In 2020, Ballotpedia covered local measures that appeared on the ballot for voters within the top 100 largest cities in the U.S. and a selection of notable police-related and election-related measures outside of the top 100 largest cities. Ballotpedia also covered all local measures in California and all statewide ballot measures. Click here to see the scope of Ballotpedia local ballot measure coverage by year.

Statewide ballot measures

See also: California 2020 ballot measures

November 3, 2020:

Type	Title	Subject	Description	Result
CISS	Proposition 14	Bonds	Issues $5.5 billion in bonds for state stem cell research institute	a
CICA	Proposition 15	Taxes	Requires commercial and industrial properties to be taxed based on market value and dedicates revenue
LRCA	Proposition 16	Affirmative Action	Repeals Proposition 209 (1996), which says that the state cannot discriminate or grant preferential treatment based on race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public employment, education, or contracting	d
LRCA	Proposition 17	Suffrage	Restores the right to vote to people convicted of felonies who are on parole	a
LRCA	Proposition 18	Suffrage	Allows 17-year-olds who will be 18 at the time of the next general election to vote in primaries and special elections	d
LRCA	Proposition 19	Taxes	Changes tax assessment transfers and inheritance rules	a
CISS	Proposition 20	Law Enforcement	Makes changes to policies related to criminal sentencing charges, prison release, and DNA collection	d
CISS	Proposition 21	Housing	Expands local governments' power to use rent control	d
CISS	Proposition 22	Business	Considers app-based drivers to be independent contractors and enacts several labor policies related to app-based companies	a/ot
CISS	Proposition 23	Healthcare	Requires physician on-site at dialysis clinics and consent from the state for a clinic to close	d
CISS	Proposition 24	Business	Expands the provisions of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and creates the California Privacy Protection Agency to implement and enforce the CCPA	a
VR	Proposition 25	Trials	Replaces cash bail with risk assessments for suspects awaiting trial	d

Local ballot measures

There were 413 local measures on the ballot on November 3 in California.

312 (75.5%) were approved
101 (24.5%) were defeated

Alameda County

See also: Alameda County, California ballot measures

• Alameda, California, Measure AA, City Governance Charter Amendments (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to clarify functions and duties of the city council and city manager, authorize the city attorney to prosecute misdemeanors, update language to be gender-neutral, and remove sections that declare a city office vacant if an official has been absent for more than 30 days, require that city board members must be appointed between May 1 and July 1, relate to travel expenses, and dictate hours of operation for city offices.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to clarify functions and duties of the city council and city manager, authorize the city attorney to prosecute misdemeanors, update language to be gender-neutral, and remove sections that declare a city office vacant if an official has been absent for more than 30 days, require that city board members must be appointed between May 1 and July 1, relate to travel expenses, and dictate hours of operation for city offices.

• Alameda, California, Measure Z, Multi-family Housing Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to repeal Article 26 which prohibits the construction of multi-family housing and limits density to one housing unit per 2,000 square feet of land.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter, which would keep Article 26 in effect to prohibit the construction of multi-family housing and limit density to one housing unit per 2,000 square feet of land.

• Alameda County, California, Measure V, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an extension of a 6.5% sales tax until June 30, 2033 to be collected in unincorporated areas including Ashland, Castro Valley, Cherryland, Fairview, San Lorenzo, and Sunol, and generating an estimated $12 million per year for county services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an extension of a 6.5% sales tax until June 30, 2033 to be collected in unincorporated areas including Ashland, Castro Valley, Cherryland, Fairview, San Lorenzo, and Sunol, and allows the current tax to expire on June 30, 2021.

• Alameda County, California, Measure W, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% for 10 years generating an estimated $150 million per year for county services including housing and services for individuals experiencing homelessness, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Alameda from 9.25% to 9.75%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% for 10 years generating an estimated $150 million per year for county services including housing and services for individuals experiencing homelessness, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Alameda at 9.25%.

• Alameda County Fire Department, California, Measure X, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Alameda County Fire Department to issue up to $90 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund fire station repairs to maintain services and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $15.70 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Alameda County Fire Department to issue up to $90 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund fire station repairs to maintain services and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $15.70 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Albany, California, Measure BB, Ranked-Choice Voting Measure (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the use of ranked choice voting for city elections for members of the city council and the board of education.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the use of ranked choice voting for city elections for members of the city council and the board of education, thereby continuing the use of the plurality voting system.

• Albany, California, Measure CC, Property Transfer Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase to the property transfer tax from $11.50 to $15 per $1,000 purchased, generating an estimated $392,000 per year for general services including emergency response, environmental programs, community services and local businesses.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase to the property transfer tax from $11.50 to $15 per $1,000 purchased, generating an estimated $392,000 per year for general services including emergency response, environmental programs, community services and local businesses.

• Albany, California, Measure DD, Utility Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase to the utility users tax from 7% to 9.5% and application of a 7.5% tax on water service, generating an estimated $675,000 per year for general services including disaster preparedness, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, emergency response and environmental services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase to the utility users tax from 7% to 9.5% and application of a 7.5% tax on water service, generating an estimated $675,000 per year for general services including disaster preparedness, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, emergency response and environmental services.

• Albany, California, Measure EE, Emergency Services Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $68 per residential unit to replace an existing parcel tax, thereby generating an additional estimated $359,600 per year for paramedic, life support, fire engine and ambulance services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $68 per residential unit for paramedic, life support, fire engine and ambulance services, thereby allowing the current parcel tax of $23.66 per residential unit to continue.

• Berkeley, California, Measure FF, Emergency Response and Preparedness Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $0.1047 per square foot per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $8.5 million per year for fire services, emergency response, 9-1-1 communication, hazard mitigation and wildfire prevention.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $0.1047 per square foot per parcel.

• Berkeley, California, Measure GG, Transportation Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a tax on Transportation Network Company trips of $0.50 per private trip and $0.25 per pooled trip for 20 years, generating an estimated $910,000 per year for general services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a tax on Transportation Network Company trips of $0.50 per private trip and $0.25 per pooled trip for 20 years.

• Berkeley, California, Measure HH, Utility Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase to the utility users tax from 7.5% to 10% on electricity and gas and a 2.5% increase to the gas users tax, generating an estimated $2.4 million per year for municipal services including reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase to the utility users tax from 7.5% to 10% on electricity and gas and a 2.5% increase to the gas users tax.

• Berkeley, California, Measure II, Police Accountability Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to establish a police accountability board and director to provide oversight of local law enforcement, access records, investigate complaints from the public and recommend disciplinary action.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to establish a police accountability board and director to provide oversight of local law enforcement, access records, investigate complaints from the public and recommend disciplinary action.

• Berkeley, California, Measure JJ, City Council Salaries Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to establish the mayor's salary as Alameda County's median three-person household income and city council members' salaries as 63% of the mayor's salary.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to establish the mayor's salary as Alameda County's median three-person household income and city council members' salaries as 63% of the mayor's salary.

• Berkeley, California, Measure KK, Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to eliminate residency requirements for the fire department, change eligibility requirements for the redistricting commission, remove gender-specific language and update authorities of the city attorney.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to eliminate residency requirements for the fire department, change eligibility requirements for the redistricting commission, remove gender-specific language and update authorities of the city attorney.

• Berkeley, California, Measure LL, Appropriations Limit (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase to the city's appropriations limit until 2024.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase to the city's appropriations limit until 2024.

• Berkeley, California, Measure MM, Rent Stabilization Ordinance (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported prohibiting evictions during state or local emergencies, authorizing the rent stabilization board to set fees for partially exempt units and limiting the accessory dwelling unit exemption.

A “no” vote opposed prohibiting evictions during state or local emergencies, authorizing the rent stabilization board to set fees for partially exempt units and limiting the accessory dwelling unit exemption.

• Hayward, California, Measure NN, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a hotel tax increase from 8.5% to a maximum of 14% generating an estimated $3 million per year for city services including street repair, emergency response, disaster preparedness, library services and after-school programs.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a hotel tax increase from 8.5% to a maximum of 14%.

• Hayward, California, Measure OO, Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to remove requirements for serving on advisory commissions such as being a qualified elector or registered voter and remove gender-specific titles.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to remove requirements for serving on advisory commissions such as being a qualified elector or registered voter and remove gender-specific titles.

• Newark, California, Measure PP, Utility Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an extension to the 3.25% utility users tax for nine years, generating an estimated $2.75 million per year for city services including emergency response, public safety, street repair, parks, law enforcement and crime and gang prevention.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an extension to the 3.25% utility users tax for nine years, thereby allowing the tax to expire on December 31, 2020.

• Oakland, California, Measure QQ, Allow 16-Year-Olds to Vote for School Board Director Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to allow the city council to pass an ordinance to allow 16-year-olds to vote for the office of the school board director.

A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to allow the city council to pass an ordinance to allow 16-year-olds to vote for the office of the school board director.

• Oakland, California, Measure RR, Remove Limits on Fines Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to remove the limit fo $1,000 for city ordinance or code violations.

A "no" vote opposed this measure amending the city charter to remove the limit fo $1,000 for city ordinance or code violations.

• Oakland, California, Measure S1, Police Oversight and Inspector General Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported changing the powers, duties, and staffing of the Oakland Police Commission and the Community Police Review Agency and creating the Office of the Inspector General to review the policies of the police commission and review agency.

A "no" vote opposed changing the powers, duties, and staffing of the Oakland Police Commission and the Community Police Review Agency and creating the Office of the Inspector General to review the policies of the police commission and review agency.

• Oakland Unified School District, California, Measure Y, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the district to issue up to $735 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the district to issue up to $735 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Piedmont, California, Measure TT, Property Transfer Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase to the property transfer tax from $13 to $17.50 per $1,000 of the price, generating an estimated $948,462 per year for city services including maintenance of law enforcement and fire facilities, parks, recreation facilities and infrastructure.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase to the property transfer tax from $13 to $17.50 per $1,000 of the price.

• Piedmont, California, Measure UU, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing Piedmont to issue up to $19.5 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to the Piedmont Community Pool including new facilities and restrooms, energy and water conservation, and community access and safety and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $26.20 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing Piedmont to issue up to $19.5 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to the Piedmont Community Pool including new facilities and restrooms, energy and water conservation, and community access and safety and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $26.20 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• San Leandro, California, Measure VV, Property Transfer Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase to the property transfer tax from $6 to $11 per $1,000 of the price, generating an estimated $4 million per year for city services including street repair, COVID-19 economic recovery, emergency response and youth violence prevention programs.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase to the property transfer tax from $6 to $11 per $1,000 of the price.

• Union City, California, Measure WW, Utility Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a 5% utility users tax for eight years on gas, electricity, video and telecommunications generating an estimated $6.1 million per year for essential services including senior support, COVID-19 recovery, emergency response, street repair, fire services, disaster preparedness and youth violence and drug prevention programs.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a 5% utility users tax for eight years on gas, electricity, video and telecommunications.

• Washington Township Healthcare District, California, Measure XX, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Washington Township Healthcare District to issue up to $425 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund hospital improvements to earthquake safety, accessibility, operating rooms, intensive care for infants and patient facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $9.98 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Washington Township Healthcare District to issue up to $425 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund hospital improvements to earthquake safety, accessibility, operating rooms, intensive care for infants and patient facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $9.98 per $100,000 in assessed value.

Alpine County

See also: Alpine County, California ballot measures

• Alpine, California, Measure C, Effluent Regulation Ordinance (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to levy an additional property tax of $150 per $100,000 in assessed value (1.5 mills) in 2021 and to increase that levy by up to $100 per $100,000 in assessed value (1 mill) every year to a maximum rate of $400 per $100,000 in assessed value (4 mills). Going into 2020, residential property was assessed at a rate of 7.15% of market value and non-residential property was assessed at 29% of market value. Under a 7.15% residential property tax assessment rate, a home with the median market value of about $470,000 would be assessed for taxes at $33,605, which means a 1 mill tax would be $33.6.

A "no" vote opposed this measure authorizing the district to levy an additional property tax of up to $400 per $100,000 in assessed value (4 mills), thereby leaving the district's total property taxes at existing rates.

Amador County

See also: Amador County, California ballot measures

• Plymouth, California, Measure C, Appointed City Clerk Ordinance (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the position of city clerk to be appointive.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the position of city clerk to be appointed.

• Plymouth, California, Measure D, Appointed City Treasurer Ordinance (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the position of city treasurer to be appointive.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the position of city treasurer to be appointive.

• Sutter Creek, California, Measure B, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a hotel tax increase from 10% to 12% for guests staying for 30 days or less, generating an estimated $55,000 per year for city funds.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a hotel tax increase from 10% to 12% for guests staying for 30 days or less.

Butte County

See also: Butte County, California ballot measures

• Chico, Measure E, City Council Election Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported changing the city charter to change from an at-large system with seven city council seats to a by-district system with seven council-member districts.

A “no” vote opposed changing the city charter and will maintain an at-large system for city council elections.

• Chico, Measure G, City Council Candidate Eligibility Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to lower the age eligibility requirement for city council from 21 to 18.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter and maintains the age eligibility requirement for city council at 21.

• El Medio Fire Protection District, Measure D, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $60.00 per single-family residential unit, $60.00 per unit for mobile homes on separate parcels, $60.00 per other residential dwelling unit, $200.00 per commercial/industrial unit, $50.00 per agricultural/vacant unit up to five acres and $10.00 for every five acres after that, and $75.00 per institutional/miscellaneous unit.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $60.00 per single-family residential unit, $60.00 per mobile home unit on separate parcels, $60.00 per other residential dwelling unit, $200.00 per commercial/industrial unit, $50.00 per agricultural/vacant unit for up to five acres and $10.00 for every five acres after that, and $75.00 per institutional/miscellaneous unit.

Calaveras County

See also: Calaveras County, California ballot measures

• Calaveras, Measure G, Marijuana Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported establishing a maximum marijuana activities tax, not exceeding $7.00 per square-foot for cultivation area and 8% of receipts for other marijuana activities, generating an estimated $1.5 - $3 million per year to be used locally.

A “no” vote opposed establishing a maximum marijuana activities tax, not exceeding $7.00 per square-foot of cultivation area and 8% of receipts for other marijuana activity, generating an estimated $1.5 - $3 million per year to be used locally.

• Calaveras Unified School District, California, Measure H, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Calaveras Unified School District to issue up to $32.8 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school and classroom renovations and improvements and requiring an estimated average property tax levy of $36.77 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Calaveras Unified School District to issue up to $32.8 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school and classroom renovations and improvements and requiring an estimated average property tax levy of $36.77 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Vallecito Unified School District, California, Measure I, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Vallecito Union School District to issue up to $2.8 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund asbestos removal, dry rot damage repair, and renovations of the Avery Middle School track and field and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $7.07 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Vallecito Union School District to issue up to $2.8 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund asbestos removal, dry rot damage repair, and renovations of the Avery Middle School track and field and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $7.07 per $100,000 in assessed value.

Colusa County

See also: Colusa County, California ballot measures

• Williams, California, Measure B, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax increase from 0.5% to 1% with revenue dedicated to general city services including public safety, street maintenance and repair, and youth and senior programs, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Williams from 7.75% to 8.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax increase from 0.5% to 1% with funds dedicated to general city services including public safety, street maintenance and repair, and youth and senior programs, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Williams at 7.75%.

Contra Costa County

See also: Contra Costa County, California ballot measures

• Antioch, California, Measure T, Development Limits Initiative (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported authorizing the school district to incrementally increase its annual revenue limit by a total of $33 million over four years and maintaining that level thereafter with an estimated property tax increase of $27 per $100,000 of assessed property value over the four years.

A "no" vote opposed authorizing the school district to incrementally increase its annual revenue limit by a total of $33 million over four years and maintaining that level thereafter.

• Concord, California, Measure V, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an extension and increase to the current sales tax from 0.5% to 1% generating an estimated $27 million per year for city services including emergency response, disaster preparedness, local businesses, street repair, gang prevention, law enforcement and addressing homelessness, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Concord from 8.75% to 9.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an extension and increase to the current sales tax from 0.5% to 1% generating an estimated $27 million per year for city services including emergency response, disaster preparedness, local businesses, street repair, gang prevention, law enforcement and addressing homelessness, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Concord at 8.75% until March 2025.

• Contra Costa County, California, Measure X, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% for 20 years generating an estimated $81 million per year for essential services including the regional hospital, community health centers, emergency response, safety-net services, early childhood services and protection of vulnerable populations, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Contra Costa County from 8.25% to 8.75%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% for 20 years generating an estimated $81 million per year for essential services including the regional hospital, community health centers, emergency response, safety-net services, early childhood services and protection of vulnerable populations, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Contra Costa County at 8.25%.

• Contra Costa County Service Area R-7, California, Measure W, Appropriations Limit (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase to the County Service Area R-7 (Alamo Parks and Recreation) appropriations limit to $1.75 million through 2024.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase to the County Service Area R-7 (Alamo Parks and Recreation) appropriations limit to $1.75 million through 2024.

• Orinda, California, Measure R, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase to the current sales tax from 0.5% to 1% for 20 years generating an estimated $2.4 million per year for essential services including wildfire prevention, disaster preparedness, storm drain repair and street maintenance, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Orinda from 8.75% to 9.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase to the current sales tax from 0.5% to 1% for 20 years generating an estimated $2.4 million per year for essential services including wildfire prevention, disaster preparedness, storm drain repair and street maintenance, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Orinda at 8.75% until 2023.

• Pittsburg, California, Measure Q, Appointed City Clerk Ordinance (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the position of city clerk to be appointive.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the position of city clerk to be appointive.

• Richmond, California, Measure U, Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a business tax of 0.06% to 5% of gross receipts, with higher rates being assigned to marijuana businesses, firearm businesses and big businesses, generating an estimated $9.5 million per year for city services including emergency response, street repair, homeless services and youth services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a business tax of 0.06% to 5% of gross receipts, with higher rates being assigned to marijuana businesses, firearm businesses and big businesses, generating an estimated $9.5 million per year for city services including emergency response, street repair, homeless services and youth services.

• San Pablo, California, Measure S, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% for five years followed by a reduction to 0.25% for five years, generating an estimated $1.45 million per year for the first five years and $725,000 per year for the last five years to fund essential services including public safety, gang prevention, youth services and jobs, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in San Pablo from 8.75% to 9.25% for five years, followed by a reduction to 9% for five years.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% for five years followed by a reduction to 0.25% for five years, generating an estimated $1.45 million per year for the first five years and $725,000 per year for the last five years to fund essential services including public safety, gang prevention, youth services and jobs, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in San Pablo at 8.75%.

Del Norte County

See also: Del Norte County, California ballot measures

• Crescent City, California, Measure S, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $1.3 million per year for general city services, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in the city from 7.5% to 8.5%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $1.3 million per year for general city services, thereby leaving the total sales tax rate in the city at 7.5%.

• Del Norte County, California, Measure R, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $1.2 million per year for general county services, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Del Norte County from 7.5% to 8.5%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $1.2 million per year for general county services, thereby leaving the total sales tax rate in Del Norte County at 7.5%.

El Dorado County

See also: El Dorado County, California ballot measures

• Cameron Park Airport District, California, Measure P, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase to an annual parcel tax from $300 to $1,200 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $157,600 per year.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase to the annual parcel tax from $300 to $1,200 per parcel, thereby allowing the existing $300 parcel to remain.

• Hickok Road Community Services District, California, Measure N, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase to the maximum annual parcel tax by $200, raising the tax from $200 to $400 per parcel, thereby generating a maximum of $24,800 per year.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase to the maximum annual parcel tax from $200 to $400, thereby allowing the existing maximum $200 parcel tax to remain.

• Mortara Circle Community Services District, California, Measure Q, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase to an annual parcel tax from $350 to $600 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $18,600 per year.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase to the annual parcel tax from $350 to $600, thereby allowing the existing $350 parcel tax to remain.

• Placerville, California, Measure R, Appointed City Treasurer Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported changing the city treasurer position from an elected position to an appointed position following the end of the term of the city treasurer elected at the November 3, 2020 election.

A “no” vote opposed changing the city treasurer position from an elected position to an appointed position.

• South Lake Tahoe, California, Measure S, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $5.4 million per year, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in South Lake Tahoe from 7.75% to 8.75%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $5.4 million per year, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in South Lake Tahoe at 7.75%.

Fresno County

See also: Fresno County, California ballot measures

• Central Unified School District, California, Measure D, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Central Unified School District to issue up to $120 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund construction of a new elementary school, improvements to security and technology infrastructure, school and classroom renovations, and creation of local construction jobs and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Central Unified School District to issue up to $120 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund construction of a new elementary school, improvements to security and technology infrastructure, school and classroom renovations, and creation of local construction jobs and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Clovis Unified School District, California, Measure A, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Clovis Unified School District to issue up to $335 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school maintenance and the construction and repair of schools and career/vocational facilities to avoid overcrowding and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Clovis Unified School District to issue up to $335 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school maintenance and the construction and repair of schools and career/vocational facilities to avoid overcrowding and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Coalinga, California, Measure B, Appointed City Clerk Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported changing the city clerk from an elected position to an appointed position.

A “no” vote opposed changing the city clerk from an elected position to an appointed position.

• Parlier, California, Measure G, Law Enforcement Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported renewing indefinitely an existing annual parcel tax of a maximum amount of $120 per single-family residential unit, $95 per unit for multi-family residential parcels, $975 per commercial parcel, $1200 per industrial parcel, $120 per agricultural parcel, and $100 per mobile home parcel to fund law enforcement.

A “no” vote opposed renewing indefinitely an existing annual parcel tax of a maximum amount of $120 per single-family residential unit, $95 per unit for multi-family residential parcels, $975 per commercial parcel, $1200 per industrial parcel, $120 per agricultural parcel, and $100 per mobile home parcel to fund law enforcement, thereby allowing the existing parcel tax to expire on June 30, 2022.

• Riverdale Joint Unified School District, California, Measure J, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Riverdale Joint Unified School District to issue up to $25.9 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund renovations of classrooms, athletic facilities, and schools, construction of permanent classrooms, and replacement of roofs, fire alarms, and heating/air conditioning systems and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Riverdale Joint Unified School District to issue up to $25.9 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund renovations of classrooms, athletic facilities, and schools, construction of permanent classrooms, and replacement of roofs, fire alarms, and heating/air conditioning systems and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Sanger, California, Measure H, Mayor's Term Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported changing the mayor's term from a two-year term to a four-year term.

A “no” vote opposed changing the mayor's term from a two-year term to a four-year term.

• Sanger Unified School District, California, Measure C, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Sanger Unified School District to issue up to $150 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school upgrades, college/career preparation, and completion of the Sanger Unified School District Educational Complex and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Sanger Unified School District to issue up to $150 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund school upgrades, college/career preparation, and the completion of the Sanger Unified School District Educational Complex and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Selma, California, Measure E, City Council Election Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to require the city council be elected by district in five districts instead of four districts.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to require the city council be elected by district in five districts instead of four districts.

• Selma, California, Measure L, Licensed Card Room Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported adding a chapter to the municipal code to allow licenses to be issued for operation of cardrooms.

A “no” vote opposed adding a chapter to the municipal code to allow licenses to be issued for operation of cardrooms.

• Washington Unified School District, California, Measure K, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Washington Unified School District to issue up to $46 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund repair for heating, air conditioning, and leaking roofs and renovations on classrooms, restrooms, and other facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Washington Unified School District to issue up to $46 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund repair for heating, air conditioning, and leaking roofs and renovations on classrooms, restrooms, and other facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

Glenn County

See also: Glenn County, California ballot measures

• Orland Fire Protection District, California, Measure G, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $45 per parcel to replace an existing parcel tax of $20 per parcel and $0.05 per acre, thereby generating an estimated $113,000 per year.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $45 per parcel to replace an existing parcel tax of $20 per parcel and $0.05 per acre.

• Willows, California, Measure H, Fire and Emergency Medical Services Sales Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $850,000 per year for fire and emergency medical services, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in the city from 7.25% to 8%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $850,000 per year for fire and emergency medical services, thereby leaving the total sales tax rate in the city at 7.25%.

Humboldt County

See also: Humboldt County, California ballot measures

• Arcata, California, Measure A, Natural Open Space Preservation Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to establish city council elections in 2021 and 2023 for two-year terms instead of four-year terms with four-year term elections restarting in 2025 and to use this method whenever regular city council elections do not fall in a year ending in a 3 so as to comply with a state law designed to require city council elections in years ending in 2 or 3 after a census.

A "no" vote opposed this measure to amend the city charter to establish city council elections in 2021 and 2023 for two-year terms instead of four-year terms with four-year term elections restarting in 2025 and to use this method whenever regular city council elections do not fall in a year ending in 3.

• Arcata, California, Measure B, Affordable Housing Authorization (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported authorizing private and public entities to develop, construct, or acquire 7.5%, an increase from 5%, or less of the housing units in Arcata for elderly, disabled, and low-income households.

A "no" vote opposed authorizing private and public entities to develop, construct, or acquire 7.5%, an increase from 5%, or less of the housing units in Arcata for elderly, disabled, and low-income households.

• Arcata Fire Protection District, California, Measure F, Fire Services Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing until 2030 an annual parcel tax of $118 per single-family residential parcel, $309 per multi-family residential parcel (2-4 units), $388 per multi-family residential parcel (5-9 units), $465 per multi-family residential parcel (10+ units), $30 per vacant parcel, $192 per rural residential parcel, $546 per commercial parcel, $910 per industrial parcel, $910 per retail parcel of 10,000 square feet or more, and $90 per mobile home parcel to replace an existing parcel tax, thereby generating an estimated $2.2 million per year for fire services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing until 2030 an annual parcel tax of $118 per single-family residential parcel, $309 per multi-family residential parcel (2-4 units), $388 per multi-family residential parcel (5-9 units), $465 per multi-family residential parcel (10+ units), $30 per vacant parcel, $192 per rural residential parcel, $546 per commercial parcel, $910 per industrial parcel, $910 per retail parcel of 10,000 square feet or more, and $90 per mobile home parcel to replace an existing parcel tax, thereby generating an estimated $2.2 million per year for fire services.

• Eureka, California, Measure C, Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to require ranked choice voting for electing the mayor and councilmembers.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to require ranked choice voting for electing the mayor and councilmembers.

• Eureka, California, Measure H, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a sales tax of 1.25% generating an estimated $9.6 million per year.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a sales tax of 1.25% generating an estimated $9.6 million per year.

• Fortuna, California, Measure G, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a sales tax of 0.75% to continue for eight years beyond its current expiration date on March 31, 2025 generating an estimated $1.4 million per year.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a sales tax of 0.75% to continue for eight years beyond its current expiration date on March 31, 2025 generating an estimated $1.4 million per year.

• Humboldt County, California, Measure I, Affordable Housing Authorization (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the development of affordable housing for low income families, seniors, and individuals with disabilities in up to 2.5% of housing units in unincorporated areas.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the development of affordable housing for low income families, seniors, and individuals with disabilities in up to 2.5% of housing units in unincorporated areas.

• South Bay School District, California, Measure D, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a 2% increase to the city's hotel tax generating an estimated $400,000 per year for city services including COVID-19 recovery, law enforcement, emergency response, street repair, business recovery and disaster response.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a 2% increase to the city's hotel tax generating an estimated $400,000 per year for city services including COVID-19 recovery, law enforcement, emergency response, street repair, business recovery and disaster response.

• Trinidad, California, Measure E, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a sales tax of 0.75% to continue for four years from April 1, 2021 - March 31, 2025.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a sales tax of 0.75% to continue for four years from April 1, 2021 - March 31, 2025.

Imperial County

See also: Imperial County, California ballot measures

• Brawley, California, Measure R, Utility Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an expansion to the city's utility tax to cover cell phones, VpIP, IP-TV, text messages, paging, and other private communication services generating an estimated $1.9 million per year.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an expansion to the city's utility tax to cover cell phones, VpIP, IP-TV, text messages, paging, and other private communication services generating an estimated $1.9 million per year.

• Brawley, California, Measure S, Appointed City Clerk Ordinance (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the position of city clerk to be appointive.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the position of city clerk to be appointive.

• Calexico Unified School District, California, Measure Q, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Calexico Unified School District to issue up to $47 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund repairs to schools and classrooms, improvements to technology, security and emergency preparedness and expansion of the Calexico High School's cafeteria and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Calexico Unified School District to issue up to $47 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund repairs to schools and classrooms, improvements to technology, security and emergency preparedness and expansion of the Calexico High School's cafeteria and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Calipatria, California, Measure T, Utility Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a 5% utility users tax on phones, electricity, gas, water, trash, sewer and cable generating an estimated $348,078 for city services including fire services, administration, parks and recreation.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a 5% utility users tax on phones, electricity, gas, water, trash, sewer and cable generating an estimated $348,078 for city services including fire services, administration, parks and recreation.

Inyo County

See also: Inyo County, California ballot measures

• Bishop, California, Measure P, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% with revenue going to the city's general fund, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Bishop from 7.75% to 8.75%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% with funds going to the city's general fund, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Bishop at 7.75%.

Kern County

See also: Kern County, California ballot measures

• Greenfield Union School District, California, Measure G, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Greenfield Union School District to issue up to $21 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund construction of classrooms, labs and facilities, support for student achievement, improvements to safety/security, installation of intruder protection systems, removal of asbestos and lead pipes, and repair of roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Greenfield Union School District to issue up to $21 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund construction of classrooms, labs and facilities, support for student achievement, improvements to safety/security, installation of intruder protection systems, removal of asbestos and lead pipes, and repair of roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Maricopa Unified School District, California, Measure F, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Maricopa Unified School District to issue up to $14 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to classrooms, technology and facilities for school and community use and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $50 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Maricopa Unified School District to issue up to $14 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to classrooms, technology and facilities for school and community use and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $50 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Wasco Union School District, California, Measure H, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Wasco Union School District to issue up to $16 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to schools, health, safety and security, restrooms and facilities, and construction of a master kitchen and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Wasco Union School District to issue up to $16 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to schools, health, safety and security, restrooms and facilities, and construction of a master kitchen and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

Kings County

See also: Kings County, California ballot measures

• Lemoore, California, Measure K, Law Enforcement and Fire Services Sales Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% for seven years generating an estimated $1.8 million per year for law enforcement and fire services, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Lemoore from 7.25% to 8.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing for seven years an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $1.8 million per year for law enforcement and fire services, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Lemoore at 7.25%.

• Riverdale Joint Unified School District, California, Measure J, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Riverdale Joint Unified School District to issue up to $25.9 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund renovations of classrooms, athletic facilities, and schools, construction of permanent classrooms, and replacement of roofs, fire alarms, and heating/air conditioning systems and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Riverdale Joint Unified School District to issue up to $25.9 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund renovations of classrooms, athletic facilities, and schools, construction of permanent classrooms, and replacement of roofs, fire alarms, and heating/air conditioning systems and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

Lake County

See also: Lake County, California ballot measures

• South Lake County Fire Protection District, Measure O, Appropriations Limit (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual appropriations limit of $1,250,000 plus special tax levy amount previously approved over and above previously approved appropriations limit, for four years, without increasing the tax rate.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual appropriations limit of $1,250,000 plus special tax levy amount previously approved over and above previously approved appropriations limit, for four years, without increasing the tax rate.

Lassen County

See also: Lassen County, California ballot measures

Los Angeles County

See also: Los Angeles County, California ballot measures

• Alhambra, California, Measure G, Remove Reference to Unified School District Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported this measure to remove all reference to the Alhambra Unified School District from the city charter, thereby allowing elections for the district to be conducted according to state law.

A "no" vote opposed this measure to remove all reference to the Alhambra Unified School District from the city charter.

• Alhambra, California, Measure V, Campaign Finance Limits and By-District City Council Elections Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter pass restrictions on campaign finance and change city council elections from at-large to by-district elections beginning in 2022.

A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter pass restrictions on campaign finance and change city council elections from at-large to by-district elections beginning in 2022, thereby leaving the existing city council election system in place in which candidates needed to reside within the districts they sought to represent but were elected at-large by voters from the whole city.

• Altadena Library District, California, Measure Z, Library Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to increase its debt by up to $795 million in bonds with a maximum repayment cost of $1.5 billion and to continue the district's existing property tax rate to repay the bonds.

A "no" vote opposed this measure authorizing the district to increase its debt by up to $795 million in bonds with a maximum repayment cost of $1.5 billion and to continue the district's existing property tax rate to repay the bonds.

• Artesia, California, Measure Q, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a tax on marijuana businesses of 15% of gross receipts and $20 per square foot for cultivation generating an estimated $200,000-400,000 per year for city services including law enforcement, parks, streets, youth programs, and senior programs.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a tax on marijuana businesses of 15% of gross receipts and $20 per square foot for cultivation generating an estimated $200,000-400,000 per year for city services including law enforcement, parks, streets, youth programs, and senior programs.

• Avalon, California, Measure H, Traveler and Boat Mooring Tax for Hospital Funding Initiative (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional tax of $2.00 for cruise ship, ferry, or aircraft passengers and $1.00 per day per vessel renting moorings generating an estimated $1.2 million per year to fund the Catalina Island Medical Center.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional tax of $2.00 for cruise ship, ferry, or aircraft passengers and $1.00 per day per vessel renting moorings generating an estimated $1.2 million per year to fund the Catalina Island Medical Center.

• Bassett Unified School District, California, Measure BB, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Bassett Unified School District to issue up to $50 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund technology improvements and repair of roofs, security systems, classrooms, restrooms and facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Bassett Unified School District to issue up to $50 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund technology improvements and repair of roofs, security systems, classrooms, restrooms and facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Bell Gardens, California, Measure A, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $2.33 million per year for city services including law enforcement, construction of an aquatic center, street maintenance, senior and special needs services, recreation programs, and infrastructure, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Bell Gardens from 9.5% to 10.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $2.33 million per year for city services including law enforcement, construction of an aquatic center, street maintenance, senior and special needs services, recreation programs, and infrastructure, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Bell Gardens at 9.5%.

• Bellflower, California, Measure M, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $4.5 million per year for municipal services including emergency response, public safety, clean drinking water, local businesses, street repair, afterschool, youth, disabled and senior programs, and addressing homelessness, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Bellflower from 9.5% to 10.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $4.5 million per year for municipal services including emergency response, public safety, clean drinking water, local businesses, street repair, afterschool, youth, disabled and senior programs, and addressing homelessness, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Bellflower at 9.5%.

• Beverly Hills, California, Measure RP, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% if any other local government entity attempts to increase the sales tax, generating an estimated $28.06 million per year for revenue to go directly to Beverly Hills, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Beverly Hills from 9.5% to 10.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% if any other local government entity attempts to increase the sales tax, generating an estimated $28.06 million per year for revenue to go directly to Beverly Hills, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Beverly Hills from 9.5% to 10.25%.

• Burbank, California, Measure RC, Rent Control Ordinance (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported establishing rent regulations on units built before February 1, 1995, eviction provisions, limits on rent increases of 0% - 7%, and updating the Landlord Tenant Commission to budget, assess fees, hire staff and initiate lawsuits.

A “no” vote opposed establishing rent regulations on units built before February 1, 1995, eviction provisions, limits on rent increases of 0% - 7%, and updating the Landlord Tenant Commission to budget, assess fees, hire staff and initiate lawsuits.

• Calabasas, California, Measure C, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a 10% tax on marijuana businesses generating an estimated $10,000 per year to fund city services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a 10% tax on marijuana businesses generating an estimated $10,000 per year to fund city services.

• Carson, California, Measure K, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $12 million per year for city services including public safety, disaster preparedness, public health, emergency response, protection of water and environment, support of local businesses and street repair, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Carson from 9.5% to 10.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $12 million per year for city services including public safety, disaster preparedness, public health, emergency response, protection of water and environment, support of local businesses and street repair, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Carson at 9.5%.

• Citrus Community College District, California, Measure Y, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Citrus Community College District to issue up to $298 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to classrooms, laboratories and job training, repairs to roofs and school safety, removal of mold and lead paint, and provision of student and veteran resources and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $25 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Citrus Community College District to issue up to $298 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to classrooms, laboratories and job training, repairs to roofs and school safety, removal of mold and lead paint, and provision of student and veteran resources and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $25 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Commerce, California, Measure AE, Marijuana Business Agreement Ordinance (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported amending Development Agreement No. 733 between Commerce and A&E Investment Group, LLC to change membership and ownership of a previously approved marijuana business.

A “no” vote opposed amending Development Agreement No. 733 between Commerce and A&E Investment Group, LLC to change membership and ownership of a previously approved marijuana business.

• Commerce, California, Measure CO, Marijuana Business Agreement Ordinance (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported amending Development Agreement No. 715 between Commerce and Commerce Concentrates, LLC to change membership and ownership, add license types including cultivation and non-storefront retail delivery, and relocate a previously approved marijuana business to 2700 Yates Avenue.

A “no” vote opposed amending Development Agreement No. 715 between Commerce and Commerce Concentrates, LLC to change membership and ownership, add license types including cultivation and non-storefront retail delivery, and relocate a previously approved marijuana business to 2700 Yates Avenue.

• Commerce, California, Measure RD, Development Agreement Ordinance (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing Development Agreement No. 743 between Commerce and RD Commerce, LLC for a marijuana business.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing Development Agreement No. 743 between Commerce and RD Commerce, LLC for a marijuana business.

• Commerce, California, Measure RS, Development Agreement Ordinance (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing Development Agreement No. 744 between Commerce and RS Innovations, Inc. for a marijuana business.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing Development Agreement No. 744 between Commerce and RS Innovations, Inc. for a marijuana business.

• Commerce, California, Measure SB, Marijuana Business Agreement Ordinance (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported amending Development Agreement No. 717 between Commerce and 2SBK Inc. to relocate a previously approved marijuana business to 6445 Bandini Boulevard.

A “no” vote opposed amending Development Agreement No. 717 between Commerce and 2SBK Inc. to relocate a previously approved marijuana business to 6445 Bandini Boulevard.

• Commerce, California, Measure SC, Marijuana Business Agreement Ordinance (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported amending Development Agreement No. 720 between Commerce and Summit Manufacturing, LLC to add cultivation as a license type for a previously approved marijuana business.

A “no” vote opposed amending Development Agreement No. 720 between Commerce and Summit Manufacturing, LLC to add cultivation as a license type for a previously approved marijuana business.

• Commerce, California, Measure VS, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.25% generating an estimated $8 million per year for city services including public safety, emergency response, parks, library services, transportation services, protection of water sources, street repair, and youth and senior services, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Commerce from 10% to 10.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.25% generating an estimated $8 million per year for city services including public safety, emergency response, parks, library services, transportation services, protection of water sources, street repair, and youth and senior services, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Commerce at 10%.

• Culver City, California, Measure B, Rent Control Code Amendment (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported requiring voter approval for ordinances to establish rent control, including ordinances establishing rent control after January 1, 2019.

A “no” vote opposed requiring voter approval for ordinances to establish rent control, including ordinances establishing rent control after January 1, 2019.

• Culver City, California, Measure RE, Property Transfer Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase to the established property transfer tax from a flat-rate of 0.45% to 0.45% on amounts of $1,499,999 or less, 1.5% on amounts of $1.5 million - $2,999,999, 3% on amounts of $3 million - $9,999,999, 4% on amounts of $10 million or more, and 0.45% on sales of 100% affordable housing, generating an estimated $6 million per year for essential services including parks, street maintenance, addressing homelessness, youth services, senior services and economic recovery.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase to the established property transfer tax from a flat-rate of 0.45% to 0.45% on amounts of $1,499,999 or less, 1.5% on amounts of $1.5 million - $2,999,999, 3% on amounts of $3 million - $9,999,999, 4% on amounts of $10 million or more, and 0.45% on sales of 100% affordable housing, generating an estimated $6 million per year for essential services including parks, street maintenance, addressing homelessness, youth services, senior services and economic recovery.

• Diamond Bar, California, Measure DB, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $3.8 million per year for essential services including street maintenance, public safety, parks and recreation facilities, and programs, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Diamond Bar from 9.5% to 10.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $3.8 million per year for essential services including street maintenance, public safety, parks and recreation facilities, and programs, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Diamond Bar at 9.5%.

• Duarte Unified School District, California, Measure S, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Duarte Unified School District to issue up to $79 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to facilities, equipment, fire safety, roofs, and emergency preparedness, and removal of asbestos and lead paint and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $50 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Duarte Unified School District to issue up to $79 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to facilities, equipment, fire safety, roofs, and emergency preparedness, and removal of asbestos and lead paint and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $50 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• El Monte, California, Measure HN, Affordable Housing Ordinance (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing for 17 years the development of 500 units per year of affordable housing for low-income individuals and families, with the ability to carryover unused units each year.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing for 17 years the development of 500 units per year of affordable housing for low-income individuals and families, with the ability to carryover unused units each year.

• El Rancho Unified School District, California, Measure N, School Board Term Limits (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported establishing term limits for members of the school board of two consecutive four-year terms, followed by the ability to serve again after at least four years.

A “no” vote opposed establishing term limits for members of the school board of two consecutive four-year terms, followed by the ability to serve again after at least four years.

• Hawthorne, California, Measure CC, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a 5% tax on marijuana businesses generating no revenue until marijuana businesses are permitted in Hawthorne.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a 5% tax on marijuana businesses generating no revenue until marijuana businesses are permitted in Hawthorne.

• Hawthorne, California, Measure LL, Mayor and City Council Term Limits (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported establishing term limits as two consecutive terms for the position of mayor and two consecutive terms for members of the city council.

A “no” vote opposed establishing term limits as two consecutive terms for the position of mayor and two consecutive terms for members of the city council.

• Hawthorne, California, Measure UU, Utility Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a 2.5% tax on utility bills generating an estimated $3.2 million per year for municipal services including emergency response, public safety, homeless programs, senior programs, youth programs, disaster preparedness, and street maintenance.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a 2.5% tax on utility bills generating an estimated $3.2 million per year for municipal services including emergency response, public safety, homeless programs, senior programs, youth programs, disaster preparedness, and street maintenance.

• Inglewood Unified School District, California, Measure I, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Inglewood Unified School District to issue up to $240 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to classrooms, technology, vocational education, facilities and equipment, repairs to roofs, plumbing, security, fire safety, drinking water, and removal of asbestos, lead paint and mold and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Inglewood Unified School District to issue up to $240 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to classrooms, technology, vocational education, facilities and equipment, repairs to roofs, plumbing, security, fire safety, drinking water, and removal of asbestos, lead paint and mold and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Lancaster, California, Measure LC, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $12 million per year for essential services including street repair, addressing homelessness, emergency response, public safety, maintaining local businesses, protecting water sources, and programs for seniors, veterans, mental health and the community, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Lancaster from 9.5% to 10.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $12 million per year for essential services including street repair, addressing homelessness, emergency response, public safety, maintaining local businesses, protecting water sources, and programs for seniors, veterans, mental health and the community, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Lancaster at 9.5%.

• Lomita, California, Measure L, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $1.3 million per year for city services including water quality, street repair, park maintenance, maintenance of local businesses, emergency response and public safety, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Lomita from 9.5% to 10.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $1.3 million per year for city services including water quality, street repair, park maintenance, maintenance of local businesses, emergency response and public safety, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Lomita at 9.5%.

• Long Beach, California, Measure US, General Oil Production Tax Increase (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported increasing the city's general-purpose oil production tax from $0.15 to up to $0.30 per barrel generating an estimated $1.6 million per year in addition to the city's special-purpose oil production tax of $0.33 per barrel with revenue dedicated to police and fire services.

A "no" vote opposed increasing the city's general-purpose oil production tax from $0.15 to up to $0.30 per barrel, thereby leaving the city's existing $0.15 per barrel general purpose and $0.33 per barrel police and fire services oil production taxes in place.

• Los Angeles County, California, Measure J, Budget Allocation for Alternatives to Incarceration Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported:

amending the county's charter to require that no less than 10% of the county's general fund be appropriated to community programs and alternatives to incarceration, such as health services and pre-trial non-custody services;
authorizing the Board of Supervisors to develop a process to allocate funds; and
authorizing the Board of Supervisors to reduce the amount allocated with a vote of 4-1 during a declared fiscal emergency.

A "no" vote opposed amending the county charter to require that no less than 10% of the county's general fund be appropriated to community programs and alternatives to incarceration.

• Los Angeles Unified School District, California, Measure RR, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the district to issue up to $7 billion in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $21.74 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the district to issue up to $7 billion in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $21.74 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Lynwood, California, Measure LH, For-profit Hospital Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a 3% tax on gross receipts for all for-profit hospitals to fund general services including public safety, infrastructure, and programs for parks, youth and seniors.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a 3% tax on gross receipts for all for-profit hospitals to fund general services including public safety, infrastructure, and programs for parks, youth and seniors.

• Malibu, California, Measure T, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a hotel tax increase from 12% to 15% generating an estimated $775,000 per year for municipal services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a hotel tax increase from 12% to 15% generating an estimated $775,000 per year for municipal services.

• Monterey Park, California, Measure JJ, Land Use Proposition (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Revised Monterey Park 2040 Land Use Element Proposition to change land uses, building sizes and building heights.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Revised Monterey Park 2040 Land Use Element Proposition to change land uses, building sizes and building heights.

• Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority, California, Measure HH, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing for ten years an annual parcel tax of $68 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $1.94 million per year for wildfire prevention, clearing dry brush, protecting open space, park ranger patrols, and protecting water quality.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing for ten years an annual parcel tax of $68 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $1.94 million per year for wildfire prevention, clearing dry brush, protecting open space, park ranger patrols, and protecting water quality.

• Palmdale, California, Measure AV, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $12 million per year for essential services including street repair, addressing homelessness, emergency response, public safety, maintaining local businesses, protecting water sources, and programs for seniors, veterans, mental health and the community, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Palmdale from 9.5% to 10.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $12 million per year for essential services including street repair, addressing homelessness, emergency response, public safety, maintaining local businesses, protecting water sources, and programs for seniors, veterans, mental health and the community, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Palmdale at 9.5%.

• Pasadena, California, Measure P, Electric Rates Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to continue collecting electric rates of no more than 12% of gross receipts, generating an estimated $18 million to transfer for general services.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to continue collecting electric rates of no more than 12% of gross receipts, generating an estimated $18 million to transfer for general services.

• Pasadena Unified School District, California, Measure O, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Pasadena Unified School District to issue up to $516.3 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to schools, technology access, drinking water, facilities and equipment, repairs to bathrooms, roofs and labs, and removal of hazardous materials and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $45 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Pasadena Unified School District to issue up to $516.3 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to schools, technology access, drinking water, facilities and equipment, repairs to bathrooms, roofs and labs, and removal of hazardous materials and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $45 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Pico Rivera, California, Measure TT, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a hotel tax increase from 10% to 15% to fund general services including street maintenance, public safety, pedestrian and bicycle safety, and school route safety.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a hotel tax increase from 10% to 15% to fund general services including street maintenance, public safety, pedestrian and bicycle safety, and school route safety.

• Pomona, California, Measure PA, Utility Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a 0.75% increase to the utility users tax for ten years.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a 0.75% increase to the utility users tax for ten years.

• Pomona, California, Measure PM, Marijuana Business Zoning Ordinance (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Safe Access Cannabis and Industrial Cannabis zones to prohibit marijuana businesses from existing within 600 feet of schools, daycares and youth centers.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Safe Access Cannabis and Industrial Cannabis zones to prohibit marijuana businesses from existing within 600 feet of schools, daycares and youth centers.

• Pomona, California, Measure PO, Marijuana Business Regulation Ordinance (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Commercial Cannabis Permit Program granting up to eight permits for marijuana businesses, maintaining marijuana businesses must be at least 1,000 feet from schools, daycares and youth facilities.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Commercial Cannabis Permit Program granting up to eight permits for marijuana businesses, maintaining marijuana businesses must be at least 1,000 feet from schools, daycares and youth facilities.

• San Fernando, California, Measure SF, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a sales tax increase from 0.5% to 0.75% generating an estimated $1.1 million per year for municipal purposes including street maintenance, infrastructure, local businesses, public Wi-Fi and debt reduction, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in San Fernando from 10% to 10.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a sales tax increase from 0.5% to 0.75% generating an estimated $1.1 million per year for municipal purposes including street maintenance, infrastructure, local businesses, public Wi-Fi and debt reduction, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in San Fernando at 10%.

• Santa Monica, California, Measure AB, Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to remove rules for appointing candidates and promoting individuals to establish an equity-based hiring and promotional process for city positions.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to remove rules for appointing candidates and promoting individuals to establish an equity-based hiring and promotional process for city positions.

• Santa Monica, California, Measure SM, Property Transfer Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase to the property transfer tax for sales of $5 million or more by $3 per $1,000 of the sales price generating an estimated $3 million per year for essential services including addressing homelessness, parks and beaches maintenance, public safety, emergency response, senior and tenant protections, libraries, small businesses, food for the hungry and youth programs.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase to the property transfer tax for sales of $5 million or more by $3 per $1,000 of the sales price generating an estimated $3 million per year for essential services including addressing homelessness, parks and beaches maintenance, public safety, emergency response, senior and tenant protections, libraries, small businesses, food for the hungry and youth programs.

• Sierra Madre, California, Measure AC, Appointed City Clerk Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to change the city clerk position to be appointed.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to change the city clerk position to be appointed.

• Signal Hill, California, Measure R, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $5 million per year for general services including street repair, infrastructure, clean public spaces, emergency response and crime prevention, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Signal Hill from 9.5% to 10.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75%, thereby leaving the total sales tax rate in Signal Hill at 9.5%.

• South El Monte, California, Measure ES, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.25% generating an estimated $1 million per year for general services including emergency response, neighborhood patrols, gang prevention, prevention of thefts, street maintenance, safe school routes, park maintenance, public safety, after-school programs, and youth and senior programs, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in South El Monte from 10% to 10.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.25% generating an estimated $1 million per year for general services including emergency response, neighborhood patrols, gang prevention, prevention of thefts, street maintenance, safe school routes, park maintenance, public safety, after-school programs, and youth and senior programs, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in South El Monte at 10%.

• South Pasadena, California, Measure U, Utility Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an extension of the city's utility users tax at a rate of 7.5% to fund city services including public safety, paramedic services and library services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an extension of the city's utility users tax at a rate of 7.5% to fund city services including public safety, paramedic services and library services, thereby allowing the current utility users tax to expire on June 30, 2022.

• West Hollywood, California, Measure E, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $11 million per year for city services including public health emergencies, addressing homelessness, local businesses, senior and health services, public safety and street repair, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in West Hollywood from 9.5% to 10.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $11 million per year for city services including public health emergencies, addressing homelessness, local businesses, senior and health services, public safety and street repair, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in West Hollywood at 9.5%.

• Whittier Union High School District, California, Measure AA, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Whittier Union High School District to issue up to $183.5 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to schools, career education, science and computer classrooms, school safety, facilities and equipment and removal of asbestos and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed property value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Whittier Union High School District to issue up to $183.5 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to schools, career education, science and computer classrooms, school safety, facilities and equipment and removal of asbestos and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed property value.

• Wrightwood Community Services District, California, Measure W, Appropriations Limit (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an appropriations limit of $660,612.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an appropriations limit of $660,612.

Madera County

See also: Madera County, California ballot measures

• Madera, California, Measure R, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a tax on marijuana businesses of 6% of gross receipts for retail businesses, 4% of gross receipts for other marijuana businesses, and no more than $10 per square foot for cultivation generating an estimated $720,000 - $1.08 million per year.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a tax on marijuana businesses of 6% of gross receipts for retail businesses, 4% of gross receipts for other marijuana businesses, and no more than $10 per square foot for cultivation generating an estimated $720,000 - $1.08 million per year.

Marin County

See also: Marin County, California ballot measures

• Novato, California, Measure Q, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a 2% increase to the city's hotel tax generating an estimated $400,000 per year for city services including COVID-19 recovery, law enforcement, emergency response, street repair, business recovery and disaster response.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a 2% increase to the city's hotel tax generating an estimated $400,000 per year for city services including COVID-19 recovery, law enforcement, emergency response, street repair, business recovery and disaster response.

• San Rafael, California, Measure R, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.25% for nine years generating an estimated $3.4 million per year for essential services including disaster preparedness, street repair, emergency response, parks, crime prevention, and services for youth, seniors, families, and homeless individuals, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in San Rafael from 9% to 9.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.25% for nine years generating an estimated $3.4 million per year for essential services including disaster preparedness, street repair, emergency response, parks, crime prevention, and services for youth, seniors, families, and homeless individuals, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in San Rafael at 9%.

• Sausalito Marin City School District, California, Measure P, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Sausalito Marin City School District to issue up to $41.6 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund construction of new classrooms, upgrades to libraries, labs and facilities, and improvements to safety and security and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Sausalito Marin City School District to issue up to $41.6 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund construction of new classrooms, upgrades to libraries, labs and facilities, and improvements to safety and security and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Tamalpais Union High School District, California, Measure M, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported renewing for nine years an existing annual parcel tax of $469 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $16.8 million per year for the Tamalpais Union High School District.

A “no” vote opposed renewing for nine years an existing annual parcel tax of $469 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $16.8 million per year for the Tamalpais Union High School District.

Mariposa County

See also: Mariposa County, California ballot measures

• Mariposa County, California, Measure N, Hospital Sales Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $2.6 million per year for John C. Fremont Hospital to upgrade facilities, maintain access to medical care, and renovate facilities to attract doctors, nurses, and specialists, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Mariposa from 7.75% to 8.75%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $2.6 million per year for John C. Fremont Hospital to upgrade facilities, maintain access to medical care, and renovate facilities to attract doctors, nurses, and specialists, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Mariposa at 7.75%.

Mendocino County

See also: Mendocino County, California ballot measures

• Willits, California, Measure K, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% for ten years generating an estimated $1 million per year for essential services including law enforcement and maintenance of streets, sports fields and facilities, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Willits from 8.375% to 9.125%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% for ten years generating an estimated $1 million per year for essential services including law enforcement and maintenance of streets, sports fields and facilities, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Willits at 8.375%.

• Willits Unified School District, California, Measure I, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Willits Unified School District to issue up to $17 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund repairs to classrooms, facilities, roofs, plumbing, heating, cooling and electrical systems, improvements to safety and security and upgrades to classrooms and facilities for college/career planning and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $40 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Willits Unified School District to issue up to $17 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund repairs to classrooms, facilities, roofs, plumbing, heating, cooling and electrical systems, improvements to safety and security and upgrades to classrooms and facilities for college/career planning and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $40 per $100,000 in assessed value.

Merced County

See also: Merced County, California ballot measures

• Le Grand Union High School District, California, Measure S, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Le Grand Union High School District to issue up to $6 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades and renovations to the Ag Career Technical Education Facilities, classrooms, restrooms, and facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $29.74 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Le Grand Union High School District to issue up to $6 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades and renovations to the Ag Career Technical Education Facilities, classrooms, restrooms, and facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $29.74 per $100,000 in assessed value.

Modoc County

See also: Modoc County, California ballot measures

Mono County

See also: Mono County, California ballot measures

• Mammoth Unified School District, California, Measure G, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported renewing for five years an existing annual parcel tax of $59 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $620,000 per year for high quality academic programs.

A “no” vote opposed renewing for five years an existing annual parcel tax of $59 per parcel.

Monterey County

See also: Monterey County, California ballot measures

• Aromas-San Juan Unified School District, California, Measure O, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to issue up to $30.5 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to safety and security, repairs to wiring, plumbing, and roofs, and classroom construction and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $50.07 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to issue up to $30.5 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to safety and security, repairs to wiring, plumbing, and roofs, and classroom construction and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $50.07 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Gonzales, California, Measure X, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a sales tax increase from 0.5% to 1% for 20 years generating an estimated additional $600,000 per year, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Gonzales from 8.25% to 8.75%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a sales tax increase from 0.5% to 1% for 20 years generating an estimated additional $600,000 per year, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Gonzales at 8.25%.

• Gonzales Unified School District, California, Measure J, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Gonzales Unified School District to issue up to $24.5 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund the construction of a new elementary school, school repairs, and upgrades to safety, security, and technology and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Gonzales Unified School District to issue up to $24.5 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund the construction of a new elementary school, school repairs, and upgrades to safety, security, and technology and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Gonzales Unified School District, California, Measure K, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Gonzalez Unified School District to issue up to $37 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund repairs and upgrades to technology, emergency preparedness, handicap accessibility, plumbing, roofing, and the expansion of vocational educational classrooms at Gonzales High School and Gonzales Adult School and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Gonzalez Unified School District to issue up to $37 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund repairs and upgrades to technology, emergency preparedness, handicap accessibility, plumbing, roofing, and the expansion of vocational educational classrooms at Gonzales High School and Gonzales Adult School and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Greenfield, California, Measure T, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a continuation of a sales tax of 0.75% for six years generating an estimated $1.1 million per year for city services including public safety, youth programs, and code enforcement services, thereby maintaining the total sales tax rate in Greenfield at 9.5% for six years.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a continuation of a sales tax of 0.75% for six years generating an estimated $1.1 million per year for city services including public safety, youth programs, and code enforcement services.

• King City, California, Measure P, Marijuana Tax (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to remove the limit fo $1,000 for city ordinance or code violations.

A "no" vote opposed this measure amending the city charter to remove the limit fo $1,000 for city ordinance or code violations.

• Marina, California, Measure Q, Urban Growth Boundary Extension (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an extension to the Marina Urban Growth Boundary Initiative until December 31, 2040 to maintain efficient development and protect open spaces.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an extension to the Marina Urban Growth Boundary Initiative to maintain efficient development and protect open spaces, and allows the initiative to expire on December 31, 2020.

• Marina, California, Measure Z, Marijuana Business Regulation Ordinance (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing restrictions on marijuana business proximity to parks and recreation centers, maintaining a 5% gross receipts tax on marijuana businesses and the cap of three adult retailers and three medical dispensaries, and continuing to prohibit recreational sales to individuals under 21.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing restrictions on marijuana business proximity to parks and recreation centers, maintaining a 5% gross receipts tax on marijuana businesses and the cap of three adult retailers and three medical dispensaries, and continuing to prohibit recreational sales to individuals under 21.

• Monterey, California, Measure Y, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a hotel tax increase from 10% to 12% on the cost of rooms and expanding the applicability to online travel companies generating an estimated $2.8-5.6 million per year for the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program and other essential services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a hotel tax increase from 10% to 12% on the cost of rooms and expanding the applicability to online travel companies generating an estimated $2.8-5.6 million per year for the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program and other essential services.

• Monterey Peninsula Community College District, California, Measure V, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Monterey Peninsula Community College District to issue up to $230 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund repairs to classrooms, facilities, roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, removal of hazardous materials, and improvements to technology and equipment and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $18 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Monterey Peninsula Community College District to issue up to $230 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund repairs to classrooms, facilities, roofs, plumbing, and electrical systems, removal of hazardous materials, and improvements to technology and equipment and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $18 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Pacific Grove, California, Measure L, Sales Tax (November 2020):

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a sales tax increase from 1% to 1.5% generating an estimated $1 million per year for city services including public safety, emergency preparedness, and improvement of city infrastructure, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Pacific Grove from 8.75% to 9.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a sales tax increase from 1% to 1.5% generating an estimated $1 million per year for city services including public safety, emergency preparedness, and improvements to city infrastructure, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Pacific Grove at 8.75%

• Salinas Union High School District, California, Measure W, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Salinas Union High School District to issue up to $140 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund repairs to classrooms, bathrooms, and roofs, upgrades to classrooms, labs, safety, and security, removal of hazardous materials, provision of safe drinking water, and offer college and career training and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Salinas Union High School District to issue up to $140 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund repairs to classrooms, bathrooms, and roofs, upgrades to classrooms, labs, safety, and security, removal of hazardous materials, provision of safe drinking water, and offer college and career training and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• San Miguel Joint Union School District, California, Measure I, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the San Miguel Joint Union School District to issue up to $6.2 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades for emergency preparedness and technology, and updates to classrooms for agricultural sciences, safety, and security and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the San Miguel Joint Union School District to issue up to $6.2 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades for emergency preparedness and technology, and updates to classrooms for agricultural sciences, safety, and security and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Sand City, California, Measure U, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a sales tax increase from 1% to 1.5% generating an estimated $1 million per year for city services, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Sand City from 8.75% to 9.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a sales tax increase from 1% to 1.5% generating an estimated $1 million per year for city services, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Sand City at 8.75%.

• Shandon Joint Unified School District, California, Measure H, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Shandon Joint Unified School District to issue up to $4 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund septic system repairs, improvements to student safety and technology, and additional classrooms and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $40 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposes authorizing the Shandon Joint Unified School District to issue up to $4 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund septic system repairs, improvements to student safety and technology, and additional classrooms and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $40 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Soledad, California, Measure S, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% generating an estimated $900,000 per year for city services including youth, arts and science, senior, animal welfare, and daycare programs and services, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Soledad from 8.75% to 9.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% generating an estimated $900,000 per year for city services including youth, arts and science, senior, animal welfare, and daycare programs and services, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Soledad at 8.75%.

• Soledad Unified School District, California, Measure N, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Soledad Unified School District to issue up to $13.75 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to technology and construction of staff/teacher rental housing and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $25.52 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Soledad Unified School District to issue up to $13.75 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to technology and construction of staff/teacher rental housing and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $25.52 per $100,000 in assessed value.

Napa County

See also: Napa County, California ballot measures

• St. Helena, California, Measure G, Hotel Development Advisory Question (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported the opinion that hotel development should be prohibited on 5.6 acres of land at the corner of Library Lane and Adams Street for 20 years. Measure G was put on the ballot as a nonbinding, advisory question with no ability to change local law.

A “no” vote opposed the opinion that hotel development should be prohibited on 5.6 acres of land at the corner of Library Lane and Adams Street for 20 years. Measure G was put on the ballot as a nonbinding, advisory question with no ability to change local law.

• Yountville, California, Measure T, Marijuana Business Regulations (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a marijuana business to exist in Yountville for retail, delivery and on-site consumption and establishing regulations, fees, permits, operation conditions and a 3% tax on gross receipts, generating an estimated $30,000 - $100,000 per year.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a marijuana business to exist in Yountville for retail, delivery and on-site consumption and establishing regulations, fees, permits, operation conditions and a 3% tax on gross receipts.

Nevada County

See also: Nevada County, California ballot measures

• Byers Lane Community Service District, California, Measure O, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $300 per parcel to replace an existing parcel tax, thereby generating an estimated $19,200 per year for road and culvert maintenance.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $300 per parcel to replace an existing parcel tax.

• Grass Valley, California, Measure N, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a marijuana business tax of 8% of gross receipts for retail businesses, 6% of gross receipts for other businesses, and $7 per square foot for commercial growth, generating an estimated $250,000 per year for essential services including public safety, streets, parks and recreation.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a marijuana business tax of 8% of gross receipts for retail businesses, 6% of gross receipts for other businesses, and $7 per square foot for commercial growth.

• Nevada City, California, Measure L, Appointed City Clerk and City Treasurer (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the positions of city clerk and city treasurer to be appointive.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the positions of city clerk and city treasurer to be appointive.

• Nevada City, California, Measure M, Streets and Sewer Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an extension to the 0.5% sales tax generating an estimated $550,000 per year for streets, sidewalks, drainage, water and sewer systems.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an extension to the 0.5% sales tax generating an estimated $550,000 per year for streets, sidewalks, drainage, water and sewer systems, thereby allowing the tax to expire on March 31, 2023.

• Truckee, California, Measure K, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a 2% hotel tax increase for 20 years generating an estimated $700,000 per year for general services including affordable housing, preservation of open space, and wildfire/disaster preparedness.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a 2% hotel tax increase for 20 years generating an estimated $700,000 per year for general services including affordable housing, preservation of open space, and wildfire/disaster preparedness.

Orange County

See also: Orange County, California ballot measures

• Costa Mesa, California, Measure Q, Marijuana Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a 4%-7% gross receipts tax on retail marijuana businesses generating an estimated $3 million per year for city services, and the regulation of marijuana business locations.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a 4%-7% gross receipts tax on retail marijuana businesses generating an estimated $3 million per year for city services, and the regulation of marijuana business locations.

• Cypress, California, Measure P, Election Procedures Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to update the process in which council vacancies are filled, change the composition, elections, and terms of council to align with state law, and change publication requirements for ordinances, public works contracts, and other legal notices.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to update the process in which council vacancies are filled, change the composition, elections, and terms of council to align with state law, and change publication requirements for ordinances, public works contracts, and other legal notices.

• Fullerton, California, Measure S, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1.25% generating an estimated $25 million per year for general city services including emergency services, public safety, street repair, and addressing homelessness, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Fullerton from 7.75% to 9%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1.25% generating an estimated $25 million per year for general city services including emergency services, public safety, street repair, and addressing homelessness, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Fullerton at 7.75%.

• Fullerton, California, Measure U, Fireworks Ordinance (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the approval of an ordinance to prohibit fireworks sale, possession, and use.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the approval of an ordinance to prohibit fireworks and would continue to allow safe sales, possession, and use of fireworks.

• La Habra, California, Measure W, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the city to impose a gross receipts tax of up to 6% on marijuana businesses and grant up to four marijuana delivery licenses, thereby increasing the city's general fund revenue by an estimated amount of between $1 million and $2 million per year.

A “no” vote opposed this measure authorizing the city to impose a gross receipts tax of up to 6% on marijuana businesses and grant up to four marijuana delivery licenses.

• La Habra, California, Measure X, Open Space Citizens' Initiative (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported requiring voter approval to change land designated as open space to another use.

A "no" vote opposed requiring voter approval to change land designated as open space to another use.

• Laguna Woods, California, Measure V, Marijuana Dispensaries Advisory Question (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported allowing marijuana dispensaries, both medical and recreational, to operate in areas zoned for commercial activity within the city.

A "no" vote opposed allowing marijuana dispensaries, both medical and recreational, to operate in areas zoned for commercial activity within the city.

• Los Alamitos, California, Measure Y, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1.5% generating an estimated $4.1 million per year for essential services including law enforcement, protection of jobs and businesses, street maintenance, youth and senior programs, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Los Alamitos from 7.75% to 9.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1.5% generating an estimated $4.1 million per year for essential services including law enforcement, protection of jobs and businesses, street maintenance, youth and senior programs, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Los Alamitos at 7.75%.

• Newport Beach, California, Measure Z, Harbor Commission Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to establish the Harbor Commission as a designated appointive board and commission.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to establish the Harbor Commission as a designated appointive board and commission.

• Orange, California, Measure AA, Open Space Project Resolution (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Trails at Santiago Creek project to designate approximately 40.7 acres to 128 single-family homes and approximately 68.5 acres to open space, creek restoration, and public trails.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Trails at Santiago Creek project to designate approximately 40.7 acres to 128 single-family homes and approximately 68.5 acres to open space, creek restoration, and public trails.

• San Clemente, California, Measure BB, City Council Term Limits (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported limiting city council term limits to two consecutive four-year terms and the ability to only serve as a city council member again after at least two years off city council.

A “no” vote opposed limiting city council term limits to two consecutive four-year terms and the ability to only serve as a city council member again after at least two years off city council.

• Tustin, California, Measure CC, City Council Members' Salaries (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported setting city council members' salaries by use of the California Government Code's salary formula, beginning at $600 per month.

A “no” vote opposed setting city council members' salaries by use of the California Government Code's salary formula, beginning at $600 per month.

• Westminster, California, Measure DD, City Council and Mayor Term Limits (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported establishing term limits of three four-year terms for city council members and the mayor.

A “no” vote opposed establishing term limits of three four-year terms for city council members and the mayor.

Placer County

See also: Placer County, California ballot measures

• Auburn, California, Measure S, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% for 7 years generating an estimated $2.56 million per year for general services including law enforcement, fire services, and code enforcement services, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Auburn from 7.25% to 8.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% for 7 years generating an estimated $2.56 million per year for general services including law enforcement, fire services, and code enforcement services, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Auburn at 7.25%.

• Placer County, California, Measure F, Civil Service System Code Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the functions and duties of the civil service commission to hear employee complaints, disciplinary appeals, and other employee hearings.

A “no” vote opposed amending the functions and duties of the civil service commission to hear employee complaints, disciplinary appeals, and other employee hearings.

• Placer County, California, Measure G, County Executive Officer Authority Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported amending the county charter to give the county executive officer authority to appoint, suspend, and remove appointed department heads.

A “no” vote opposed amending the county charter to give the county executive officer authority to appoint, suspend, and remove appointed department heads.

• Placer County, California, Measure H, Bid Threshold Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the county charter to remove bid threshold requirements that contradict state law.

A “no” vote opposed amending the county charter to remove bid threshold requirements that contradict state law.

• Placer County, California, Measure I, Elected Official Eligibility Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the county charter to require elected officials to be county residents during their entire term and for at least thirty days prior to nomination papers being filed.

A “no” vote opposed amending the county charter to require elected officials to be county residents during their entire term and for at least thirty days prior to nomination papers being filed.

• Roseville, California, Measure J, Charter Amendments (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to bring sections into compliance with state law and the municipal code including changes to word choices, updates to the time of the city council's regular meetings, authorize the city council to determine whether public works contracts should be contracted or completed by city employees, and update sections to reflect previous changes made to eligibility and procedure for city council elections.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to bring sections into compliance with state law and the municipal code including changes to word choices, updates to the time of the city council's regular meetings, authorize the city council to determine whether public works contracts should be contracted or completed by city employees, and update sections to reflect previous changes made to eligibility and procedure for city council elections.

• Roseville, California, Measure K, City Council Term Limits Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to establish that a partial term of less than two years does not count towards a council member's term limit, but a combination of an appointment to a vacant seat and an election that exceeds two years together will count as a term.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to establish that a partial term of less than two years does not count towards a council member's term limit, but a combination of an appointment to a vacant seat and an election that exceeds two years together will count as a term.

• Roseville, California, Measure L, Mayor and Vice-Mayor Terms Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to establish a system for appointing a vice-mayor and mayor through the by-district elections for city council and determine that the term limit for each individual will be two years as vice-mayor followed by two years as mayor.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to establish a system for appointing a vice-mayor and mayor through the by-district elections for city council and determine that the term limit for each individual will be two years as vice-mayor followed by two years as mayor.

• Roseville, California, Measure M, City Council Vacancy Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to establish a process for filling vacancies on city council, determine that a city council position becomes vacant if a council member moves out of their district, permit the city council to begin the process of filling a vacancy before it occurs, establish that appointed or elected individuals to vacant positions must serve the remainder of the term, and require vacancies for the positions of mayor and vice mayor to be filled on a rotation.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to establish a process for filling vacancies on city council, determine that a city council position becomes vacant if a council member moves out of their district, permit the city council to begin the process of filling a vacancy before it occurs, establish that appointed or elected individuals to vacant positions must serve the remainder of the term, and require vacancies for the positions of mayor and vice mayor to be filled on a rotation.

• Roseville, California, Measure N, City Council Special Meetings Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to authorize the city manager and city attorney to call special meetings of the city council, require a 72 hour notice for special meetings instead of a 24 hour notice, and permit special meeting notice to be distributed electronically.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to authorize the city manager and city attorney to call special meetings of the city council, require a 72 hour notice for special meetings instead of a 24 hour notice, and permit special meeting notice to be distributed electronically.

• Roseville, California, Measure O, Bid Limits Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to raise the sealed bid limit to $75,000, remove the annual adjustment for inflation and deflation, and allow notification of bids to be posted online or in a newspaper rather than requiring both.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to raise the sealed bid limit to $75,000, remove the annual adjustment for inflation and deflation, and allow notification of bids to be posted online or in a newspaper rather than requiring both.

• Roseville, California, Measure P, Personnel Administration Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to authorize the personnel board to fill vacancies by appointment and permit the personnel board to apply waivers to the applicant examination process.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to authorize the personnel board to fill vacancies by appointment and permit the personnel board to apply waivers to the applicant examination process.

• Roseville, California, Measure Q, Utility Services Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to prohibit the provision of retail potable water outside the city and transfer authority to set nonresidential electric rates from the city manager to the city council.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to prohibit the provision of retail potable water outside the city and transfer authority to set nonresidential electric rates from the city manager to the city council.

• Roseville, California, Measure R, Commission Establishment Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to establish the Independent Redistricting Commission with the authority to redraw city council district boundaries following each federal decennial census.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to establish the Independent Redistricting Commission with the authority to redraw city council district boundaries following each federal decennial census.

Plumas County

See also: Plumas County, California ballot measures

Riverside County

See also: Riverside County, California ballot measures

• Banning, California, Measure L, Marijuana Tax (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported authorizing a tax of up to 10% on marijuana distribution facilities to provide an estimated $20,289-$405,790 per year for general city services.

A "no" vote opposed authorizing a tax of up to 10% on marijuana distribution facilities to provide an estimated $20,289-$405,790 per year for general city services.

• Corona, California, Measure X, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $30 million per year for the city's general fund, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Corona from 7.75% to 8.75%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $30 million per year for the city's general fund, thereby leaving the total sales tax rate in Corona at 7.75%.

• Corona, California, Measure Y, City Council Term Limits (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported establishing a lifetime limi of three terms for city council members.

A "no" vote opposed this measur establishing a lifetime limi of three terms for city council members, thereby leaving no term limits for city council members.

• Jurupa Valley, California, Measure U, Marijuana Business Regulation Changes and Tax Increase (November 2020): ✖

A "yes" vote supported replacing existing regulations on marijuana businesses and increasing taxes on marjuana businesses in the following ways:

require conditional use permits and annual regulatory permits for all marijuana businesses;
permit onemarijuana retail business per 12,000 in population, which would amount to nine instead of the existing seven;
use a lottery system to select licenses;
require businesses to be at least 1,000 feet from schools, day care and youth centers, churches, or parks;
require minimum parking spaces and additional opertional requirements for marijuana businesses concerning signage, order, hours of operation, marijuana consumption, and security; and
impose gross receipts taxes at 6% for retailers, 2% for distributors, 2.5% fr manufacturing, and 1% for testing laboratories and a tax on indoor cultivation businesses at a rate of $10 per square foot.

A "no" vote opposed this measure changing regulations and increasing taxes on marijuana businesses, thereby leaving the existing taxes and regulations in place

• Lake Elsinore, California, Measure Z, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported adopting a city council ordinance to rezone 176.6 acres in northeastern Oceanside from Agricultural to Planned Development to allow for the North River Farms development project.

A "no" vote opposed adopting a city council ordinance to rezone 176.6 acres in northeastern Oceanside to Planned Development to allow for the North River Farms development project, thereby blocking the North River Farms development project and leaving the land zoned for Agricultural, which allows crop-producing activities and limited residential development with minimum lot sizes of 2.5 acres so long as the residential use doesn't interfere with agricultural purposes.

• Menifee, California, Measure M, Sales Tax Repeal Initiative (November 2020): ✖

A "yes" vote supported this initiative to repeal a 1% sales tax that provided revenue for the city's general fund, thereby reducing the total sales tax rate in Menifee from 8.75% to 7.75%.

A "no" vote opposed this initiative to repeal a 1% sales tax that provided revenue for the city's general fund, thereby leaving the total sales tax rate in Menifee at 8.75%.

• Riverside, California, Measure Q, Procedures for Filling Elected Office Vacancies Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to do the following:

require the city council to make an appointment to fill a vacancy for an elected office with up to one year left in the term;
require a special election to fill a vacancy for an elected office with more than one year left in the term;
establish a process for a runoff election if no candidate receives a majority of votes in the special election to fill a vacancy; and
prohibit appointed officials from making references indicating they are incumbents for future elections to the same seat.

A "no" vote opposed this measure amending the city charter to do the following:

require the city council to make an appointment to fill a vacancy for an elected office with up to one year left in the term;
require a special election to fill a vacancy for an elected office with more than one year left in the term;
establish a process for a runoff election if no candidate receives a majority of votes in the special election to fill a vacancy; and
prohibit appointed officials from making references indicating they are incumbents for future elections to the same seat.

• Riverside, California, Measure R, Consolidate Mayor and City Council Elections with the State Primary and General Elections Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to consolidate city council and mayor elections with state primary and general elections and to allow for temporary adjustments to term lengths and election dates to carry out the consolidation.

A "no" vote opposed this measure amending the city charter to consolidate city council and mayor elections with state primary and general elections and to allow for temporary adjustments to term lengths and election dates to carry out the consolidation.

• Riverside, California, Measure S, Recommendation from Charter Review Committee on Amendments Proposed by the City Council Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported requiring the city council to submit any charter amendments they propose—not those initiated through a signature petition—to the charter review commission in order to receive a recommendation before the city council refers them to voters.

A "no" vote opposed this measure requiring the city council to submit any charter amendments they propose to the charter review commission in order to receive a recommendation before the city council refers them to voters.

• Riverside, California, Measure T, Budget Publication Requirements Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✖

A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to remove the requirement that the city's budget be posted in all public libraries; remove the requirement that a copy of the budget be made and that copies of the budget be made available to all departments, offices, and agencies of the city; to state that certain city council approved capital funding does not lapse at the end of the fiscal year; and to replace the word citizen with person in provisions concerning commenting at public meetings.

A "no" vote opposed this measure amending the city charter to remove the requirement that the city's budget be posted in all public libraries; remove the requirement that a copy of the budget be made and that copies of the budget be made available to all departments, offices, and agencies of the city; to state that certain city council approved capital funding does not lapse at the end of the fiscal year; and to replace the word citizen with person in provisions concerning commenting at public meetings.

• Romoland School District, California, Measure P, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the district to issue up to $39 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed this measure authorizing the district to issue up to $39 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• San Jacinto, California, Measure V, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $3.2 million per year for the city's general fund, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in San Jacinto from 7.75% to 8.75%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $3.2 million per year for the city's general fund, thereby leaing the the total sales tax rate in San Jacinto at 7.75%.

Sacramento County

See also: Sacramento County, California ballot measures

• Citrus Heights, California, Measure M, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1%, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Citrus Heights from 7.75% to 8.75% and generating an estimated $12 million per year for the city's general fund.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1%, thereby leaving the total sales tax rate in Citrus Heights at 7.75%.

• Isleton, California, Measure L, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% for five years thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Isleton from 8.75% to 9.25% and generating an estimated $83,726.06-$106,858.02 per year for the city's general fund.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% for five years, thereby leaving the total sales tax rate in Isleton at 8.75%.

• Rancho Cordova, California, Measure R, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% generating an estimated $8 million per year for the city's general fund, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Rancho Cordova from 8.25% to 8.75%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% for the city's general fund, thereby leaving the total sales tax rate in Rancho Cordova at 8.25%.

• River Delta Unified School District, California, Measure J, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the River Delta Unified School District to issue up to $45.7 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to schools, technology, roofs, fire safety and drinking water, removal of asbestos and mold, and construction of educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the River Delta Unified School District to issue up to $45.7 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to schools, technology, roofs, fire safety and drinking water, removal of asbestos and mold, and construction of educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• River Delta Unified School District, California, Measure K, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the River Delta Unified School District to issue up to $14.6 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to schools, safety, technology, roofs, fire safety and drinking water, removal of asbestos and mold, and construction of educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to allow the city council to pass an ordinance to allow 16-year-olds to vote for the office of the school board director.

• Sacramento, California, Measure A, Charter Revision Measure (November 2020): ✖

A "yes" vote supported approving a revised city charter to make the following changes, among others:

change the form of city government from a council-manager form to a mayor-council form, making the mayor the city's chief executive officer instead of the city manager;
changes budget provisions, including making the mayor responsible for proposing the budget, requiring two public hearings before passing a budget instead of one, and requiring “inclusive economic development and youth services” funding in the budget;
require certain social and economic impact reports, adopt a code of ethics and conduct for city officials, and enact transparency responsiveness provisions; and
create an ethics commission and a fair housing and human rights commission.

A "no" vote opposed approving a revised city charter thereby leaving the existing charter in place, including the city's council-manager form of government.

• Sacramento, California, Measure B, Redistricting Deadline Exception Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to create a one-time exception for the redistricting deadline after the 2020 census to account for COVID-19 census delays by allowing the city's redistricting commission until 130 days before the 2022 primary election to complete redistricting and create a map to be used at the 2022 primary election.

A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to create a one-time exception for the redistricting deadline after the 2020 census to account for COVID-19 census delays, thereby keeping in place the existing deadline of six months after receiving census data and the existing requirement that a district map must be completed at least six months prior to an election to be used for that election.

• Sacramento, California, Measure C, Rental Housing Board Creation and Rent Regulations Initiative (November 2020): ✖

A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to do the following:

create a nine-member rental housing board, with eight members elected by voters in each city council district and one member appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the elected members;
regulate rent and limit rent increases according to the consumer price index but set between 2% and 5% annually;
sets specific conditions required for a landlord to evict a tenant; and
imposes an annual fee on landlords at an amount determined by the board in order to fund the operation of the board.

A "no" vote opposed this measure amending the city charter to do the following:

create a nine-member rental housing board, with eight members elected by voters in each city council district and one member appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the elected members;
regulate rent and limit rent increases according to the consumer price index but set between 2% and 5% annually;
sets specific conditions required for a landlord to evict a tenant; and
imposes an annual fee on landlords at an amount determined by the board in order to fund the operation of the board.

San Benito County

See also: San Benito County, California ballot measures

• Aromas-San Juan Unified School District, California, Measure O, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to issue up to $30.5 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to safety and security, repairs to wiring, plumbing, and roofs, and classroom construction and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $50.07 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to issue up to $30.5 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to safety and security, repairs to wiring, plumbing, and roofs, and classroom construction and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $50.07 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• San Benito County, California, Measure N, Agricultural Land Use Initiative (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Strada Verde Specific Plan to designate 2,777 acres for various uses including research, automotive testing/tracks, offices, businesses, industrial, hospitality, retail, other services, the development of Pajaro River Park, and the designation of 561.7 acres for agricultural use.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Strada Verde Specific Plan to designate 2,777 acres for various uses including research, automotive testing/tracks, offices, businesses, industrial, hospitality, retail, other services, the development of Pajaro River Park, and the designation of 561.7 acres for agricultural use.

San Bernardino County

See also: San Bernardino County, California ballot measures

• Adelanto, California, Measure R, Parks, Capital Improvements, Blight Elimination and Public Safety Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax ranging from $50 - $600 per acre on vacant parcels, thereby generating an estimated $6.2 million per year to fund parks and recreation, capital improvements, elimination of illegal dumping and blight and public safety.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax ranging from $50 - $600 per acre on vacant parcels, thereby generating an estimated $6.2 million per year to fund parks and recreation, capital improvements, elimination of illegal dumping and blight and public safety.

• Apple Valley, California, Measure O, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✖

A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $317 million in bonds to fund facility improvements and imposing a property tax at a rate of $440 per $100,000 of assessed property value for bond repayment.

A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $317 million in bonds to fund facility improvements and imposing a property tax at a rate of $440 per $100,000 of assessed property value for bond repayment.

• Chino Hills, California, Measure M, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase to the city's hotel tax from 10% to 12% generating an estimated $260,000 per year for general city services including emergency services, street repair, preservation of parks and open spaces, maintenance of local jobs and businesses, and financial stability, and redefining "hotel" in the municipal code.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase to the city's hotel tax from 10% to 12% generating an estimated $260,000 per year for general city services including emergency services, street repair, preservation of parks and open spaces, maintenance of local jobs and businesses, and financial stability, and redefining "hotel" in the municipal code.

• Hesperia, California, Measure N, Affordable Water Supply Municipal Code Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the municipal code to allow three new homes per acre instead of eight, allow eight multifamily dwellings per acre instead of 25, maintain standards for apartment sizes, and limit extensions for residential tracts and parcel maps to the state minimum to sustain an affordable water supply.

A “no” vote opposed amending the municipal code to allow three new homes per acre instead of eight, allow eight multifamily dwellings per acre instead of 25, maintain standards for apartment sizes, and limit extensions for residential tracts and parcel maps to the state minimum to sustain an affordable water supply.

• Montclair, California, Measure L, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $7 million per year for general needs including public safety, public health emergencies, protection of local water, emergency services, street repair, after school programs, senior programs, and homelessness, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Montclair from 8% to 9%.

A “no” vote opposes authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $7 million per year for general needs including public safety, public health emergencies, protection of local water, emergency services, street repair, after school programs, senior programs, and homelessness, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Montclair at 8%.

• Redlands, California, Measure T, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $10.7 million per year for city services including safety, emergency services, law enforcement, addressing homelessness, and maintenance of libraries, parks, sidewalks, roads and public areas, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Redlands from 7.75% to 8.75%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $10.7 million per year for city services including safety, emergency services, law enforcement, addressing homelessness, and maintenance of libraries, parks, sidewalks, roads and public areas, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Redlands at 7.75%.

• San Bernardino, California, Measure S, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a sales tax of 1%—to replace an existing tax of 0.25%—generating an estimated $40 million per year for general city services, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in the city from to 8.75%.

A “no” vote opposed this measure authorizing a sales tax of 1% to replace an expiring 0.25% tax, thereby leaving the total sales tax rate in the city at 8% or allowing it to drop to 7.75% if the existing 0.25% sales tax to 8.75%.

• San Bernardino County, California, Measure J, Charter Revision (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported adopting the revised charter.

A "no" vote opposed adopting the revised charter.

• San Bernardino County, California, Measure K, Board of Supervisors Salary Reduction and Term Limits Charter Amendment (November 2020):

A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to reduce the salary of members of the board of supervisors to $5,000 per month and to establish term limits for board members of one term.

A "no" vote opposed this measure amending the city charter to reduce the salary of members of the board of supervisors to $5,000 per month and to establish term limits for board members of one term instead of the existing limit of three consecutive terms.

• San Bernardino County Fire Protection District, California, Measure U, Fire Protection District Parcel Tax Repeal (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported repealing a parcel tax of $157.26 per parcel in the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District, resulting in approximately $41.5 million less in revenue per year.

A “no” vote opposed repealing a parcel tax of $157.26 per parcel in the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District.

• Spring Valley Lake Community Services District, California, Measure V, Establishment of Special District (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the formation of the Spring Valley Lake Community Services District to authorize the provision of water, sewer collection, recycling, waste management and street sweeping.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the formation of the Spring Valley Lake Community Services District to authorize the provision of water, sewer collection, recycling, waste management and street sweeping.

• Upland, California, Measure Q, Memorial Park Discontinuance Ordinance (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the discontinued use of approximately 4.63 acres of Memorial Park to be sold to San Antonio Regional Hospital, generating approximately $4.3 million for park improvements including a baseball field, parking, amenities, landscaping, structures and walking trails.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the discontinued use of approximately 4.63 acres of Memorial Park to be sold to San Antonio Regional Hospital, generating approximately $4.3 million for park improvements including a baseball field, parking, amenities, landscaping, structures and walking trails.

• Victorville, California, Measure P, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $15 million per year for services including law enforcement, fire services, street repair, maintenance of libraries, parks, and recreation facilities and homelessness programs, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Victorville from 7.75% to 8.75%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $15 million per year for services including law enforcement, fire services, street repair, maintenance of libraries, parks, and recreation facilities and homelessness programs, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Victorville at 7.75%.

• Wrightwood Community Services District, California, Measure W, Appropriations Limit (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an appropriations limit of $660,612.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an appropriations limit of $660,612.

San Diego County

See also: San Diego County, California ballot measures

• Cajon Valley Union School District, California, Measure T, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the district to issue up to $125 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $13 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the district to issue up to $125 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $13 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Carlsbad, California, Measure G, City Council Salary Restrictions (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported limiting city council salaries in the following ways:

limiting salary adjustments to the amount stated by the San Diego Regional Consumer Price Index,
requiring amount adjustments to be waived or established annually in January, and
prohibiting adjustments from being made retroactively if they were previously waived in a given year.

A "no" vote opposed this measure limiting city council salaries.

• Dehesa School District, California, Measure U, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the district to issue up to $3.1 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the district to issue up to $3.1 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Encinitas, California, Measure H, Marijuana Commercial Zoning and Regulation (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported specified zoning for and regulation of marijuana retail, cultivation, product manufacturing, and distribution in Encinitas.

A "no" vote opposed this measure's specified zoning for and regulation of marijuana retail, cultivation, product manufacturing, and distribution in Encinitas, thereby leaving municipal marijuana restrictions in place.

• Imperial Beach, California, Measure I, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $1,300,000 per year until ended by voters, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Imperial Beach from 7.75% to 8.75%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $1,300,000 per year until ended by voters, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Imperial Beach at 7.75%.

• La Mesa-Spring Valley School District, California, Measure V, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a 3% tax on marijuana businesses generating an estimated $465,000 - $1.55 million per year for city services and permitting Ojai to increase the tax up to 10%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a 3% tax on marijuana businesses generating an estimated $465,000 - $1.55 million per year for city services and permitting Ojai to increase the tax up to 10%.

• Lakeside Fire Protection District, California, Measure Y, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the district to issue up to $160 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the district to issue up to $160 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Lemon Grove, California, Measure J, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a tax on marijuana retail business of up to 8% and on other marijuana businesses of up to 4% of gross receipts generating an estimated revenue of between $560,000 and $1.12 million per year for general city services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a tax on marijuana retail business of up to 8% and on other marijuana businesses of up to 4% of gross receipts generating an estimated revenue of between $560,000 and $1.12 million per year for general city services.

• Oceanside, California, Measure K, Mayor and City Council Term Limits (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported enacting term limits for the offices of city council and mayor of three four-year terms, regardless of whether the terms are consecutive or not.

A "no" vote opposed this measure enacting term limits for the offices of city council and mayor of three four-year terms.

• Oceanside, California, Measure L, Development Project Zoning Referendum (November 2020): ✖

A "yes" vote supported adopting a city council ordinance to rezone 176.6 acres in northeastern Oceanside from Agricultural to Planned Development to allow for the North River Farms development project.

A "no" vote opposed adopting a city council ordinance to rezone 176.6 acres in northeastern Oceanside to Planned Development to allow for the North River Farms development project, thereby blocking the North River Farms development project and leaving the land zoned for Agricultural, which allows crop-producing activities and limited residential development with minimum lot sizes of 2.5 acres so long as the residential use doesn't interfere with agricultural purposes.

• Oceanside, California, Measure M, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a tax on marijuana retail, manufacturing, and distribution business of up to 6% and on cultivation marijuana businesses of up to 3.5% of gross receipts generating an estimated $1.9 million per year for general city services.

A “no” vote opposed this measure authorizing a tax on marijuana retail, manufacturing, and distribution business of up to 6% and on cultivation marijuana businesses of up to 3.5% of gross receipts generating an estimated $1.9 million per year for general city services.

• Oceanside Unified School District, California, Measure W, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the district to issue up to $160 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the district to issue up to $160 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Poway, California, Measure P, Development Project Zoning Ordinance (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported approving zoning changes, general plan changes, and a special project plan allowing for the Farm in Poway development project consisting of up to 160 homes and a minimum of 70 acres of open space on 117.2 acres located at 17166 Stoneridge Country Club Lane. Poway Proposition FF (1988) requires voter approval for development projects such as the Farm in Poway.

A "no" vote opposed this measre approving zoning changes, general plan changes, and a special project plan, thereby not allowing the Farm in Poway development project consisting of up to 160 homes and a mnimum of 70 acres of open space on 117.2 acres located at 17166 Stoneridge Country Club Lane. Poway Proposition FF (1988) requires voter approval for development projects such as the Farm in Poway.

• Rincon Ranch Community Services District, California, Measure Z, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the district to levy an annual parcel tax of $6 per acre plus $170 per parcel to fund road maintenance and repair.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the district to levy an annual parcel tax of $6 per acre plus $170 per parcel to fund road maintenance and repair.

• San Diego, California, Measure A, Housing Bond Issue (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the city to issue up to $900 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund low-income, substance abuse, and mental health service housing requiring an estimated property tax levy of between $3 and $21 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the city to issue up to $900 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund low-income, substance abuse, and mental health service housing requiring an estimated property tax levy of between $3 and $21 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• San Diego, California, Measure B, Commission on Police Practices Amendment (2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported amending the city's charter to replace the Community Review Board on Police Practices with the Commission on Police Practices that would be appointed by the city council to conduct investigations and subpoena witnesses and documents related to deaths resulting from police interactions and complaints made against police officers.

A "no" vote opposed amending the city's charter to establish the Commission on Police Practices, thereby maintaining the Community Review Board on Police Practices.

• San Diego, California, Measure E, 30-foot Height Limit Exception (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported providing an exception from the 30-foot height limit in the Coastal Zone for the Midway-Pacific Highway Community Plan area, which includes the Sports Arena.

A "no" vote opposed providing an exception from the 30-foot height limit in the Coastal Zone for the Midway-Pacific Highway Community Plan area, which includes the Sports Arena.

• San Diego Unified School District, California, Measure C, Primary and General Elections by Sub-District for School Board Members Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported establishing that school district board members are elected by sub-district in both primary and general elections rather than running by sub-district in primaries but being elected by the entire district in the general election.

A "no" vote opposed establishing that school district board members are elected by sub-district in both primary and general elections, thereby leaving provisions establishing that board candidates run by sub-district in primaries but are elected by the entire district in the general election.

• San Diego Unified School District, California, Measure D, Procedures for Removing School Board Members for Cause and Filling Vacancies Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to add San Diego Unified School District board members under the city's rules for removing elected officials for cause and filling the vacancies.

A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to add San Diego Unified School District board members under the city's rules for removing elected officials for cause and filling the vacancies.

• Santee, California, Measure N, Development Project Voter Approval Requirement Citizen Initiative (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported requiring voter approval of any future zoning changes or development projects that change residential land use categories if the changes intensify use (undefined), change between residential zoning and commercial or industrial zoning if the changes intensify use, or increase residential density.

A "no" vote opposed this measure requiring voter approval of certain future zoning changes or development projects, thereby leaving the existing city council approval requirement in place.

• Santee, California, Measure Q, 12-Year Total Elected Official Term Limit Citizen Initiative (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported this citizen initiative to establish lifetime 12-year total limits (three four-year terms) for elected officials, including city council and mayoral terms combined. Measure Q and Measure R were put on the ballot as competing measures.

A "no" vote opposed this citizen initiative to establish lifetime 12-year total limits (three four-year terms) for elected officials, including city council and mayoral terms combined, thereby leaving no term limits in place for city elected officials.

• Santee, California, Measure R, City Council and Mayor Term Limits Council-Referred Measure (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported this city council-referred measure to establish lifetime three-term term limits for the office of the city council and separate lifetime two-term limits for the office of mayor. Measure R and Measure Q were put on the ballot as competing measures.

A "no" vote opposed this city council-referred measure to establish lifetime three-term term limits for the office of the city council and separate lifetime two-term limits for the office of mayor, thereby leaving no term limits in place for elected city officials.

• Solana Beach, California, Measure S, Permit and Regulate Marijuana Businesses and Cultivation Initiative (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Revised Monterey Park 2040 Land Use Element Proposition to change land uses, building sizes and building heights.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Revised Monterey Park 2040 Land Use Element Proposition to change land uses, building sizes and building heights.

• South Bay Union School District, California, Measure X, Term Limits (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to allow the city council to pass an ordinance to allow 16-year-olds to vote for the office of the school board director.

A "no" vote opposes this measure establishing term limits for school board members of three terms.

• Valley Center Fire Protection District, California, Measure AA, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the district to levy an annual parcel tax of $0.06 per residential sq. ft., $0.18 per commercial and industrial sq. ft., and $49 per unimproved parcel, thereby generating an estimated $820,000 per year.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the district to levy an annual parcel tax of $0.06 per residential sq. ft., $0.18 per commercial and industrial sq. ft., and $49 per unimproved parcel, thereby generating an estimated $820,000 per year.

San Francisco County

See also: San Francisco County, California ballot measures

• Caltrain, California, Proposition RR, Rail Service Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.125% for 30 years generating an estimated $100 million per year for the Caltrain rail service, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in San Francisco from 8.5% to 8.625%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.125% generating an estimated $100 million per year for 30 years with funds dedicated to the Caltrain rail service, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in San Francisco at 8.5%.

• San Francisco, California, Proposition A, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the city to issue up to $487.5 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund permanent investments in transitional supportive housing facilities, shelters, and/or facilities that serve individuals experiencing homelessness, mental health challenges, or substance use, improve the safety and quality of parks, and improve the safety and condition of streets and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $14 per $100,000 in assessed value

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the city to issue up to $487.5 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund permanent investments in transitional supportive housing facilities, shelters, and/or facilities that serve individuals experiencing homelessness, mental health challenges, or substance use, improve the safety and quality of parks, and improve the safety and condition of streets and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $14 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• San Francisco, California, Proposition B, Public Works Commission and Sanitation and Streets Commission Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to create a Public Works Commission and a Sanitation and Streets Commission.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to establish a Public Works Commission and a Sanitation and Streets Commission.

• San Francisco, California, Proposition C, Member of City Body Eligibility Requirements Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to remove the requirement that individuals serving on city boards, commissions, and advisory bodies must be U.S. citizens and registered voters, while still requiring those individuals to be of legal voting age and San Francisco residents.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to remove the requirement that individuals serving on city boards, commissions, and advisory bodies must be U.S. citizens and registered voters, while still requiring those individuals to be of legal voting age and San Francisco residents.

• San Francisco, California, Proposition D, Sheriff's Department Oversight Board Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported amending the city and county charter to create the Sheriff's Department Oversight Board authorized to report findings and recommendations on department operations to the board of supervisors and to create the Sheriff's Department Office of Inspector General to investigate non-criminal misconduct by employees and in-custody deaths and recommend policy changes to the sheriff and board of supervisors.

A "no" vote opposed amending the city and county charter to create the Sheriff's Department Oversight Board and the Sheriff's Department Office of Inspector General.

• San Francisco, California, Proposition E, Police Staffing Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to remove the mandatory police staffing level, to require the police department to submit a report and recommendation for police staffing levels every two years to the police commission, and to require the commission to consider the report when approving the department's budget.

A "no" vote opposed this measure to amend the city charter to remove the mandatory police staffing level, thereby maintaining the requirement enacted by Proposition D (1994) of having at least 1,971 full-time police officers on staff.

• San Francisco, California, Proposition F, Business and Tax Regulations Code Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code of the city charter to eliminate the payroll expense tax, increase the business registration fee by $230-460, increase gross receipts tax rates to 0.015-1.040%, increase the administrative office tax rate to 1.61%, increase gross receipts tax rates by 0.175-0.690% and the administrative office tax rate by 1.5% pending certain lawsuits, place a 1-3.5% tax on gross receipts from commercial leases, as well as other business tax changes. This also supported maintaining baseline funding for the Municipal Transportation Fund, the Park, Recreation, and Open Space Fund, the Children and Youth Fund, the Library Preservation Fund, the Housing Trust Fund, the Public Education Enrichment Fund, the Dignity Fund, and the Street Tree Maintenance Fund, regardless of changes to business taxes being voted on at the November 3, 2020 election.

A “no” vote opposed amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code of the city charter to eliminate the payroll expense tax, increase the business registration fee by $230-460, increase gross receipts tax rates to 0.015-1.040%, increase the administrative office tax rate to 1.61%, increase gross receipts tax rates by 0.175-0.690% and the administrative office tax rate by 1.5% pending certain lawsuits, place a 1-3.5% tax on gross receipts from commercial leases, as well as other business tax changes. This also opposed maintaining baseline funding for the Municipal Transportation Fund, the Park, Recreation, and Open Space Fund, the Children and Youth Fund, the Library Preservation Fund, the Housing Trust Fund, the Public Education Enrichment Fund, the Dignity Fund, and the Street Tree Maintenance Fund, regardless of changes to business taxes being voted on at the November 3, 2020 election.

• San Francisco, California, Proposition G, Local Election Voting Age Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to lower the voting age to 16 for local candidates and ballot measures.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to lower the voting age to 16 for local candidates and ballot measures.

• San Francisco, California, Proposition H, Planning Code Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an ordinance to amend the city's planning code to simplify business procedures including increasing permissible uses, eliminating public notification processes, and requiring an expedited process for permits.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an ordinance to amend the city's planning code to simplify business procedures including increasing permissible uses, eliminating public notification processes, and requiring an expedited process for permits.

• San Francisco, California, Proposition I, Real Estate Transfer Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase to the transfer tax rate on real estate sales and leases of 35 years or more, to 5.5% on transactions of $10 million to $25 million and to 6% on transactions of $25 million or more, generating an estimated $196 million per year.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase to the transfer tax rate on real estate sales and leases of 35 years or more, to 5.5% on transactions of $10 million to $25 million and to 6% on transactions of $25 million or more, generating an estimated $196 million per year.

• San Francisco, California, Proposition K, Affordable Housing Authorization (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the city to develop or acquire up to 10,000 units of low-income rental housing.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the city to develop or acquire up to 10,000 units of low-income rental housing.

• San Francisco, California, Proposition L, Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional tax of 0.1%-0.6% of gross receipts or 0.4%-2.4% of payroll expenses for businesses in which the highest-paid managerial employee earns more than 100 times the median compensation of employees, generating an estimated $60-140 million per year.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional tax of 0.1%-0.6% of gross receipts or 0.4%-2.4% of payroll expenses for businesses in which the highest-paid managerial employee earns more than 100 times the median compensation of employees, generating an estimated $60-140 million per year.

• San Francisco Unified School District, California, Proposition J, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $288 per parcel, adjusted for inflation each year, to replace an existing parcel tax, thereby generating an estimated $48.1 million per year for 17 years.

A "no" vote opposed authorizing for 17 years an annual parcel tax of $288 per parcel, thereby allowing the existing $320 parcel tax to remain in effect.

San Joaquin County

See also: San Joaquin County, California ballot measures

• Banta School District, California, Measure V, Consolidation and District Creation (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported consolidating a portion of Tracy Unified School District and the Banta Elementary School District into a new district, the Banta School District.

A "no" vote opposed consolidating a portion of Tracy Unified School District and the Banta Elementary School District into a new district, the Banta School District.

• Manteca, California, Measure Z, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $12 million, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Manteca from 8.25% to 9.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $12 million, thereby leaving the total sales tax rate in Manteca at 8.25%.

• Manteca Unified School District, California, Measure A, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the district to issue up to $260 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $45 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed this measure authorizing the district to issue up to $260 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $45 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• San Joaquin County, Measure X, Early Childhood and Youth Services Marijuana Tax (November 2020): ✖

A "yes" vote supported authorizing the county to impose a marijuana tax of between 3.5% and 8% of gross receipts and $2.00 per sq. ft. of cultivation in order raise an estimated $250,000 per year to fund childhood and youth services.

A "no" vote opposed this measure authorizing the county to impose a marijuana tax of between 3.5% and 8% of gross receipts and $2.00 per sq. ft. of cultivation in order raise an estimated $250,000 per year to fund childhood and youth services.

• Tracy, California, Measure W, Marijuana Tax (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported authorizing marijuana business taxes at the following rates: 6% of gross receipts for retail businesses, 4% of gross receipts for other businesses, and $12 per sq. ft. for canopy cultivation, thereby generate an estimated $350,000-$700,000 per year in revenue for the city's general fund.

A "no" vote opposed this measure authorizing marijuana business taxes at the following rates: 6% of gross receipts for retail businesses, 4% of gross receipts for other businesses, and $12 per sq. ft. for canopy cultivation.

• Tracy, California, Measure Y, Growth Management Exemption for Workforce Housing Affordable Based on Median Income (November 2020): ✖

A "yes" vote supported an ordinance providing an exemption to the city's growth management restrictions for certain development projects in areas near the Valleylink light rail system (TOD areas) that make 10% of residential units affordable for households (a) to rent that have between 80% and 100% of the city's median income (between $70,712 and $88,390 for a household of 3.5) or (b) to purchase that have between 100% and 120% of the city's median income (between $88,390 and $106,068 for a household of 3.5).

A "no" vote opposed this measure providing an exemption to the city's growth management restrictions for certain development projects in areas near the Valleylink light rail system (TOD areas) that are affordable based on the city's median income, thereby leaving the city's existing limits on development projects in place.

• Woodbridge Rural County Fire Protection District, California, Measure U, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $0.08 per square foot of building space and $45 per unimproved parcel, thereby generating an estimated $1.2 million per year for the district.

A “no” vote opposed this measure authorizing an annual parcel tax of $0.08 per square foot of building space and $45 per unimproved parcel.

San Luis Obispo County

See also: San Luis Obispo County, California ballot measures

• Atascadero, California, Measure D-20, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported authorizing an increase in the local hotel tax from 7.75% to 8.75% to fund emergency services, infrastructure, and recreational and community services.

A "no" vote opposed authorizing a 1% increase in the local hotel tax, thereby maintaining the existing rate of 7.75%.

• Atascadero Unified School District, California, Measure C-20, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Atascadero Unified School District to issue up to $40 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund expansion of facilities for engineering, technology, construction, agriculture, and robotics, improvements to security, safety and emergency preparedness, and construction of additional facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $43 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Atascadero Unified School District to issue up to $40 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund expansion of facilities for engineering, technology, construction, agriculture, and robotics, improvements to security, safety and emergency preparedness, and construction of additional facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $43 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Grover Beach, California, Measure F-20, Additional Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1%, which increased the combined local sales tax rate to 1.5% and the total sales tax rate to 8.75%.

A "no" vote opposed authorizing an additional 1% local sales tax, thereby maintaining the existing total tax rate of 7.75%.

• Morro Bay, California, Measure E-20, Additional Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported authorizing an additional local sales tax of 1% bringing the combined local sales tax rate to 1.5% and the total sales tax rate in Morro Bay to 8.75%.

A "no" vote opposed authorizing an additional local sales tax of 1%, thereby maintaining the local sales tax rate of 0.5% and the total sales tax rate in Morro Bay at 7.75%.

• Paso Robles, California, Measure J-20, Sales Tax Increase (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1%, which increased the combined local sales tax rate to 1.5% and the total sales tax rate to 8.75%.

A "no" vote opposed authorizing an additional 1% local sales tax, thereby maintaining the existing total tax rate of 7.75%.

• Pismo Beach, California, Measure B-20, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported authorizing an increase in the local hotel tax from 10% to 11% to fund emergency services, local water and beaches, and senior services.

A "no" vote opposed authorizing a 1% increase in the local hotel tax, thereby maintaining the existing rate of 10%.

• San Luis Obispo, California, Measure G-20, Sales Tax Increase (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% and renewing the existing 0.5% local sales tax, which increased the combined local sales tax rate to 1.5% and the total sales tax rate to 8.75%.

A "no" vote opposed authorizing an additional 1% local sales tax and maintaining the existing 0.5% local sales tax rate, thereby allowing the existing 0.5% rate to expire in 2023.

• Shandon Joint Unified School District, California, Measure H, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Shandon Joint Unified School District to issue up to $4 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund septic system repairs, improvements to student safety and technology, and additional classrooms and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $40 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposes authorizing the Shandon Joint Unified School District to issue up to $4 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund septic system repairs, improvements to student safety and technology, and additional classrooms and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $40 per $100,000 in assessed value.

San Mateo County

See also: San Mateo County, California ballot measures

• Caltrain, California, Proposition RR, Rail Service Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.125% for 30 years generating an estimated $100 million per year for the Caltrain rail service, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in San Francisco from 8.5% to 8.625%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.125% generating an estimated $100 million per year for 30 years with funds dedicated to the Caltrain rail service, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in San Francisco at 8.5%.

• Daly City, California, Measure Q, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% generating an estimated $6 million per year for city services for emergency response, local businesses, homelessness, seniors, natural disasters, and public health, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Daly City from 9.25% to 9.75%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% generating an estimated $6 million per year for city services for emergency response, local businesses, homelessness, seniors, natural disasters, and public health, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Daly City at 9.25%.

• East Palo Alto, California, Measure V, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a hotel tax increase from 12% to 13% on January 1, 2022 and to 14% on January 1, 2023, generating an estimated $195,000 the first year and $390,000 per year thereafter to fund affordable housing.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a hotel tax increase from 12% to 13% on January 1, 2022 and to 14% on January 1, 2023, generating an estimated $195,000 the first year and $390,000 per year thereafter to fund affordable housing.

• Half Moon Bay, California, Measure U, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a hotel tax increase from 12% to 14% on July 1, 2021 and to 15% on July 1, 2022, generating an estimated $1.5 million per year for city services including emergency response, disaster preparedness, support to local businesses, public health and safety.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a hotel tax increase from 12% to 14% on July 1, 2021 and to 15% on July 1, 2022, generating an estimated $1.5 million per year for city services including emergency response, disaster preparedness, support to local businesses, public health and safety.

• Jefferson Union High School District, California, Measure Z, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Jefferson Union High School District to issue up to $163 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to safety, security, emergency communication and construction of classrooms and facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $27 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Jefferson Union High School District to issue up to $163 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to safety, security, emergency communication and construction of classrooms and facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $27 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• San Bruno, California, Measure S, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a business license tax up to 10% on gross receipts generating no revenue until marijuana businesses are permitted within the city.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a business license tax up to 10% on gross receipts generating no revenue until marijuana businesses are permitted within the city.

• San Bruno, California, Measure X, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a hotel tax increase from 12% to 14% generating an estimated $370,000 per year for city services including traffic and parking, public safety, emergency response, disaster response and parks.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a hotel tax increase from 12% to 14% generating an estimated $370,000 per year for city services including traffic and parking, public safety, emergency response, disaster response and parks.

• San Mateo, California, Measure R, Building Regulations General Plan Amendment (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a ten year extension to policies limiting building heights and intensities and authorizing the city council to approve increases to those limits in designated areas.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a ten year extension to policies limiting building heights and intensities and authorizing the city council to approve increases to those limits in designated areas.

• San Mateo, California, Measure W, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a hotel tax increase to 14%, generating an estimated $1 million per year to fund city services including street repair, emergency services, traffic control, maintenance of parks and community facilities, and infrastructure.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a hotel tax increase to 14%, generating an estimated $1 million per year to fund city services including street repair, emergency services, traffic control, maintenance of parks and community facilities, and infrastructure.

• San Mateo, California, Measure Y, Building Regulations General Plan Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the general plan to maintain policies that limit building heights, residential densities, nonresidential building intensities, and housing requirements for residential projects for ten years.

A “no” vote opposed amending the general plan to maintain policies that limit building heights, residential densities, nonresidential building intensities, and housing requirements for residential projects for ten years.

• San Mateo-Foster City School District, California, Measure T, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the San Mateo-Foster City School District to issue up to $409 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund classroom upgrades, repair of bathrooms, roofs, plumbing, sewer, electrical systems, heating and cooling systems, upgrades to technology for distance learning, and health and safety features and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the San Mateo-Foster City School District to issue up to $409 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund classroom upgrades, repair of bathrooms, roofs, plumbing, sewer, electrical systems, heating and cooling systems, upgrades to technology for distance learning, and health and safety features and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

Santa Barbara County

See also: Santa Barbara County, California ballot measures

• Cold Spring School District, California, Measure L2020, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Cold Spring School District to issue up to $7.8 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to portable buildings, new classrooms for science, engineering, technology and art, repairs to buildings, roofs, sewer, water, plumbing, and restrooms, and improvements to safety and emergency preparedness and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $13 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Cold Spring School District to issue up to $7.8 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to portable buildings, new classrooms for science, engineering, technology and art, repairs to buildings, roofs, sewer, water, plumbing, and restrooms, and improvements to safety and emergency preparedness and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $13 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Goleta Union School District, California, Measure M2020, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Goleta Union School District to issue up to $80 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to labs and technology, repairs to classrooms, facilities, roofs and plumbing, and improvements such as handicap accessibility and increases to renewable energy and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $19.31 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Goleta Union School District to issue up to $80 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to labs and technology, repairs to classrooms, facilities, roofs and plumbing, and improvements such as handicap accessibility and increases to renewable energy and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $19.31 per $100,000 in assessed value.

Santa Clara County

See also: Santa Clara County, California ballot measures

• Caltrain, California, Proposition RR, Rail Service Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.125% for 30 years generating an estimated $100 million per year for the Caltrain rail service, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in San Francisco from 8.5% to 8.625%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.125% generating an estimated $100 million per year for 30 years with funds dedicated to the Caltrain rail service, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in San Francisco at 8.5%.

• Cambrian School District, California, Measure R, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the district to issue up to $88 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the district to issue up to $88 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Campbell Union High School District, California, Measure L, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported renewing an existing annual parcel tax of $85 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $4,814,485 per year.

A “no” vote opposed renewing an existing annual parcel tax of $85 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $4,814,485 per year.

• Evergreen Elementary School District, California, Measure P, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the district to issue up to $80 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the district to issue up to $80 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Franklin-McKinley School District, California, Measure K, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing for five years an annual parcel tax of $72 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $1.2 million per year.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing for five years an annual parcel tax of $72 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $1.2 million per year.

• Fremont Union High School District, California, Measure M, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported renewing for eight years an existing annual parcel tax of $98 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $5 million per year.

A “no” vote opposed renewing for eight years an existing annual parcel tax of $98 per parcel.

• Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District, California, Measure N, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing for seven years an annual parcel tax of $164 per parcel per year, thereby generating an estimated $328,000 per year for academic programs in the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing for seven years an annual parcel tax of $164 per parcel per year, thereby generating an estimated $328,000 per year for academic programs in the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District.

• Los Gatos, California, Measure A, Create Finance Commission Initiative (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported this citizen initiative to replace the city's Council Finance Committee and Sales Tax Oversight Committee with a finance commission to advise the city council on financial matters and consisting of five voting citizen members appointed, one each, by each city council member and two nonvoting council members including either the mayor or vice mayor.

A "no" vote opposed this citizen initiative to create a finance commission, thereby leaving in place the Council Finance Committee to advise the city council on investment policy, the annual financial report, unfunded pension benefits, and revenue source increases and the sales tax oversight committee.

• Los Gatos, California, Measure B, City Council Term Limits Initiative (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported this citizen initiative to establish term limits for town council members requiring a four-year break after serving two four-year terms.

A "no" vote opposed this citizen initiative establishing term limits for town council members, thereby leaving no term limits for council members in place.

• Milpitas, California, Measure F, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.25% for eight years generating an estimated $6.5 million per year for the city's general fund, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Milpitas from 9% to 9.25%.

A “no” vote opposed this measure authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.25% for eight years, thereby leaving the total sales tax rate in Milpitas at 9%.

• Mount Pleasant Elementary School District, California, Measure Q, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the district to issue up to $12 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the district to issue up to $12 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Mountain View, California, Measure C, Large Vehicle Parking Restrictions (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported prohibiting parking vehicles that are more than 22 feet in length, seven feet in height, or seven feet in width (such as RVs, boats, and large trucks) on streets 40 feet or less in width, with exceptions for certain wheelchair accessible vehicles with disabled placards.

A "no" vote opposed this measure prohibiting parking vehicles that are more than 22 feet in length, seven feet in height, or seven feet in width (such as RVs, boats, and large trucks) on streets 40 feet or less in width, with exceptions for certain wheelchair accessible vehicles with disabled placards.

• Palo Alto Unified School District, California, Measure O, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported renewing for six years an existing annual parcel tax of $836 per parcel, with 2% annual adjustments, thereby generating an estimated $16 million per year.

A “no” vote opposed renewing for six years an existing annual parcel tax of $836 per parcel, with 2% annual adjustments.

• San Jose, California, Measure G, Police Auditor Powers and Redistricting Procedures and Planning Commission Membership Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported amending the city's charter to make the following changes:

authorize the independent police auditor to review reports and records related to officer-involved shootings and uses of force that resulted in death or injury in order to make policy recommendations,
change the size of the city's planning commission from seven to 11, and
authorize the city council to establish redistricting timelines following the release of the census.

A "no" vote opposed amending the city's charter, thereby maintaining the following provisions:

the independent police auditor does not have access to reports and records related to officer-involved shootings and uses of force that resulted in death or injury in order to make policy recommendations;
the city's planning commission consists of seven members; and
the city council must pass the redistricting ordinance by October 31 of the year following the census.

• San Jose, California, Measure H, Card Room Tax Increase (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to do the following:

increase its card room gross revenue tax from 15% to 16.5%;
impose a tax on third party funding sources at 5%, 7.5%, or 10% depending on gross revenue;
allowing up to 30 more card tables in the city (a maximum of 128 or 64 per card room); and
thereby generate an estimated $15 million per year in general purpose revenue.

A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city increase its card room tax, impose a third party funding source tax, and increase the number of card tables allowed, thereby continuing to:

leaving its card room gross revenue tax from at 15%;
not taxing third party funding sources in addition; and
allowing a maximum of 98 card tables total or 49 per card room.

• San Jose-Evergreen Community College District, California, Measure I, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing for nine years an annual parcel tax of $18 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $4.5 million per year.

A “no” vote opposed this measure authorizing for nine years an annual parcel tax of $18 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $4.5 million per year.

• San Jose-Evergreen Community College District, California, Measure J, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the district to issue up to $858 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $17.5 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the district to issue up to $858 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $17.5 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Santa Clara, California, Measure E, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to levy an additional hotel tax of up to 4% generating up to $7 million per year in general fund revenue, thereby increasing the total hotel tax rate in the city from 9.5% to up to 13.5%.

A "no" vote opposed this measure authorizing the city to levy an additional hotel tax of up to 4%, thereby leaving the total hotel tax rate in the city at 9.5%.

• Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority, California, Measure T, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported renewing until ended by voters an existing annual parcel tax of $24 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $8 million per year.

A “no” vote opposed this measure renewing until ended by voters an existing annual parcel tax of $24 per parcel, thereby allowing the tax to expire.

• Santa Clara Valley Water District, California, Measure S, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported renewing until ended by voters an existing annual parcel tax of $0.006 per sq. ft., thereby generating an estimated $45.5 million per year for the district.

A “no” vote opposed renewing until ended by voters an existing annual parcel tax of $0.006 per sq. ft., thereby allowing the tax to expire.

Santa Cruz County

See also: Santa Cruz County, California ballot measures

• Aromas-San Juan Unified School District, California, Measure O, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to issue up to $30.5 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to safety and security, repairs to wiring, plumbing, and roofs, and classroom construction and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $50.07 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Aromas-San Juan Unified School District to issue up to $30.5 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to safety and security, repairs to wiring, plumbing, and roofs, and classroom construction and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $50.07 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District, California, Measure N, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing for seven years an annual parcel tax of $164 per parcel per year, thereby generating an estimated $328,000 per year for academic programs in the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing for seven years an annual parcel tax of $164 per parcel per year, thereby generating an estimated $328,000 per year for academic programs in the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District.

• Scotts Valley Unified School District, California, Measure A, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Scotts Valley Unified School District to issue up to $49 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to health, safety and ventilation and repair of roofs, plumbing, sewer and electrical systems and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $32 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Scotts Valley Unified School District to issue up to $49 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to health, safety and ventilation and repair of roofs, plumbing, sewer and electrical systems and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $32 per $100,000 in assessed value.

Shasta County

See also: Shasta County, California ballot measures

Sierra County

See also: Sierra County, California ballot measures

• Downieville Fire Protection District, California, Measure G, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $60 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $18,000 per year for fire and emergency services and raising the district's appropriations limit.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $60 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $18,000 per year for fire and emergency services and raising the district's appropriations limit.

• Sierra City Fire District, California, Measure H, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $60 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $28,000 per year for fire and emergency services and raising the district's appropriations limit.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $60 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $28,000 per year for fire and emergency services and raising the district's appropriations limit.

• Sierra County, California, Measure E, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a hotel tax increase from 10% to 12.5% to fund emergency services including medical, fire and rescue.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a hotel tax increase from 10% to 12.5% to fund emergency services including medical, fire and rescue.

Siskiyou County

See also: Siskiyou County, California ballot measures

• Dunsmuir, California, Measure H, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1.5% generating an estimated $200,000 per year for city purposes, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Dunsmuir from 7.75% to 9.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1.5% generating an estimated $200,000 per year for city purposes, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Dunsmuir at 7.75%.

• Greater McCloud Fire and Emergency Response Zone, California, Measure G, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $93.79 per improved parcel, $66.20 per first two unimproved parcels, $24.83 per third and fourth unimproved parcels, and $8.28 per fifth or more unimproved parcels, thereby generating an estimated $86,158.14 per year for fire and emergency services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $93.79 per improved parcel, $66.20 per first two unimproved parcels, $24.83 per third and fourth unimproved parcels, and $8.28 per fifth or more unimproved parcels, thereby generating an estimated $86,158.14 per year for fire and emergency services.

• Grenada Fire Protection District, California, Measure I, Appropriations Limit (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported maintaining the current appropriations limit of $50,000 for four years.

A “no” vote opposed maintaining the current appropriations limit of $50,000 for four years.

• Happy Camp Fire Protection District, California, Measure D, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $39 per improved parcel and $12 per unimproved parcel, thereby generating an estimated $19,434.62 per year for maintenance and operations within the Happy Camp Fire Protection District.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $39 per improved parcel and $12 per unimproved parcel, thereby generating an estimated $19,434.62 per year for maintenance and operations within the Happy Camp Fire Protection District.

• Lake Shastina Community Services District, California, Measure J, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a tax on marijuana retail, manufacturing, and distribution business of up to 6% and on cultivation marijuana businesses of up to 3.5% of gross receipts generating an estimated $1.9 million per year for general city services.

A “no” vote opposed this measure authorizing a tax on marijuana retail, manufacturing, and distribution business of up to 6% and on cultivation marijuana businesses of up to 3.5% of gross receipts generating an estimated $1.9 million per year for general city services.

• Mount Shasta, California, Measure L, Marijuana Business Regulations (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing regulations and licensing requirements for industrial marijuana businesses.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing regulations and licensing requirements for industrial marijuana businesses.

• Siskiyou Union High School District, California, Measure K, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Siskiyou Union High School District to issue up to $3 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to security, safety and technology, classroom repairs, and expansion of labs and educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $8 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Siskiyou Union High School District to issue up to $3 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to security, safety and technology, classroom repairs, and expansion of labs and educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $8 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• South Yreka Fire Protection District, California, Measure C, Appropriations Limit (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported increasing the South Yreka Fire Protection District's appropriations limit to $90,000 for four years.

A “no” vote opposed increasing the South Yreka Fire Protection District's appropriations limit to $90,000 for four years.

• Tulelake, California, Measure N, Public Safety Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $60 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $27,000 per year for public safety including law enforcement operations, personnel, equipment, training and supplies, dispatch, code enforcement and animal control.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $60 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $27,000 per year for public safety including law enforcement operations, personnel, equipment, training and supplies, dispatch, code enforcement and animal control.

• Tulelake, California, Measure O, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a hotel tax of 8% generating an estimated $2,000 - $10,000 per year for city services including infrastructure, promotion, community events and beautification.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a hotel tax of 8% generating an estimated $2,000 - $10,000 per year for city services including infrastructure, promotion, community events and beautification.

• Weed, California, Measure B, Marijuana Business Regulations (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported establishing regulations on marijuana businesses including requiring licenses, limiting licenses, and other regulations on operations and conduct of such businesses.

A “no” vote opposed establishing regulations on marijuana businesses including requiring licenses, limiting licenses, and other regulations on operations and conduct of such businesses.

• Weed, California, Measure M, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.25% generating an estimated $260,000 per year for municipal purposes including parks, law enforcement, fire services, maintenance of streets and cemeteries, and emergency funds, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Weed from 7.5% to 7.75%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.25% generating an estimated $260,000 per year for municipal purposes including parks, law enforcement, fire services, maintenance of streets and cemeteries, and emergency funds, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Weed at 7.5%.

• Yreka, California, Measure E, Appointed City Clerk Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported changing the position of city clerk to be an appointed position.

A “no” vote opposed changing the position of city clerk to be an appointed position.

Solano County

See also: Solano County, California ballot measures

• Benicia, California, Measure D, Marijuana Dispensaries Advisory Question (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported the opinion that new marijuana dispensaries should be permitted within the city. Measure D was put on the ballot as a nonbinding, advisory question with no ability to change local law.

A “no” vote opposed the opinion that new marijuana dispensaries should be permitted within the city. Measure D was put on the ballot as a nonbinding, advisory question with no ability to change local law.

• Dixon, California, Measure S, Water Rates Initiative (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported repealing the water rate changes that were established on January 22, 2019 and reinstating the water rates from January 1, 2019.

A “no” vote opposed repealing the water rate changes that were established on January 22, 2019, therefore maintaining the existing water rates.

• Dixon, California, Measure T, Elected City Clerk Ordinance (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported changing the position of city clerk from an appointed position to an elected position.

A “no” vote opposed changing the position of city clerk from an appointed position to an elected position.

• Fairfield, California, Measure C, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a marijuana business tax of 6% of gross receipts for retail businesses, 4% of gross receipts for other businesses, and $10 per square foot for cultivation generating an estimated $237,500 - $360,000 per year.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a marijuana business tax of 6% of gross receipts for retail businesses, 4% of gross receipts for other businesses, and $10 per square foot for cultivation generating an estimated $237,500 - $360,000 per year.

• Rio Vista, California, Measure O, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% for five years generating an estimated $1.149 million - $1.344 million per year for general services including law enforcement, fire services and parks, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Rio Vista from 8.125% to 8.875% beginning on April 1, 2022.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% for five years generating an estimated $1.149 million - $1.344 million per year for general services including law enforcement, fire services and parks, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Rio Vista at 8.125%.

• River Delta Unified School District, California, Measure J, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the River Delta Unified School District to issue up to $45.7 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to schools, technology, roofs, fire safety and drinking water, removal of asbestos and mold, and construction of educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the River Delta Unified School District to issue up to $45.7 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to schools, technology, roofs, fire safety and drinking water, removal of asbestos and mold, and construction of educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• River Delta Unified School District, California, Measure K, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the River Delta Unified School District to issue up to $14.6 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to schools, safety, technology, roofs, fire safety and drinking water, removal of asbestos and mold, and construction of educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to allow the city council to pass an ordinance to allow 16-year-olds to vote for the office of the school board director.

• Suisun City, California, Measure Q, Mayor and City Council Term Limits (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a four term limit for the offices of the mayor and city council members.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a four term limit for the offices of the mayor and city council members.

• Suisun City, California, Measure R, Appointed City Clerk Ordinance (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported changing the position of city clerk to be an appointed position.

A “no” vote opposed changing the position of city clerk to be an appointed position.

• Vacaville, California, Measure V, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a marijuana business tax of 6% of gross receipts for retail businesses, 4% of gross receipts for other businesses, and $10 per square foot for cultivation generating an estimated $400,000 - $600,000 to fund general services including law enforcement, fire services and roads.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a marijuana business tax of 6% of gross receipts for retail businesses, 4% of gross receipts for other businesses, and $10 per square foot for cultivation generating an estimated $400,000 - $600,000 to fund general services including law enforcement, fire services and roads.

• Vallejo, California, Measure G, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $12 million per year for city services including retention of jobs and businesses, fire services, emergency response, crime prevention, youth services, homelessness services, law enforcement training, transparency and accountability, and public safety and maintenance, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Vallejo from 8.375% to 9.125%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $12 million per year for city services including retention of jobs and businesses, fire services, emergency response, crime prevention, youth services, homelessness services, law enforcement training, transparency and accountability, and public safety and maintenance, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Vallejo from 8.375% to 9.125%.

• Winters Joint Unified School District, California, Measure W, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Winters Joint Unified School District to issue up to $19 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund roof repair, updates to classrooms, restrooms and facilities, and improvements to education quality and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $49 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Winters Joint Unified School District to issue up to $19 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund roof repair, updates to classrooms, restrooms and facilities, and improvements to education quality and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $49 per $100,000 in assessed value.

Sonoma County

See also: Sonoma County, California ballot measures

• Cloverdale, California, Measure R, Utility Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an extension to the 3% utility users tax generating an estimated $445,000 per year for city services including street repair, installation of power backup systems, natural disaster and health emergency preparedness, and youth programs.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an extension to the 3% utility users tax generating an estimated $445,000 per year for city services including street repair, installation of power backup systems, natural disaster and health emergency preparedness, and youth programs.

• Cotati, California, Measure S, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an extension of a 1% sales tax generating an estimated $2.2 million per year for city services including emergency response, public safety, domestic violence response, natural disaster preparedness, street repair and parks.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an extension of a 1% sales tax generating an estimated $2.2 million per year for city services including emergency response, public safety, domestic violence response, natural disaster preparedness, street repair and parks.

• Fort Ross School District, California, Measure M, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing for eight years an annual parcel tax of $48 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $34,000 per year for support of academic programs, library services and transportation services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing for eight years an annual parcel tax of $48 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $34,000 per year for support of academic programs, library services and transportation services.

• Healdsburg, California, Measure T, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an extension of a 0.5% sales tax generating an estimated $2.1 million per year for essential services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an extension of a 0.5% sales tax generating an estimated $2.1 million per year for essential services, thereby allowing the tax to expire in 2022.

• Kenwood Fire Protection District, California, Measure Z, Appropriations Limit (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase to the district's appropriations limit for four years.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase to the district's appropriations limit for four years.

• North Sonoma County Healthcare District, California, Measure BB, Hospital Sale Agreement (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the sale of Healdsburg District Hospital to NorCal HealthConnect, LLC to continue the provision of emergency, inpatient and outpatient services to local residents.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the sale of Healdsburg District Hospital to NorCal HealthConnect, LLC to continue the provision of emergency, inpatient and outpatient services to local residents.

• Petaluma, California, Measure U, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $13.5 million per year for essential services including natural disaster and health emergency preparedness, emergency response, fire services, law enforcement, street repair, public safety and local businesses thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Petaluma from 8.25% to 9.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $13.5 million per year for essential services including natural disaster and health emergency preparedness, emergency response, fire services, law enforcement, street repair, public safety and local businesses thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Petaluma at 8.25%.

• Petaluma Health Care District, California, Measure CC, Hospital Sale Agreement (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the sale of Petaluma Valley Hospital to NorCal HealthConnect, LLC for $52.6 million to continue provision of 24/7 walk-in emergency care for at least 20 years.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the sale of Petaluma Valley Hospital to NorCal HealthConnect, LLC for $52.6 million to continue provision of 24/7 walk-in emergency care for at least 20 years.

• Santa Rosa, California, Measure Q, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported extending a sales tax of 0.5% for ten years generating an estimated $18 million per year for city services including emergency response, disaster, wildfire and pandemic preparedness, park maintenance, street repair, and senior and youth programs.

A “no” vote opposed extending a sales tax of 0.5% for ten years generating an estimated $18 million per year for city services including emergency response, disaster, wildfire and pandemic preparedness, park maintenance, street repair, and senior and youth programs.

• Sebastopol Union School District, California, Measure N, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing for eight years an annual parcel tax of $76 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $331,000 per year for academic programs including reading, writing, math, art, science and music and counseling services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing for eight years an annual parcel tax of $76 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $331,000 per year for academic programs including reading, writing, math, art, science and music and counseling services.

• Shoreline Unified School District, California, Measure L, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported renewing for eight years an existing annual parcel tax of $212 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $1 million per year for enhancing and maintaining education programs including science, technology, engineering, math, art, music, reading and writing programs.

A “no” vote opposed renewing for eight years an existing annual parcel tax of $212 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $1 million per year for enhancing and maintaining education programs including science, technology, engineering, math, art, music, reading and writing programs.

• Sonoma, California, Measure V, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing for ten years an annual parcel tax of $68 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $1.94 million per year for wildfire prevention, clearing dry brush, protecting open space, park ranger patrols, and protecting water quality.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing for ten years an annual parcel tax of $68 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $1.94 million per year for wildfire prevention, clearing dry brush, protecting open space, park ranger patrols, and protecting water quality.

• Sonoma, California, Measure W, Urban Growth Boundary Ordinance (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported prohibiting parking vehicles that are more than 22 feet in length, seven feet in height, or seven feet in width (such as RVs, boats, and large trucks) on streets 40 feet or less in width, with exceptions for certain wheelchair accessible vehicles with disabled placards.

A "no" vote opposed this measure prohibiting parking vehicles that are more than 22 feet in length, seven feet in height, or seven feet in width (such as RVs, boats, and large trucks) on streets 40 feet or less in width, with exceptions for certain wheelchair accessible vehicles with disabled placards.

• Sonoma, California, Measure X, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the district to issue up to $12 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the district to issue up to $12 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Sonoma, California, Measure Y, Marijuana Cultivation Initiative (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing regulations and licensing requirements for industrial marijuana businesses.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing regulations and licensing requirements for industrial marijuana businesses.

• Sonoma County, California, Measure DD, Transportation Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing for 20 years an extension of a 0.25% sales tax generating an estimated $26 million per year for transportation including road repair, traffic reduction, safer biking and walking paths, local bus services, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, improvements to evacuation routes and enhanced services for seniors and students.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing for 20 years an extension of a 0.25% sales tax generating an estimated $26 million per year for transportation including road repair, traffic reduction, safer biking and walking paths, local bus services, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, improvements to evacuation routes and enhanced services for seniors and students.

• Sonoma County, California, Measure O, Mental Health, Addiction and Homeless Services Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.25% for ten years generating an estimated $25 million per year for mental health, addiction and homeless services, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Sonoma County from 8.25% to 8.5%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.25% for ten years generating an estimated $25 million per year for mental health, addiction and homeless services, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Sonoma County at 8.25%.

• Sonoma County, California, Measure P, Changes to Law Enforcement Review Board (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported replacing the ordinance that governs the Independent Office of Law Enforcement Review and Outreach (IOLERO) to make the following changes:

require the director of the IOLERO to be qualified as a Certified Practitioner of Oversight by the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement,
prohibit the director's removal unless approved by a four-fifths vote of the board of supervisors,
authorize access to all investigative evidence, contact witnesses, and subpoena records,
recommend disciplinary actions for officers subject to IOLERO investigations,
authorize the publication of body camera footage on the IOLERO website,
impose duties on the sheriff-coroner and require cooperation with the IOLERO,
require triennial performance audits of the IOLERO and set the office's budget at 1% of the total budget for the sheriff-coroner, and
make the board of supervisors the appointing power for the Community Advisory Council.

A "no" vote opposed repealing and replacing the ordinance that governs the Independent Office of Law Enforcement Review and Outreach (IOLERO), thereby maintaining its existing scope and powers.

• Timber Cove Fire Protection District, California, Measure AA, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing for 15 years an annual parcel tax of $185 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $92,500 per year for fire and rescue training, equipment and services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing for 15 years an annual parcel tax of $185 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $92,500 per year for fire and rescue training, equipment and services.

Stanislaus County

See also: Stanislaus County, California ballot measures

• Burbank-Paradise Fire Protection District, California, Measure Z, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $250 per residential unit, thereby generating an estimated $615,000 per year for fire protection and emergency response.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $250 per residential unit.

• Hughson, California, Measure V, Mayor Term Limits (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the term of mayor to be four years.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the term of mayor to be four years.

• Hughson Fire Protection District, California, Measure W, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing for 12 years an annual parcel tax of $39.75 per residential unit, thereby generating an estimated $167,000 per year for emergency equipment and vehicles and fire stations.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing for 12 years an annual parcel tax of $39.75 per residential unit, thereby generating an estimated $167,000 per year for emergency equipment and vehicles and fire stations.

• Newman Crows Landing Unified School District, California, Measure X, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Newman Crows Landing Unified School District to issue up to $25.82 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to vocational education classrooms, technology, security, safety and emergency preparedness and construction of classrooms and P.E. facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $48 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Newman Crows Landing Unified School District to issue up to $25.82 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to vocational education classrooms, technology, security, safety and emergency preparedness and construction of classrooms and P.E. facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $48 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Salida Union School District, California, Measure U, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Salida Union School District to issue up to $9.24 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to internet access, technology, emergency preparedness, fire systems, security, safety and roof repair and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $20 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Salida Union School District to issue up to $9.24 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to internet access, technology, emergency preparedness, fire systems, security, safety and roof repair and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $20 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Stanislaus Union School District, California, Measure Y, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue up to $21.4 million in bonds.

A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue up to $21.4 million in bonds.

• Turlock, California, Measure A, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $11 million per year for general services including emergency response, public safety, gang and drug prevention programs, fire station restoration, addressing homelessness, street repair and small businesses, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Turlock from 7.875% to 8.625%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.75% generating an estimated $11 million per year for general services including emergency response, public safety, gang and drug prevention programs, fire station restoration, addressing homelessness, street repair and small businesses, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Turlock at 7.875%.

• Waterford, California, Measure S, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a marijuana business tax of 1.5 cents per $1 of gross receipts.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a marijuana business tax of 1.5 cents per $1 of gross receipts.

• Waterford Unified School District, California, Measure T, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Waterford Unified School District to issue up to $5.35 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund renovations to classrooms, improvements to security, technology and emergency preparedness and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Waterford Unified School District to issue up to $5.35 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund renovations to classrooms, improvements to security, technology and emergency preparedness and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

Sutter County

See also: Sutter County, California ballot measures

• Woodland Joint Unified School District, California, Measure Y, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Woodland Joint Unified School District to issue up to $44.205 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund expansion of vocational education facilities, improvements to technology, repair of classrooms, schools, roofs, HVAC, wiring and plumbing and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $24 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Woodland Joint Unified School District to issue up to $44.205 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund expansion of vocational education facilities, improvements to technology, repair of classrooms, schools, roofs, HVAC, wiring and plumbing and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $24 per $100,000 in assessed value.

Tehama County

See also: Tehama County, California ballot measures

Trinity County

See also: Trinity County, California ballot measures

• Trinity County, California, Measure G, Marijuana Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a tax on marijuana cultivation at a rate of $15.44 per pound for flowers, $4.59 per pound for leaves, $2.16 per pound for fresh plants, and 2.5% of gross receipts for those with a marijuana retail license, maintaining a maximum tax rate of 25% for the first 100 pounds, 50% for 100-400 pounds, 75% for 400-1,000 pounds, and a tax at the full rate for more than 1,000 pounds.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a tax on marijuana cultivation at a rate of $15.44 per pound for flowers, $4.59 per pound for leaves, $2.16 per pound for fresh plants, and 2.5% of gross receipts for those with a marijuana retail license, maintaining a maximum tax rate of 25% for the first 100 pounds, 50% for 100-400 pounds, 75% for 400-1,000 pounds, and a tax at the full rate for more than 1,000 pounds

• Trinity County, California, Measure J, Volunteer Fire District Directors (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported changing the required number of directors for the board of the Coffee Creek Volunteer Fire District from nine to five.

A “no” vote opposed changing the required number of directors for the board of the Coffee Creek Volunteer Fire District, thereby maintaining the current requirement of nine directors.

• Trinity County, California, Measure K, Law Enforcement Sales Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% to fund local law enforcement with funds being distributed between the sheriff (67%), the district attorney (17%) and probation (16%), thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Trinity County from 7.25% to 7.75%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.5% to fund local law enforcement with funds being distributed between the sheriff (67%), the district attorney (17%) and probation (16%), thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Trinity County at 7.25%.

• Trinity Life Support Community Services District, California, Measure H, Special District Formation (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the formation of the Trinity Life Support Community Services District to provide 24/7 ambulance services. Measure H was placed on the ballot in connection with Measure I, a parcel tax to fund ambulance services in the district.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the formation of the Trinity Life Support Community Services District to provide 24/7 ambulance services.

• Trinity Life Support Community Services District, California, Measure I, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $45 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $258,000 per year for 24/7 ambulance services. Measure I was placed on the ballot in connection with Measure H, an ordinance to authorize the formation of the Trinity Life Support Community Services District.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $45 per parcel for 24/7 ambulance services.

Tulare County

See also: Tulare County, California ballot measures

• Exeter, California, Measure P, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $800,000 per year for general services including emergency response, public safety, crime prevention, street repair, local businesses, parks, youth and senior services, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Exeter from 7.75% to 8.75%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $800,000 per year for general services including emergency response, public safety, crime prevention, street repair, local businesses, parks, youth and senior services, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Exeter at 7.75%.

• Farmersville, California, Measure Q, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a 10% hotel tax generating an estimated $185,000 per hotel per year for general programs, services, economic development and improvements.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a 10% hotel tax generating an estimated $185,000 per hotel per year for general programs, services, economic development and improvements.

• Porterville, California, Measure R, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a tax on marijuana businesses of 10% of gross receipts or $25 per square foot to fund general services and public safety.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a tax on marijuana businesses of 10% of gross receipts or $25 per square foot to fund general services and public safety.

• Porterville, California, Measure S, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a hotel tax increase from 8% to 12% to fund general services including infrastructure, economic development, tourism promotion and the Mighty 190 campaign.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a hotel tax increase from 8% to 12% to fund general services including infrastructure, economic development, tourism promotion and the Mighty 190 campaign.

• Sunnyside Union Elementary School District, California, Measure O, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Sunnyside Union Elementary School District to issue up to $2 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund roof repairs and improvements to classrooms, restrooms, facilities, health, safety and handicap accessibility and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Sunnyside Union Elementary School District to issue up to $2 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund roof repairs and improvements to classrooms, restrooms, facilities, health, safety and handicap accessibility and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

Tuolumne County

See also: Tuolumne County, California ballot measures

• Sonora, California, Measure R, Appointed City Clerk (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the position of city clerk to be appointive.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the position of city clerk to be appointive.

• Sonora, California, Measure S, Appointed City Treasurer (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to establish the Harbor Commission as a designated appointive board and commission.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to establish the Harbor Commission as a designated appointive board and commission.

• Sonora, California, Measure T, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a hotel tax increase from 10% to 12% including for campgrounds and recreational-vehicle parks, generating an estimated $80,000 per year for general services including law enforcement, emergency response and road maintenance.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a hotel tax increase from 10% to 12% including for campgrounds and recreational-vehicle parks, generating an estimated $80,000 per year for general services including law enforcement, emergency response and road maintenance.

• Tuolumne County, California, Measure U, Hotel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a hotel tax increase from 10% to 12% generating an estimated $1.85 million per year for general services including fire services, road maintenance, law enforcement, animal control, libraries and parks.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a hotel tax increase from 10% to 12% generating an estimated $1.85 million per year for general services including fire services, road maintenance, law enforcement, animal control, libraries and parks.

Ventura County

See also: Ventura County, California ballot measures

• Ojai, California, Measure G, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a 3% tax on marijuana businesses generating an estimated $465,000 - $1.55 million per year for city services and permitting Ojai to increase the tax up to 10%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a 3% tax on marijuana businesses generating an estimated $465,000 - $1.55 million per year for city services and permitting Ojai to increase the tax up to 10%.

• Ojai Unified School District, California, Measure K, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Ojai Unified School District to issue up to $2.336 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to school quality, classrooms, restrooms, facilities, health, safety and security and upgrades to electrical systems, plumbing and sewer systems, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $27 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Ojai Unified School District to issue up to $2.336 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund improvements to school quality, classrooms, restrooms, facilities, health, safety and security and upgrades to electrical systems, plumbing and sewer systems, and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $27 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Oxnard, California, Measure E, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1.5% generating an estimated $40 million per year for general services including emergency response, disaster and public health preparedness, protection of fire stations, addressing homelessness, local businesses and public safety, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Oxnard from 7.75% to 9.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1.5% generating an estimated $40 million per year for general services including emergency response, disaster and public health preparedness, protection of fire stations, addressing homelessness, local businesses and public safety, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Oxnard at 7.75%.

• Oxnard, California, Measure F, Development Permit Ordinance (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an expedited development permit process for projects that meet specific requirements or are filed by specific types of professionals.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an expedited development permit process for projects that meet specific requirements or are filed by specific types of professionals.

• Oxnard, California, Measure L, City Governance Ordinance (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase of power to the city treasurer that cannot be reduced by the city council, a reduction of oversight authority of the city manager and finance director, and grants authority to the city treasurer over the city's budget, investment portfolio, finance department and annual municipal budget preparation.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase of power to the city treasurer that cannot be reduced by the city council, a reduction of oversight authority of the city manager and finance director, and grants authority to the city treasurer over the city's budget, investment portfolio, finance department and annual municipal budget preparation.

• Oxnard, California, Measure M, City Governance Ordinance (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported establishing meeting procedures for city legislative bodies to follow including use of prerecorded staff presentations, use of Robert's Rules of Order, purchase of guidebooks and training on meeting procedures, restriction of meeting times and alter rules for public comment.

A “no” vote opposed establishing meeting procedures for city legislative bodies to follow including use of prerecorded staff presentations, use of Robert's Rules of Order, purchase of guidebooks and training on meeting procedures, restriction of meeting times and alter rules for public comment.

• Oxnard, California, Measure N, Termination of Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing early termination of the sales tax established through Measure O in 2008 if street and alley work do not meet the Pavement Condition Index requirement.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing early termination of the sales tax established through Measure O in 2008 if street and alley work do not meet the Pavement Condition Index requirement, thereby allowing the tax to expire as scheduled on March 31, 2029 unless extended by the city council.

• San Buenaventura, California, Measure I, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a tax on marijuana businesses of 8% of gross receipts for retail marijuana businesses, 4% for other marijuana businesses and $10 per square foot for cultivation.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a tax on marijuana businesses of 8% of gross receipts for retail marijuana businesses, 4% for other marijuana businesses and $10 per square foot for cultivation.

• San Buenaventura, California, Measure J, Public Works Charter Amendment (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported amending the city charter to create flexibility in methods used for completing public works projects.

A “no” vote opposed amending the city charter to create flexibility in methods used for completing public works projects.

• Ventura County, California, Measure O, Marijuana Permit Ordinance (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing marijuana cultivation and distribution with limitations of 500 acres for cultivation of general marijuana and 100 acres for indoor nurseries, permits for sales between distributors, and a tax of 4% of gross receipts on general cultivation and 1% of gross receipts on nursery cultivation.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing marijuana cultivation and distribution with limitations of 500 acres for cultivation of general marijuana and 100 acres for indoor nurseries, permits for sales between distributors, and a tax of 4% of gross receipts on general cultivation and 1% of gross receipts on nursery cultivation.

• Ventura Unified School District, California, Measure H, Parcel Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported renewing for four years an existing annual parcel tax of $59 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $2.2 million per year for improvements to academic programs and technology, retention of qualified teachers, and maintenance of career training programs and small class sizes.

A “no” vote opposed renewing for four years an existing annual parcel tax of $59 per parcel for improvements to academic programs and technology, retention of qualified teachers, and maintenance of career training programs and small class sizes.

Yolo County

See also: Yolo County, California ballot measures

• Davis, California, Measure B, Land Use Amendment (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported changing the established land use designations for the Davis Innovation and Sustainability Campus and Mace Triangle properties to include innovation center, housing and retail.

A “no” vote opposed changing the established land use designations for the Davis Innovation and Sustainability Campus and Mace Triangle properties to include innovation center, housing and retail.

• Davis, California, Measure D, Land Use Ordinance Extension (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an extension to the Citizens' Right to Vote on Future Use of Open Space and Agricultural Lands Ordinance to December 31, 2030.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an extension to the Citizens' Right to Vote on Future Use of Open Space and Agricultural Lands Ordinance, thereby allowing the ordinance to expire on December 31, 2020.

• Esparto Unified School District, California, Measure X, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✖

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Esparto Unified School District to issue up to $19.9 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to classrooms and labs, improvements to safety, security and access for students with disabilities, and replacement of heating, cooling and plumbing systems and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Esparto Unified School District to issue up to $19.9 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to classrooms and labs, improvements to safety, security and access for students with disabilities, and replacement of heating, cooling and plumbing systems and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• River Delta Unified School District, California, Measure J, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the River Delta Unified School District to issue up to $45.7 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to schools, technology, roofs, fire safety and drinking water, removal of asbestos and mold, and construction of educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the River Delta Unified School District to issue up to $45.7 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to schools, technology, roofs, fire safety and drinking water, removal of asbestos and mold, and construction of educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• River Delta Unified School District, California, Measure K, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the River Delta Unified School District to issue up to $14.6 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to schools, safety, technology, roofs, fire safety and drinking water, removal of asbestos and mold, and construction of educational facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to allow the city council to pass an ordinance to allow 16-year-olds to vote for the office of the school board director.

• Washington Unified School District, California, Measure Z, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Washington Unified School District to issue up to $150 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to classrooms, internet access, academic, safety and disabled accessibility standards, roofs, plumbing and electrical systems and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Washington Unified School District to issue up to $150 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund upgrades to classrooms, internet access, academic, safety and disabled accessibility standards, roofs, plumbing and electrical systems and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $60 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Winters, California, Measure A, Urban Growth Boundary (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported establishing an Urban Growth Boundary to limit development within said boundary and develop a planning process for areas outside of city limits but within the city's jurisdiction.

A “no” vote opposed establishing an Urban Growth Boundary to limit development within said boundary and develop a planning process for areas outside of city limits but within the city's jurisdiction.

• Winters Joint Unified School District, California, Measure W, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Winters Joint Unified School District to issue up to $19 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund roof repair, updates to classrooms, restrooms and facilities, and improvements to education quality and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $49 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Winters Joint Unified School District to issue up to $19 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund roof repair, updates to classrooms, restrooms and facilities, and improvements to education quality and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $49 per $100,000 in assessed value.

• Woodland, California, Measure R, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an extension to the current 0.25% sales tax for ten years generating an estimated $2.8 million per year for city services, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Woodland at 8%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an extension to the current 0.25% sales tax for ten years generating an estimated $2.8 million per year for city services, thereby allowing the current tax to expire on September 30, 2022.

• Woodland, California, Measure S, Funds Allocation Advisory Question (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported the opinion that 25% of tax revenue collected from taxes established by the November 2020 ballot should be allocated to the Woodland Public Library to fund programs, maintenance and expansion of hours. Measure S was put on the ballot as a nonbinding, advisory question with no ability to change the law.

A “no” vote opposed the opinion that 25% of tax revenue collected from taxes established by the November 2020 ballot should be allocated to the Woodland Public Library to fund programs, maintenance and expansion of hours. Measure S was put on the ballot as a nonbinding, advisory question with no ability to change the law.

• Woodland, California, Measure T, Funds Allocation Advisory Question (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported the opinion that 55% of tax revenue collected from taxes established by the November 2020 ballot should be reallocated to fund youth and teen programs and recreation facilities. Measure T was put on the ballot as a nonbinding, advisory question with no ability to change local law.

A “no” vote opposed the opinion that 55% of tax revenue collected from taxes established by the November 2020 ballot should be reallocated to fund youth and teen programs and recreation facilities. Measure T was put on the ballot as a nonbinding, advisory question with no ability to change local law.

• Woodland, California, Measure U, Funds Allocation Advisory Question (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported the opinion that 15% of tax revenue collected from taxes established by the November 2020 ballot should be reallocated to fund public safety, crime prevention and community-building programs. Measure U was put on the ballot as a nonbinding, advisory question with no ability to change local law.

A “no” vote opposed the opinion that 15% of tax revenue collected from taxes established by the November 2020 ballot should be reallocated to fund public safety, crime prevention and community-building programs. Measure U was put on the ballot as a nonbinding, advisory question with no ability to change local law.

• Woodland, California, Measure V, Funds Allocation Advisory Question (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported the opinion that 5% of tax revenue collected from taxes established by the November 2020 ballot should be reallocated to a utility ratepayer assistance program for low-income families and seniors. Measure V was put on the ballot as a nonbinding, advisory question with no ability to change local law.

A “no” vote opposed the opinion that 5% of tax revenue collected from taxes established by the November 2020 ballot should be reallocated to a utility ratepayer assistance program for low-income families and seniors. Measure V was put on the ballot as a nonbinding, advisory question with no ability to change local law.

• Woodland Joint Unified School District, California, Measure Y, Bond Issue (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the Woodland Joint Unified School District to issue up to $44.205 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund expansion of vocational education facilities, improvements to technology, repair of classrooms, schools, roofs, HVAC, wiring and plumbing and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $24 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the Woodland Joint Unified School District to issue up to $44.205 million in bonds with bond revenue going to fund expansion of vocational education facilities, improvements to technology, repair of classrooms, schools, roofs, HVAC, wiring and plumbing and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $24 per $100,000 in assessed value.

Yuba County

See also: Yuba County, California ballot measures

• Marysville, California, Measure N, Marijuana Business Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing a tax on marijuana businesses of 6% of gross receipts for retail, 4% of gross receipts for other marijuana businesses, and $10 per square foot for cultivation, generating an estimated $300,000 - $470,000 per year for municipal services including law enforcement, fire services, roads and recreation.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing a tax on marijuana businesses of 6% of gross receipts for retail, 4% of gross receipts for other marijuana businesses, and $10 per square foot for cultivation, generating an estimated $300,000 - $470,000 per year for municipal services including law enforcement, fire services, roads and recreation.

• Wheatland, California, Measure O, Sales Tax (November 2020): ✔

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an extension to the current 0.5% sales tax for ten years generating an estimated $330,000 per year for essential services including disaster preparedness, emergency response, law enforcement, fire services, road repair and parks, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Wheatland at 7.75%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an extension to the current 0.5% sales tax for ten years generating an estimated $330,000 per year for essential services including disaster preparedness, emergency response, law enforcement, fire services, road repair and parks, thereby allowing the current 0.5% sales tax to expire on March 31, 2021.

	v • e State of California Sacramento (capital)
Elections	What's on my ballot? \| Elections in 2025 \| How to vote \| How to run for office \| Ballot measures
Government	Who represents me? \| U.S. President \| U.S. Congress \| Federal courts \| State executives \| State legislature \| State and local courts \| Counties \| Cities \| School districts \| Public policy

November 3, 2020 ballot measures in California

Statewide ballot measures

Local ballot measures

Alameda County

Alpine County

Amador County

Butte County

Calaveras County

Colusa County

Contra Costa County

Del Norte County

El Dorado County

Fresno County

Glenn County

Humboldt County

Imperial County

Inyo County

Kern County

Kings County

Lake County

Lassen County

Los Angeles County

Madera County

Marin County

Mariposa County

Mendocino County

Merced County

Modoc County

Mono County

Monterey County

Napa County

Nevada County

Orange County

Placer County

Plumas County

Riverside County

Sacramento County

San Benito County

San Bernardino County

San Diego County

San Francisco County

San Joaquin County

San Luis Obispo County

San Mateo County

Santa Barbara County

Santa Clara County

Santa Cruz County

Shasta County

Sierra County

Siskiyou County

Solano County

Sonoma County

Stanislaus County

Sutter County

Tehama County

Trinity County

Tulare County

Tuolumne County

Ventura County

Yolo County

Yuba County

See also

Information about voting

2025 Elections

2026 Elections

2024 Election analysis

Trending

Public Policy

Information for candidates

Get Engaged

Services

Additional analysis

SITE NAVIGATION