Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Impact of term limits on state legislative elections in 2018
State legislative term limits analysis | |
---|---|
2019 »
« 2016
| |
![]() |
Impact of term limits by year |
2018・2016・ 2014 2012・2011・2010 |
State senates |
Arizona・Arkansas・California Colorado・Florida・Maine Michigan・Missouri・Montana Nebraska・Nevada・Ohio Oklahoma・South Dakota |
State houses |
Arizona・Arkansas・California Colorado・ Florida・Maine Michigan・Missouri・Montana Nevada・Ohio Oklahoma・South Dakota |
State legislatures with term limits |
Term limits on the ballot |
2018 state legislative elections |
Of the 87 state legislative chambers that held elections in 2018, 24 of them—12 senate chambers and 12 house chambers—included incumbents who were unable to run for re-election due to term limits.[1] In the 24 chambers affected by term limits in 2018, 1,463 seats were up for election.[2] The Nevada Senate, Arkansas House, and Arkansas Senate are impacted by term limits, but no incumbents were term-limited in 2018. There are 99 chambers throughout the country.
In 29 legislative chambers across 15 states, state legislators are subject to term limits. In the United States, there are 1,972 state senate seats and 5,411 state house seats. Of the 1,972 senate seats, 562 seats (29 percent) are subject to term limits. Of the 5,411 house seats, 1,368 seats (25 percent) are subject to term limits.
- See also: State legislative elections, 2018
Term-limited legislators by state
The map below displays the 15 states that use term limits for state legislators. All 15 states held elections in 2018 except Louisiana. Click on a state below to see the total number of termed-out state legislators in 2018 as well as a breakdown of the totals for each legislative chamber.
States with the biggest term limit impacts
- The Michigan State Senate had the highest percentage of state senators term-limited in 2018. Of the 38 seats up for election, 26 Michigan senators, or 68 percent of the chamber, was term-limited in 2018.
- Missouri had the highest percentage of state representatives term-limited in 2018. Of the 163 seats up for election, 44 Missouri representatives, or 27 percent of the chamber, was term-limited in 2018.
States with the smallest term limit impacts
- The Arkansas State Senate and the Nevada State Senate were tied with the lowest impact by term limits in the 2018 elections. Both chambers had zero state senators term-limited in 2018.
- The Arkansas House of Representatives had zero state representatives term-limited in 2018. The second-lowest number of term-limited representatives was in California. The California State Assembly had only one state representative term-limited out of the 80 seats up for election in 2018.
Democratic and Republican term-limited incumbents
Term limits can often have an impact on the competitiveness of a state legislative election because term limits create open seats. Open seats are believed to be more electorally competitive than seats in which an incumbent is running for re-election because incumbents tend to win re-election. A 2015 study by Ballotpedia found that in state legislative elections between 1972 and 2014, the incumbency win rate never fell below 90 percent, with the exception of 1974 when 88 percent of incumbents won re-election.
In total, 263 state legislators—86 Democratic and 177 Republican—were term-limited in 2018 and were associated with either the Democratic or Republican parties. There were four states where term limits had the potential to have an outsized impact: Arizona, Colorado, Maine, and Michigan. The number of open seats created by term limits in these states in 2018 created opportunities for either party to gain or lose enough seats to reshape partisan control of one or both legislative chambers in the state. Read below to find out how each senate and house chamber in these four states were affected by term limits in the 2018 elections.
Senate
A total of 90 state senators—28 Democratic and 62 Republican—were term-limited in 2018 and were associated with either the Democratic or Republican parties. Going into the 2018 elections, the Democratic Party was the majority party in one of the 12 term-limited state senates with elections in 2018. The Republican Party was the majority in 10 of the 12 state senates with elections in 2018.[5] Nebraska's state Senate is term-limited and officially nonpartisan.
Democrats: One state senate—Colorado—had more Democrats term-limited than Republicans.
- Colorado: Out of the 17 seats up for election in the Colorado State Senate in 2018, seven seats—four Democratic and three Republican—were affected by term limits. This represented 41.2 percent of the seats up for election in 2018. As of July 2017, Republican held a 18-17 majority in the Senate.
Republicans: Eight state senates—California, Arizona, Florida, Maine, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, and Ohio—had more Republicans term-limited than Democrats. As of July 2017, every chamber was held by a Republican majority except the California State Senate.
- Arizona: Of the 30 seats up for election in 2018, six seats—four Republican and two Democratic—were affected by term limits. This represented 20.0 percent of the seats up for election in 2018. As of July 2017, Republicans held a 17-13 majority in the Senate.
- Maine: Of the 35 seats up for election in 2018, eight seats—seven Republican and one Democratic—were affected by term limits. This represented 22.9 percent of the seats up for election in 2018. As of July 2017, Republicans held a 18-17 majority in the Senate.
- Michigan: Of the 38 seats up for election in 2018, 26 seats—19 Republican and seven Democratic—were affected by term limits. This represented 68.4 percent of the seats up for election in 2018. As of July 2017, Republicans held a 27-11 majority in the Senate.
2018 term-limited state senate elections | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Majority party | ![]() term-limited |
![]() term-limited |
![]() term-limited |
Seats up in 2018 | % of seats |
Arizona | Republican | 2 | 4 | 0 | 30 | 20.0% |
Arkansas | Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0.0% |
California | Democratic | 2 | 4 | 0 | 20 | 30.0% |
Colorado | Republican | 4 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 41.2% |
Florida | Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 10.0% |
Maine | Republican | 1 | 7 | 0 | 35 | 22.9% |
Michigan | Republican | 7 | 19 | 0 | 38 | 68.4% |
Missouri | Republican | 1 | 8 | 0 | 17 | 52.9% |
Montana | Republican | 2 | 4 | 0 | 25 | 24.0% |
Nebraska | Nonpartisan[6] | 0 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 25.0% |
Nevada | Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% |
Ohio | Republican | 4 | 6 | 0 | 17 | 58.8% |
Oklahoma | Republican | 3 | 3 | 0 | 24 | 25.0% |
South Dakota | Republican | 2 | 2 | 0 | 35 | 11.4% |
Total | --- | 28 | 62 | 6 | 331 | 29.0% |
House
A total of 173 state representatives—58 Democratic and 115 Republican—were term-limited in 2018 and were associated with either the Democratic or Republican parties. Heading into the 2018 elections, the Democratic Party was the majority party in four of the 12 term-limited state houses with elections in 2018. The Republican Party held the majority in eight of the 12 term-limited state houses with elections in 2018.[7]
Democrats: Four state houses—California, Colorado, Nevada, and Michigan—had more Democrats term-limited than Republicans. As of July 2017, every chamber was held by a Democratic majority except the Michigan House.
- Colorado: Of the 65 seats up for election in 2018, five Democratic seats, were affected by term limits. This represented 7.7 percent of the seats up for election in 2018. As of July 2017, Democrats held a 37-28 majority in the House.
- Michigan: Of the 110 seats up for election in 2018, 24 seats—13 Democratic and 11 Republican—were affected by term limits. This represented 21.8 percent of the seats up for election in 2018. As of July 2017, Republicans held a 63-47 majority in the House.
Republicans: Eight state houses—Arizona, Florida, Missouri, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Maine—had more Republicans term-limited than Democrats. As of July 2017, every chamber was held by a Republican majority except the Maine House.
- Arizona: Of the 60 seats up for election in 2018, eight seats—three Democratic and five Republican—were affected by term limits. This represented 13.3 percent of the seats up for election in 2018. As of July 2017, Republicans held a 35-25 majority in the House.
- Maine: Of the 151 seats up for election in 2018, 19 seats—five Democratic and 14 Republican—were affected by term limits. This represented 12.6 percent of the seats up for election in 2018. As of July 2017, Democrats held a 75-71 majority in the House with five independents. In addition, two independent seats were term-limited in 2018 and were both held previously by Democratic members before they switched their party affiliation in May 2017.
2018 term-limited state house elections | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Majority party | ![]() term-limited |
![]() term-limited |
![]() term-limited |
Seats up in 2018 | % of seats |
Arizona | Republican | 3 | 5 | 0 | 60 | 13.3% |
Arkansas | Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0% |
California | Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 1.3% |
Colorado | Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 7.7% |
Florida | Republican | 3 | 17 | 0 | 120 | 16.7% |
Maine | Democratic | 5 | 14 | 2 | 151 | 13.9% |
Michigan | Republican | 13 | 11 | 0 | 110 | 21.8% |
Missouri | Republican | 8 | 36 | 0 | 163 | 27% |
Montana | Republican | 5 | 9 | 0 | 100 | 14% |
Nevada | Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 2.4% |
Ohio | Republican | 8 | 12 | 0 | 99 | 20.2% |
Oklahoma | Republican | 5 | 7 | 0 | 101 | 11.9% |
South Dakota | Republican | 1 | 4 | 0 | 70 | 7.1% |
Total | --- | 58 | 115 | 2 | 1,261 | 13.9% |
State senators
There were 42 state senates that held general elections in November 2018. In 14 of these states, state senators were subject to term limits. Louisiana is the only state with state senate term limits that did not have a general election in 2018.
A total of 96 state senators were ineligible to run for re-election in 2018 because of term limit laws in their state. This represented 32 percent of the 302 seats up for election in the 12 term-limited state senates with elections in November 2018. The Nevada Senate and Arkansas Senate were up for election in 2018 and have term limits, but no senators were impacted by term limits in 2018. This included:
- 28 incumbent Democratic state senators
- 62 incumbent Republican state senators
- 6 nonpartisan state senators[8]
Some of the 96 state senators listed below may have resigned before their term ended. These officials were still counted in the total number of term-limited state senators in 2018.
1. Anastasia Pittman (D), Oklahoma State Senate, District 48. |
State representatives
There were 45 state houses that held general elections in November 2018. In 13 of these states, state house terms were subject to term limits. There are 15 states with state legislative term limits, but Louisiana did not hold a state house election in 2018 and Nebraska does not have a state house.
A total of 175 state representatives were ineligible to run for re-election in 2018 because of term limit laws in their state. This represented 15 percent of the 1,161 seats up for election in the 12 term-limited state houses with elections in November 2018. The Arkansas House was up for election in 2018 and has term limits, but no Arkansas representatives were impacted by term limits in 2018. This included:
- 58 incumbent Democratic state representatives
- 115 incumbent Republican state representatives
- 2 incumbent independent state representatives
Some of the 175 state representatives listed below may have resigned before their term ended. These officials were still counted in the total number of term-limited state representatives in 2018.
1. Adam Zemke (D), Michigan House of Representatives, District 55. |
Year-to-year comparisons
Overview
The table below displays the term-limited state legislators by year from 2010 to 2018. A total of 1,414 state legislators were term-limited from 2010 to 2018. During that same period of time, Republicans had 129 state legislators more than Democrats ineligible to run for office because of term limits.
- Democratic legislators term-limited: 618
- Republican legislators term-limited: 747
- Nonpartisan legislators term-limited: 49
2018
In 2018, 271 state legislators were termed out in state senates and state houses combined. A total of 96 state senators were term-limited in 2018. A total of 175 state representatives were termed out in 2018.
As a result of term limits in the 2018 state legislative elections, more Republican legislators were ineligible to run than Democratic legislators.
Incumbents
The following table detailed the number of state legislators unable to run for re-election in 2018 due to term limits broken down by party and chamber.
2018 term-limited incumbents | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | # of termed senators | # of termed representatives | Total |
Democratic | 28 | 58 | 86 |
Republican | 62 | 115 | 177 |
Minor Party/ Nonpartisan |
6[9] | 2 | 8 |
Total | 96 | 175 | 271 |
Chambers
The following table detailed the number of chambers where one party lost more incumbents due to term limits in 2018.
2018 chambers with the most losses | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | Senates with most losses | Houses with most losses | Total |
Democratic | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Republican | 8 | 8 | 16 |
Equal D/R losses (or nonpartisan chamber) | 5 | 1 | 6 |
Total | 14 | 13 | 27 |
Post-election results
Thirty-five of the 271 term-limited seats (12.9%) changed partisan control in the 2018 elections. Democrats had a net gain of 15 seats and Republicans had a net loss of 13 seats. Ten seats switched from Democrat to Republican, 23 seats flipped from Republican to Democrat, and two seats changed from independent to Democrat.[10]
Nebraska senators are officially nonpartisan. Five Nebraska senators term-limited in 2018 were affiliated with the Republican Party, while the other was affiliated with the Democratic Party. The Nebraska senators were counted as major party incumbents in the post-election results.
2018 post-election results | ||
---|---|---|
Party | Pre-election | Post-election |
Democratic | 87 | 102 |
Republican | 182 | 169 |
Minor Party/Nonpartisan | 2[11] | 0 |
Post-election partisan change of term-limited seats | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Party | Office | District | 2018 election winner | Party |
Joseph Schiavoni | Democratic | Ohio State Senate | District 33 | Michael Rulli | Republican |
Randy Bass | Democratic | Oklahoma State Senate | District 32 | John Montgomery | Republican |
Billie Sutton | Democratic | South Dakota State Senate | District 21 | Rocky Blare | Republican |
Anthony Cannella | Republican | California State Senate | District 12 | Anna Caballero | Democratic |
Brian Langley | Republican | Maine State Senate | District 7 | Louis Luchini | Democratic |
Michael Thibodeau | Republican | Maine State Senate | District 11 | Erin Herbig | Democratic |
Dave Hildenbrand | Republican | Michigan State Senate | District 29 | Winnie Brinks | Democratic |
James Marleau | Republican | Michigan State Senate | District 12 | Rosemary Bayer | Democratic |
Patrick Colbeck | Republican | Michigan State Senate | District 7 | Dayna Polehanki | Democratic |
Edward Buttrey | Republican | Montana State Senate | District 11 | Tom Jacobson | Democratic |
Bob Krist | Republican | Nebraska State Senate | District 10 | Wendy DeBoer | Democratic |
Kevin Bacon | Republican | Ohio State Senate | District 3 | Tina Maharath | Democratic |
J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Arizona House of Representatives | District 17 | Jennifer Pawlik | Democratic |
Wayne Parry | Republican | Maine House of Representatives | District 10 | Henry Ingwersen | Democratic |
Ralph Chapman | Independent | Maine House of Representatives | District 133 | Sarah Pebworth | Democratic |
Heather Sirocki | Republican | Maine House of Representatives | District 28 | Christopher Caiazzo | Democratic |
Denise Harlow | Independent | Maine House of Representatives | District 36 | Michael Brennan | Democratic |
Deborah Sanderson | Republican | Maine House of Representatives | District 88 | Chloe Maxmin | Democratic |
James Gillway | Republican | Maine House of Representatives | District 98 | Scott Cuddy | Democratic |
Michael McCready | Republican | Michigan House of Representatives | District 40 | Mari Manoogian | Democratic |
Martin Howrylak | Republican | Michigan House of Representatives | District 41 | Padma Kuppa | Democratic |
Gary Cross | Republican | Missouri House of Representatives | District 35 | Keri Ingle | Democratic |
Anne Gonzales | Republican | Ohio House of Representatives | District 19 | Mary Lightbody | Democratic |
Mike Duffey | Republican | Ohio House of Representatives | District 21 | Beth Liston | Democratic |
Kristina Daley Roegner | Republican | Ohio House of Representatives | District 37 | Casey Weinstein | Democratic |
Marlene Anielski | Republican | Ohio House of Representatives | District 6 | Phil Robinson | Democratic |
Weldon Watson | Republican | Oklahoma House of Representatives | District 79 | Melissa Provenzano | Democratic |
Randy McDaniel | Republican | Oklahoma House of Representatives | District 83 | Chelsey Branham | Democratic |
Scott Dianda | Democratic | Michigan House of Representatives | District 110 | Gregory Markkanen | Republican |
Pat Conway | Democratic | Missouri House of Representatives | District 10 | Bill Falkner | Republican |
Ben Harris | Democratic | Missouri House of Representatives | District 118 | Mike McGirl | Republican |
Ed Cannaday | Democratic | Oklahoma House of Representatives | District 15 | Randy Randleman | Republican |
Brian Renegar | Democratic | Oklahoma House of Representatives | District 17 | Jim Grego | Republican |
Spencer Hawley | Democratic | South Dakota House of Representatives | District 7 | Doug Post | Republican |
Chuck Hoskin | Democratic | Oklahoma House of Representatives | District 6 | Rusty Cornwell | Republican |
2017
No states with term limits held elections in 2017.
2016
In 2016, 253 state legislators were termed out in state senates and state houses combined. A total of 67 state senators were termed out in 2016. This represented 20.2 percent of the 331 total state senate seats up for election in the 13 term-limited state senates with elections in November 2016. A total of 186 state representatives were termed out. This represented 14.8 percent of the 1,261 total seats up for election in the 13 term-limited state houses with elections in November 2016.
Incumbents
The following table detailed the number of state legislators unable to run for re-election in 2016 due to term limits broken down by party and chamber.
2016 term-limited incumbents | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | # of termed senators | # of termed representatives | Total |
Democratic | 29 | 84 | 113 |
Republican | 26 | 102 | 128 |
Nonpartisan | 12 | 0 | 12 |
Total | 67 | 186 | 253 |
Chambers
The following table detailed the number of chambers where one party lost more incumbents due to term limits in 2016.
2016 chambers with the most losses | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | Senates with most losses | Houses with most losses | Total |
Democratic | 5 | 4 | 9 |
Republican | 5 | 8 | 13 |
Equal D/R losses (or nonpartisan chamber) | 3 | 1 | 4 |
Total | 13 | 13 | 26 |
2015
In 2015, 21 state legislators were ineligible to run for office because of term limits. Louisiana was the only state holding elections for a term-limited legislature in 2015.
Incumbents
The following table detailed the number of state legislators unable to run for re-election in 2015 due to term limits broken down by party and chamber.
2015 term-limited incumbents | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | # of termed senators | # of termed representatives | Total |
Democratic | 3 | 7 | 10 |
Republican | 4 | 7 | 11 |
Total | 7 | 14 | 21 |
2014
In 2014, a total of 223 state legislators were ineligible to run for office because of term limits. This was 14 percent of the 1,592 state legislative seats up for election in the 14 term-limited states with 2014 elections, and 3.7 percent of the 6,047 state legislative seats that were up for election altogether in 2014, including the non-term-limited states.
Incumbents
The following table detailed the number of state legislators unable to run for re-election in 2014 due to term limits broken down by party and chamber.
2014 term-limited incumbents | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | # of termed senators | # of termed representatives | Total |
Democratic | 22 | 73 | 95 |
Republican | 24 | 87 | 111 |
Nonpartisan | 17 | 0 | 17 |
Total | 63 | 160 | 223 |
Chambers
The following table detailed the number of chambers where one party lost more incumbents due to term limits in 2014.
2014 chambers with the most losses | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | Senates with most losses | Houses with most losses | Total |
Democratic | 6 | 4 | 10 |
Republican | 5 | 9 | 14 |
Equal D/R losses (or nonpartisan chamber) | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Total | 13 | 13 | 26 |
2013
No states with term limits held elections in 2013.
2012
In 2012, 255 state legislators were ineligible to run for office because of term limits. This was 14.3 percent of the 1,786 state legislative seats up for election in the 14 term-limited states with 2012 elections, and about 4 percent of the 6,015 state legislative seats that were up for election altogether in 2012, including the non-term-limited states.
In 2012, the last election cycle in which the same seats were up for election as 2016, Republicans had a marginal disadvantage in terms of the number incumbents lost to term limits as well as the number of chambers in which each party saw more members lost to term limits. However, Democrats lost one more state representative than Republicans did during this cycle.
Incumbents
The following table detailed the number of state legislators unable to run for re-election in 2012 due to term limits broken down by party and chamber.
2012 term-limited incumbents | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | # of termed senators | # of termed representatives | Total |
Democratic | 35 | 87 | 122 |
Republican | 40 | 85 | 125 |
Nonpartisan | 8 | 0 | 8 |
Total | 83 | 172 | 255 |
Chambers
The following table detailed the number of chambers where one party lost more incumbents due to term limits in 2012.
2012 chambers with the most losses | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | Senates with most losses | Houses with most losses | Total |
Democratic | 4 | 6 | 10 |
Republican | 5 | 7 | 12 |
Equal D/R losses (or nonpartisan chamber) | 4 | 0 | 4 |
Total | 13 | 13 | 26 |
2011
In 2011, 16 state legislators were ineligible to run for office because of term limits. Louisiana was the only state with term limits that held an election in 2011. The 16 state legislators termed-out in 2011 made up 10.4 percent of the total legislative seats up for election in Louisiana.
There were six state senators termed-out in 2011, making up 15.4 percent of the 39 state senate seats up for election in 2011. There were ten state representatives termed-out in 2011, making up 9.5 percent of the 105 state representative seats up for election in 2011.
Incumbents
The following table detailed the number of state legislators unable to run for re-election in 2011 due to term limits broken down by party and chamber.
2011 term-limited incumbents | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | # of termed senators | # of termed representatives | Total |
Democratic | 5 | 5 | 10 |
Republican | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Minor Party/ Nonpartisan |
0 | 1 | 1 |
Total | 6 | 10 | 16 |
2010
In 2010, 375 state legislators were ineligible to run for office because of term limits. This was 23 percent of the 1,600 state legislative seats up for election in the 14 term-limited states with 2010 elections.
The Republican Party had more members impacted by term limits in the 2010 state legislative elections than the Democratic Party, both in terms of how many individual incumbent legislators the Republican Party lost (190, versus 182 for the Democratic Party) and in terms of how many state legislative chambers lost more Republicans (13, versus 10 for the Democratic Party).
Incumbents
The following table detailed the number of state legislators unable to run for re-election in 2010 due to term limits broken down by party and chamber.
2010 term-limited incumbents | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | # of termed senators | # of termed representatives | Total |
Democratic | 54 | 128 | 182 |
Republican | 66 | 124 | 190 |
Nonpartisan | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Total | 121 | 254 | 375 |
Chambers
The following table detailed the number of chambers where one party lost more incumbents due to term limits in 2010.
2010 chambers with the most losses | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | Senates with most losses | Houses with most losses | Total |
Democratic | 4 | 6 | 10 |
Republican | 7 | 6 | 13 |
Equal D/R losses | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Total | 13 | 13 | 26 |
See also
- State legislatures with term limits
- State legislative elections, 2018
- Impact of term limits on state senate elections in 2018
- Impact of term limits on state representative elections in 2018
- Term limits on the ballot
- Term limits in the United States
Footnotes
- ↑ The Nevada Senate, Arkansas House, and Arkansas Senate were up for election in 2018 and have term limits, but no incumbents were term-limited in 2018.
- ↑ The Nevada Senate, Arkansas House, and Arkansas Senate are impacted by term limits, but no incumbents were term-limited in 2018. In the three chambers, a total of 129 seats were up for election in 2018. No legislators were unable to run in 2018 in those three chamber because of term limits.
- ↑ Ballotpedia confirmed through phone calls that at least seven California legislators were term-limited in 2018. The number of California legislators term-limited and the overall number of term-limited state legislators had a chance to change if Ballotpedia could confirm that more members were term-limited in 2018.
- ↑ Some of the 271 term-limited state legislators in 2018 may resign before their term ends. These legislators were still counted in the total number of term-limited legislators in 2018.
- ↑ The Nevada Senate and Arkansas Senate were up for election in 2018 and have term limits, but no senators were impacted by term limits in 2018.
- ↑ The Nebraska Senate is officially nonpartisan, but is held by the Republican Party. Five Republicans and one Democrat were term-limited in 2018. For more information on how Ballotpedia determined the partisan affiliation for Nebraska senators, please click here.
- ↑ The Arkansas House was up for election in 2018 and has term limits, but no Arkansas representatives were impacted by term limits in 2018.
- ↑ Nebraska senators are officially nonpartisan. Five Nebraska senators term-limited in 2018 were affliated with the Republican Party, while the other was affliated with the Democratic Party.
- ↑ Nebraska senators are officially nonpartisan. Five Nebraska senators term-limited in 2018 were affiliated with the Republican Party, while the other was affiliated with the Democratic Party.
- ↑ Google Spreadsheet, "Post-election term limits results, 2018," accessed April 25, 2019
- ↑ Nebraska senators are officially nonpartisan. Five Nebraska senators term-limited in 2018 were affiliated with the Republican Party, while the other was affiliated with the Democratic Party. The Nebraska senators were counted as major party incumbents in the post-election results.
|