Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey

Illinois judicial elections, 2014: Difference between revisions

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
 
Line 356: Line 356:
{{Election news disclaimer}}
{{Election news disclaimer}}
{{Election news collapsed
{{Election news collapsed
|Title=A close call for Karmeier
|Title=High campaign costs in Illinois counties
|Date=November 13, 2014
|Text=
''See also: [[JP Election Brief: 2014 retention report]]''
Justice '''[[Lloyd Karmeier]]''' just barely earned enough votes for another term on the [[Illinois Supreme Court]], after facing a last minute campaign against his retention. Karmeier received 60.77 percent of the vote, slightly surpassing the 60 percent necessary for retention.<ref>[http://www.wsiltv.com/news/local/Justice-Karmeier-Retained-By-A-Slim-Margin--281644001.html ''WSIL News 3'', "Justice Karmeier Retained By A Slim Margin," November 5, 2014]</ref><ref name=results/>
 
After a relatively quiet campaign for Karmeier, a television ad opposing Karmeier was aired on October 18 by a political action group called "Campaign for 2016." The ad urged voters to remove Karmeier from the bench. Funded mainly by plaintiffs' attorneys, it accused him of ruling in favor of big business after receiving $4 million from pro-business interests during his 2004 campaign. The ad ended with the phrase "Our justice is not for sale." In response, the {{BP|Republican State Leadership Committee}}, a national PAC, began heavily campaigning in support of the justice. Their ad commended Karmeier for standing strong against "Chicago trial lawyers who have tried to buy the courts".<ref name=trib/> Additionally, the group began pouring money into Karmeier's campaign, having donated $950,000 by October 29.<ref name=trib>[http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-karmeier-supreme-court-1029-biz-20141027-story.html#page=1 ''Chicago Tribune'', "Outside money pouring into state Supreme Court race," October 29, 2014]</ref>
}}
{{Election news collapsed
|Title=Experts debate solutions to high campaign costs in Illinois counties
|Date=September 11, 2014
|Date=September 11, 2014
|Text=
|Text=
''See also: [[JP Election Brief: Party switches and the soaring cost of campaigning]]
''See also: [[JP Election Brief: Party switches and the soaring cost of campaigning]]


According to the ''Madison-St. Clair Record'', the price tag on a judicial campaign in [[Madison County, Illinois (Judicial)|Madison]] and [[Bond County, Illinois (Judicial)|Bond County]], [[Illinois]], can range from five to 20 times more than in comparable judicial circuits in the state. An analysis provided by the ''Madison-St. Clair Record'' of the campaign contributions of ten judges from the years 2004 through 2012 within the Fifth Circuit reveals that at least $1,032,039 was collectively raised in contributions. For comparison, an analysis of the campaign contributions raised by thirteen judges from the Sixth Circuit amounted to $44,665. The newspaper cited the figures as records obtained from the '''Illinois State Board of Elections'''.<ref name=mscr>[http://madisonrecord.com/issues/306-campaigns-elections/266244-winning-election-as-judge-in-madison-county-costs-a-lot-more-than-in-other-similar-courts ''The Madison-St. Clair Record'', "Winning election as judge in Madison County costs a lot more than in other similar courts," September 4, 2014]</ref>
According to the ''Madison-St. Clair Record'', the price of a judicial campaign in [[Madison County, Illinois (Judicial)|Madison]] and [[Bond County, Illinois (Judicial)|Bond County]], [[Illinois]], can range from five to 20 times more than in comparable judicial circuits in the state. An analysis provided by the ''Madison-St. Clair Record'' of the campaign contributions of ten judges from the years 2004 through 2012 within the Fifth Circuit reveals that at least $1,032,039 was collectively raised in contributions. For comparison, an analysis of the campaign contributions raised by thirteen judges from the Sixth Circuit amounted to $44,665. The newspaper cited the figures as records obtained from the '''Illinois State Board of Elections'''.<ref name=mscr>[http://madisonrecord.com/issues/306-campaigns-elections/266244-winning-election-as-judge-in-madison-county-costs-a-lot-more-than-in-other-similar-courts ''The Madison-St. Clair Record'', "Winning election as judge in Madison County costs a lot more than in other similar courts," September 4, 2014]</ref>
}}


One possible cause of the discrepancy in campaign fund size could be civil litigation. Madison County is, as of 2014, the main docket for asbestos related cases in the nation. Prior to the passing of the Class Action Fairness Act in 2005, the county served as a national hub for class action filings, ranking only below Los Angeles and Cook Counties in terms of case load.
There were critics of the way judicial campaign financing is conducted in Illinois. One debated issue revolved around the question of whether it should be allowed for a lawyer to contribute to a judge's campaign that the lawyer might end up practicing in front of. '''David Yepsen''', who serves as director of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at Southern Illinois University, took a critical view of this practice. He stated that this arrangement, "may be quite legal but they look bad." He pointed out that this kind of contribution served to undermine the trust citizens place in courts. Further, he argued that rising costs of all campaigns, not limited to judicial elections, prevents many candidates from participating.<ref name=mscr/>
'''Ed Murnane''', president of the Illinois Civil Justice League, offered three approaches that he believed would alleviate the problems arising from high campaign costs. First, he suggested changing the dates of judicial elections to be conducted along with municipal and school elections rather than in November. Another possible solution he advocated was a bi-partisan screening process involving both lawyers and non-lawyers. This would result in more thorough and expert reviews of judicial candidates on the ballot. Thirdly, he offered the idea to publicly finance judicial elections combined with an approval screening process. These potential solutions, Murnane believed, could be beneficial to the judicial selection system in the state. Under current campaign finance law, Murnane noted that there were no limits on campaign contributions.<ref name=mscr/>
Whether these proposed solutions would be effective or not will likely remain unknown. Murnane commented, "There are solutions but there is no willingness to correct this problem in Madison County and in several other counties in Illinois."<ref name=mscr/>
}}
{{Election news collapsed
{{Election news collapsed
|Title=Illinois reform group sends out candidate survey
|Title=Illinois reform group sends out candidate survey
Line 393: Line 373:




Why did this group send out the surveys? It’s simple: voter education. '''Ed Murnane''', president of ICJL, said that “[i]t’s very important people pay attention to judicial elections. . . .Illinois is one of the few states that elects judges on a purely partisan basis.”<ref name=1>[http://washingtonexaminer.com/ill.-legal-reform-group-launches-2014-judicial-candidate-survey/article/feed/2154961 ''Washington Examiner'', “Ill. reform group launches 2014 judicial candidate survey,” August 6, 2014]</ref>  
The group said they sent out out the surveys for the purpose of voter education. '''Ed Murnane''', president of ICJL, said that “[i]t’s very important people pay attention to judicial elections. . . .Illinois is one of the few states that elects judges on a purely partisan basis.”<ref name=1>[http://washingtonexaminer.com/ill.-legal-reform-group-launches-2014-judicial-candidate-survey/article/feed/2154961 ''Washington Examiner'', “Ill. reform group launches 2014 judicial candidate survey,” August 6, 2014]</ref>  




The group posted the results of the survey on its website, [http://www.illinoisjudges.net/ IllinoisJudges.net]. To motivate the Illinois judges and candidates to respond, anyone who failed or refused to participate in the survey were publicly recognized by the group.<ref name=2>[http://www.illinoisjudges.net/ ''IllinoisJudges.net, a Project of the Illinois Civil Justice League'', “ICJL Launches 2014 General Election Judicial Candidate Survey And Evaluations,” August 4, 2014]</ref> The group offered candidates and judges two opportunities to respond to the survey before bringing their failure to do so to the attention of voters.<ref name=3>[http://www.illinoisjudges.net/subhead_about.htm ''IllinoisJudges.Net, a Project of the Illinois Civil Justice League'', “About IllinoisJudges.net: the ICJL’s Objective,” accessed on August 6, 2014]</ref> In addition to providing voters with information before they headed to the polls, ICJL endorsed “merited” candidates and judges, as well.<ref name=2/>
The group posted the results of the survey on its website, [http://www.illinoisjudges.net/ IllinoisJudges.net]. Judges and candidates who did not respond to the survey were named by the group.<ref name=2>[http://www.illinoisjudges.net/ ''IllinoisJudges.net, a Project of the Illinois Civil Justice League'', “ICJL Launches 2014 General Election Judicial Candidate Survey And Evaluations,” August 4, 2014]</ref> ICJL also endorsed “merited” candidates and judges.<ref name=2/>




ICJL was concerned that voters were ignoring the Illinois justice system, particularly the elected judges who rarely get voted out of office. Murnane said that “[v]ery few people pay attention [to the judicial elections] and there is little to no competition. People don’t know who these judges are and what they stand for.”<ref name=1/> Murnane was also concerned about the ramifications of uneducated voters making selections at the polls. “Judges have a tremendous impact on the daily lives of the citizens of Illinois. They have the right to take children away from families and sentence people to years in prison. People ought to know who these judges are.”<ref name=1/>
ICJL expressed concern that voters were ignoring the Illinois justice system, particularly the elected judges who rarely get voted out of office. Murnane said that “[v]ery few people pay attention [to the judicial elections] and there is little to no competition. People don’t know who these judges are and what they stand for.”<ref name=1/> Murnane was also concerned about the ramifications of uneducated voters making selections at the polls. “Judges have a tremendous impact on the daily lives of the citizens of Illinois. They have the right to take children away from families and sentence people to years in prison. People ought to know who these judges are.”<ref name=1/>




Line 406: Line 386:


{{Election news collapsed
{{Election news collapsed
|Title=A low-key judicial primary
|Title=A judicial primary
|Date=March 20, 2014
|Date=March 20, 2014
|Text=
|Text=
''See also: [[JP Election Brief: Controversy around judicial election laws]]''
''See also: [[JP Election Brief: Controversy around judicial election laws]]''


On March 18, '''[[Illinois]]''' voters headed to the polls for the 2014 primaries. While there were some hot contests for gubernatorial and other legislative positions, the judicial primaries proved to be more subdued. Even with sunny weather, voter turnout was low even for a primary election. By 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, only 8 percent of eligible voters in Chicago had cast their ballots according to the '''Chicago Board of Election Commissioners'''.<ref name=cbs>[http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2014/03/18/in-chicago-voter-turnout-extremely-low/ ''CBS Chicago'', "Illinois Primary 2014: In Chicago, Voter Turnout Extremely Low," March 18, 2014]</ref> With polls in the city open from 6:00 a.m. through 7:00 p.m., the unofficial election results counted 220,649 voters, approximately 16 percent of those registered.<ref name=chicagoprimary>[http://www.chicagoelections.com/dm/general/SummaryReport.pdf ''Chicago Elections'', "General Primary Election - Unofficial Summary Report," March 18, 2014]</ref>
On March 18, '''[[Illinois]]''' voters headed to the polls for the 2014 primaries. By 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, 8 percent of eligible voters in Chicago had cast their ballots according to the '''Chicago Board of Election Commissioners'''.<ref name=cbs>[http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2014/03/18/in-chicago-voter-turnout-extremely-low/ ''CBS Chicago'', "Illinois Primary 2014: In Chicago, Voter Turnout Extremely Low," March 18, 2014]</ref> With polls in the city open from 6:00 a.m. through 7:00 p.m., the unofficial election results counted 220,649 voters, approximately 16 percent of those registered.<ref name=chicagoprimary>[http://www.chicagoelections.com/dm/general/SummaryReport.pdf ''Chicago Elections'', "General Primary Election - Unofficial Summary Report," March 18, 2014]</ref>




The last two elections saw statewide turnouts between 23 to 24 percent according to assistant executive director of the '''Illinois State Board of Elections''', '''Jim Tenuto'''.<ref name=reuters>[http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/18/us-usa-politics-illinois-primary-idUSBREA2H0IY20140318 ''Reuters'', "Illinois primary voters pick candidates for governor, Senate," March 18, 2014]</ref> Tenuto commented that there seemed to have been a lack of interest and excitement for the primary elections in the state. Election officials speculated that the absence of big [[Democratic]] contests may have been a cause of this lack of enthusiasm.<ref name=reuters/>
The last two elections saw statewide turnouts between 23 to 24 percent according to assistant executive director of the '''Illinois State Board of Elections''', '''Jim Tenuto'''.<ref name=reuters>[http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/18/us-usa-politics-illinois-primary-idUSBREA2H0IY20140318 ''Reuters'', "Illinois primary voters pick candidates for governor, Senate," March 18, 2014]</ref> Tenuto said that there seemed to have been a lack of interest and excitement for the primary elections in the state. Election officials suggested that the absence of big [[Democratic]] contests may have been a cause of this lack of enthusiasm.<ref name=reuters/>


<center>'''Winners of the [[Cook County, Illinois (Judicial)|Cook County]] Democratic primary election''' ''(unopposed candidates not included)'':<ref name=chicagoprimary/>
<center>'''Winners of the [[Cook County, Illinois (Judicial)|Cook County]] Democratic primary election''' ''(unopposed candidates not included)'':<ref name=chicagoprimary/>
Line 446: Line 426:
''See also: [[JP Election Brief: Close races, scandal and removal from the ballot]]''
''See also: [[JP Election Brief: Close races, scandal and removal from the ballot]]''


On March 18, the [[Illinois]] primary took center stage. Participating in this year's election were a number of interesting candidates.  
On March 18, '''[[Linda L. Mastandrea]]''', an attorney and gold medal paralympian, ran for the McDonald vacancy on the [[Illinois Cook Judicial Circuit Court|Cook County Circuit Court]] .<ref name=trib1>[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2014-03-09/opinion/ct-judges-endorsement-edit-0309-20140309_1_races-campaign-mailer-candidates ''The Chicago Tribune'', "For the appellate, circuit courts," March 9, 2014]</ref> Mastandrea received an endorsement from the ''Chicago Tribune'', which highlighted her advocacy work on behalf of disabled clients. The '''Council of Lawyers''' expressed concern that Mastandrea lacked experience in complex litigation. She was unopposed in the primary.




Running for the McDonald vacancy on the [[Illinois Cook Judicial Circuit Court|Cook County Circuit Court]], '''[[Linda L. Mastandrea]]''' is not just an attorney but also a gold medal paralympian in wheelchair track.<ref name=trib1>[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2014-03-09/opinion/ct-judges-endorsement-edit-0309-20140309_1_races-campaign-mailer-candidates ''The Chicago Tribune'', "For the appellate, circuit courts," March 9, 2014]</ref> Mastandrea, who won the ''Chicago Tribune'' endorsement, had been praised for her advocacy work on behalf of disabled clients. The '''Council of Lawyers''' expressed concern that Mastandrea lacked experience in complex litigation. She was unopposed in the primary.
In the race for the Jordan vacancy in the [[Illinois Cook Judicial Circuit Court Subcircuits|Cook County 12th Subcircuit]], the Tribune endorsed '''[[James Edward Hanlon, Jr.]]''', citing his experience with commercial litigation.<ref name=trib2>[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2014-03-09/opinion/ct-judges-endorsement-edit-0309-20140309_1_races-campaign-mailer-candidates ''The Chicago Tribune'', "For the appellate, circuit courts," March 09, 2014]</ref> Hanlon's opponents in the race, '''[[James L. Kaplan]]''' and '''[[Ralph Eugene Meczyk]]''', were disqualified from running.<ref name=trib2/><ref>[http://ralphmeczykforjudge.org/biography/ ''Ralph E. Meczyk'', "About," accessed March 13, 2014]</ref>




The race for the Jordan vacancy in the [[Illinois Cook Judicial Circuit Court Subcircuits|Cook County 12th Subcircuit]] proved to be a colorful one. The Tribune endorsed '''[[James Edward Hanlon, Jr.]]''', citing his well-rounded skills with commercial litigation.<ref name=trib2>[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2014-03-09/opinion/ct-judges-endorsement-edit-0309-20140309_1_races-campaign-mailer-candidates ''The Chicago Tribune'', "For the appellate, circuit courts," March 09, 2014]</ref> One of Hanlon's opponents in the race, '''[[James L. Kaplan]]''' was discovered by a WGN/Medill Watchdog report to be skirting residency requirements by renting an apartment in the subcircuit while his family's home is in [[Lake County, Illinois (Judicial)|Lake County]].<ref name=trib2/> He sought a return to the bench, as he was appointed to the 8th Subcircuit in late 2010 but was unable to secure election to a full term in 2012. In 2014, he was endorsed by Congresswoman {{BP|Jan Schakowsky}}.<ref>[http://www.judgekaplan.com/ratings.html ''James Kaplan campaign website:'' Bar Ratings & Endorsements, accessed March 13, 2014]</ref> Also in the race was '''[[Ralph Eugene Meczyk]]''', who was found to be not qualified by the Council of Lawyers due to a 1980 felony conviction for underreporting income. However, Meczyk was pardoned for the crime by President '''Bill Clinton''' and boasted 37 years of civil, criminal and appellate experience.<ref name=trib2/><ref>[http://ralphmeczykforjudge.org/biography/ ''Ralph E. Meczyk'', "About," accessed March 13, 2014]</ref>
There were two openly gay candidates running for positions in [[Cook County, Illinois (Judicial)|Cook County]]. '''[[Judy Rice]]''' and '''[[James Patrick Crawley]]''' ran for the [[Illinois Cook Judicial Circuit Court Subcircuits|Cook County 7th Subcircuit]]'s Taylor vacancy and the Veal vacancy of the [[Illinois Cook Judicial Circuit Court|Cook County Circuit Court]], respectively. According to the ''Windy City Media Group'', Rice is a Chicago native with a background in city government and Crawley is a personal injury attorney with over 25 years legal experience.<ref name=windy>[http://www.windycitymediagroup.com/lgbt/ELECTIONS-2014-JUDGES-LGBT-candidates-Rice-and-Crawley-eye-the-bench/46489.html ''The Windy City Media Group'', "ELECTIONS 2014: JUDGES LGBT candidates Rice and Crawley eye the bench," March 5, 2014]</ref>  
 
 
There were two openly gay candidates running for positions in [[Cook County, Illinois (Judicial)|Cook County]]. '''[[Judy Rice]]''' and '''[[James Patrick Crawley]]''' ran for the [[Illinois Cook Judicial Circuit Court Subcircuits|Cook County 7th Subcircuit]]'s Taylor vacancy and the Veal vacancy of the [[Illinois Cook Judicial Circuit Court|Cook County Circuit Court]], respectively. According to the ''Windy City Media Group'', Rice is a Chicago native with a history in city government and Crawley is a personal injury attorney with over 25 years legal experience.<ref name=windy>[http://www.windycitymediagroup.com/lgbt/ELECTIONS-2014-JUDGES-LGBT-candidates-Rice-and-Crawley-eye-the-bench/46489.html ''The Windy City Media Group'', "ELECTIONS 2014: JUDGES LGBT candidates Rice and Crawley eye the bench," March 5, 2014]</ref>  
}}
}}


Line 464: Line 441:
''See also: [[JP Election Brief: Texas primary recap, election funding and participation]]''
''See also: [[JP Election Brief: Texas primary recap, election funding and participation]]''


With the [[Texas]] primary complete, the next state scheduled to hold a primary election was [[Illinois]]. On Monday, March 3, voters began early voting for the primary that occurred on March 18. The turnout was slow at first, attributed to a mix of wintery weather and some municipal office holiday closures.<ref name=slow>[http://www.nwherald.com/2014/03/03/slow-start-to-early-voting-across-illinois/atggvw9/ ''Northwest Herald'', "Slow start to early voting across Illinois," March 3, 2014]</ref> 2014's primary was unique due to the fact that it marked the first time 17-year-old Illinois residents could vote, providing they would turn 18 by the time of the November election.<ref name=slow/>
With the [[Texas]] primary complete, the next state scheduled to hold a primary election was [[Illinois]]. On Monday, March 3, voters began early voting for the primary that occurred on March 18.<ref name=slow>[http://www.nwherald.com/2014/03/03/slow-start-to-early-voting-across-illinois/atggvw9/ ''Northwest Herald'', "Slow start to early voting across Illinois," March 3, 2014]</ref> 2014's primary was unique due to the fact that it marked the first time 17-year-old Illinois residents could vote, providing they would turn 18 by the time of the November election.<ref name=slow/>
 


While officials hoped to increase voter participation in primary elections, they were aware that primaries traditionally had low levels of voter turnout. According to elections officials quoted in the ''Northwest Herald'', around 12 percent of Chicago voters chose to cast early ballots in the 2010 and 2012 primaries.<ref name=slow/>
According to elections officials quoted in the ''Northwest Herald'', around 12 percent of Chicago voters chose to cast early ballots in the 2010 and 2012 primaries.<ref name=slow/>




'''Carrie Downey''', clerk and recorder for [[Clark County, Illinois (Judicial)|Clark County]], anticipated a 14 percent voter turnout for her county’s primary elections, even with an extra month of early grace period voting.<ref name=clark>[http://wthitv.com/2014/02/18/il-primary-election-approaching/ ''WTHI-TV News'', "IL Primary Election Approaching," February 18, 2014]</ref> On February 18, only 11 Clark County voters casted ballots in Downey’s office. One of those voters, '''Judith McFadden''', commented to WTHI-TV News, "I think it's important for everybody to come out and vote, because if you don’t vote, you shouldn't be able to complain."<ref name=clark/>
'''Carrie Downey''', clerk and recorder for [[Clark County, Illinois (Judicial)|Clark County]], said she anticipated a 14 percent voter turnout for her county’s primary elections, even with a month of early grace period voting.<ref name=clark>[http://wthitv.com/2014/02/18/il-primary-election-approaching/ ''WTHI-TV News'', "IL Primary Election Approaching," February 18, 2014]</ref> On February 18, only 11 Clark County voters casted ballots in Downey’s office.
}}
}}


Line 479: Line 455:
''See also: [[JP Election Brief: The importance of primaries]]''
''See also: [[JP Election Brief: The importance of primaries]]''


On March 18, Illinois voters decided which of the 144 judicial candidates would advance to compete in the general election on November 4. Some critics argued that the partisan election process that Illinois uses limits voters' choice in the general election.<ref name=critic>[https://web.archive.org/web/2/http://madisonrecord.com/arguments/261408-while-pension-reform-enjoys-spotlight-illinois-judicial-election-system-remains-flawed ''Madison-St. Clair Record'', "While Pension ‘Reform’ Enjoys Spotlight, Illinois Judicial Election System Remains Flawed," December 4, 2013]</ref> According to the Madison-St. Clair Record, ''"only 17 percent of Illinois general election voters will get a chance to choose between two candidates in an open race for judge in November 2014. There will be no choice on the judicial ballot for five of every six general election voters in Illinois."''<ref name=critic/> This number was based on 2010 turnout estimates.
On March 18, Illinois voters decided which of the 144 judicial candidates would advance to the general election on November 4. The Madison-St. Clair Record published an article arguing that the partisan election process that Illinois uses limits voters' choice in the general election.<ref name=critic>[https://web.archive.org/web/2/http://madisonrecord.com/arguments/261408-while-pension-reform-enjoys-spotlight-illinois-judicial-election-system-remains-flawed ''Madison-St. Clair Record'', "While Pension ‘Reform’ Enjoys Spotlight, Illinois Judicial Election System Remains Flawed," December 4, 2013]</ref> According to the Madison-St. Clair Record, ''"only 17 percent of Illinois general election voters will get a chance to choose between two candidates in an open race for judge in November 2014. There will be no choice on the judicial ballot for five of every six general election voters in Illinois."''<ref name=critic/> This number was based on 2010 turnout estimates.
 
 
There was no doubt that there were more [[Democratic]] candidates running in the urban [[Illinois Cook Judicial Circuit Court|Cook County Circuit Court]] (Chicago) and more [[Republican]] candidates running in rural, downstate counties. Whether these tendencies called for election reform was up for debate. Each state has [[Judicial selection in the states|different methods of judicial selection]]. Some, like Illinois, use a partisan election approach, while others, such as [[Wisconsin]], go with nonpartisan elections. Other states appoint judges through the governor, commissions or other governing bodies. Undoubtedly, every system have both pros and cons, and understanding how each system works can be confusing for voters. That's why Judgepedia has resources available to help you find out how judicial elections work in your state. You can start here: [[Judicial election methods by state]].
}}
 
{{Election news collapsed
|Title=Circuit candidate battles opponent, past arrest, former opponent’s widow
|Date=February 20, 2014
|Text=
''See also: [[JP Election Brief: Wisconsin primary concludes as the rest of the nation is just heating up]]''
 
The past of an [[Illinois]] candidate for circuit judge was brought into the limelight recently. The State Journal-Register reported that [[Gabriel T. Grosboll]], a [[Republican]] candidate for the [[Illinois Eighth Judicial Circuit Court|Eighth Circuit]] bench in [[Menard County, Illinois (Judicial)|Menard County]], had a run-in with the law in 2007 while he was an assistant state attorney in [[Sangamon County, Illinois (Judicial)|Sangamon County]] under [[John Schmidt]].<ref name=state>[http://www.sj-r.com/article/20140216/NEWS/140219522/10608/OPINION ''The State Journal-Register'', "Bernard Schoenburg: Race for Menard County judge drawing interest,” February 16, 2014]</ref>
 
Grosboll was carrying an open container of alcohol, along with another person, when a police officer stopped the pickup truck in which they were passengers. The driver, who was sober, got a warning. Grosboll later pleaded guilty and was fined.<ref name=state/> Regarding the reaction of his boss at the time, Grosboll said, "[Schmidt] verbally reprimanded me, but there was no suspension or anything like that.<ref name=state/>" Schmidt is now a judge for the [[Illinois Seventh Judicial Circuit Court|Seventh Circuit]]. Grosboll also called the incident a “stupid mistake” and said that he “learned from it.”<ref name=state/>
 
Grosboll faced [[Mike Atterberry]] in the primary election on March 18. Ken Baumgarten, who was a state attorney in Menard County while Grosboll was working under Schmidt, was a third candidate until he died in December of a blood clot. Baumgarten’s widow, a former local news anchor, endorsed Atterberry in The Petersburg Observer.<ref name=state/>




The race was to fill a seat left vacant by [[Carol Pope]], who became a judge for the [[Illinois Fourth District Appellate Court]] in 2008.<ref name=state/>
There were more [[Democratic]] candidates running in the urban [[Illinois Cook Judicial Circuit Court|Cook County Circuit Court]] (Chicago) and more [[Republican]] candidates running in rural, downstate counties. Each state has [[Judicial selection in the states|different methods of judicial selection]]. Some, like Illinois, use a partisan election approach, while others, such as [[Wisconsin]], go with nonpartisan elections. Other states appoint judges through the governor, commissions or other governing bodies. To read more about different judicial election methods by state, click here: [[Judicial election methods by state]].
}}
}}


{{Election news collapsed
{{Election news collapsed
|Title=Bollinger set to win circuit court seat already
|Title=Bollinger set to win circuit court seat  
|Date=February 13, 2014
|Date=February 13, 2014
|Text=
|Text=

Latest revision as of 16:15, 1 July 2025

Judicial elections
Illinois judicial elections, 2014
Overview
Total candidates: 302
Primary candidates: 141
General election candidates: 232
Incumbency
Incumbents: 176
Incumbent success rate: 98%
Competition - general election
Percent of candidates in contested races: 12%
Percent uncontested: 20%
Percent retention: 68%
Partisan victories
Republican Button-Red.svg 28
Democratic Button-Blue.svg 32
2015
2013
Judicial Elections
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
Judicial elections, 2014
Judicial election dates
Candidates by state
Supreme court elections


Last updated: November 2014

The 2014 Illinois judicial elections consisted of partisan elections and retentions. In 2014, many races were decided in the primary election, due to participation by only one party in those races. Most candidates were judges facing retention elections. Despite the fact that judges must receive at least 60 percent of the votes to win in these elections, no Illinois judge has lost a retention since 1990, as of 2014.

See: Illinois elections summary, 2014.

Election dates

  • December 23: Filing deadline (partisan primaries)
  • March 18: Primary election
  • May 4: Filing deadline (retentions)
  • November 4: General election[1][2]

In addition to candidate lists, this page includes information about how the state's judicial elections work, as well as articles about noteworthy news in races across the state.

General election: Contested races

(I) denotes incumbent

Cook County 12th Subcircuit, Jordan vacancy

Cook County 4th Subcircuit, Billik, Jr. vacancy

Second Judicial Circuit Court, Sawyer vacancy

Third Judicial Circuit Court, Callis vacancy

Fourth Judicial Circuit Court, Tungate vacancy

Fourth Judicial Circuit Court, Middendorff vacancy

Fifth Judicial Circuit Court, Clary vacancy

Tenth Judicial Circuit Court, Shore vacancy

Twelfth Judicial Circuit Court First Subcircuit, A vacancy

Twelfth Judicial Circuit Court First Subcircuit, Livas vacancy

Twelfth Judicial Circuit Court Second Subcircuit, A vacancy

Fourteenth Judicial Circuit Court, Hamer vacancy

Fourteenth Judicial Circuit Court, Stengel vacancy

Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court, Cook vacancy

Retentions

The following judges faced a retention election in order to keep their seat. In such elections, the incumbent judge is not being evaluated against an opponent. Rather, he or she simply receives votes of "yes" to retain or "no", do not retain.

Supreme Court

First District Appellate Court

Second District Appellate Court

Third District Appellate Court

Fourth District Appellate Court

Cook Judicial Circuit Court

Cook County 1st Subcircuit

Cook County 2nd Subcircuit

Cook County 3rd Subcircuit

Cook County 4th Subcircuit

Cook County 5th Subcircuit

Cook County 6th Subcircuit

Cook County 7th Subcircuit

Cook County 8th Subcircuit

Cook County 9th Subcircuit

Cook County 10th Subcircuit

Cook County 11th Subcircuit

Cook County 13th Subcircuit

Cook County 14th Subcircuit

Cook County 15th Subcircuit

First Circuit Court

Second Circuit Court

Third Circuit Court

Fifth Circuit Court

Sixth Circuit Court

Seventh Circuit Court

Eighth Circuit Court

Ninth Circuit Court

Tenth Judicial Circuit Court

Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court

Twelfth Judicial Circuit Court

Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Court

Fourteenth Judicial Circuit Court

Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court

Sixteenth Judicial Circuit Court

Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court

Eighteenth Judicial Circuit Court

Nineteenth Judicial Circuit Court

Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court

Twenty-First Judicial Circuit Court

Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit Court

General election: Uncontested

The following candidates were elected or re-elected after running unopposed in the general election.

Illinois First District Appellate Court

Illinois Second District Appellate Court

Illinois Fourth District Appellate Court


Cook Judicial Circuit Court

Cook County 2nd Subcircuit

Cook County 3rd Subcircuit

Cook County 4th Subcircuit

Cook County 7th Subcircuit

Cook County 9th Subcircuit

Cook County 10th Subcircuit

Cook County 11th Subcircuit

Cook County 13th Subcircuit

Cook County 15th Subcircuit

Second Judicial Circuit Court

Fourth Judicial Circuit Court

Sixth Judicial Circuit Court

Seventh Judicial Circuit Court

Eighth Judicial Circuit Court

Ninth Judicial Circuit Court

Tenth Judicial Circuit Court

Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court

Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court

Sixteenth Judicial Circuit Court Third Subcircuit

Eighteenth Judicial Circuit Court

Nineteenth Judicial Circuit Court First Subcircuit

Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit Court Second Subcircuit

Primary

For candidate lists and results from the judicial primary on March 18, 2014, please see: Illinois judicial primary elections, 2014.

Process

Judicial elections in Illinois occur during even-numbered years.[3] Supreme, appellate, and circuit court judges in Illinois participate in partisan elections.[4] At the end of their term, judges have the option to run in a retention election.[5]

Partisan elections

The general primary occurs on the third Tuesday in March.[3] Unlike many states with contested judicial elections, races in Illinois are regularly contested, often with several candidates running for a seat. The Illinois primary is closed, meaning voters must declare which major political party's ballot they wish to vote on.[6]

The candidate that wins the most votes in the primary advances to the general election to compete against the candidate from the other party.[3] If only one party has candidates in a primary race, that winner will continue on to run unopposed in the general election.[7] Uncontested candidates in the primary are not included on the ballot and automatically advanced to the general election.[3][8]

Retention

At the expiration of their term, judges may run for retention. Judges seeking retention are required to file a declaration of candidacy to succeed themselves with the Secretary of State at least six months prior to the general election. The names of judges seeking retention are then given to voters on a special judicial ballot without party designation and without an opposing candidate, on the sole question of whether he or she shall be retained in office for another term.[5] Retention elections are held along with the general elections in the specific district or circuit where the judge is seeking retention. To be retained, judges must receive at least 60 percent of the vote.[9]

Noteworthy events

The following articles were current as of the dates listed.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. Illinois State Board of Elections, "Election information"
  2. Illinois State Board of Elections, "2014 Election Calendar"
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Illinois General Assembly, "Election Code 10 ILCS 5," accessed March 7, 2014
  4. American Judicature Society, "Methods of Judicial Selection: Illinois," accessed March 10, 2014
  5. 5.0 5.1 The Illinois Courts, "About the Courts in Illinois," accessed March 10, 2014
  6. Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago, "2014 Primary: Frequently Asked Questions," accessed March 12, 2014
  7. The News-Gazette, "John Roska: Judicial elections explained," March 9, 2014
  8. The Chicago Tribune, "Unopposed Candidates Find Waiting The Primary Concern," February 3, 1992, accessed March 7, 2014
  9. Illinois Constitution, Article VI, Section 12 (d)
  10. The Madison-St. Clair Record, "Winning election as judge in Madison County costs a lot more than in other similar courts," September 4, 2014
  11. CBS Chicago, "Illinois Primary 2014: In Chicago, Voter Turnout Extremely Low," March 18, 2014
  12. 12.0 12.1 Chicago Elections, "General Primary Election - Unofficial Summary Report," March 18, 2014
  13. 13.0 13.1 Reuters, "Illinois primary voters pick candidates for governor, Senate," March 18, 2014
  14. The Chicago Tribune, "For the appellate, circuit courts," March 9, 2014
  15. 15.0 15.1 The Chicago Tribune, "For the appellate, circuit courts," March 09, 2014
  16. Ralph E. Meczyk, "About," accessed March 13, 2014
  17. The Windy City Media Group, "ELECTIONS 2014: JUDGES LGBT candidates Rice and Crawley eye the bench," March 5, 2014
  18. 18.0 18.1 18.2 Northwest Herald, "Slow start to early voting across Illinois," March 3, 2014
  19. WTHI-TV News, "IL Primary Election Approaching," February 18, 2014
  20. 20.0 20.1 Madison-St. Clair Record, "While Pension ‘Reform’ Enjoys Spotlight, Illinois Judicial Election System Remains Flawed," December 4, 2013
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 21.3 ‘’Herald & Review,’’ “Chiligiris drops from judge race against Bollinger,” February 8, 2014
  22. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.