State legislatures compared by extent of electoral competitiveness in 2012
This chart captures the ranking that a state legislature received on all three factors in this Election Competitiveness Index.
- The first column, "Primary Contests," ranks states against each other based on the percentage of incumbents who had a primary challenger.
- The second column, "Major Party Competition," ranks states against each other based on the percentage of major party candidates on the general election ballot with a major party challenger.
- The third column, "Open Seats," contrasts states based on the percentage of incumbents who ran for re-election in 2012.
- The fourth column is an arithmetical average of the state's scores on all three factors.
Note: California, Louisiana and Washington employ a top-two primary system. In top-two states, two primary candidates from any party can advance to the general election.[1]
States compared by electoral competitiveness
Note on ranking system: In each case, 1 represents the most electorally competitive environment, and 4 represents the least electorally competitive environment.
| State legislature | Primary contests | Open seats | Major party competition | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alaska | 16 | 25 | 22 | 16 |
| Arizona | 3 | 19 | 26 | 12 |
| Arkansas | 34 | 5 | 35 | 29 |
| California | 10 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| Colorado | 41 | 2 | 6 | 11 |
| Connecticut | 44 | 34 | 9 | 26 |
| Delaware | 28 | 31 | 37 | 40 |
| Florida | 15 | 10 | 30 | 21 |
| Georgia | 23 | 37 | 43 | 43 |
| Hawaii | 8 | 40 | 25 | 24 |
| Idaho | 1 | 7 | 16 | 4 |
| Illinois | 24 | 28 | 38 | 39 |
| Indiana | 31 | 30 | 28 | 31 |
| Iowa | 33 | 14 | 21 | 23 |
| Kansas | 4 | 11 | 19 | 7 |
| Kentucky | 25 | 38 | 34 | 38 |
| Maine | 43 | 3 | 2 | 9 |
| Massachusetts | 38 | 44 | 40 | 44 |
| Michigan | 7 | 21 | 1 | 2 |
| Minnesota | 40 | 16 | 3 | 13 |
| Missouri | 21 | 9 | 44 | 37 |
| Montana | 26 | 4 | 11 | 10 |
| Nebraska | 20 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Nevada | 14 | 8 | 12 | 6 |
| New Hampshire | 2 | 12 | 13 | 3 |
| New Mexico | 17 | 24 | 32 | 27 |
| New York | 27 | 39 | 23 | 28 |
| North Carolina | 18 | 13 | 27 | 17 |
| North Dakota | 37 | 17 | 8 | 15 |
| Ohio | 35 | 33 | 5 | 18 |
| Oklahoma | 29 | 26 | 33 | 36 |
| Oregon | 42 | 35 | 14 | 30 |
| Pennsylvania | 30 | 42 | 31 | 41 |
| Rhode Island | 13 | 41 | 36 | 34 |
| South Carolina | 22 | 32 | 41 | 42 |
| South Dakota | 19 | 15 | 24 | 14 |
| Tennessee | 9 | 29 | 29 | 25 |
| Texas | 12 | 23 | 39 | 33 |
| Utah | 6 | 27 | 10 | 8 |
| Vermont | 39 | 36 | 18 | 32 |
| Washington | 36 | 18 | 17 | 22 |
| West Virginia | 5 | 43 | 20 | 20 |
| Wisconsin | 32 | 20 | 15 | 19 |
| Wyoming | 11 | 22 | 42 | 35 |
See also
- State legislative elections, 2012
- Impact of term limits on state legislative elections in 2012
- 2012 state legislative elections analyzed using a Competitiveness Index
- Incumbents with no primary challenger in the 2012 state legislative elections
- Major party candidates with major party competition in the November 2012 state legislative elections
- Open seats in the 2012 state legislative elections
Footnotes
- ↑ On September 14, 2012, Joseph Perkins from CalWatchdog published an article arguing that the top-two system was not explicitly included in Ballotpedia's study. For more read here.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||