Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Dabney Friedrich

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Dabney Friedrich
Image of Dabney Friedrich
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Tenure

2017 - Present

Years in position

7

Education

Bachelor's

Trinity University, 1988

Graduate

Oxford University, 1989

Law

Yale Law School, 1992

Personal
Birthplace
Pensacola, Fla.
Contact


Dabney Langhorne Friedrich is a judge on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. She was nominated to the court by President Donald Trump (R) on June 7, 2017, and confirmed by the U.S. Senate on November 27, 2017, by a vote of 97-3.[1][2] To see a full list of judges appointed by Donald Trump, click here.

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia is one of 94 U.S. District Courts. They are the general trial courts of the United States federal courts. To learn more about the court, click here.

Friedrich previously served as assistant U.S. attorney from 1995-2002. She also served as commissioner for the United States Sentencing Commission from 2006-2017.

Judicial nominations and appointments

United States District Court for the District of Columbia

See also: Federal judges nominated by Donald Trump

Friedrich was nominated to the court by President Donald Trump (R) on June 7, 2017. She was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on November 27, 2017, by a vote of 97-3.[1] She received commission on December 1, 2017.[3] To read more about the federal nomination process, click here.

Nomination Tracker
Fedbadgesmall.png
Nominee Information
Name: Dabney Langhorne Friedrich
Court: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Progress
Confirmed 173 days after nomination.
ApprovedANominated: June 7, 2017
ApprovedAABA Rating: Substantial Majority Well Qualified, Minority Qualified
Questionnaire: Questionnaire
ApprovedAHearing: July 25, 2017
QFRs: (Hover over QFRs to read more)
ApprovedAReported: September 14, 2017 
ApprovedAConfirmed: November 27, 2017
ApprovedAVote: 97-3

Confirmation vote

The U.S. Senate confirmed Friedrich on November 27, 2017, on a vote of 97-3.[4] To see a full breakdown of the vote on the official U.S. Senate website, click here.

Dabney Friedrich confirmation vote (November 27, 2017)
Party Yea Nay No vote
Electiondot.png Democratic 44 2 0
Ends.png Republican 52 0 0
Grey.png Independent 1 1 0
Total 97 3 0

Senate Judiciary Committee hearing

Friedrich had her hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on July 25, 2017. The committee voted to advance Friedrich's nomination to the full Senate on September 14, 2017.[5]

Nomination

Dabney was nominated to replace Judge Reggie Walton, who assumed senior status in 2015.

The American Bar Association unanimously rated Nalbandian well-qualified for the position.[6] To read more about ABA ratings, click here.

Education

Friedrich earned her bachelor's degree in economics from Trinity University in 1988 and her J.D. from Yale Law School in 1992. She obtained a diploma in legal studies from Oxford University in 1989.[2][7]

Professional career

  • 1998-2002: Eastern District of Virginia
  • 1995-1998: Southern District of California

Noteworthy cases

Alabama Association of Realtors v. United States Department of Health and Human Services (2021)

See also: Federal government responses to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, 2020-2021

On May 5, 2021, Friedrich issued an opinion in Alabama Association of Realtors v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, ruling that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention did not possess the legal authority to extend the existing nationwide eviction moratorium.[8]

“The pandemic has triggered difficult policy decisions that have had enormous real-world consequences. The nationwide eviction moratorium is one such decision. It is the role of the political branches, and not the courts, to assess the merits of policy measures designed to combat the spread of disease, even during a global pandemic. The question for the Court is a narrow one: Does the Public Health Service Act grant the CDC the legal authority to impose a nationwide eviction moratorium? It does not,” Friedrich wrote in her opinion.[8]

The eviction moratorium ordered by the CDC took effect on September 4, 2020, and was initially set to expire on December 31, 2020. In the Consolidated Appropriations Act, Congress extended the CDC’s order until January 13, 2021. The CDC extended the moratorium again through March 31, 2021. The CDC’s extension was set to expire on June 30, 2021.[9]

Immediately following Friedrich's ruling, the U.S. Justice Department appealed Friedrich's ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. On May 14, Friedrich agreed to a temporary stay on her earlier ruling, writing in her opinion that DHHS made a “sufficiently strong showing” that pausing the eviction moratorium would be detrimental to public health.[10]

On June 2, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled to leave Friedrich's stay in place.[11] President Joe Biden (D) announced on June 24 that the moratorium would be extended by one month and would expire on July 31, 2021. The U.S. Supreme Court voted 5-4 on June 29 to leave the moratorium in place until its expiration on July 31.[12]

About the court

District of Columbia
District of Columbia Circuit
Seal of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.png
Judgeships
Posts: 15
Judges: 15
Vacancies: 0
Judges
Chief: James E. Boasberg
Active judges:
Amir Ali, Loren AliKhan, James E. Boasberg, Tanya S. Chutkan, Jia Cobb, Rudolph Contreras, Christopher Reid Cooper, Dabney Friedrich, Timothy J. Kelly, Trevor McFadden, Amit Priyavadan Mehta, Randolph D. Moss, Carl Nichols, Ana C. Reyes, Sparkle Sooknanan

Senior judges:
John Deacon Bates, Rosemary Collyer, Paul Friedman, Joyce Hens Green, Thomas Hogan, Beryl A. Howell, Ellen Huvelle, Amy B. Jackson, Henry Kennedy, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, Royce Lamberth, Richard Leon, Richard Roberts, Barbara Rothstein, Emmet G. Sullivan, Reggie Walton


The United States District Court for the District of Columbia is one of 94 United States district courts. Cases dealing with the laws of the District of Columbia are heard by this court only under the same circumstances that would cause a case under state law to come before a federal court. Appeals from this court are heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

The court sits in the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse located on Constitution Avenue NW. The District has no local district attorney or equivalent, and so prosecutorial matters fall under the jurisdiction of the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia.

The District Court for the District of Columbia has original jurisdiction over cases filed in the District of Columbia. These cases can include civil and criminal matters that fall under federal law. The D.C. District Court hears federal cases within the District of Columbia. Its appellate court is the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

To read opinions published by this court, click here.

The federal nomination process

Federal judges are nominated by the president of the United States and confirmed by the Senate. There are multiple steps to the process:

  • The president nominates an individual for a judicial seat.
  • The nominee fills out a questionnaire and is reviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
  • The Senate Judiciary Committee holds a hearing with the nominee, questioning them about things like their judicial philosophy, past rulings or opinions, etc.
  • As part of this process, the committee sends a blue slip to senators from the home state in which the judicial nomination was received, allowing them to express their approval or disapproval of the nominee.
  • After the hearing, the Senate Judiciary Committee will vote to approve or return the nominee.
  • If approved, the nominee is voted on by the full Senate.
  • If the Committee votes to return the nominee to the president, the president has the opportunity to re-nominate the individual.
  • The Senate holds a vote on the candidate.
  • If the Senate confirms the nomination, the nominee receives a commission to serve a lifelong position as a federal judge.
  • If the Senate does not confirm the nomination, that nominee does not become a judge.


See also

External links

Footnotes

Political offices
Preceded by
-
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
2017-Present
Succeeded by
-


Washington, D.C.Washington, D.C. judicial newsJudicial selection in Washington, D.C.United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaUnited States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia CircuitDistrict of Columbia Court of AppealsSuperior Court of the District of ColumbiaDCTemplate.jpg