2016 presidential contest, it was estimated that an independent candidate would need to collect in excess of 880,000 signatures in order to appear on the general election ballot in every state.[1]
- An individual can run as a write-in candidate. In 33 states, a write-in candidate must file some paperwork in advance of the election. In nine states, write-in voting for presidential candidates is not permitted. The remaining states do not require write-in candidates to file paperwork in advance of the election.[1]
The information presented here applies only to presidential candidates. For additional information about ballot access requirements for state and congressional candidates, see this article.
Election dates and filing deadlines, 2016
The maps below detail the election dates and candidate filing deadlines for the Democratic and Republican presidential primaries and caucuses in 2016. The states with earlier deadlines are shaded in darker colors. A table listing the same information can be found below the maps.
Deadlines for parties to certify their candidates for the general election
If a nominee were to drop out of the race and be replaced by his or her party, what kind of ballot access obstacles might he or she face?
States require political parties to submit names of presidential nominees in order to certify them for the general election ballot. Every state has some sort of official or unofficial deadline for this (see the table below). Some states have earlier deadlines than others because of early voting, voting by mail, and absentee voting. As of February 2016, 34 states offered early voting in some form or another, and several states allowed voting as early as late September.[2] Three states (Colorado, Oregon, and Washington) use all-mail voting systems, thereby eliminating the need for early voting.
August/early September
In 2016, the bulk of the dates for certifying the names of major party presidential candidates were in August and September. Mid-August was the point at which either party could have found a replacement nominee and still have been able to get its candidate's name on the ballot in enough states to be competitive in November without having to navigate the courts and ballot access issues. For example, if a nominee had dropped out in late August, his or her name would already have been certified to appear as the party's candidate for president in about 20 states. If he or she had dropped out in late September, that number would have risen to almost 40 states.
Late September
Replacing a candidate's name in late September could have been challenging. The parties would likely have needed to look to the courts. As Politico noted on August 4, 2016, the courts have shown a willingness to work with the parties on the issue of deadlines: "Courts have tended to discard ballot deadlines in favor of having two parties represented on the ballot.”[3] In 2002, for instance, the New Jersey Supreme Court allowed Democrats to replace their nominee for a U.S. Senate seat 15 days after the certification deadline.[4] In addition to this, election officials in the states have been known to show some leeway on the deadlines. Richard Winger, an expert on ballot access laws, told Ballotpedia by email, “even when major parties have missed deadlines for certifying presidential and vice-presidential nominees, or presidential elector candidates, election officials have always set the deadline aside.”[5]
The other factor to consider, however, is whether or not the opposing party would have filed lawsuits seeking to enforce state laws as they are written in order to prevent a replacement nominee from appearing on the ballot. Such a process would have consumed a considerable amount of time, energy, and resources for both parties and would likely have exacerbated the struggles of the party trying to get its replacement nominee on the ballot.
October/early November
In October, especially later in the month, and in early November (before November 8), the situation would have become significantly more complicated. At this point, nearly all ballot certification deadlines would have passed, many ballots were printed, and voters in some states had already cast their ballots.
This begs the question: What happens if a candidate has dropped out of the race but wins the popular vote in a state? Would the replacement nominee just receive those electoral votes? The answer lies in what that state has to say about its electors in the electoral college. The Constitution does not dictate how electors must cast their votes. But some states do. More than half the states have laws dictating how electors must vote. If the former nominee won in a state that does not have a law on how its electors vote, then, theoretically, he or she could win all of that state's electoral votes. But if the former nominee won in a state that does have a law on how its electors vote, then one would have to look at that law's fine print to see what would happen and if the state's electoral votes could go to the replacement nominee.
Examples of state laws on presidential electors
- Michigan: "Refusal or failure to vote for the candidates for president and vice-president appearing on the Michigan ballot of the political party which nominated the elector constitutes a resignation from the office of elector, his vote shall not be recorded and the remaining electors shall forthwith fill the vacancy." (Michigan State Statute 168.47)
- Florida: "Each such elector shall be a qualified elector of the party he or she represents who has taken an oath that he or she will vote for the candidates of the party that he or she is nominated to represent." (Florida State Statute 103.021)
- Colorado: "Each presidential elector shall vote for the presidential candidate and, by separate ballot, vice-presidential candidate who received the highest number of votes at the preceding general election in this state." (Colorado State Statute 1.4.304)
Deadlines for parties to certify their candidates for the general election
The table below details state deadlines for major political parties to certify the names of their presidential and vice presidential candidates for placement on the general election ballot in 2016.
Qualifications
Article 2, Section 1, of the United States Constitution sets the following qualifications for the presidency:[6]
“ | No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.[7] | ” |
—United States Constitution |
Article 2, Section 4, of the United States Constitution says an individual can be disqualified from the presidency if impeached and convicted:
“ | The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.[7] | ” |
—United States Constitution |
The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution says an individual can also be disqualified from the presidency under the following conditions:
“ | No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.[7] | ” |
—United States Constitution |
Party nomination processes
- See also: Primary election and Caucus
Hover over the terms below to display definitions. | |
Ballot access laws | |
Primary election | |
Caucus | |
Delegate | |
A political party formally nominates its presidential candidate at a national nominating convention. At this convention, state delegates select the party's nominee. Prior to the nominating convention, the states conduct presidential preference primaries or caucuses. Generally speaking, only state-recognized parties — such as the Democratic Party and the Republican Party — conduct primaries and caucuses. These elections measure voter preference for the various candidates and help determine which delegates will be sent to the national nominating convention.[1][8][9]
The Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee, the governing bodies of the nation's two major parties, establish their own guidelines for the presidential nomination process. State-level affiliates of the parties also have some say in determining rules and provisions in their own states. Individuals interested in learning more about the nomination process should contact the political parties themselves for full details.
Statutory requirements
As noted above, political parties have considerable freedom to determine the methods by which they nominate presidential candidates. In those states that conduct presidential preference primaries, there are usually some statutory candidate filing requirements, but these vary considerably from state to state. In most states that conduct primaries, a candidate may petition for placement on the primary ballot. In some states, elections officials or party leaders select candidates to appear on the ballot; candidates selected in this manner are not usually required to file additional paperwork. In other states, a candidate may have to pay a filing fee (to the state, to the party, or both) in order to have his or her name printed on the ballot.
The table below summarizes general statutory filing procedures for a candidate seeking the nomination of his or her party. Please note that this information is not exhaustive. Specific filing requirements can vary by party and by state. For more information, contact the appropriate state-level party.
Filing requirements for partisan candidates, 2016 | |||
---|---|---|---|
State | Primary or caucus | Filing method | Details |
Alabama | Primary | Petition and filing fee | The candidate must file a petition containing at least 500 signatures. In addition, the candidate must pay a filing fee, which is set by the party. |
Alaska | Caucus | N/A | N/A |
Arizona | Primary | Petition or proof of ballot placement in other states | The candidate must file a petition containing at least 500 signatures. Alternatively, the candidate must prove that he or she will appear on the ballot in at least two other states. |
Arkansas | Primary | Filing fee | The candidate must file with his or her political party. The candidate may be required to pay a filing fee, which is set by the party. Upon filing with the party, the candidate must submit a party certificate to the secretary of state. |
California | Primary | Petition | A candidate must petition for placement on the primary ballot. Signature requirements vary from party to party. |
Colorado | Caucus | N/A | N/A |
Connecticut | Primary | Petition or selection by elections officials | The secretary of state can order that a candidate's name be printed on the primary ballot. Alternatively, the candidate must file a petition containing signatures equaling at least 1 percent of the total number of enrolled members in the candidate's party in the state. |
Delaware | Primary | Petition | The candidate must file a petition containing signatures from at least 500 voters belonging to the same party as the candidate. |
Florida | Primary | Selection by party officials | The parties submit lists of their primary candidates for placement on the ballot. |
Georgia | Primary | Selection by party officials | The parties submit lists of their primary candidates for placement on the ballot. |
Hawaii | Caucus | N/A | N/A |
Idaho | Both | Filing fee | A candidate must pay a $1,000 filing fee in order to have his or her name printed on the primary ballot. |
Illinois | Primary | Petition | The candidate must file a petition containing between 3,000 and 5,000 signatures. Only members of the candidate's party can sign the petition. |
Indiana | Primary | Petition | The candidate must file a petition containing at least 4,500 signatures; at least 500 signatures must come from each of Indiana's congressional districts. |
Iowa | Caucus | N/A | N/A |
Kansas | Caucus | N/A | N/A |
Kentucky | Both | Petition or selection by elections officials, as well as a filing fee | The Kentucky State Board of Elections nominates candidates to appear on the primary ballot. Alternatively, a candidate can petition for placement on the primary ballot. This petition must contain at least 5,000 signatures. All presidential primary candidates are liable for a $1,000 filing fee. |
Louisiana | Primary | Petition or filing fee | The candidate must pay a filing fee of $750, plus "any additional fee imposed by a political party state central committee." Alternatively, a candidate may petition for placement on the primary ballot. This petition must contain at least 6,000 signatures; only voters belonging to the same party as the candidate can sign the petition. |
Maine | Caucus | N/A | N/A |
Maryland | Primary | Petition or selection by elections officials | The secretary of state determines which candidates appear on the primary ballot. Alternatively, a candidate can petition for placement on the primary ballot. This petition must contain at least 400 signatures. |
Massachusetts | Primary | Petition, selection by elections officials, or selection by party officials | A candidate can petition for placement on the primary ballot. This petition must contain at least 2,500 signatures. Alternatively, the secretary of state and party officials can select names to appear on the primary ballot. |
Michigan | Primary | Petition, selection by elections officials, or selection by party officials | A candidate can petition for placement on the primary ballot. This petition must contain signatures equaling at least one-half of 1 percent "of the total votes cast in the state at the previous presidential election for the presidential candidate of the political party for which the individual is seeking this nomination." Alternatively, the secretary of state and party officials can select names to appear on the primary ballot. |
Minnesota | Caucus | N/A | N/A |
Mississippi | Primary | Petition or selection by elections officials | The secretary of state determines which candidates appear on the primary ballot. Alternatively, a candidate can petition for ballot placement. This petition must contain at least 500 signatures. |
Missouri | Primary | Petition or filing fee | A candidate must pay a $1,000 filing fee to his or her party in order to appear on the primary ballot. Alternatively, a candidate can petition for ballot placement. This petition must contain at least 5,000 signatures. |
Montana | Primary | Petition | A candidate must submit a petition containing at least 500 signatures in order to have his or her name printed on the primary ballot. |
Nebraska | Both | Petition or selection by elections officials | The secretary of state determines which candidates appear on the primary ballot. Alternatively, a candidate can petition for ballot placement. The petition must contain 100 signatures from each of the state's congressional districts; only voters belonging to the same party as the candidate can sign the petition. |
Nevada | Caucus | N/A | N/A |
New Hampshire | Primary | Filing fee | A candidate must pay a $1,000 filing fee in order to have his or her named printed on the primary ballot. |
New Jersey | Primary | Petition | A candidate must submit a petition containing at least 1,000 signatures in order to have his or her name printed on the primary ballot; only voters belonging to the same party as the candidate can sign the petition. |
New Mexico | Primary | Petition | A special committee determines which candidates appear on the primary ballot. Alternatively, a candidate can petition for placement on the primary ballot. The petition must contain signatures equaling at least 2 percent of the total votes cast for president in each of the state's congressional districts in the last election. |
New York | Primary | N/A[10] | N/A[10] |
North Carolina | Primary | Petition, selection by elections officials, or selection by party officials | Party leaders and elections officials select names to appear on the primary ballot. Alternatively, a candidate can petition for placement on the ballot. The petition must contain 10,000 signatures; only voters belonging to the same party as the candidate can sign the petition. |
North Dakota | Caucus | N/A | N/A |
Ohio | Primary | N/A[10] | N/A[10] |
Oklahoma | Primary | Petition or filing fee | A candidate can petition for placement on the primary ballot. This petition must be signed by 1 percent of the registered voters in each congressional district, or 1,000 registered voters in each congressional district, whichever is less. Alternatively, the candidate can pay a $2,500 filing fee. |
Oregon | Primary | Petition or selection by elections officials | The secretary of state selects names to appear on the primary ballot. Alternatively, a candidate can petition for ballot placement. The petition must be signed by at least 1,000 voters from each of the state's congressional districts; only voters belonging to the same party as the candidate can sign the petition. |
Pennsylvania | Primary | Petition and filing fee | A candidate must submit a petition containing 2,000 signatures. The candidate must also pay a $200 filing fee. |
Rhode Island | Primary | Petition | The candidate must submit a petition containing at least 1,000 signatures. |
South Carolina | Primary | Method varies by party | Ballot access methods vary by party. |
South Dakota | Primary | Notice of intent and selection by party officials | A primary candidate must file a notice of intent in order to have his or her name printed on the primary ballot. A party participating in the primary must "certify the candidate names or the delegates and alternate slates which are to be listed on the primary ballot" to the secretary of state. |
Tennessee | Primary | Petition or selection by elections officials | The secretary of state determines which candidates appear on the primary ballot. Alternatively, a candidate can petition for ballot placement. This petition must be signed by at least 2,500 registered voters. |
Texas | Primary | Method varies by party | Ballot access methods vary by party. |
Utah | Caucus | N/A | N/A |
Vermont | Primary | Petition and filing fee | A candidate must submit a petition and pay a $2,000 filing fee. The petition must contain at least 1,000 signatures. |
Virginia | Primary | Petition | A candidate must submit a petition containing at least 5,000 signatures, with at least 200 signatures from each of the state's congressional districts. |
Washington | Both | Petition or selection by elections officials | The secretary of state determines which candidates appear on the primary ballot. Alternatively, a candidate can submit a petition containing at least 1,000 signatures; only voters belonging to the same party as the candidate can sign the petition. |
Washington, D.C. | Both | Petition | The candidate must petition for placement on the primary ballot. The petition must contain signatures equaling at least 1 percent of the district's qualified voters, or 1,000 signatures, whichever is less. |
West Virginia | Primary | Petition or filing fee | The candidate must pay a $2,500 filing fee in order to have his or her name printed on the primary ballot. Alternatively, a candidate can petition for ballot placement. This petition must contain at least 10,000 signatures (four signatures for every dollar of the filing fee). |
Wisconsin | Primary | Petition or selection by elections officials | The Presidential Preference Selection Committee determines which names appear on the primary ballot. Alternatively, a candidate can petition for ballot placement. This petition must contain at least 1,000 signatures from each of the state's congressional districts. |
Wyoming | Caucus | N/A | N/A |
Note: Because caucuses are administered by political parties themselves with minimal involvement from the state, there are typically no formal legal filing requirements for candidates in these contests. Source: This information was compiled by Ballotpedia staff in September 2015. For specific references to state statutes, see the appropriate state page. |
Requirements for independents
Generally speaking, an independent presidential candidate must petition for placement on the general election ballot in all 50 states as well as Washington, D.C. A handful of states may allow an independent candidate to pay a filing fee in lieu of submitting a petition. The methods for calculating how many signatures are required vary considerably from state to state, as do the actual signature requirements. For instance, some states establish a flat signature requirement. Other states calculate signature requirements as percentages of voter registration or votes cast for a given office.
In order to access the ballot nationwide, it was estimated that an independent presidential candidate in 2016 would need to collect more than 880,000 signatures. California was expected to require independent candidates to collect 178,039 signatures, more than any other state. Tennessee was expected to require 275 signatures, fewer than any other state.
The map below compares signature requirements by state. A lighter shade indicates a lower total signature requirement while a darker shade indicates a higher signature requirement. It should be noted that other variables factor into this process; for instance, some states require candidates to collect a certain number of signatures from each congressional district.
Signature requirements
The table below provides the formula used for determining the number of required signatures, the estimated number of signatures required, and the 2016 filing deadline. Official signature requirements are published by state elections administrators; the numbers presented here are estimates based on the most recent data available as of November 2015.
Petition signature requirements for independent presidential candidates, 2016 | |||
---|---|---|---|
State | Formula | Estimate of signatures needed | Filing deadline |
Alabama | 5,000 | 5,000 | 8/18/2016 |
Alaska | 1% of the total number of state voters who cast ballots for president in the most recent election | 3,005 | 8/10/2016 |
Arizona | 3% of all registered voters who are not affiliated with a qualified political party | 36,000 | 9/9/2016 |
Arkansas | 1,000 | 1,000 | 8/1/2016 |
California | 1% of the total number of registered voters in the state at the time of the close of registration prior to the preceding general election | 178,039 | 8/12/2016 |
Colorado | 5,000 | 5,000 | 8/10/2016 |
Connecticut | 1% of the total vote cast for president in the most recent election, or 7,500, whichever is less | 7,500 | 8/10/2016 |
Delaware | 1% of the total number of registered voters in the state | 6,500 | 7/15/2016 |
Florida | 1% of the total number of registered voters in the state | 119,316 | 7/15/2016 |
Georgia | Temporary court order applying only to 2016 candidates | 7,500 | 7/12/2016 |
Hawaii | 1% of the total number of votes cast in the state for president in the most recent election | 4,372 | 8/10/2016 |
Idaho | 1,000 | 1,000 | 8/24/2016 |
Illinois | 1% of the total number of voters in the most recent statewide general election, or 25,000, whichever is less | 25,000 | 6/27/2016 |
Indiana | 2% of the total vote cast for secretary of state in the most recent election | 26,700 | 6/30/2016 |
Iowa | 1,500 eligible voters from at least 10 of the state's counties | 1,500 | 8/19/2016 |
Kansas | 5,000 | 5,000 | 8/1/2016 |
Kentucky | 5,000 | 5,000 | 9/9/2016 |
Louisiana | 5,000 | 5,000 | 8/19/2016 |
Maine | Between 4,000 and 6,000 | 4,000 | 8/1/2016 |
Maryland | 1% of the total number of registered state voters | 38,000 | 8/1/2016 |
Massachusetts | 10,000 | 10,000 | 8/2/2016 |
Michigan | 30,000 | 30,000 | 7/21/2016 |
Minnesota | 2,000 | 2,000 | 8/23/2016 |
Mississippi | 1,000 | 1,000 | 9/9/2016 |
Missouri | 10,000 | 10,000 | 7/25/2016 |
Montana | 5% of the total votes cast for the successful candidate for governor in the last election, or 5,000, whichever is less | 5,000 | 8/17/2016 |
Nebraska | 2,500 registered voters who did not vote in any party's primary | 2,500 | 8/1/2016 |
Nevada | 1% of the total number of votes cast for all representatives in Congress in the last election | 5,431 | 7/8/2016 |
New Hampshire | 3,000 voters, with at least 1,500 from each congressional district | 3,000 | 8/10/2016 |
New Jersey | 800 | 800 | 8/1/2016 |
New Mexico | 3% of the total votes cast for governor in the last general election | 15,388 | 6/30/2016 |
New York | 15,000, with at least 100 from each of the state's congressional districts | 15,000 | 8/2/2016 |
North Carolina | 2% of the total votes cast for governor in the previous general election | 89,366 | 6/9/2016 |
North Dakota | 4,000 | 4,000 | 9/5/2016 |
Ohio | 5,000 | 5,000 | 8/10/2016 |
Oklahoma | 3% of the total votes cast in the last general election for president | 40,047 | 7/15/2016 |
Oregon | 1% of the total votes cast in the last general election for president | 17,893 | 8/30/2016 |
Pennsylvania | 2% of the largest entire vote cast for any elected candidate in the state at the last preceding election at which statewide candidates were voted for | 25,000 | 8/1/2016 |
Rhode Island | 1,000 | 1,000 | 9/9/2016 |
South Carolina | 5% of registered voters up to 10,000 | 10,000 | 7/15/2016 |
South Dakota | 1% of the combined vote for governor in the last election | 2,775 | 8/2/2016 |
Tennessee | 25 votes per state elector (275 total) | 275 | 8/18/2016 |
Texas | 1% of the total votes cast for all candidates in the previous presidential election | 79,939 | 5/9/2016 |
Utah | 1,000 | 1,000 | 8/15/2016 |
Vermont | 1,000 | 1,000 | 8/1/2016 |
Virginia | 5,000 registered voters, with at least 200 from each congressional district | 5,000 | 8/26/2016 |
Washington | 1,000 | 1,000 | 7/23/2016 |
Washington, D.C. | 1% of the district's qualified voters | 4,600 | 8/10/2016 |
West Virginia | 1% of the total votes cast in the state for president in the most recent election | 6,705 | 8/1/2016 |
Wisconsin | Between 2,000 and 4,000 | 2,000 | 8/2/2016 |
Wyoming | 2% of the total number of votes cast for United States representative in the most recent general election | 3,302 | 8/30/2016 |
TOTALS | 884,453 | ||
Note: Two states (Colorado and Louisiana) allow independent candidates to pay filing fees in lieu of submitting petitions. Sources: This information was compiled by Ballotpedia staff in November 2015. These figures were verified against those published by Richard Winger in the October 2015 print edition of Ballot Access News. |
Requirements for write-in candidates
Although a write-in candidate is not entitled to ballot placement, he or she may still be required to file paperwork in order to have his or her votes tallied (or to be eligible to serve should the candidate be elected). In 33 states, a write-in presidential candidate must file some paperwork in advance of an election. In nine states, write-in voting for presidential candidates is not permitted. The remaining states do not require presidential write-in candidates to file special paperwork before the election. See the map below for further details.
Ballot access for minor parties
Some states have special provisions permitting parties to place presidential candidates on the ballot without attaining full ballot status. Ballot access for the presidential candidates of select minor parties in previous election cycles is detailed below.
Presidential ballot access, 2024
- See also: Presidential candidates, 2024.
There were 11 candidates on the ballot in Louisiana, more than in any other state. Washington came in second, with 10 candidates. New York had two candidates on the ballot, the fewest in 2024.
The following map shows the number of presidential candidates on the ballot in 2024 in each state.
For information from previously presidential election years, click "[Show more]" below.
Presidential ballot access, 2020
- See also: Presidential candidates, 2020
There were 21 candidates on the ballot each in Vermont and Colorado, more than in any other state. Arkansas and Louisiana came in second, with 13 candidates each. Twelve states featured only three candidates on the ballot.
The following map shows the number of presidential candidates on the ballot in 2020 in each state.
Presidential ballot access, 2016
- See also: Presidential candidates, 2016
In 2016, the Democratic and Republican parties were fully ballot-qualified in all 50 states, granting them presidential ballot access by default. The following large minor parties achieved presidential ballot access as indicated:[11][12][13]
- Libertarian Party: 50 states
- Green Party: 44 states (write-in status in an additional three states)
- Constitution Party: 24 states (write-in status in an additional 22 states)
The maps below provide further details for each of these parties. Hover over a state to see further details.
Impact of minor party presidential candidates on party ballot status
In some states, the performance of a minor party's presidential candidate can directly help that party attain state ballot status. The table below identifies state-level affiliates of the Libertarian and Green parties that gained ballot status between 2016 and 2017.[14] The table also indicates whether the performance of a presidential candidate can figure directly in methods for attaining ballot status.
Impact of minor party presidential candidates on parties attaining ballot status between 2016 and 2017 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Political party | State | Methods for attaining ballot status | Impact of candidate on party status | Notes |
Libertarian Party | Iowa | Candidate petition, then poll 2% Hold meeting of 250, then poll 2%[15] |
Party met multiple thresholds for ballot status | The Libertarian Party also ran a candidate for the United States Senate who won 2.6% of the total votes cast for that office.[16] |
Libertarian Party | Massachusetts | Registration drive, 1% Candidate petition, then poll 3%[15] |
Direct impact | The Libertarian candidate for president, Gary Johnson, won 4.2% of the total votes cast for that office. No other statewide contests featured Libertarians.[17] |
Libertarian Party | New Hampshire | Candidate petition, then poll 4% Petition of 3% of last gubernatorial vote[15] |
Party met multiple thresholds for ballot status | The Libertarian Party's candidate for governor, Max Abramson, won 4.3% of the total votes cast for that office.[18] |
Libertarian Party | South Dakota | Petition of 2.5% of last gubernatorial vote[15] | No direct impact | The performance of a party's presidential candidate cannot directly help that party attain ballot status. |
Green Party | Delaware | Registration drive, 0.1% | No direct impact[15] | The performance of a party's presidential candidate cannot directly help that party attain ballot status. |
Green Party | Missouri | Petition of 10,000 signatures | No direct impact[15] | The performance of a party's presidential candidate cannot directly help that party attain ballot status. |
"Sore loser" laws
Some states bar candidates who sought and failed to secure the nomination of a political party from running as independents in the general election. Ballot access expert Richard Winger has noted that, generally speaking, "sore loser laws have been construed not to apply to presidential primaries." In August 2015, Winger compiled a list of precedents supporting this interpretation. According to Winger, 45 states have sore loser laws on the books, but in 43 of these states the laws do not seem to apply to presidential candidates. Sore loser laws apply to presidential candidates in only two states: South Dakota and Texas. See this article for further details.[19][20][21]
Historical information
According to ballot access expert Richard Winger, between 1892 and 2012 there were 401 instances in which a state required an independent or minor party candidate to collect more than 5,000 signatures in order to appear on the general election ballot. Winger said, "Every state has procedures for independent presidential candidates [as well] as procedures for newly-qualifying parties. ... Throughout U.S. history, the presidential nominees of unqualified parties have frequently used the independent candidate procedure instead of the new party procedure, if the independent procedure was easier. The reverse is also true." See this article for state-by-state details.[19]
Campaign finance requirements
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is the only agency authorized to regulate the financing of presidential and other federal campaigns (i.e., campaigns for the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives). The states cannot impose additional requirements on federal candidates. Federal law requires all presidential candidates to file a statement of candidacy within 15 days of receiving contributions or making expenditures that exceed $5,000. The statement of candidacy is the only federally mandated ballot access requirement for presidential candidates; all other ballot access procedures are mandated at the state level. The candidacy statement authorizes "a principal campaign committee to raise and spend funds" on behalf of the candidate. Within 10 days of filing the candidacy statement, the committee must file a statement of organization with the FEC. In addition, federal law establishes contribution limits for presidential candidates. These limits are detailed in the table below. The uppermost row indicates the recipient type; the leftmost column indicates the donor type.[22][23]
Candidate committees | Political action committees | State and district party committees | National party committees | Additional national party committee accounts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Individual | $3,300 per election | $5,000 per year | $10,000 per year (combined) | $41,300 per year | $123,900 per account, per year |
Candidate committee | $2,000 per election | $5,000 per year | Unlimited transfers | Unlimited transfers | N/A |
Multicandidate political action committee | $5,000 per election | $5,000 per year | $5,000 per year (combined) | $15,000 per year | $45,000 per account, per year |
Other political action committee | $3,300 per election | $5,000 per year | $10,000 per year (combined) | $41,300 per year | $123,900 per account, per year |
State and district party committee | $5,000 per election | $5,000 per year | Unlimited transfers | Unlimited transfers | N/A |
National party committee | $5,000 per election | $5,000 per year | Unlimited transfers | Unlimited transfers | N/A |
Note: Contribution limits apply separately to primary and general elections. For example, an individual could contribute $3,300 to a candidate committee for the primary and another $3,300 to the same candidate committee for the general election. Source: Federal Election Commission, "Contribution limits," accessed May 8, 2023 |
Presidential candidate committees are required to file regular campaign finance reports disclosing "all of their receipts and disbursements" either quarterly or monthly. Committees may choose which filing schedule to follow, but they must notify the FEC in writing and "may change their filing frequency no more than once per calendar year."[24]
For contribution limits from previous years, click "[Show more]" below.
Federal contribution limits, 2019-2020 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate committees | Political action committees | State and district party committees | National party committees | Additional national party committee accounts | |
Individual | $2,800 per election | $5,000 per year | $10,000 per year (combined) | $33,500 per year | $106,500 per account, per year |
Candidate committee | $2,000 per election | $5,000 per year | Unlimited transfers | Unlimited transfers | N/A |
Multicandidate political action committee | $5,000 per election | $5,000 per year | $5,000 per year (combined) | $15,000 per year | $45,000 per account, per year |
Other political action committee | $2,800 per election | $5,000 per year | $10,000 per year (combined) | $35,500 per year | $106,500 per account, per year |
State and district party committee | $5,000 per election | $5,000 per year | Unlimited transfers | Unlimited transfers | N/A |
National party committee | $5,000 per election | $5,000 per year | Unlimited transfers | Unlimited transfers | N/A |
Note: Contribution limits apply separately to primary and general elections. For example, an individual could contribute $2,800 to a candidate committee for the primary and another $2,800 to the same candidate committee for the general election. Source: Federal Election Commission, "Contribution limits," accessed August 8, 2019 |
Federal contribution limits, 2015-2016 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate committees | Political action committees | State and district party committees | National party committees | Additional national party committee accounts | |
Individual | $2,700 per election | $5,000 per year | $10,000 per year (combined) | $33,400 per year | $100,200 per account, per year |
Candidate committee | $2,000 per election | $5,000 per year | Unlimited transfers | Unlimited transfers | N/A |
Multicandidate political action committee | $5,000 per election | $5,000 per year | $5,000 per year (combined) | $15,000 per year | $45,000 per account, per year |
Other political action committee | $2,700 per election | $5,000 per year | $10,000 per year (combined) | $33,400 per year | $100,200 per account, per year |
State and district party committee | $5,000 per election | $5,000 per year | Unlimited transfers | Unlimited transfers | N/A |
National party committee | $5,000 per election | $5,000 per year | Unlimited transfers | Unlimited transfers | N/A |
Note: Contribution limits apply separately to primary and general elections. For example, an individual could contribute $2,700 to a candidate committee for the primary and another $2,700 to the same candidate committee for the general election. Source: Federal Election Commission, "The FEC and Federal Campaign Finance Law," updated January 2015 |
Notable independent and third-party candidacies
Ross Perot, 1992
On February 20, 1992, in a televised interview with Larry King, Texas businessman Ross Perot announced that he would seek the presidency as an independent candidate if his supporters took the initiative to get his name on the ballot in all 50 states. According to MSNBC, "a national grassroots mobilization ensued and Perot moved up in the polls." An ABC News/Washington Post poll conducted in early June 1992 found Perot leading both incumbent George H.W. Bush (R) and Bill Clinton (D).[25][26][27]
Perot's support waned over the course of the summer, however, and in July he announced his withdrawal from the race. In October 1992, Perot announced his re-entry into the presidential race. He participated in the presidential debates that fall and experienced a surge of support in the polls leading up to Election Day. Ultimately, Perot won 19.7 million votes, accounting for 19 percent of the nationwide popular vote. Perot won no electoral votes, however, and Clinton was elected president. Perot appeared on the ballot in all 50 states.[25][26][27]
Speculation surrounding Donald Trump, 2015
On August 6, 2015, the first Republican presidential primary debate of the 2016 election season took place in Cleveland, Ohio. At the beginning of the debate, moderator Bret Baier asked candidates to raise their hands if they were unwilling to pledge not to run as third-party candidates in the fall, should they fail to win the Republican nomination. Donald Trump, the frontrunner at the time of the debate, was the only candidate to raise his hand. Following the debate, Trump continued to refuse to rule out a third-party or independent run if he failed to secure the party's nomination. However, on September 3, 2015, Trump signed a party loyalty pledge affirming that he would endorse the ultimate Republican nominee and forgo an independent or third-party run. Describing his bid for the 2016 Republican nomination, Trump said, "We have our heart in it. We have our soul in it."[28][29]
According to The Wall Street Journal, "GOP analysts said they had never heard of such a pledge being used in modern elections, and questioned if it would be binding or survive a legal challenge." Republican Party operative Peter Wehner said, "If they [at the RNC] think it's honestly going to keep [Trump] from running for a third-party bid, they are delirious. Donald Trump does what is in the interest of Donald Trump. He has no loyalty to the Republican Party." The debate was rendered moot when Trump became the presumptive Republican nominee in May 2016.[28][29]
Notable court cases
Williams v. Rhodes
- See also: Williams v. Rhodes
The American Independent Party and the Socialist Labor Party sought ballot access in Ohio for the 1968 presidential election. At the time, Ohio state law required the candidate's political party to obtain voter signatures totaling 15 percent of the number of ballots cast in the preceding election for governor. The American Independent Party obtained the required number of signatures but did not file its petition prior to the stated deadline. The Socialist Labor Party did not collect the requisite signatures. Consequently, both parties were denied placement on the ballot. The two parties filed separate suits in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio against a variety of state officials, including then-Governor James Rhodes.[30][31]
On October 15, 1968, in a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Williams v. Rhodes that the state laws in dispute were "invidiously discriminatory" and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because they gave "the two old, established parties a decided advantage over new parties." The court also ruled that the challenged laws restricted the right of individuals "to associate for the advancement of political beliefs" and "to cast their votes effectively." The court further ruled that Ohio showed no "compelling interest" to justify these restrictive practices and ordered the state to place the American Independent Party's candidates for the presidency and vice-presidency on the ballot. The court did not require the state to place the Socialist Labor Party's candidates for the same offices on the ballot.[30][31]
Anderson v. Celebrezze
- See also: Anderson v. Celebrezze
An Ohio statute required independent presidential candidates to file statements of candidacy and nominating petitions in March in order to qualify to appear on the general election ballot in November. Independent candidate John Anderson announced his candidacy for president in April 1980, and all requisite paperwork was submitted on May 16, 1980. The Ohio secretary of state, Anthony J. Celebrezze, refused to accept the documents.[32][33]
Anderson and his supporters filed an action challenging the constitutionality of the aforementioned statute on May 19, 1980, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The district court ruled in Anderson's favor and ordered Celebrezze to place Anderson's name on the ballot. Celebrezze appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals, which ultimately overturned the district court's ruling (the election took place while this appeal was pending).[32][33]
On April 19, 1983, in a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court reversed the appeals court's ruling, maintaining that Ohio's early filing deadline indeed violated the voting and associational rights of Anderson's supporters.[32][33]
Recent news
The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms President ballot access. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.
See also
- Presidential election, 2016
- Ballot access for major and minor party candidates
- Filing deadlines and signature requirements for independent presidential candidates, 2016
- Other ballot access lawsuits:
- Bullock v. Carter (1972)
- Lubin v. Panish (1974)
- Storer v. Brown (1974)
- Illinois State Board of Elections v. Socialist Workers Party (1979)
- Norman v. Reed (1992)
- U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton (1995)
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Vote Smart, "Government 101: United States Presidential Primary," accessed August 15, 2015 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "votesmart" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ Roll Call, "Replacing Trump on Ballots: Murky Payoff and a Legal Thicket," August 9, 2016
- ↑ Politico, "Playbook," August 4, 2016
- ↑ LA Times, "What if Trump drops out?" August 4, 2016
- ↑ Email from Richard Winger on August 5, 2016
- ↑ The Constitution of the United States of America, "Article 2, Section 1," accessed August 3, 2015
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ The Washington Post, "Everything you need to know about how the presidential primary works," May 12, 2015
- ↑ FactCheck.org, "Caucus vs. Primary," February 3, 2020
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 More information about this state's filing processes will be added when it becomes available.
- ↑ Libertarian Party, "2016 Presidential Ballot Access Map," accessed November 8, 2016
- ↑ Green Party US, "Ballot Access," accessed November 8, 2016
- ↑ Constitution Party, "Ballot Access," accessed November 8, 2016
- ↑ Affiliates of the Constitution Party are not included because no state affiliates of the party attained new ballot status between 2016 and 2017.
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 15.5 Ballot Access News, "April 1, 2017 – Volume 32, Number 11," accessed July 28, 2017
- ↑ Iowa Secretary of State, "2016 General Election Canvass Summary," accessed July 28, 2017
- ↑ Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, "Election results," accessed July 28, 2017
- ↑ New Hampshire Secretary of State, "Governor - 2016 General Election," accessed July 28, 2017
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 This information comes from research conducted by Richard Winger, publisher and editor of Ballot Access News.
- ↑ The Georgetown Law Journal, "Sore Lower Laws and Democratic Contestation," accessed August 13, 2015
- ↑ CNN, "Trump 3rd party run would face 'sore loser' laws," August 13, 2015
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "The FEC and Federal Campaign Finance Law," updated January 2015
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "Quick Answers to Candidate Questions," accessed August 13, 2015
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "2016 Reporting Dates," accessed June 17, 2022
- ↑ 25.0 25.1 MSNBC, "Ross Perot myth reborn amid rumors of third-party Trump candidacy," July 24, 2015
- ↑ 26.0 26.1 PBS, "The Election of 1992," accessed November 6, 2015
- ↑ 27.0 27.1 Federal Election Commission, "Federal Elections 92," accessed November 6, 2015
- ↑ 28.0 28.1 The Wall Street Journal, "Donald Trump Swears Off Third-Party Run," September 3, 2015
- ↑ 29.0 29.1 The Guardian, "Donald Trump signs pledge not to run as independent," September 3, 2015
- ↑ 30.0 30.1 Justia.com, "Williams v. Rhodes - 393 U.S. 23 (1968)," accessed December 26, 2013
- ↑ 31.0 31.1 Oyez - U.S. Supreme Court Media - IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, "Williams v. Rhodes," accessed December 26, 2013
- ↑ 32.0 32.1 32.2 Justia.com, "Anderson v. Celebrezze - 460 U.S. 780 (1983)," accessed December 26, 2013
- ↑ 33.0 33.1 33.2 Oyez Project - U.S. Supreme Court Media - IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, "Anderson v. Celebrezze," accessed December 26, 2013