Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

State supreme court retention election results, 1990-present

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Methods of judicial selection
Judicialselectionlogo.png
Election methods
Partisan election
Nonpartisan election
Michigan method
Retention election
Assisted appointment
Assisted appointment
Bar-controlled commission
Governor-controlled commission
Hybrid commission
Direct appointment
Court appointment
Gubernatorial appointment
Legislative election
Municipal government selection


Thirty-eight states, require state supreme court justices to run for re-election including 20 states that use retention elections.

Retention elections are not an initial selection method. Instead, they are used in combination with another initial selection method. Retention elections are most frequently used with assisted appointment selection methods, though certain states with partisan or nonpartisan elections also use retention elections for subsequent terms. The majority required for retention is 50% in every state except Illinois, where the requirement is 60%.

Since 1990, justices have won retention 98% of the time. As of November 2025, Pennsylvania was the most recent state to hold retention elections. All three justices won retention with over 64% of the vote. The most recent defeat happened in Oklahoma, where Justice Yvonne Kauger lost retention in 2024.

This page examines retention elections dating back to 1990 in each state that holds them. It shows how many justices won retention, how turnout has changed from 1990 to the present, and the average percentage a justice wins retention by, with comparisons from state to state.

HIGHLIGHTS
  • Only nine justices have lost retention elections. Iowa voted out three justices, the most of any state.
  • Justices in Maryland had the highest average “Yes” vote rate (84.9%). Justices in Alaska had the lowest average (61.6%).
  • The year with the highest average percentage received by justices was in 2004 (74.3%). The lowest percentage received overall was in 2005 (51.5%), while the even year with the lowest average percentage received was 1994 (66.3%).
  • To learn more about state supreme court elections, click here. To learn more about judicial elections in all 50 states, click here.

    States that use retention elections

    The map below highlights selection methods in state supreme courts across the country, in those states that have retention as a valid selection method.


    Retention election results analysis, 1990-present

    The following section features tables and maps comparing retention vote metrics across states that hold these elections.

    The following map shows the average percentage a justice received in each state.



    The following chart shows the average percentage of votes a justice received in each state, as well as the average percentage of "yes" votes received across all states.

    Retention elections by state, 1990-present

    Click on the following tabs to see the results of retention elections in each state since 1990. A bolded name and result means the justice was not retained. At the bottom of each chart is the number of elections in that period, the number of justices, the partisan count of justices in applicable states, and the average % of victory for a justice in each state.

    Alaska Supreme Court retention results, 1990-2024
    Year Justice Votes received Total Votes Percentage
    1990 Warren Matthews 110,036 168,933 65.14%
    1994 Allen Compton 119,089 185,246 64.29%
    1998 Robert Eastaugh 127,794 196,825 64.93%
    2000 Alexander Bryner 138,749 226,096 61.37%
    2000 Dana Fabe 130,620 228,803 57.09%
    2000 Warren Matthews 134,657 221,463 60.80%
    2002 Walter Carpeneti 130,566 195,683 66.72%
    2008 Robert Eastaugh 172,440 271,384 63.54%
    2010 Dana Fabe 126,885 233,409 54.36%
    2012 Daniel Winfree 165,777 255,330 64.93%
    2014 Craig Stowers 146,829 233,363 62.92%
    2016 Joel Bolger 157,225 271,665 57.87%
    2016 Peter J. Maassen 154,304 268,509 57.47%
    2020 Susan Carney 200,598 318,258 63.03%
    2024 Dario Borghesan 159,319 262,860 60.61%
    2024 Jennifer S. Henderson 156,819 260,738 60.14%
    16 elections 13 justices     Average %: 61.58%

    See also

    Select your state from the dropdown menu or map below to navigate to relevant judicial selection.

    http://ballotpedia.org/Judicial_selection_in_STATE

    Footnotes