Florida's 13th Congressional District election, 2026
|
← 2024
|
| Florida's 13th Congressional District |
|---|
 |
| General election |
| Election details |
| Filing deadline: April 24, 2026 |
| Primary: August 18, 2026 General: November 3, 2026 |
| How to vote |
| Poll times:
7 a.m. to 8 p.m. |
| Race ratings |
DDHQ and The Hill: Pending Inside Elections: Likely Republican Sabato's Crystal Ball: Likely Republican |
| Ballotpedia analysis |
| U.S. Senate battlegrounds U.S. House battlegrounds Federal and state primary competitiveness Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2026 |
| See also |
1st • 2nd • 3rd • 4th • 5th • 6th • 7th • 8th • 9th • 10th • 11th • 12th • 13th • 14th • 15th • 16th • 17th • 18th • 19th • 20th • 21st • 22nd • 23rd • 24th • 25th • 26th • 27th • 28th Florida elections, 2026 U.S. Congress elections, 2026 U.S. Senate elections, 2026 U.S. House elections, 2026 |
All U.S. House districts, including the 13th Congressional District of Florida, are holding elections in 2026. The general election is November 3, 2026. To learn more about other elections on the ballot, click here.
Candidates and election results
Note: The following list includes official candidates only. Ballotpedia defines official candidates as people who:
- Register with a federal or state campaign finance agency before the candidate filing deadline
- Appear on candidate lists released by government election agencies
General election
The general election will occur on November 3, 2026.
General election for U.S. House Florida District 13
The following candidates are running in the general election for U.S. House Florida District 13 on November 3, 2026.
Candidate | ||
 | Anna Paulina Luna (R) | |
 | Earle Ford (D) | |
| Susan Leff (D) | ||
| Jeff Moore (D) | ||
| Reggie Paros (D) | ||
 | Brandt Robinson (D) | |
 | Njällssen Amaro Lionheart (R) | |
 | Tony D'Arrigo (No Party Affiliation)  | |
| ||||
| = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Candidate profiles
This section includes candidate profiles that may be created in one of two ways: either the candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey, or Ballotpedia staff may compile a profile based on campaign websites, advertisements, and public statements after identifying the candidate as noteworthy. For more on how we select candidates to include, click here.
Party: No Party Affiliation
Incumbent: No
Political Office: None
Submitted Biography: "Candidate Tony D’Arrigo is a community‑driven, future‑focused leader who blends hospitality expertise, tech experience, and small‑business grit. As the owner-operator behind Two Step Entertainment, Tony has worked closely with everyday creators—gamers, musicians, podcasters, artists, and influencers—who are trying to build sustainable livelihoods in a volatile economy. He’s seen firsthand how access, opportunity, and fair systems can transform lives. Professionally, Tony is a Hospitality Business Management Consultant who helps build and strengthen hospitality businesses across the country—from small independent operators to large multi-location concepts. He understands staffing, margins, guest experience, and what it really takes to keep doors open and people employed. Tony is: A builder, not just a critic– he’s launched platforms and helped turn around real businesses. A champion of working families, creators, and hospitality workers– those most exposed to economic shocks. A practical, tech‑savvy problem solver – focused on systems that actually work, not slogans. Community‑first– he believes strong neighborhoods are built around local businesses, gathering spaces, and youth leadership. A listener and collaborator- used to taking feedback from guests, staff, owners, and users, then turning it into action. Tony D’Arrigo is someone who understands both the pressures people face and the power of community to meet those challenges"
Voting information
- See also: Voting in Florida
Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey responses
Ballotpedia asks all federal, state, and local candidates to complete a survey and share what motivates them on political and personal levels. The section below shows responses from candidates in this race who completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.
Survey responses from candidates in this race
Click on a candidate's name to visit their Ballotpedia page.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
| Collapse all
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
I will fight to restore the $500B cut from Medicare and $900B cut from Medicaid—and protect Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid for every senior and working family. My goal is universal healthcare: guaranteed coverage for all, caps on costs tied to income, and no more benefit cliffs or surprise bills. Every child gets free healthcare, every senior keeps what they earned, and no American goes bankrupt because they got sick. Healthcare is a right—not a privilege.
Restoring the American Dream: Fair Money, Fair Markets, Fair Chance
I’ll take on predatory lenders, abusive auto practices, and a broken credit system that punishes working people. That means capping interest rates, cleaning up credit reporting, honest car pricing, and government‑backed mortgages at fair rates when banks won’t do their job. I’ll push to eliminate federal income tax for households under $75K, so families keep more of what they earn. The American Dream should be reachable for workers—not just investors and the well‑connected.
Power Back to the People: Clean Energy, Honest Government, True Conservatism
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
I respect Bernie because he’s been saying the same thing for decades: government should work for working people, not billionaires and big corporations. He’s been consistently fighting for Medicare for All, protecting Social Security and Medicare, raising wages, and taking on predatory corporate behavior long before those ideas were popular. What I’d like to model from his example is: His moral clarity on economic justice and healthcare as a right. His willingness to stand up to both parties when they forget working families. His refusal to be bought by corporate money or lobbyists.
Like Bernie, I want to be a representative who never forgets where I came from, who I work for, and who I’m fighting for.
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
Tells the truth, even when it’s inconvenient. Keeps promises or explains clearly why something changed. Transparent about money, influences, and decision-making. Accountability to the People (Not Donors) Remembers they work for constituents, not lobbyists. Welcomes oversight, tough questions, and criticism. Admits mistakes and corrects course instead of doubling down. Empathy & Lived Understanding Understands what it’s like to live paycheck to paycheck, deal with medical bills, or face unfair systems. Listens deeply to people’s stories and lets those stories shape policy priorities. Courage & Independence Willing to stand up to their own party, donors, or powerful interests when they’re wrong. Takes tough votes to protect people, not to protect a career. Competence & Work Ethic Actually reads bills, understands policy tradeoffs, and does the homework. Shows up prepared, on time, and follows through on constituent needs. Problem-Solving Mindset Focuses on “How do we fix this?” rather than “Who can we blame?” Looks for practical, workable solutions instead of slogans. Respect for the Constitution & Rule of Law Defends rights and liberties consistently, not selectively. Uses government to protect people from abuse, not to control their private lives. Consistency & Principle Has clear values and applies them the same way, regardless of who is affected. Doesn’t flip positions just because the political wind changes. Communication & Accessibility Explains complex issues in plain language. Holds town halls, answers emails, and stays reachable. Humility & Service Sees the job as service, not status.
Gives credit to others, shares wins with the community, and doesn’t need to be the hero in every story.
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
Members of Congress write, sponsor, debate, amend, and vote on laws that affect the entire country. They help shape the federal budget, decide how tax dollars are spent, and serve on committees that focus on specific areas like healthcare, veterans’ affairs, education, transportation, or national security. Most real work happens in these committees, where bills are examined in detail before reaching the House floor. 2. Represent Their District
A Congressman is the voice of the people in their district. That means listening to constituents through town halls, meetings, calls, emails, and community events—and then reflecting those needs, values, and priorities in every vote and policy position. They are expected to stand up for their district’s interests, even when that means pushing back on party leadership or powerful special interests. 3. Constituent Services (Casework)
One of the most important but least talked‑about responsibilities is helping individuals navigate the federal government. That includes assisting with Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, veterans’ benefits, IRS issues, immigration cases, passports, and more. A good Congressman has a strong district office that answers calls, solves problems, and makes sure people aren’t lost in bureaucracy. 4. Oversight & Accountability
Congress has a constitutional duty to oversee the executive branch and federal agencies. Through hearings, investigations, and committee work, a Congressman helps ensure laws are being followed, taxpayer money is used properly, and abuse, corruption, or waste are exposed and corrected. This is how Congress checks and balances presidential power and the federal bureaucracy.
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
That I made life meaningfully better for working people, seniors, and kids—not in speeches, but in laws passed and problems solved. I want to leave behind: Stronger healthcare and entitlements that people can actually rely on—Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security protected and expanded, with a real path toward universal healthcare. Fairer financial rules that stop predatory lenders, abusive auto practices, and rigged credit systems from destroying families who are just trying to get by. Real relief for working families—from taxes, from medical debt, from impossible housing and energy costs. And just as important, I want people in my district to be able to say:
“He listened. He told us the truth. He didn’t sell out. He fought for us every single day—and we could feel the difference.”
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
Not because of the shield or the strength, but because of what he represents: someone who starts out small and underestimated, but refuses to back down when something is wrong. He’s loyal to people and principles—not parties, not politicians, not whoever happens to be in charge. When the system goes off the rails, he doesn’t just “follow orders”; he stands up and says, “No, this isn’t right.”
That’s the kind of backbone I believe an elected official should have: country over party, people over power, and the courage to stand their ground even when they’re outnumbered.
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
Like millions of Americans, I’ve lived paycheck to paycheck. An unexpected bill or a spike in utilities wasn’t just an inconvenience—it was a crisis. Then cancer hit. Overnight, “normal” stress turned into survival mode. Even with treatment, I had to worry not just about staying alive, but about how to pay for it, how to keep up with bills, and how not to drown in medical debt. That combination—financial strain and a life‑threatening illness—changes how you see everything. It’s why I’m so focused on: Protecting and expanding Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security Making universal, affordable healthcare a reality Cracking down on predatory lending and abusive credit practices
I’m not looking at these issues from a distance. I’ve lived them in my body, in my bank account, and in my family.
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
Closest to the People House members represent smaller districts, not whole states. They run for re‑election every two years, so they’re constantly accountable to voters. This makes the House the chamber most directly tied to public opinion and everyday concerns. Power of the Purse The Constitution requires that revenue and spending bills originate in the House. That gives the House a special role in taxes, budgets, and how federal money is raised and spent. Size and Diversity of Voices With 435 voting members, the House is much larger than the Senate. That means more ideological, regional, racial, and economic diversity—and a wider range of viewpoints and constituencies. Majoritarian and Fast‑Moving The House runs on strict rules and majority control. The majority party can move legislation quickly, set the agenda, and control which bills get a vote. It’s designed to be more responsive and dynamic than the Senate. Investigative and Oversight Power House committees (Oversight, Judiciary, Ways and Means, etc.) have strong subpoena and investigative powers. They play a central role in exposing waste, fraud, abuse, and holding the executive branch accountable. The House alone has the power to impeach federal officials. Institutional Role in Democracy The House is meant to be the “people’s house”—the most democratic, frequently refreshed, and locally rooted part of the federal government.
It’s where national policy is supposed to collide with real‑world district needs and lived experience.
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
Here’s the honest breakdown: Why experience can help: Knows how the system works: committees, procedure, budgets, agencies. Can be more effective, faster—less time “learning the ropes.” Understands how to build coalitions and get bills actually passed, not just proposed. Why it’s not everything: Longtime insiders can become disconnected from real life—especially working families living paycheck to paycheck. “Experience” can sometimes mean experience serving donors, lobbyists, and party bosses instead of constituents. Fresh voices with real-world experience (small business, healthcare, military, teaching, hospitality, etc.) often understand people’s problems better than career politicians. My view: Relevant experience matters—but that can be in business, community work, organizing, or public service, not just elected office. The best representatives combine real-world lived experience with a willingness to learn the mechanics of government quickly.
What matters most is integrity, work ethic, and who you’re actually fighting for—not how many years you’ve spent in politics.
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
Those pressures show up in concrete ways: Economic insecurity for working families Wages that don’t keep up with housing, healthcare, and energy Predatory lending, unstable credit, and debt traps A shrinking path to real middle‑class security (savings, homeownership, retirement) A healthcare and entitlement system under stress Rising healthcare costs and gaps in coverage Political attacks on Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security An aging population that will need more care and support, not less Collapse of trust in institutions and democracy Polarization and disinformation A sense that government works for corporations and lobbyists, not people Gridlock that blocks real solutions on housing, healthcare, climate, and wages Technology and automation reshaping work Gig and contract work replacing stable jobs AI and automation changing entire industries before laws catch up A benefits system still built for a 1950s workforce All of this adds up to one core question:
Can we build a system where ordinary Americans have real economic security, honest representation, and a fair shot—while the ground is shifting under our feet?
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
Why two years makes sense: It keeps representatives constantly accountable. If they stop listening or go Washington‑insider, voters can replace them quickly. The House is meant to be the “people’s house”—fast‑moving, responsive to changing needs, not insulated from public opinion. What’s wrong with the current setup: With nonstop fundraising and campaigning, many members spend too much time dialing for dollars and too little time governing. Short terms can encourage short‑term thinking instead of long‑term solutions. My view: Yes, two years is acceptable and true to the Constitution’s design, but we must reform the system around it: Reduce the influence of big money and dark money. Make campaigns shorter, cheaper, and more transparent. Strengthen ethics and accountability so members spend their time serving, not fundraising.
The problem isn’t the two‑year term—it’s who representatives feel accountable to. That’s what needs to change.
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
I oppose term limits for Congress because elections are the real term limits. Voters should decide who stays and who goes—not Washington think tanks or constitutional gimmicks. If a member stops serving their district, the people already have the power to fire them at the ballot box. Term limits would: Force out effective, experienced legislators who know how to write laws, navigate committees, and deliver for their districts. Hand more power to unelected staff, lobbyists, and bureaucrats, who stay in Washington long after term‑limited members are gone. Reduce accountability, because short-timers with guaranteed exit dates have less incentive to answer to voters. Instead of term limits, I support: Tougher ethics rules and transparency Banning dark money and reining in lobbyist influence Making it easier for challengers to run and be heard
The solution isn’t to limit voters’ choices—it’s to clean up the system so voters’ choices actually matter.
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
Bernie Sanders – Moral clarity and persistence
Someone who never stops fighting for working people, seniors, and the poor—even when it’s unpopular or inconvenient. I respect his consistency on healthcare, Social Security, and economic fairness. Elizabeth Warren – Taking on corporate abuse
Her focus on predatory lending, broken credit systems, and consumer protection is exactly the kind of toughness we need against banks, auto lenders, and big finance that exploit working families. Dwight D. Eisenhower / “Old-school Republicans” – Duty and restraint
A model of constitutional conservatism: limited government in people’s private lives, strong oversight of corporate power, and a sense of duty over partisanship or personal ego. I’d aim to combine their strengths:
Sanders’ commitment to ordinary people, Warren’s focus on fair markets and consumer protection, and Eisenhower’s sense of responsibility, restraint, and country over party.
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
Maria works full‑time in hospitality, but her hours swing week to week. Her mother relies on Medicare and a small Social Security check. Her grandson gets school lunches, but they still struggle to keep food on the table when rent and utilities spike. Then her mother had a medical emergency. Even with Medicare, the ambulance, hospital stay, and follow‑ups left them thousands of dollars in debt. Maria told me, “I did everything right. I worked. I paid my taxes. I took care of my family. And one bad month almost ended us.” What hit me wasn’t just the numbers—it was the way she said she felt “punished for being poor and responsible at the same time.” That conversation crystallized a lot of what I’m running on: protecting and expanding Medicare and Social Security, making healthcare truly affordable and universal, ending predatory lending, and building a system where one medical crisis or one bad loan can’t destroy a family that’s doing everything they can to stay afloat.
Maria’s story isn’t unique—and that’s exactly why it matters so much.
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
In a country as big and diverse as the United States, no one gets 100% of what they want. Durable laws that actually last usually come from negotiation, not from one side ramming everything through. Without compromise, you get: Gridlock and performative politics instead of solutions Constant swings in policy every time power changes hands Deepening division and distrust But not all compromise is good. There are red lines that should not be crossed: You don’t compromise on whether people deserve basic dignity, equal rights, or the right to vote. You don’t trade away protections for seniors, children, or working families just to “get a deal.” You don’t sell out your constituents to satisfy lobbyists or party bosses. So the honest answer: Yes, I believe in compromise to move the country forward—on details, timelines, and methods. No, I will not compromise on core principles: protecting healthcare and entitlements, defending constitutional rights, fighting corruption and dark money, and making sure policy serves people, not special interests.
Compromise on how we help people—not on whether we help them.
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
If elected, I’d use that power to: Protect and strengthen Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security
Any tax or revenue bill I support must protect and fund our entitlements—not starve them. No “backdoor cuts” through budgets. I’d push revenue structures that guarantee long‑term stability for seniors and working families. Shift the burden off working families
I support eliminating federal income tax for households under $75,000 and making sure billionaires, large corporations, and predatory industries finally pay their fair share. Revenue bills should lighten the load on people living paycheck to paycheck, not add to it. Fund real priorities: healthcare, housing, and clean energy
I’d use the House’s revenue power to redirect money away from waste, corporate welfare, and harmful subsidies (like giveaways to big oil) and toward universal healthcare, affordable housing, fair lending systems, and clean, affordable energy. Demand transparency and honesty in budgeting
No more hiding cuts or giveaways in fine print. I’d push for clear, plain‑language explanations of who pays and who benefits in every major revenue bill, so constituents can see exactly what’s being done in their name.
In short, I’d treat the House’s revenue power as the main lever to protect working families, fund our promises, and stop Washington from balancing the budget on the backs of seniors and the poor.
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
Here’s how I believe it should be used: Expose corruption, waste, and abuse of power Investigate when taxpayer money is misused, when agencies fail the people they serve, or when corporations cheat, defraud, or endanger the public. No one—presidents, CEOs, or agencies—should be above scrutiny. Protect everyday Americans, not special interests Use hearings to shine a light on predatory lending, abusive auto and credit practices, healthcare denials, and corporate behavior that hurts working families, seniors, and children. Put real people at the witness table, not just lobbyists and lawyers. Strengthen laws and fix broken systems Investigations should lead to better policy: closing loopholes, tightening protections, and making programs like Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and child welfare actually work as intended. The goal isn’t just blame—it’s solutions. Be fair, fact‑driven, and transparent Subpoena power should never be used as a political weapon or for personal vendettas. Follow evidence, respect due process, and make findings public so Americans can see the truth for themselves.
In short, the House should use its investigative powers to hold the powerful accountable, protect taxpayers and vulnerable people, and improve the systems we all depend on—not to stage partisan theater.
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
Despite health scares, financial strain, and all the reasons to give up or play it safe, I’ve stayed in the fight—working in hospitality, helping build businesses, and now stepping up to run for Congress. For me, the accomplishment isn’t a title or an award; it’s that I didn’t let hardship turn me bitter or silent.
Instead, I turned those experiences into a mission: to fix the systems that fail people like me—on healthcare, lending, housing, and basic economic security—and to speak up for folks who don’t have the time or energy to fight the government and their bills at the same time.
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
I’d frame the role in four parts: Set Guardrails, Not Micromanagement Create clear national rules for safety, transparency, data use, and accountability. Require companies to test AI systems for bias, accuracy, and harm—especially in lending, hiring, policing, healthcare, and housing. If an AI system denies you a loan, job, or benefit, you should have the right to know why and to appeal to a human. Protect Workers and Consumers Study and anticipate job disruption, and fund retraining, education, and transition support for workers whose jobs are automated. Ban or strictly limit AI uses that are inherently abusive: mass surveillance of citizens, deepfake election manipulation, predatory ad targeting of vulnerable people, and exploitative lending or pricing algorithms. Use AI to Improve Public Services, Not Replace Humans Deploy AI to make government more efficient—cut red tape, detect fraud, speed up benefits—while keeping humans in charge of final decisions that affect rights, freedom, and livelihood. Never let AI become an excuse to deny people due process or human review. Keep Power Out of a Few Hands Prevent a handful of corporations from owning all the critical AI infrastructure and data. Support open standards, research, and competition so innovation benefits the public, not just a few CEOs and shareholders. Bottom line:
The government’s role in AI should be to protect rights, prevent abuse, and make sure this technology serves people—workers, families, and communities—not the other way around.
Tony D'Arrigo (No Affiliation)
National Voting Standards (Floor, Not Ceiling) Automatic voter registration (opt‑out, not opt‑in). Same‑day registration and easy address updates. At least 2 weeks of early voting, including evenings and weekends. No‑excuse vote‑by‑mail available to every voter. Election Security & Transparency Paper ballots or voter‑verified paper trails for every vote. Routine, risk‑limiting audits after each federal election. Strict chain‑of‑custody rules and public reporting of results and audits. Strong cybersecurity support for state and local election offices. End Voter Suppression & Protect Access Ban deliberate voter roll purges without notice and due process. Outlaw tactics that target specific communities with long lines, reduced polling places, or confusing ID rules. Restore and strengthen the Voting Rights Act, requiring pre‑clearance for changes in areas with a history of discrimination. Fair Maps & Independent Redistricting Require independent redistricting commissions for U.S. House districts, with clear rules against partisan gerrymandering. Districts drawn around communities—not to protect incumbents or parties. Money & Influence Transparency Full disclosure of all spending in federal elections—no dark money. Real‑time reporting of large donations and independent expenditures.
The goal: every eligible voter can vote easily, every legitimate vote is counted securely, and no one—party, politician, or billionaire—gets to rig the rules in their favor.
You can ask candidates in this race to fill out the survey by clicking their names below:
Campaign finance
| Name | Party | Receipts* | Disbursements** | Cash on hand | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Paulina Luna | Republican Party | $1,389,003 | $666,697 | $853,722 | As of September 30, 2025 |
| Earle Ford | Democratic Party | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
| Susan Leff | Democratic Party | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
| Jeff Moore | Democratic Party | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
| Reggie Paros | Democratic Party | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
| Brandt Robinson | Democratic Party | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
| Njällssen Amaro Lionheart | Republican Party | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
| Tony D'Arrigo | No Party Affiliation | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
|
Source: Federal Elections Commission, "Campaign finance data," 2026. This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* According to the FEC, "Receipts are anything of value (money, goods, services or property) received by a political committee." |
|||||
General election race ratings
- See also: Race rating definitions and methods
Ballotpedia provides race ratings from four outlets: The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections, Sabato's Crystal Ball, and DDHQ/The Hill. Each race rating indicates if one party is perceived to have an advantage in the race and, if so, the degree of advantage:
- Safe and Solid ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge and the race is not competitive.
- Likely ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge, but an upset is possible.
- Lean ratings indicate that one party has a small edge, but the race is competitive.[1]
- Toss-up ratings indicate that neither party has an advantage.
Race ratings are informed by a number of factors, including polling, candidate quality, and election result history in the race's district or state.[2][3][4]
| Race ratings: Florida's 13th Congressional District election, 2026 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race tracker | Race ratings | ||||||||
| 12/9/2025 | 12/2/2025 | 11/25/2025 | 11/18/2025 | ||||||
| The Cook Political Report with Amy Walter | Likely Republican | Likely Republican | Likely Republican | Likely Republican | |||||
| Decision Desk HQ and The Hill | Pending | Pending | Pending | Pending | |||||
| Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales | Likely Republican | Likely Republican | Likely Republican | Likely Republican | |||||
| Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball | Likely Republican | Likely Republican | Likely Republican | Likely Republican | |||||
| Note: Ballotpedia reviews external race ratings every week throughout the election season and posts weekly updates even if the media outlets have not revised their ratings during that week. | |||||||||
Ballot access
The table below details filing requirements for U.S. House candidates in Florida in the 2026 election cycle. For additional information on candidate ballot access requirements in Florida, click here.
| Filing requirements for U.S. House candidates, 2026 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State | Office | Party | Signatures required | Filing fee | Filing deadline | Source |
| Florida | U.S. House | Ballot-qualified party | 1% of the registered voters in the geographical area of candidacy | $10,440 | 4/24/2026 | Source |
| Florida | U.S. House | Unaffiliated | 1% of the registered voters in the geographical area of candidacy | $6,960 | 4/24/2026 | Source |
District history
The section below details election results for this office in elections dating back to 2020.
2024
2022
2020
District analysis
This section will contain facts and figures related to this district's elections when those are available.
See also
| Florida | 2026 primaries | 2026 U.S. Congress elections |
|---|---|---|
 |
 |
 |
|
Voting in Florida Florida elections: 2026 • 2025 • 2024 • 2023 • 2022 • 2021 • 2020 • 2019 • 2018 |
Republican primary battlegrounds U.S. Senate Democratic primaries U.S. Senate Republican primaries U.S. House Democratic primaries U.S. House Republican primaries |
U.S. Senate elections U.S. House elections Special elections Ballot access |
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Inside Elections also uses Tilt ratings to indicate an even smaller advantage and greater competitiveness.
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Nathan Gonzalez," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Kyle Kondik," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Charlie Cook," April 22, 2018
