Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Kathleen M. O'Malley

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 07:41, 10 August 2024 by Kirsten Corrao (contribs) (Add PersonCategories widget; remove some hard-coded categories)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Kathleen M. O'Malley
Image of Kathleen M. O'Malley

Nonpartisan

Prior offices
United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Predecessor: John Potter

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Successor: Leonard Stark
Predecessor: Alvin Schall

Education

Bachelor's

Kenyon College, 1979

Law

Case Western Reserve University School of Law, 1982

Personal
Birthplace
Drexel Hill, Pa.

Kathleen M. O'Malley was a federal judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. She joined the court in 2010 after a nomination from President Barack Obama (D). O'Malley retired on March 11, 2022.[1][2][3]

Biography

Early life and education

Born in Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania, O'Malley graduated from Kenyon College with her bachelor's degree in 1979 and from Case Western Reserve University School of Law with her J.D. in 1982.[4]

Professional career

  • 1993-1994: Chief of staff and first assistant
  • 1991-1993: Chief counsel

Judicial career

Federal Circuit Court of Appeals

Nomination Tracker
Fedbadgesmall.png
Nominee Information
Name: Kathleen M. O'Malley
Court: Federal Circuit
Progress
Confirmed 287 days after nomination.
ApprovedANominated: March 10, 2010
ApprovedAABA Rating: Unanimously Well Qualified
Questionnaire: Questionnaire
ApprovedAHearing: July 28, 2010
QFRs: QFRs (Hover over QFRs to read more)
ApprovedAReported: September 23, 2010 
ApprovedAConfirmed: December 22, 2010
ApprovedAVote: Voice vote

O'Malley was nominated by President Obama on March 10, 2010, to fill a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated by Alvin Schall.[5] Obama said of the nomination, "Kate O’Malley will... bring an unwavering commitment to fairness and judicial integrity to the federal bench."[6]

The Federal Circuit Bar Association supported O'Malley's nomination to the Federal Circuit.[7] The American Bar Association rated O'Malley Unanimously Well Qualified for the nomination.[8]

O'Malley's hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee was on July 28, 2010. On September 23, 2010, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted unanimously to report O'Malley's nomination to the United States Senate for a vote. O'Malley was confirmed by the Senate on December 22, 2010.[9][10][11][12] She received her commission on December 27, 2010.[4]

Northern District of Ohio

O'Malley was nominated to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio by President Bill Clinton on September 20, 1994, to a seat vacated by John Potter. The American Bar Association rated O'Malley Substantial Majority Well Qualified, Minority Qualified for the nomination.[13] Hearings on O'Malley's nomination were held before the Senate Judiciary Committee on October 6, 1994, and her nomination was reported by then-U.S. Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.) the same day. O'Malley was confirmed on a voice vote of the U.S. Senate on October 7, 1994, and she received her commission on October 12, 1994. O'Malley resigned from the district court on December 27, 2010, upon her elevation to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. O'Malley's seat on the Northern District of Ohio was abolished under provisions of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010.[4][14][15]

Noteworthy cases

Federal Circuit raises standard to remove federal employees (2021)

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on March 11, 2021, set a new bar for firing federal agency employees in the case Santos v. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).[16][17]

The court found that NASA failed to provide justification for placing its employee, Fernando Santos, on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP). An agency generally issues a PIP as a signal to a poor-performing employee before initiating disciplinary action.[16][17]

The three-judge panel (Judges Kathleen M. O'Malley, William Bryson, and Todd Hughes) ruled that federal law requires agencies to justify the issuance of a PIP when a fired employee challenges a PIP-based removal. Prior to the court’s decision, agencies had not been required to justify the use of a PIP.[16][17]

“Allowing a PIP to serve as the pre-removal notice required by Section 4303 is not the same as allowing the mere fact of a PIP to create a presumption that the pre-PIP conduct was actually unacceptable,” wrote Judge O’Malley in the opinion. “Thus, we hold that, once an agency chooses to impose a post-PIP termination, it must prove by substantial evidence that the employee’s unacceptable performance ‘continued’—i.e., it was unacceptable before the PIP and remained so during the PIP.”[16][17]

The judges remanded the case to the Merit Systems Protection Board for further proceedings.[16][17]

SCOTUS upholds Federal Circuit over interpretation of federal trademark law (2017)

See also: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Matal v. Tam)

On April 3, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of an en banc panel of the Federal Circuit. Judge Kathleen O'Malley issued a concurring opinion in the case.

Simon Shiao Tam, the founder of a rock band called THE SLANTS, attempted to register the band's name with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) for trademark protection. The PTO refused, citing a provision under the Lanham Act, a federal trademark law, that prohibits extending trademark protection for anyone registering scandalous, immoral, or disparaging marks. The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the PTO's claim, holding that the provision of the Lanham Act in question, 15 U.S.C. §1052(a), was unconstitutional.

In a concurring opinion, Judge Kathleen O'Malley stated not only that §1052(a) violated the First Amendment, but that §1052(a) "was also unconstitutionally vague, rendering it unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution."[18]

Writing for a seven-justice majority, Justice Samuel Alito affirmed the circuit court's decision. In his opinion for the court, Justice Alito acknowledged Judge O'Malley's opinion and noted "the admitted vagueness of the disparagement test and the huge volume of applications have produced a haphazard record of enforcement."[19]

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. U.S. Courts, "Future Judicial Vacancies," accessed July 28, 2021
  2. Law360, "BREAKING: Judge O'Malley To Retire, Giving Biden 2nd Fed. Circ. Seat," July 28, 2021
  3. Bloomberg Law, "Federal Circuit Judge Kathleen O’Malley to Retire in March 2022," July 28, 2021
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Federal Judicial Center, "Biographical directory of federal judges," accessed October 28, 2015
  5. The White House, "Presidential Nominations Sent to the Senate," March 10, 2010
  6. The White House, "President Obama Nominates Raymond Lohier, Jr. for the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, Judge Kate O'Malley for the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit," March 10, 2010
  7. Blog of Legal Times, "Federal Circuit Court Nominee Gains Support," March 11, 2010
  8. American Bar Association, "Ratings of Article III judicial nominees, 111th Congress," accessed January 7, 2017
  9. U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, "Judicial Nomination Materials: 111th Congress," accessed September 24, 2015 (dead link)
  10. Legal Times, "Democrats Push Forward on Goodwin Liu, Other Judge Nominees," September 23, 2010
  11. Web.archive, "Results of Executive Business Meeting," September 23, 2010
  12. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named blt
  13. American Bar Association, "Ratings of Article III judicial nominees, 103rd Congress," accessed January 7, 2017
  14. United States Congress, "PN 1786 — Kathleen M. O'Malley — The Judiciary," accessed January 7, 2017
  15. United States Congress, "H.R.3288 - Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010," December 1, 2010
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 Government Executive, "In 'Landmark' Ruling, Court Raises Threshold for Firing Feds," March 19, 2021
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 JUSTIA, "Santos v. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, No. 19-2345 (Fed. Cir. 2021)," accessed April 12, 2021
  18. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, In re Simon Shiao Tam, December 22, 2015
  19. Supreme Court of the United States, Joseph Matal, Interim Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, v. Tam, June 19, 2017